RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    初等學校 多文化 敎育課程 開發 方向 硏究 = A Study on the Direction of Multicultural Curriculum Development at Elementary School Level

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11972004

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to conceptualize multicultural curriculum and to construct a multicultural curriculum development model. In addition, this study aims at understanding the current situation on the cases of research school management and the cases of excellent practice of general school, through qualitative and quantitative analysis, with analysis criteria established on the basis of, and presenting development direction of multicultural curriculum on the foundation of it. The aims of this study in detail are as follows;
    1. To conceptualize multicultural curriculum and construct an eclectic and interactive model.
    2. To analyze the cases of research school management and the excellent practices of general school, using analysis criteria established on the basis of conceptionalization of multicultural curriculums and an eclectic and interactive model.
    3. To understand the present state of multicultural education implementation through quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis, and use the result as a resource for exploring multicultural curriculum direction.
    4. To present a development direction to multicultural curriculum.
    The study objective is the implementation cases of 12 elementary schools which managed research schools because the Ministry of Education asked them to from 2006 to 2009 and managed practice cases of 25 general elementary schools in Daegu.
    This study used literature study, case study, focus group interviews, and structured interviews, laying an emphasis on integrative inquiry methods.
    This study is conceptualized multicultural education after theoretical discussion on general multicultural education. This study, on the object of learners, conceptualized multicultural education as the education directing unification, pursuing recognition of differences through adaptation of culture and enhancement of identity, respect of recognition and variety, and equality and the right at the viewpoint of multiculturalists by removing prejudice and discrimination.
    This study looked into general curriculum and constructed conceptualization models as mutual systems between four ingredients such as cultural view points, aim and content, learner, and reformation step; laying multicultural curriculum at the center of the process. The traits of this model are an interactive system, multicultural model, and function-centered composition under the capability of responding positively to eclectic educational changes. This study conceptualized multicultural curriculum, planned by the model, with ‘the interactive system going through reformation as a series of educational procedures on unified education to carry out equality and justice by recognizing the difference through cultural adaptation and identity enhancement, respecting variety, removing prejudice, and abolishing discrimination on the target of learners from multiculturalist viewpoints.
    In addition, this study constructed a multicultural curriculum development model with ten elements; proceeding, comprehensive, mutual, and reflectional, as material resources of curriculums, from learners, society, and knowledge to global and multicultural value, decision-making processes in selecting aims, outer effects, aim-drawing, plan, implementation, evaluation, curriculum revolution through evaluation results.
    An eclectic and interactive model constructed by mixing a multicultural curriculum conceptualization model and a development model shows mutual relationship among respective elements of multicultural curriculum. It will be helpful to understand multicultural curriculum comprehensively and develop curriculum in the future.
    Based on the studies as above. The results will offer many suggestions for the development of multicultural curriculum.
    First, multicultural curriculum has to be composed of an interactive system among four elements such as ① cultural viewpoint, ② aim and content, ③ learners, ④ step of revolution. Multiculture curriculum is a series of educational procedures on unified education to recognize differences, to respect diversity, to remove prejudice, and to remove discrimination through cultural adaptation and identity enhancement and to reach true equality and justice for learners in the point of multiculturalists’.
    Second, multicultural curriculum has to be developed into an eclectic and interactive model of multicultural curriculum development. This model, proceeding and comprehensive, has a trait of interactive system and reflects eclecticism.
    ① Curriculum material resources, learners, society, and knowledge have to be considered. As learner elements, individual and social entities have a deep relationship with cultural identity development. As social elements, Korea is divided into two in a democratic system. As knowledge elements, educational contents depend on cultural considerations. All of them have a deep relationship within multicultural education.
    ② A conceptualization model of multicultural curriculum has to be utilized. This conception has a great role in developing curriculums and are expected to be developed into the future.
    ③ The stage of decision-making where enduring and multicultural values and aims are decided. In this stage, school policies, participation and support in policy and communities, and attitude of school officials operate as outer effects.
    ④ A general frame of multicultural curriculum is composed by decision-making.
    ⑤ Goals of multicultural education are described in a general frame of multicultural curriculum. These goals have a trait of interactivity system in the planning, implementation, evaluation and curriculum revolution.
    ⑥ Curriculum planning : aims, contents, methods, and evaluation of multicultural education are included. Here unit arrangement, related to educational contents, is considered.
    ⑦ Curriculum implementation : This stage can be divided into two levels such as planned curriculum (subjects and non-subject instruction) and latent curriculum.
    ⑧ Curriculum evaluation : In this stage, general curriculum is evaluated and instruction and learning activities are evaluated. The evaluation activities have an effect on the next stage of reformation.
    ⑨ Curriculum reform : In this stage, the substitution, alteration, reconstructive change, and value orientation change are reformed and multicultural curriculum is developed.
    Third, the criteria for analyzing multicultural education implement can be constructed and applied as followings. ① The aspect related with conceptualization of multicultural education, education object, formation of education units, and education contents. ② The effect on curriculum planned on the implementation areas of multicultural curriculum and the effect on latent curriculum. ③ The evaluation and suggestion on evaluation area of multicultural curriculums. ④ The activities linked with outer-effect, teacher education and multicultural organization.
    Last, the analysis of multicultural education implementation must be utilized positively. The concepts of multicultural education are utilized without clear discrimination. So, they have to be conceptualized at the point of multiculturalist view. The education object has to be all of the students including multicultural home-stay students. Desirable education formation is unit formation. As for the contents of education, minor adaptation education is managed without much difficulty. However education must also head for major understanding. Multicultural curriculum has to be implemented after they are unified in the subject area, voluntary activity area(pan-subject), and special activity area, and others. In addition, they need to be considered at the latent curriculum effects.
    Educational organizations and local governments keep a cooperative and systematic relationship to carry out effective multi-ultural education. In addition, all of the teachers, parents, and community members have to make a unifed effort.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to conceptualize multicultural curriculum and to construct a multicultural curriculum development model. In addition, this study aims at understanding the current situation on the cases of research school management and t...

