RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 음성지원유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI우수등재

        상생협력과 공급사 성과

        이수열(Su Yol Lee) 한국경영학회 2013 經營學硏究 Vol.42 No.4

        Firms have changed a way of managing their supply chain by adopting win-win collaboration approach as they have realized that a large and increasing amount of sources for a corporate competitive advantage can be found in their supply chain. Such win-win collaboration in supply chains that focuses on a supply chain`s capabilities rather than mere short-term outputs has been paid more attention in Korea as polarization between large buying firms and their small suppliers became problematic. However, several important aspects have received relatively little attention. First, to date, little academic research has clearly identified win-win collaboration and its elements, and explored its effects on supply chain performance in the Korean context whereas rhetoric about the importance of win-win collaboration is abundant. Second, previous studies examining the relationship between collaboration and overall supply chain performance have provided mixed results. Third, most previous studies have more focused on large buying firms` performance, and thus little attention have paid to suppliers, in particular that of small and medium size (SME) suppliers. Given this gap, this paper explores tow questions. How does win-win collaboration influence the performance of suppliers? More specifically, how does social capital accumulated between large buyers and SME suppliers mediate the relationships between win-win collaboration and supplier performance? First, this study identified a comprehensive set of win-win collaboration practices in the Korean context by synthesizing relevant literature and perspectives of practitioners. Second, the study suggests a mediating role of relational social capital between win-win collaboration and the performance of suppliers. Third, this paper provides empirical analyses of these relationships. Consistent with the purpose of this study, the study focused on medium-sized suppliers. A total of 197 responses from SME suppliers were used for the empirical analysis. The results of a series of rigorous tests provided support for the validity and reliability of the scales, including two sub-constructs of win-win collaboration ? fairness and collaboration. Regression analyses were used to test the effects of win-win collaboration on relational social capital and supplier manufacturing performance as well as the mediating effects of relational social capital on the relationship between win-win collaboration and performance. Overall, the research results indicate that the hypotheses for the relationships between win-win collaboration, relational social capital, and supplier performance were supported. First, win-win collaboration has positive and significant impact on social capital accumulation between a buyer and its suppliers. Second, both dimensions of win-win collaboration ? fairness and collaboration ? contribute to the improvement of supplier manufacturing performance. In particular, fairness is found to have a higher impact on supplier performance than collaboration. Third, the results empirically verify a significant positive effect of social capital on the performance of suppliers. Noteworthy is that win-win collaboration increased the supplier`s manufacturing performance through relational social capital accumulation. In other words, relational social capital was found to fully mediate the effects of win-win collaboration on supplier performance. Through a comprehensive model and empirical evidence, this study provides a better understanding of win-win collaboration and important guidelines for managers of buyers as well as suppliers who wish to foster stronger supply chain capabilities. First, large buying firms should recognize that both buyers and suppliers can benefit from win-win collaboration, and thus it is not a one-directional support and/or dispensation. In addition, win-win collaboration is likely to fail if fairness is not well guaranteed. Second, managers of buyers and suppliers should foster fre

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        한국전력공사(KEPCO)의 CSR과 CSV 소생 전략

