상생협력과 공급사 성과 = 관계적 사회자본의 매개효과

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Firms have changed a way of managing their supply chain by adopting win-win collaboration approach as they have realized that a large and increasing amount of sources for a corporate competitive advantage can be found in their supply chain. Such win-win collaboration in supply chains that focuses on a supply chain`s capabilities rather than mere short-term outputs has been paid more attention in Korea as polarization between large buying firms and their small suppliers became problematic. However, several important aspects have received relatively little attention. First, to date, little academic research has clearly identified win-win collaboration and its elements, and explored its effects on supply chain performance in the Korean context whereas rhetoric about the importance of win-win collaboration is abundant. Second, previous studies examining the relationship between collaboration and overall supply chain performance have provided mixed results. Third, most previous studies have more focused on large buying firms` performance, and thus little attention have paid to suppliers, in particular that of small and medium size (SME) suppliers. Given this gap, this paper explores tow questions. How does win-win collaboration influence the performance of suppliers? More specifically, how does social capital accumulated between large buyers and SME suppliers mediate the relationships between win-win collaboration and supplier performance? First, this study identified a comprehensive set of win-win collaboration practices in the Korean context by synthesizing relevant literature and perspectives of practitioners. Second, the study suggests a mediating role of relational social capital between win-win collaboration and the performance of suppliers. Third, this paper provides empirical analyses of these relationships. Consistent with the purpose of this study, the study focused on medium-sized suppliers. A total of 197 responses from SME suppliers were used for the empirical analysis. The results of a series of rigorous tests provided support for the validity and reliability of the scales, including two sub-constructs of win-win collaboration ? fairness and collaboration. Regression analyses were used to test the effects of win-win collaboration on relational social capital and supplier manufacturing performance as well as the mediating effects of relational social capital on the relationship between win-win collaboration and performance. Overall, the research results indicate that the hypotheses for the relationships between win-win collaboration, relational social capital, and supplier performance were supported. First, win-win collaboration has positive and significant impact on social capital accumulation between a buyer and its suppliers. Second, both dimensions of win-win collaboration ? fairness and collaboration ? contribute to the improvement of supplier manufacturing performance. In particular, fairness is found to have a higher impact on supplier performance than collaboration. Third, the results empirically verify a significant positive effect of social capital on the performance of suppliers. Noteworthy is that win-win collaboration increased the supplier`s manufacturing performance through relational social capital accumulation. In other words, relational social capital was found to fully mediate the effects of win-win collaboration on supplier performance. Through a comprehensive model and empirical evidence, this study provides a better understanding of win-win collaboration and important guidelines for managers of buyers as well as suppliers who wish to foster stronger supply chain capabilities. First, large buying firms should recognize that both buyers and suppliers can benefit from win-win collaboration, and thus it is not a one-directional support and/or dispensation. In addition, win-win collaboration is likely to fail if fairness is not well guaranteed. Second, managers of buyers and suppliers should foster fre

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이수열, "협력적 공급사슬관리가 참여기업 성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구：공급사슬 내 역량이전의 관점에서" 한국경영과학회 34 (34): 85-104, 2009

2 김기찬, "중소기업 유형별 대 중소기업간 상생협력전략, In 대중소기업 상생협력의 전략과 과제" 전경련중소기업협력센터 37-79, 2007

3 오중산, "완성차업체-공급업체간 협력이 성과에 미치는 영향과 기술불확실성의 조절효과: 한국 자동차 산업을 중심으로" 한국생산관리학회 19 (19): 23-57, 2008

4 상생협력연구회, "상생경영" 김영사 2006

5 김경묵, "상생 협력의 문화 정합성에 관한 연구: 한․미․일 성과공유(Benefit Sharing) 관행 비교를 중심으로" 한국경영학회 38 (38): 133-163, 2009