    The purpose of this study is to conceptualize multicultural curriculum and to construct a multicultural curriculum development model. In addition, this study aims at understanding the current situation on the cases of research school management and the cases of excellent practice of general school, through qualitative and quantitative analysis, with analysis criteria established on the basis of, and presenting development direction of multicultural curriculum on the foundation of it. The aims of this study in detail are as follows;
    1. To conceptualize multicultural curriculum and construct an eclectic and interactive model.
    2. To analyze the cases of research school management and the excellent practices of general school, using analysis criteria established on the basis of conceptionalization of multicultural curriculums and an eclectic and interactive model.
    3. To understand the present state of multicultural education implementation through quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis, and use the result as a resource for exploring multicultural curriculum direction.
    4. To present a development direction to multicultural curriculum.
    The study objective is the implementation cases of 12 elementary schools which managed research schools because the Ministry of Education asked them to from 2006 to 2009 and managed practice cases of 25 general elementary schools in Daegu.
    This study used literature study, case study, focus group interviews, and structured interviews, laying an emphasis on integrative inquiry methods.
    This study is conceptualized multicultural education after theoretical discussion on general multicultural education. This study, on the object of learners, conceptualized multicultural education as the education directing unification, pursuing recognition of differences through adaptation of culture and enhancement of identity, respect of recognition and variety, and equality and the right at the viewpoint of multiculturalists by removing prejudice and discrimination.
    This study looked into general curriculum and constructed conceptualization models as mutual systems between four ingredients such as cultural view points, aim and content, learner, and reformation step; laying multicultural curriculum at the center of the process. The traits of this model are an interactive system, multicultural model, and function-centered composition under the capability of responding positively to eclectic educational changes. This study conceptualized multicultural curriculum, planned by the model, with ‘the interactive system going through reformation as a series of educational procedures on unified education to carry out equality and justice by recognizing the difference through cultural adaptation and identity enhancement, respecting variety, removing prejudice, and abolishing discrimination on the target of learners from multiculturalist viewpoints.
    In addition, this study constructed a multicultural curriculum development model with ten elements; proceeding, comprehensive, mutual, and reflectional, as material resources of curriculums, from learners, society, and knowledge to global and multicultural value, decision-making processes in selecting aims, outer effects, aim-drawing, plan, implementation, evaluation, curriculum revolution through evaluation results.
    An eclectic and interactive model constructed by mixing a multicultural curriculum conceptualization model and a development model shows mutual relationship among respective elements of multicultural curriculum. It will be helpful to understand multicultural curriculum comprehensively and develop curriculum in the future.
    Based on the studies as above. The results will offer many suggestions for the development of multicultural curriculum.
    First, multicultural curriculum has to be composed of an interactive system among four elements such as ① cultural viewpoint, ② aim and content, ③ learners, ④ step of revolution. Multiculture curriculum is a series of educational procedures on unified education to recognize differences, to respect diversity, to remove prejudice, and to remove discrimination through cultural adaptation and identity enhancement and to reach true equality and justice for learners in the point of multiculturalists’.
