RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      초등학교의 협동적 학교조직문화 측정 도구 개발과 형성에 관한 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13214822

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        경산 : 대구가톨릭대학교, 2013

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(박사) -- 대구가톨릭대학교 대학원 , 교육학과 , 2013. 8

      • 발행연도

        2013

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        371.3 판사항(5)

      • 발행국(도시)

        경상북도

      • 기타서명

        (A) Study of formation and scale development of collaborative school organizational culture for elementary school

      • 형태사항

        viii, 130 p : 삽화,도표 ; 26 cm.

      • 일반주기명

        지도교수: 정일환
        참고문헌 수록

      • 소장기관
        • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
        • 대구가톨릭대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of the study was to design a scale to measure the formation status of the collaborative school organization culture in elementary schools with, to verify what differences exist according to the school types, locations, teaching profession careers, school size, genders and positions in order to understand the perception level on the formation status of the collaborative school organizational culture for the improvement of elementary schools.
      A tool of 50 questions were developed with 6 subfactors of collaborative leadership, teacher collaboration, professional development, unity of purpose, collegial support and learning partnership of the collaborative school organizational culture for the improvement of elementary schools.
      The data from 106 schools and 1,522 respondents of Daegu metropolitan city education office and Gyeongsangbuk-do education office were used to achieve the purpose of the study. As the main statistics technique, the descriptive statistics and Cronbach α were calculated using Mplus 5 and SPSS 19.0 and the construct validity was tested through confirmatory factor analysis and the multivariate analysis of variance(MANOVA) was performed.
      The results of the study can be summarized as follows;
      First, the reliability on the total questions showed .974 which is very acceptable and the subfactors showed in the range of .871~.962. As the results of confirmatory factor analysis using correlation analysis and structural equation model(SEM) among the subfactors and between the subfactors and total score, the correlation between the total score and each subfactor of the collaborative school organizational culture showed very highly meaningful correlation statistically.
      Second, the average score of collaborative school organizational culture was 3.92. For the subfactors, it showed comparably high scores as 4.13 for collegial support which is the highest and 4.04 for unity of purpose, 3.95 for learning partnership, 3.88 for professional development, 3.87 for collaborative leadership. The subfactor of teacher collaboration scored average 3.62 which is relatively the lowest. Generally it proved that collaboration school organization culture has beed formed in elementary schools.
      Third, the average score of the collaborative school organizational culture of creative schools and open recruitment principal schools was high but the average of the collaborative school organizational culture of general schools was relatively low. The subfactors score of creative schools and open recruitment principal schools was also higher than general schools.
      Fourth, the highest score of collaborative school organizational culture was from Daegu metropolitan city elementary schools and the lowest was from Gyeongsangbuk-do mid-small size town elementary schools. The biggest gap came from the subfactors of unity of purpose and learning partnership and teacher collaboration showed similar level which is generally low between Daegu metropolitan city and Gyeongsangbuk-do mid-small size town.
      Fifth, the more teaching profession career the teachers had, the higher the average of the collaborative school organizational culture was and the less teaching profession career the teachers had, the lower the average of the collaborative school organizational culture was. The biggest gap came from the subfactor of collaborative leadership and professional development showed relatively small gap between high teaching profession career teachers and low teaching profession career teachers.
      Sixth, the collaborative school organizational culture of 6 and under class size schools showed the highest scores and the collaborative school organizational culture of 25 and more class size schools showed the lowest. The subfactor of collaborative leadership showed big difference between small scale schools and big scale schools and teacher collaboration and professional development didn't show big difference but they're generally low.
      Seventh, the average score of collaborative school organizational culture showed almost same excluding collaborative leadership between male teachers and female teachers.
      Eighth, the higher positioned teachers showed higher scores of collaborative school organizational culture and the lower positioned teachers showed lower scores of collaborative school organizational culture.
      The subfactor of collaborative leadership showed big difference between principals/assistant principals group and teachers group and teacher collaboration is very low in department manager teachers and teachers group.
      This study was performed with lack of previous studies while most of the previous studies were focused on school organizational culture and organization effectiveness and there is limitation to generalize the results of this study since this study researched for collaborative school organizational culture formation with very limited participants of elementary school teachers in Daegu metropolitan city and Gyeongsangbuk-do. So, it is in need to research for more segmentations of various school types with country level participants and test the results of this study. In addition, the interview was made only with a few participants while this study is a very fragmentary research with the limitation of quantity approach by survey questionnaire but it will be possible to collect more data and various opinions more easily if survey and interview can be made with the teachers in collective training course or workshop course of educational training institute of local education office such as quantity approach and quality approach.
      Finally, there should be follow-up studies continuously since this is an experimentative study on the collaborative school organizational culture, and furthermore, it will be meaningful to determine what differences are there in middle school and high school through the same study.
      번역하기

      The purpose of the study was to design a scale to measure the formation status of the collaborative school organization culture in elementary schools with, to verify what differences exist according to the school types, locations, teaching profession ...