6 박지윤, "비즈니스 아키텍처 개념에 의한 신뢰계층화 및 대·중소기업 상생협력모형 개발" 가톨릭대학교 대학원 2006

7 정유훈, "도요다 사례에서배우는 교훈"

8 홍장표, "대중소기업 간 동반성장문화 확산을 위한 창조적 동반성장 모델 개발" 대중소기업동반성장위원회 2011

9 권영철, "대기업-중소기업간 상생협력 촉진 요인으로서 관계특유투자 분석" 한국경영학회 11 (11): 145-164, 2007

10 김경묵, "대․중소기업 간 협력 성과의 공유: 성과공유제도와 협력이익배분제도 비교" 한국경영학회 16 (16): 51-79, 2012

11 이종욱, "대 중소기업 상생협력의발전 방향과 과제, In 대중소기업 상생협력의 전략과 과제" 전경련중소기업협력센터 133-156, 2007

12 김경묵, "대 중소기업 간 성과공유 모델 및 표준계약서 개발 연구" 산업자원부 2005

13 전인우, "대 중 소기업 협력지수 개발 및 적용" 중소기업연구원 2005

14 김승일, "대 중 소기업 협력에 관한 기본 프레임워크" 중소기업연구원 2005

15 김수욱, "글로벌 기업경영과 상생협력 전략, In 대중소기업 상생협력의 전략과 과제" 전경련중소기업협력센터 81-131, 2007

16 복준혁, "구매기업의 힘의 원천이 공급기업의 공정성인식, 관계몰입도 및 공급망 통합 활동에 미치는 영향" 한국생산관리학회 23 (23): 283-311, 2012

17 유승호, "공급망 상생협력 활동과 성과 공유 전략" 한국경영과학회 36 (36): 69-84, 2011

18 Sako, M., "“Supplier relations and performance in the auto industry: European-Japanese-US comparisons of the voice/exit choice" 1995

19 Bell, G. G., "Trust deterioration in an international buyer-supplier relationship" 36 (36): 65-78, 2002

20 Greto, M., "Toyota: The accelerator crisis, Thunderbird School of Global Management Case" Thunderbird School of Global Management 2010

21 Chen, I.J., "Towards a theory of supply chain management : the constructs and measurements" 22 (22): 119-150, 2004

22 Hahn, C. K. ., "The supplier development program : a conceptual model" 26 (26): 2-7, 1990

23 Heide, J.B., "The shadow of the future: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer-seller cooperation" 35 (35): 265-291, 1992

24 Chen, H., "The role of auditing in buyer-supplier relations" 4 (4): 1-17, 2008

25 Krause, D. R., "The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement" 25 (25): 528-545, 2007

26 Dyer, J.H., "The relational view : Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage" 23 (23): 660-679, 1998

27 Baron, R.M., "The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : Conceptual strategic and statistical considerations" 51 : 1173-1182, 1986

28 Ketchen, D.J., "The intersection of strategic management and supply chain management" 33 (33): 51-56, 2004

29 Benton, W.C, "The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction" 23 : 1-22, 2005

30 Flynn, B. B., "The impact of supply chain integration on performance : A contingency and configuration approach" 28 (28): 58-71, 2010

31 Zhao, X., "The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain" 26 (26): 368-388, 2008

32 O’Leary-Kelly, S.W., "The empirical assessment of construct validity" 16 : 387-405, 1998

33 Lee, H. L., "The bullwhip effect in supply chains" 38 (38): 93-102, 1997

34 Shin, H., "Supply management orientation and supplier/ buyer performance" 18 (18): 317-333, 2000

35 Modi, S.B., "Supplier development : Improving supplier performance through knowledge transfer" 21 : 1222-1238, 2007

36 Moran, P., "Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance" 26 : 1129-1151, 2005

37 Parkhe, A., "Strategic alliance structuring : a game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation" 36 : 794-829, 1993

38 Griffith, D. A., "Social exchange in supply chain relationships : The resulting benefits of procedural and distributive justice" 24 : 85-98, 2006