    Second, multicultural curriculum has to be developed into an eclectic and interactive model of multicultural curriculum development. This model, proceeding and comprehensive, has a trait of interactive system and reflects eclecticism.
    ① Curriculum material resources, learners, society, and knowledge have to be considered. As learner elements, individual and social entities have a deep relationship with cultural identity development. As social elements, Korea is divided into two in a democratic system. As knowledge elements, educational contents depend on cultural considerations. All of them have a deep relationship within multicultural education.
    ② A conceptualization model of multicultural curriculum has to be utilized. This conception has a great role in developing curriculums and are expected to be developed into the future.
    ③ The stage of decision-making where enduring and multicultural values and aims are decided. In this stage, school policies, participation and support in policy and communities, and attitude of school officials operate as outer effects.
    ④ A general frame of multicultural curriculum is composed by decision-making.
    ⑤ Goals of multicultural education are described in a general frame of multicultural curriculum. These goals have a trait of interactivity system in the planning, implementation, evaluation and curriculum revolution.
    ⑥ Curriculum planning : aims, contents, methods, and evaluation of multicultural education are included. Here unit arrangement, related to educational contents, is considered.
    ⑦ Curriculum implementation : This stage can be divided into two levels such as planned curriculum (subjects and non-subject instruction) and latent curriculum.
    ⑧ Curriculum evaluation : In this stage, general curriculum is evaluated and instruction and learning activities are evaluated. The evaluation activities have an effect on the next stage of reformation.
    ⑨ Curriculum reform : In this stage, the substitution, alteration, reconstructive change, and value orientation change are reformed and multicultural curriculum is developed.
    Third, the criteria for analyzing multicultural education implement can be constructed and applied as followings. ① The aspect related with conceptualization of multicultural education, education object, formation of education units, and education contents. ② The effect on curriculum planned on the implementation areas of multicultural curriculum and the effect on latent curriculum. ③ The evaluation and suggestion on evaluation area of multicultural curriculums. ④ The activities linked with outer-effect, teacher education and multicultural organization.
    Last, the analysis of multicultural education implementation must be utilized positively. The concepts of multicultural education are utilized without clear discrimination. So, they have to be conceptualized at the point of multiculturalist view. The education object has to be all of the students including multicultural home-stay students. Desirable education formation is unit formation. As for the contents of education, minor adaptation education is managed without much difficulty. However education must also head for major understanding. Multicultural curriculum has to be implemented after they are unified in the subject area, voluntary activity area(pan-subject), and special activity area, and others. In addition, they need to be considered at the latent curriculum effects.
    Educational organizations and local governments keep a cooperative and systematic relationship to carry out effective multi-ultural education. In addition, all of the teachers, parents, and community members have to make a unifed effort.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적
    • 2. 연구의 내용 및 방법
    • 3. 연구의 범위 및 제한점
    • 4. 선행 연구의 분석
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적
    • 2. 연구의 내용 및 방법
    • 3. 연구의 범위 및 제한점
    • 4. 선행 연구의 분석
    • Ⅱ. 다문화교육의 개념 정립
    • 1. 다문화교육의 개념적 토대
    • 2. 국내․외 다문화교육 정책
    • 3. 한국 다문화교육의 특수성
    • Ⅲ. 다문화 교육과정 개발의 토대
    • 1. 다문화 교육과정의 체제
    • 2. 다문화 교육과정의 이론적 토대
    • 3. 일반적 교육과정 개발 모형
    • Ⅳ. 다문화 교육과정 개념화 및 개발 모형
    • 1. 다문화 교육과정 개념화 모형
    • 2. 다문화 교육과정 개발 모형
    • 3. 다문화 교육과정 개발의 절충적․상호작용 모형
    • Ⅴ. 다문화 교육과정 개발 방향
    • 1. 연구학교 분석 및 해석
    • 2. 일반학교 분석 및 해석
    • 3. 개발 방향
    • Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언
    • 1. 요약 및 결론
    • 2. 제언
    • 참고 문헌
    • 영문 초록
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1. 학교교육과정론, 김경자, 교육과학사, 학교교육과정론, , 2000