      The purpose of the study was to design a scale to measure the formation status of the collaborative school organization culture in elementary schools with, to verify what differences exist according to the school types, locations, teaching profession careers, school size, genders and positions in order to understand the perception level on the formation status of the collaborative school organizational culture for the improvement of elementary schools.
      A tool of 50 questions were developed with 6 subfactors of collaborative leadership, teacher collaboration, professional development, unity of purpose, collegial support and learning partnership of the collaborative school organizational culture for the improvement of elementary schools.
      The data from 106 schools and 1,522 respondents of Daegu metropolitan city education office and Gyeongsangbuk-do education office were used to achieve the purpose of the study. As the main statistics technique, the descriptive statistics and Cronbach α were calculated using Mplus 5 and SPSS 19.0 and the construct validity was tested through confirmatory factor analysis and the multivariate analysis of variance(MANOVA) was performed.
      The results of the study can be summarized as follows;
      First, the reliability on the total questions showed .974 which is very acceptable and the subfactors showed in the range of .871~.962. As the results of confirmatory factor analysis using correlation analysis and structural equation model(SEM) among the subfactors and between the subfactors and total score, the correlation between the total score and each subfactor of the collaborative school organizational culture showed very highly meaningful correlation statistically.
      Second, the average score of collaborative school organizational culture was 3.92. For the subfactors, it showed comparably high scores as 4.13 for collegial support which is the highest and 4.04 for unity of purpose, 3.95 for learning partnership, 3.88 for professional development, 3.87 for collaborative leadership. The subfactor of teacher collaboration scored average 3.62 which is relatively the lowest. Generally it proved that collaboration school organization culture has beed formed in elementary schools.
      Third, the average score of the collaborative school organizational culture of creative schools and open recruitment principal schools was high but the average of the collaborative school organizational culture of general schools was relatively low. The subfactors score of creative schools and open recruitment principal schools was also higher than general schools.
      Fourth, the highest score of collaborative school organizational culture was from Daegu metropolitan city elementary schools and the lowest was from Gyeongsangbuk-do mid-small size town elementary schools. The biggest gap came from the subfactors of unity of purpose and learning partnership and teacher collaboration showed similar level which is generally low between Daegu metropolitan city and Gyeongsangbuk-do mid-small size town.
      Fifth, the more teaching profession career the teachers had, the higher the average of the collaborative school organizational culture was and the less teaching profession career the teachers had, the lower the average of the collaborative school organizational culture was. The biggest gap came from the subfactor of collaborative leadership and professional development showed relatively small gap between high teaching profession career teachers and low teaching profession career teachers.
      Sixth, the collaborative school organizational culture of 6 and under class size schools showed the highest scores and the collaborative school organizational culture of 25 and more class size schools showed the lowest. The subfactor of collaborative leadership showed big difference between small scale schools and big scale schools and teacher collaboration and professional development didn't show big difference but they're generally low.
      Seventh, the average score of collaborative school organizational culture showed almost same excluding collaborative leadership between male teachers and female teachers.
      Eighth, the higher positioned teachers showed higher scores of collaborative school organizational culture and the lower positioned teachers showed lower scores of collaborative school organizational culture.
      The subfactor of collaborative leadership showed big difference between principals/assistant principals group and teachers group and teacher collaboration is very low in department manager teachers and teachers group.
      This study was performed with lack of previous studies while most of the previous studies were focused on school organizational culture and organization effectiveness and there is limitation to generalize the results of this study since this study researched for collaborative school organizational culture formation with very limited participants of elementary school teachers in Daegu metropolitan city and Gyeongsangbuk-do. So, it is in need to research for more segmentations of various school types with country level participants and test the results of this study. In addition, the interview was made only with a few participants while this study is a very fragmentary research with the limitation of quantity approach by survey questionnaire but it will be possible to collect more data and various opinions more easily if survey and interview can be made with the teachers in collective training course or workshop course of educational training institute of local education office such as quantity approach and quality approach.
      Finally, there should be follow-up studies continuously since this is an experimentative study on the collaborative school organizational culture, and furthermore, it will be meaningful to determine what differences are there in middle school and high school through the same study.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서 론 1
      • 1. 문제 제기 및 연구의 필요성 1
      • 2. 연구 목적 및 연구 내용 6
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 7
      • I. 서 론 1
      • 1. 문제 제기 및 연구의 필요성 1
      • 2. 연구 목적 및 연구 내용 6
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 7
      • 1. 학교조직문화의 의의 7
      • 2. 협동적 학교조직문화의 특성과 요소 21
      • 3. 선행연구 고찰 30
      • Ⅲ. 연구방법 42
      • 1. 연구 절차 42
      • 2. 연구 대상 44
      • 3. 측정도구 및 자료 분석 47
      • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 및 논의 48
      • 1. 협동적 학교조직문화의 측정도구 개발 48
      • 가. 측정문항 개발 및 선정 48
      • 나. 신뢰도 및 타당도 검증 50
      • 2. 조사 연구 결과 56
      • 가. 기초통계 56
      • 나. 학교 유형에 따른 협동적 학교조직문화 57
      • 다. 학교 소재지에 따른 협동적 학교조직문화 62
      • 라. 교직 경력에 따른 협동적 학교조직문화 68
      • 마. 학교 규모에 따른 협동적 학교조직문화 76
      • 바. 성별에 따른 협동적 학교조직문화 81
      • 사. 직급에 따른 협동적 학교조직문화 83
      • 3. 논의 89
      • V. 요약, 결론 및 제언 101
      • 1. 요 약 101
      • 2. 결론 및 제언 105
      • 참고문헌 112
      • 부 록 120
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1. Theory Z, Waagen, , 1982