39 Inkpen, A.C., "Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer" 30 (30): 146-165, 2005

40 Nahapiet, J., "Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage" 23 (23): 242-266, 1998

41 Carey, S., "Social capital configuration, legal bonds and performance in buyer-supplier relationships" 29 : 277-288, 2011

42 Mossholder, K. W., "Relationships between based of power and work reactions : The mediational role of procedure justice" 24 (24): 533-552, 1998

43 Teece, D. J., "Profiting from technological innovation : implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy" 15 : 285-306, 1986

44 Thibaut, J., "Procedural justice: A psychological analysis" Erlbaum 1975

45 Maloni, M.J., "Power influences in the supply chain" 21 (21): 42-73, 2000

46 Beugre, C.D., "Offshoring and cross-border interorganizational relationship: A justice model" 39 : 445-468, 2008

47 Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis" Pearson Education 2006

48 Kale, P., "Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances : Building relational capital" 21 (21): 217-237, 2000

49 Helper, S., "Have things really changed between automakers and their suppliers?" 32 : 15-28, 1991

50 Kotabe, M., "Gaining from vertical partnerships : Knowledge transfer, relationship duration, and supplier performance improvement in the U. S. and Japanese automotive industries" 24 (24): 293-316, 2003

51 Yu, C. M. J., "Formal governance mechanisms, relational governance mechanisms, and transactionspecific investments in supplier-manufacturer relationships" 35 (35): 128-139, 2006

52 Boyer, K.K., "Extending the supply chain" AMACOM 2005

53 Fornell, c., "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error" 18 : 39-50, 1981

54 Johnston, D. A., "Effects of supplier trust on performance of cooperative supplier relationships" 22 (22): 22-38, 2004

55 Lin, F., "Effects of information sharing on supply chain performance in electronic commerce" 49 (49): 258-268, 2002

56 Granovetter, M. S., "Economic institutions as social constructions : A framework for analysis" 25 (25): 3-11, 1992

57 Sako, M., "Does trust improve business performance?, In Trust within and between organizations" Oxford University Press 88-117, 1998

58 Sako, M., "Determinants of trust in supplier relations : evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States" 34 (34): 387-417, 1998

59 Cousins, P. D., "Creating supply chain relational capital : The impact of formal and informal socialization processes" 24 (24): 851-863, 2006

60 Gittell, J.H., "Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance" 48 (48): 1408-1426, 2002

61 Wagner, S.M., "Configuring and managing strategic supplier portfolios" 33 (33): 717-730, 2004

62 Ward, P.T., "Competitive priorities in operations management" 29 (29): 1035-1046, 1998

63 Podsakoff, P.M., "Common method bias in behavioral research : A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies" 88 (88): 879-903, 2003

64 Ahuja, G., "Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation : a longitudinal study" 45 : 425-455, 2000

65 Fine, C., "Clockspeed-winning industry control in the age of temporary advantage" Perseus Books 1998

66 Artz, K. W., "Buyer-supplier performance : The role of asset specificity, reciprocal investments and relational exchange" 10 (10): 113-126, 1999

67 Ward, P. T., "Business environment, operations strategy, and performance : An empirical study of Singapore manufacturers" 13 (13): 99-115, 1995

68 Liker, J.K., "Building deep supplier relationships" 82 (82): 102-112, 2004

69 Dwyer, F.R, "Bargaining in an asymmetrical power structure" 45 (45): 104-115, 1981

70 Lawson, B., "Antecedents and consequences of social capital on buyer performance improvement" 26 : 446-460, 2008

71 Flynn, B.B., "An exploratory study of the nature of cumulative capabilities" 22 : 439-457, 2004

72 Krause, D. R., "An empirical investigation of supplier development : reactive and strategic processes" 17 (17): 39-58, 1998

73 산업자원부, "2007 대중소기업 성과공유제 사례집" 산업자원부 2007