    2. 문화 간 적응교육, 권효숙, , 2006

    3. 2009 다문화교육계획, 대구광역시교육청, , 2009

    4. 함께가요, 함께해요, 전라북도교육청, "함께가요, , 2009

    5. Multicultural education. N.J, Banks, , 2007

    6. Fundamentals of curriculum. N, Walker, , 1990

    7. Models of curriculum planning, Posner, , 1988

    8. 한국사회와 다문화가족, 이은숙, , 2007

    9. Focus group: Theory and practice, David, Shamdasani, , 1990

    10. 한국의 다문화교육 정책, 전우홍, 숙명여자대학교 다문화통합연구소, , 2009

    1. 학교교육과정론, 김경자, 교육과학사, 학교교육과정론, , 2000

    2. 문화 간 적응교육, 권효숙, , 2006

    3. 2009 다문화교육계획, 대구광역시교육청, , 2009

    4. 함께가요, 함께해요, 전라북도교육청, "함께가요, , 2009

    5. Multicultural education. N.J, Banks, , 2007

    6. Fundamentals of curriculum. N, Walker, , 1990

    7. Models of curriculum planning, Posner, , 1988

    8. 한국사회와 다문화가족, 이은숙, , 2007

    9. Focus group: Theory and practice, David, Shamdasani, , 1990

    10. 한국의 다문화교육 정책, 전우홍, 숙명여자대학교 다문화통합연구소, , 2009

    11. Act of meaning. Cambridge, Mass.:, Bruner, "Act of meaning. Cambridge, , 1990

    12. Curriculum development and design, Print, Murray, Allen & Unwin, , 1993

    13. Developing the Curriculum(3rd ed), Oliva, P. F., Developing the curriculum(3rd ed.), , 1992

    14. 문화심리학적 연구방법론, 최상진, 한규석, 한국심리학회, , 2000

    15. 현대 교육과정과 교육평가, 강현석, 학지사, 현대 교육과정과 교육평가, , 2005

    16. Do we "acquire" culture or vice versa?, Bruner, "Do we ""acquire"" culture or vice versa?", , 1993

    17. Curriculum : principles and foundations, Zais, Robert S, Crowell, Curriculum principles and foundations, , 1976

    18. 미국 다문화 교육과 교육과정, 장인실 ( Insil Chang ), 한국교육과정학회, , 2006

    19. Developing and Documenting The Curriculum, Armstrong,D.G., Developing and documenting the curriculum, , 1989

    20. Making choices for multiculturaleducation, Sleeter, Grant, , 1999

    21. Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation, Berry, J. W., Berry, "Immigration, , 1997

    22. 주제별통계-인구?가족-혼인통계, 통계청, , 2008

    23. 한국 다문화교육의 전망과 과제, 차윤경, , 2008

    24. Educating citizens in a multicultural society, Banks, James A, Teachers College Press, Educating citizens in a multicultural society, , 2007

    25. Teaching and learning in multiculturalschools, Coelho, Teaching and learning in multicultural schools, , 1998

    26. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction, Tyler, Ralph W, Chicago University Press, Basic principles of curriculum and instruction, , 1971