      2. 학교·학급경영, 박병량, 학지사, , 2001

      3. Collaborative schools, Scott, Smith, , 1988

      4. EBS뉴스(2013.05.13), EBS뉴스, , 2013

      5. Dynamic administration, Follett, Mary Parker, Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, , 1957

      6. In Search of Excellence, Waterman, Peter, , 1982

      7. Mintzberg on Management, Mintzberg, Mintzberg on management, , 1989

      8. 매일경제(2013.05.14), 매일경제(, , 2013

      9. Changing the school culture, Dalin, Per, Cassell, , 1993

      10. Working together in schools, Donaldson, Sanderson, , 1996

      1. Theory Z, Waagen, , 1982

      2. 학교·학급경영, 박병량, 학지사, , 2001

      3. Collaborative schools, Scott, Smith, , 1988

      4. EBS뉴스(2013.05.13), EBS뉴스, , 2013

      5. Dynamic administration, Follett, Mary Parker, Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, , 1957

      6. In Search of Excellence, Waterman, Peter, , 1982

      7. Mintzberg on Management, Mintzberg, Mintzberg on management, , 1989

      8. 매일경제(2013.05.14), 매일경제(, , 2013

      9. Changing the school culture, Dalin, Per, Cassell, , 1993

      10. Working together in schools, Donaldson, Sanderson, , 1996

      11. Building community in schools, Sergiovanni, Thomas J, Jossey-Bass, Building Community in Schools, , 1994

      12. Improving schools from within, Barth, , 1990

      13. Leadership and school culture, Bates, , 1992

      14. The human side ofschool change, Evans, The human side of school change, , 1996

      15. Refining the culturalperspective, Nias, Refining the cultural perspective, , 1989

      16. Organizational behavior: Concepts, Robbins, , 1993

      17. Behavior in Organizations (6th ed), Baron, Greenberg, , 1997

      18. Good seeds grow in strong cultures, Saphier, King, , 1985

      19. Supervision :A redefinition 5th ed, Sergiovanni, Starratt, , 1993

      20. The power of organizational setting, Little, , 1981

      21. Staffrelationshipsintheprimaryschool, Yeomans, Southworth, Nias, Staff relationships in the primary school, , 1989

      22. 학교교육 내실화 방안 연구, 양승실, 한국교육개발원, , 2001

      23. Organizational culture and leadership, Schein, Edgar H, Jossey-Bass, , 1997

      24. School teacher : a sociological study, Lortie, Dan C, University of Chicago Press, School Teacher: A Sociological Study, , 1975

      25. Development of a school culture survey, Gruenert, , 1998

      26. School improvement in an era of change, Hopkins, David, Cassell, , 1994

      27. 학교조직문화의 이론적 연구, 조남두, 학교 조직문화의 이론적 연구, , 1994

      28. What's worth fighting for in your school?, Fullan, Michael, Teachers College Press, What's worth fighting for in your school?, , 1996