        이수열(Su-Yol Lee),김유상(Yu-Sang Kim) 한국경영학회 2018 Korea Business Review Vol.22 No.2

        기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)은 산업계에 널리 퍼져 하나의 현상이 되었지만 그것이 올바른 이해에 바탕을 두고 있는지는 회의적이다. 기업 비즈니스와 사회가치 창출 연계성을 강조한 공유가치창출(CSV)이 주목 받고 있지만 이 개념 역시 한때의 유행으로 끝나지 않기 위해서는 바른 이해와 지속적인 사례 발굴이 요구된다. 이 사례는 CSR과 CSV의 바른 이해를 바탕으로 국내 최대 공기업인 한국전력공사(KEPCO)의 사회공헌과 연계된 다양한 기업 활동을 진단하고 향후 전략 방향을 논의할 수 있도록 개발되었다. 한전의 다양한 CSR 사회공헌 활동과 잠재적 CSV 사업을 정리하여 제시하였다. 사례 토론의 효과성을 높이기 위해 CSR, CSV에 대한 이론적 배경과 분석 틀에 대한 참고 내용을 부록에서 제공하고 있다. 이 사례는 사회공헌 활동, 전략적 CSR과 CSV에 대한 올바른 이해를 바탕으로 자사의 기존 사업을 진단, 분석, 미래전략을 수립하고자 하는 기업들에게 실무적인 도움을 준다. 특히 사회공헌으로 인식되지 못했으나 사회적 가치 창출 효과가 높은 핵심 사업을 CSV 잣대로 재평가할 수 있는 기회를 제공한다. Although corporate social responsibility(CSR) has spread out through the business circle as a business phenomenon, there still exists that misunderstanding CSR. Creating shared value(CSV), evoking syndrome as a promising alternative to CSR, is also facing challenges that need adequate understanding and continue to develop relevant business cases. This case is designed to provide a place for class discussion on Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO)’s CSR and CSV activities and strategies based on a comprehensive understanding CSR and CSV. First, this case presents an extensive list of KEPCO’s social contribution activities and potential CSV cases. Second, a short review of the debates of CSR and CSV, as well as a useful analytic framework in diagnosing CSR and CSV strategies, are provided. This case offers implications for practitioners who wish to diagnose and analyze their firm’s social contribution practices and develop a better and comprehensive CSR and CSV strategies. In particular, the framework of this case can be used to seek and re-evaluate potential CSV activities that have generated social benefits but little recognized as CSV cases.

      • KCI등재
      • 근대 일본작가의 上海 체험

        이수열(Lee, Soo-Yeol) 한국해양대학교 국제해양문제연구소 2010 해양도시문화교섭학 Vol.- No.2

        In modern times, Shanghai was the foreign metro city that most Japanese visited. This article thought about a meaning of Shanghai as the space of the cultural contacts through analyzing some modern Japanese literary works such as Muramatsu Shohu, Tanizaki Junichiro, Akutagawa Ryunosuke, Takeda Taijun, Hotta Yosie. To say conclusively, among the literary people who noticed Chinese political reality through service in a war and domiciliation with the people who visited Shanghai as a tourist based on exoticism, many differences were watched. The article thought about possibility of the de-nationalism by taking up diverse aspects of such cultural contacts.

      • KCI등재

        상생협력 공급사슬 관리의 유형과 성과

        이수열(Su-Yol Lee) 한국SCM학회 2015 한국SCM학회지 Vol.15 No.2

        An increasing number of firms have adopted a win-win collaboration approach since an amount of sources for a corporate competitive advantage can be found in their supply chain. Win-win collaboration has been paid more attention both in the industry circle and academia for the decades. However, previous studies have little examined various different types of win-win collaboration strategies. This study explores typology of win-win collaboration strategies which have been adopted by Korean firms in their buyer-supplier relationship, identifies unique characteristics of each type, and examines the difference in performance of win-win collaboration strategies. The cluster analysis of 541 Korean companies indicates four different types of win-win collaboration:‘collaboration leader’,‘collaboration sideliner’,‘relationship builder’, and‘collaboration practitioner’. This study empirically examines whether there are differences between these four win-win collaboration strategies in terms of operational performance, customer satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and marketing-R&D-operations integration. Overall, the research results indicate that‘collaboration leader’shows the highest levels of performance, followed by ‘relationship builder’and‘collaboration practitioner’, and‘collaboration sideliner’shows the lowest levels of performance with some exceptions. This study provides a better understanding of win-win collaboration strategies and important guidelines for managers of buyers as well as suppliers who wish to enhance supply chain performance.

      • 근대 일본사상과 상하이

        이수열(Lee, Soo-Yeol) 동북아시아문화학회 2016 동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집 Vol.2016 No.10

        In modern times, Shanghai was the foreign metro city that most Japanese visited. This article thought about a meaning of Shanghai as the space of the cultural contacts through analyzing some modern Japanese literary works. To say conclusively, among the literary people who noticed Chinese political reality through service in a war and domiciliation with the people who visited Shanghai as a tourist based on exoticism, many differences were watched. The article thought about possibility of the de-nationalism by taking up diverse aspects of such cultural contacts.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