    27. 프랑스 다문화 교육의 배경과 쟁점, 이민경, 한국교육과정평가원, , 2007

    28. 2007 다문화가정 자녀 교육지원 계획, 교육인적자원부, , 2007

    29. An introduction to multicultural education, 4/E, Banks, "An introduction to multicultural education, , 2008

    30. 초등학생용 ‘교과서 보완 지도자료, 교육인적자원부, , 2007

    31. 한국사회의 다문화화와 교육의 과제, 강신임, 동국대학교 대학원, "동국대학교대학원연구논집 28호, , 1998

    32. Curriculum: a comprehensive introduction (5th ed.), NcNeil, Curriculum: a comprehensive introduction (5th ed.), , 1981

    33. Multicultural education: A blueprint for educators, Suleiman, , 2004

    34. Curriculum : alternative approaches, ongoing issues, Marsh, Volin J, Merrill, Curriculum: alternative approaches. ongoing issues, , 1999

    35. Curriculum and aims. New York: Teachers College Press, Soltis,J.F., Walker, , 1986

    36. 문화 심리학에 대한 사회 심리학적 접근, 구자숙, 서울대학교 사회과학연구원, "한국사회과학, , 1998

    37. 초등학교 다문화 교육의 현황 및 지향점, 김인, 초등학교 다문화교육의 현황 및 지향점, , 2009

    38. 한국 사회의 다문화 현상과 교육적 과제, 김홍운 ( Hong Un Kim ), 김두정 ( Doo Jung Kim ), 충남대학교 인문과학연구소, 한국 사회의 다문화 현상과 교육적 과제, , 2007

    39. Multicultural education: history, issues, and practices, Hoosain.R, Salili.F, "Multicultural education: history, , 2001

    40. 함께하는 아름다운 동행! 대구 다문화교육, 대구광역시교육청, , 2008

    41. The practical 4: something for curriculum professor to do, Schwab, , 1983

    42. 사회과 다문화 수업을 위한 CAT 모형의 구안, 김용신(Yong Sin Kim), 김정호(Jeong Ho Kim), 한국사회과교육연구학회, 사회과 다문화 수업을 위한 CAT 모형의 구안, , 2009

    43. 미국 다문화교육의 동향과 사회과 교육과정, 하윤수(Ha Yun Su), 한국사회과교육연구학회, "사회과교육, , 2009

    44. 한국사회의 다민족화에 대비한 교육의 방향, 한건수, , 2006

    45. Comprehensive multicultural education : theory and practice, Bennett, Christine I, Allyn and Bacon, Comprehensive multicultural education: Theory and practice, , 1986

    46. Course design: A guide to curriculum development for teacher, Rudnitsky.A.N, Posner.G.J, , 2006

    47. 한국의 다문화교육정책, 한국다문화교육학회, 전우홍, "한국의 다문화교육정책, , 2009

    48. Multiculturalism globalization,.and the politics of knowledge, Sleeter C, "Multiculturalism, , 2008

    49. Thinking through cultures : expeditions in cultural psychology, Shweder, Richard A, Harvard University Press, , 1991

    50. 학교 다문화교육 프로그램 운영실태 분석 연구, 조영달, , 2008

    51. 다문화교육의 현황과 다문화교육 접근방향 탐색, 안병환(Ahn Byung-Hwan), 한국교육포럼(아시아태평양교육학회), "한국교육논단, , 2009

    52. 학습사회 실현을 위한 미래교육 비전과 전략(안), 대통령자문교육혁신위원회, , 2007

    53. Race, Culture, and Education : the Selected Works of James A. Banks, Banks, James A, Routledge, "Race, , 2006

    54. What can she know? feminist theory and the construction of knpwledge, Code, , 1991

    55. 초등학교 교사들의 다문화교육에 대한 인식과 실천, 박남수, 한국사회교과교육학회, "사회과교육연구, , 2007

    56. Comprehensive multicultural education : Theory and practice(6th ed. ), Bennett, C. I., , 2007

    57. 외국인근로자 자녀 특별학급 운영 실체에 대한 토론, 심의보, , 2009

    58. 한국사회에 적합한 다문화교사교육과정에 관한 연구, 장원순(Won-Soon Jang), 한국사회과교육연구학회, "사회과교육, , 2009

    59. 비교 다문화정책론. 일반교사 다문화교육 연수자료집, 곽한영, , 2008

    60. 우리나라 다문화교육에 대한 논의와 실천상의 문제점, 김선미, , 2008

    61. Theory and practice of curriculum studies London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, Lawton, , 1978