      29. The comer program: Changing school culture, Squires, Kranyik, , 1996

      30. 12년 시.도교육청 평가 결과 발표, 교육과학기술부 보도자료, , 2012

      31. Organizational behavior in education 6th ed, Owens, Organizational Behavior in Education. 6th ed, , 1998

      32. Organizationalcultureandleadership (2nded.), Schien, "Organizational culture and leadership, , 1992

      33. Organizational Behavior in Education (7th ed), Owens, Organizational Behavior in Education. 7th ed, , 2001

      34. A collaborative culture for school improvement, Valentine, , 2006

      35. Matching Corporate Culture and Business Strategy, Schwartz, S.M.Davis, Matching corporate culture and business strategy, , 1981

      36. Changing school culture through staff development, Joyce, , 1991

      37. 조직간 협동 모형의 적용가능성 탐색, 김홍희, , 2002

      38. Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness, Dension, , 1990

      39. How schools change : lessons from three communities, Wagner, Tony, Beacon Press, , 1994

      40. 학교 조직문화의 형성과정에 관한 연구, 柳允錫, 단국대학교 대학원, , 1995

      41. Site-based Management: Engine for Reform or Pipedream?, Eubanks, Levine, , 1989

      42. Arriving at Four Cultures by Managing the Reward Systems, Sethia, Arriving at Four Cultures by Managing the Reward systems, , 1985

      43. Organizational culture inventory. leader's guide, 2nd ed, Cooke, "Organizational culture inventory. leader's guide, , 1989

      44. Teachers' workplace : the social organization of schools, Rosenholtz, Susan J, Longman, , 1989

      45. 학교공동체의 개념적 분석과 그 구축 전략, 노종희, 한국교육행정학회, 교육행정학연구 16(2): 385-401, , 1998

      46. School govermance regimes and teachers' job satisfaction:, Jr.J.M.Schneider, Verdugo, , 1997

      47. Reframing organizations : artistry, choice, and leadership, Bolman, Lee G, Jossey-Bass Publishers, "Reframing Organization's: Artistry, , 1997

      48. 초·중등 학교의 조직문화 분석에 관한 연구, 정일환, 한국교육학회 대구·경북지회, "초?중등학교의 조직문화 분석에 관한 연구, , 2000

      49. Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, A.A.Kennedy, Dill, Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life, , 1982

      50. Educational administration : theory, research, and practice, Hoy, Wayne K, Random House, "Educational administration: Theory research, , 1982

      51. Strategic mtopia: Culture as an invisible barrier to change, Lorsch, , 1985

      52. 학교조직의 환경,문화,효과성간의 관계 연구, 조남두, 학교조직의 환경?문화?효과성 간의 관계 연구, , 1992

      53. 유아교육기관의 협동적 조직문화에 관한 연구, 이정희, 인제대학교 교육대학원, 인제대 교육대학원 석사학위논문, , 2004

      54. Inventing better schools : an action plan for educational reform, Schlechty, Phillip C., Jossey-Bass, Inventing better schools: An action plan for educational reform, , 1997

      55. Revisiting "The culture of the school and the problem of change", Sarason, Seymour Bernard, Teachers College Press, Revisiting the culture of the school and the problem of change, , 1996

      56. The Principal:New Leadership for New Challenges. Upper Saddle River, Seyfarth, The Principal: New Leadership for New challenges. Upper Saddle River, , 1999

      57. 학교조직문화와 조직효과성간의 관계에 관한 연구, 김두성, 전북대학교, , 1993

      58. 초등학교 학교조직문화 유형과 교사효능감과의 관계, 김석수, 부산교육대학교 교육대학원, 부산교육대학교교육대학원 석사학위논문, , 2007

      59. The Organization Culture Assessment Inventory : A. Metaphorical Settings, Steinhoff, Owens, , 1988

      60. A middle school's approach to developing an effective school work culture, Wood, Chance, A middle school’s approach to developing an effective school work culture, , 1996

      61. What's worth fighting for in your school? working together for your school, Fullan, Hargreaves, , 1991

      62. Beyond two dimensions: A grounded theory model of conflict-handing behavior, Nicotera, , 1993

      63. Making a difference: Teachers' sense of self-efficacy and student achievement, Ashton, Webb, , 1986

      64. Making schools smarter : a system for monitoring school and district progress, Leithwood, Kenneth A, Corwin Press, Making schools smarter: A system for monitoring school and district progress, , 2001

