http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
호혜적 개발협력을 위한 주요 국가의 STI 시스템 분석 및 협력방향 - 브라질, 인도를 중심으로 -
김왕동(Wangdong Kim),임덕순(Deok Soon Yim),선인경(Inkyoung Sun),김은주(Eun Joo Kim),이다은(Daeun Lee),유제현(Jehyun Yu),이정원(Jung-won Lee),김기국(Ki-Kook Kim),최용인(Yongin Choi),김원호(Wonho Kim),조충제(Chungje Jo),박민경(Minkyoung P 과학기술정책연구원 2021 정책연구 Vol.- No.-
Reciprocal development cooperation refers to “all activities in the public and private sectors that benefit the donor country’s national interest as well as poverty eradication and economic and social development in the recipient country”. The Korean governments development cooperation paradigm is expected to gradually shift from a humanitarian level to a reciprocal level. However, in the case of science and technology innovation, it is difficult to acquire information about countries that are subject to reciprocal development cooperation. Therefore, in this study, the conceptual framework for reciprocal development cooperation was established and STI systems of major countries were analyzed to provide basic STI data and to suggest directions for reciprocal development cooperation. In this study, two countries, Brazil and India, were selected for analysis by applying three criteria: “differentiation from existing research,” “relevance to national interests and national tasks,” and “possibility of securing data”. In this study, the STI system components of Brazil and India were classified and analyzed into macro-environment, STI governance, STI investment and achievements, STI human resources, STI innovative actors, and STI support organizations. The reciprocal development cooperation agenda was described focusing on three dimensions: “what”, “how” and “who”. First, in the perspective of “what”, climate change, digital transformation, infectious diseases, and other issues were derived as cooperation contents. Second, policy advice and joint research, human exchange, and so on, were suggested as cooperation methods. Third, universities, GRIs, and companies were suggested as cooperation partners. Brazils STI system is characterized by a weak national R&D budget, excellent research manpower and strong basic research, lack of connection and creation of innovation demand between universities and companies, weak industrial competitiveness, lack of science and technology policy and strategy, policy implementation, and coordination of inefficiency and slow-step administration. The characteristics of the Indian STI system include inefficient governance and lack of interconnection led by the government, insufficient investment in STI between the government and the private sector, abundant STI manpower and global talent, the pursuit of R&D activities centered on universities and public research institutes rather than the private sector, bureaucratic and bureaucratic An inefficient STI support organization was identified. In-depth interviews and consultations were conducted with experts from each country to derive the Korea-Brazil development cooperation agenda and the Korea-India development cooperation agenda. The interview and advisory groups were largely divided into policymakers(public officials) for each country, researchers(researchers and professors), and local experts(embassies and dispatchers). The detailed agenda contents are described in Chapters 6 and 7. This study is expected to contribute to the theoretical construction of the field of development cooperation, and to the derivation of the governments Korea-Brazil and Korea-India STI cooperation agenda. The study also can contribute to the demand for STI system information of Brazil and India. However, this study has limitations in responding to more demand by the government by selecting Brazil and India as two countries for reciprocal development cooperation. Therefore many more countries besides Brazil and India should be explored in the future. In addition, in order to improve the reliability and validity of the STI cooperation agenda between Korea-Brazil and Korea-India, interviews and consultations with more experts are required.
Whose Science is More Scientific? The Role of Science in WTO Trade Disputes
Inkyoung Kim,Steve Brazil 사단법인 코리아컨센서스연구원 2018 분석과 대안 Vol.2 No.1
This study examines the role of science in resolving trade disputes. After the Great East Japan Earthquake of 11 March 2011 that not only jeopardized the people of Japan, but also put the safety of an entire region at risk, the Republic of Korea (Korea) has imposed import bans as well as increased testing and certification requirements for radioactive material on Japanese food products. Japan has challenged these restrictions at the World Trade Organizations Dispute Settlement Body (DSB). This study aims to explain how international trade agreements and previous DSB rulings have dealt with different scientific viewpoints provided by confronting parties. In doing so, it will contrast the viewpoints espoused by Korean and Japanese representatives, and then analyzes the most similar case studies previously ruled on by the DSB, including the case of beef hormones and the case of genetically modified crops including biotech corn, both between the United States and the European Communities (EC). This study finds that science is largely subordinate to national interests in the case of state decision-making within the dispute settlement processes, and science has largely been relegated to a supportive role. Due to the ambiguity and lack of truly decisive decisions in the Appellate Body in science-based trade disputes, this study concludes that the Appellate Body avoids taking a firm scientific position in cases where science is still inconclusive in any capacity. Due to the panel’s unwillingness to establish expert review boards as it has the power to do, instead favoring an individual-based system so that all viewpoints can be heard, it has also developed a system with its own unique weaknesses. Similar to any court of law in which each opposing party defends its own interests, each side brings whatever scientific evidence it can to defend its position, incentivizing them to disregard scientific conclusions unfavorable to their position. With so many questions that can arise, combined with the problems of evolving science, questions of risk, and social concerns in democratic society, it is no wonder that the panel views scientific information provided by the experts as secondary to the legal and procedural issues. Despite being ruled against the EC on legal issues in two previous cases, the EC essentially won both times because the panel did not address whether its science was correct or not. This failure to conclusively resolve a debate over whose science is more scientific enabled the EC to simply fix the procedural issues, while continuing to enforce trade restrictions based on their scientific evidence. Based on the analysis of the two cases of disputes, Korea may also find itself guilty of imposing an unwarranted moratorium on Japan’s fish exports, only to subsequently pass new restrictions on labelling and certification requirements because Japan may have much scientific evidence at its disposal. However, Korea might be able to create enough uncertainty in the panel to force them to rule exclusively on the legal issues of the case. This will then equip Korea, like the EC in the past, with a way of working around the ruling, by changing whatever legal procedure they need to while maintaining some, if not most, of its restrictions when the panel fails to address its case on scientific grounds.
National Master Plan for STI Research and Development and Application in Lao PDR 2020-2022
Inkyoung Sun,Wangdong Kim,Ji Hyun Kim,Deok Soon Yim,Jiyong An,Young Rak Choi,Jong-il Lee,Chungho Lee,Soumana Chounlamany,Keophaivanh Doaungsavanh,Khamphet Vongdala,Phouthasone Sinthavong,Viengvilay Th 과학기술정책연구원 2020 조사연구 Vol.- No.-
Inkyoung Kim,Rohan Unny-Law 사단법인 코리아컨센서스연구원 2019 분석과 대안 Vol.3 No.2
How can we reconcile our aspirations for more economic growth or prosperity with the constraints of a finite planet? One of the high-income countries, Japan, makes us wonder if we can deal with two different challenges simultaneously: overcoming economic recession and solving environmental degradation. This study investigates the supply-side perspective which highlights the productive capacity and efficiency of the economy through economic lenses and the demand-side perspective which highlights the Japanese personal lifestyles through social lenses. This study aims to answer the question, if Japan’s sustainable consumption behavior is counter to economic development whilst environmentally proactive. It finds that translating individual practices and cultures of sustainability into the macro- scopic economic growth path is key to a sustainable and healthy Japan.