    62. 결혼 이주여성 자녀교육 프로그램 개발과 교육지원 방안, 장정희, , 2006

    63. 다문화 교육과정 설계에서 문화심리학의 적용가능성 탐색, 강현석(Hyeon-Suk Kang), 한국사회과교육연구학회, "사회과교육, , 2008

    64. Cultural diversity and eucation: Foundations, curriculum and teaching(5th ed.), Banks, "Cultural diversity and eucation: Foundations, , 2006

    65. 유치원과 초등학교의 다문화교육 실태와 교사의 인식 비교, 지성애 ( Sung Ae Chi ), 김경숙 ( Keong Sook Kim ), 정대현 ( Dae Hyun Jung ), 김지예 ( Ji Ye Kim ), 김현주 ( Hyun Ju Kim ), 채영란 ( Young Ran Chae ), 한국영유아교원교육학회(구 중앙유아교육학회), 유치원과 초등학교의 다문화교육 실태와 교사의 인식 비교, , 2006

    66. 초,중등교사의 문화 다양성과 다문화 가정 학생에 대한 태도, 박윤경, 성경희, 조영달, 초?중등 교사의 문화다양성과 다문화가정 학생에 대한 태도, , 2008

    67. 포커스 그룹 인터뷰방법을 통한 대구지역 관광안내책자 분석, 정정숙(Chung Jung Sook), 대한관광경영학회, "대한관광학회 논문집, , 1997

    68. Focus group interview를 이용한 여대생의 영양상담에 대한 요구 분석, 김경아, 서울여자대학교 대학원, , 1999

    69. 2007 교육인적자원부 지정 다문화교육 정책연구학교 운영 보고서, 김영성, , 2007

    70. 유아를 위한 다문화 교육의 개념 및 교수방법에 대한 이론적 고찰, 장영희, 誠信女子大學校, "성신연구논문집, , 1997

    71. 심리학에서의 객관성, 보편성 및 사회성의 오류 : 문화심리학의 도전, 한규석, 최상진, 한국심리학회, "심리학에서의 객관성, , 1998

    72. 초등학생의 다문화학습활동에 관한 반성적 실천 연구. 박사학위논문, 박정문, , 2006

    73. 한국 사회에 적합한 다문화교육의 실행 전략 및 교수법개발, 교육연구, 한국교육정책연구소, "한국 사회에 적합한 다문화교육의 실행 전략 및 교수법개발, , 2008

    74. Analyzing the curriculum. 김인식?박영무?최호성(역)(1996). 교육과정 이론과 분석, Posner.G.J, , 1994

    75. 한국 다문화교육의 개념 정립과 교육과정 개발 방향 탐색. 박사학위 논문, 양영자, , 2008

    76. Multiculturalism and multicultural education in toward multiculturalism: A reader in multiculturalism, Wurzel, , 1988

    77. Analytical description of current status of foreign spouses in taiwan and relevant issues in education, Fang Chunchi, , 2009

    78. 분단-다문화시대 교육 이념으로서의 민족주의와 다문화주의의 양립가능성 모색, 양영자, , 2007

    79. 한국사회의 소수민족, ‘코시안’ 아동의 사례를 통한 다문화 교육의 방향 탐색, 오성배, 한국 사회의 소수민족 ‘코시안’아동의 사례를 통한 다문화교육의 방향 탐색, , 2006

    80. 한국 다문화교육의 교육내용 쟁점 분석. Multiculturalism, globalization, and school curriculum, 황규호, 양영자, "한국 다문화교육의 교육내용 쟁점 분석. Multiculturalism, , 2008

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