      65. Bridging the boundary: Externalactivity and performance in organizational teams, Ancona, Caldwell, , 1992

      66. 학교조직문화에 따른 교장의 장학행위와 장학효과성의 관계, 배원식, 학교조직 문화에 따른 교장의 장학행위와 장학효과성의 관계, , 2007

      67. 학교조직문화와 교사효능감 및 학교조직몰입간의 관계 연구, 정우영, , 2006

      68. 학교장의 지도성이 학교조직문화에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 김용식, 원광대학교, , 1993

      69. 효율적 단위학교 운영을 위한 학교 조직문화에 대한 질적 탐색, 박은실, 이화여자대학교 대학원, 이화여대 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2002

      70. 학교조직문화.교장의 수업지도성.교사의 전문적 수용권의 관계, 이석열, 이석열, 충남대학교, 학교조직문화·교장의 수업지도성·교사의 전문적 수용권의 관계, , 1997

      71. Contrived collegiality: The micro-politics of teacher collaboration, in Blase, J.(ed), Hargreaves, "Contrived collegiality: The micro-politics of teacher collaboration, , 1991

      72. Looking beneath the surface: Teacher collaborationthrough the lens ofgrading prctices, Kain, Looking beneath the surface: Teacher collaboration through the lens of grading prctices, , 1996

      73. Some surprising things about collaboration: Knowing how people connect makes it better, Mintzberg, , 1996

      74. The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers' professional relations, Little, , 1990

      75. 학교장의 변화지향적 지도성과 조직문화 및 조직효과성과의 관계, 문용주, 원광대학교 대학원, 원광대 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2004

      76. The learner-centered school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement, McCombs, Whistler, , 1997

      77. 학교장의 감성리더십과 학교조직문화가 학교조직역량에 미치는영향, 김정서, 학교장의 감성리더십과 학교조직 문화가 학교조직역량에 미치는 영향, , 2009

      78. 학교장의 감성리더십과 학교조직문화와 학교조직효과성의 관계 연구, 신동한, 성균관대학교 일반대학원, 성균관대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2009

      79. Using bureaucratic and cultural linkages to improve instruction: The principal's contribution, Wilson, Firestone, , 1985

      80. The lifeworld of leadership : creating culture, community, and personal meaning in our schools, Sergiovanni, Thomas J, Jossey-Bass Publishers, "The Lifeworld of Leadership: Creating Culture, , 2000

      81. 학교장의 수업지도성이 학교조직문화 및 학교조직효과성에 미치는 영향, 곽상기, , 2004

      82. 협동적 학교조직 문화형성에 관한 연구, 한국정책과학학회보, 제7권 제1호, 정일환, "협동적 학교조직 문화형성에 관한 연구, , 2003

      83. 학교상황에 따라 학교장의 도덕적 지도성이 학교조직효과성에 미치는 영향, 김재덕, 학교 상황에 따라 학교장의 도덕적 지도성이 학교조직효과성에 미치는 영향, , 2006

      84. 지식사회에서의 교사의 지도성, 학교조직문화 및 조직효과성 간의 영향 연구, 박중재, 박중재, 국민대학교 대학원, 국민대 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2008

      85. Culture and Organization: Software of the Mind-Intercultural Cooperation and its importance for survival, Hofstede, , 1997

      86. Individualism and individuality: Reinterpreting the teacher culture, in Little, J., & McLaughlin, W.(eds.), Hargreaves, "Individualism and individuality: Reinterpreting the teacher culture, , 1993

      87. 유치원 교사가 인식하는 심리적 안녕감과 협동적 조직문화, 한국교원교육연구, 제28권 제2호, 박신영, "유치원 교사가 인식하는 심리적 안녕감과 협동적 조직문화, , 2011

      88. 교사가 지각한 학교장의 변혁적 지도성과 교사 집단의 임파워먼트 및 학교 조직효과성과의 관계, 최연인, 건국대학교 대학원, 건국대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2005

      89. Measuringnormativebeliefsandsharedbehavioralexpectation in organization:Thereliability and validityoftheorganizationalcultureinventory, Cooke, Szumal, Measuring normative beliefs and shared behavioral expectation in organization: The reliability and validity of the organizational culture inventory, , 1993

      90. Teachers' professional Development in the context of high school reform: findings from a three-year study of restructuring schools. Washington D. C.: National, Little, , 1999

      91. 학교문화, 수업지도성 및 학업성취도간의 관계분석에 따른 학교정책에의 적용 가능성 탐색, 교육행정학연구, 제17권 제4호, 주삼환, 윤인숙, 신현석, "학교문화, , 1999

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