건축물 연면적 현황과 도시기본계획의 중심지와의 비교 분석을 통한 물리적 중심지 검증 연구

서주옥(Suh, Juok),김도년(Kim, Donyun),이성창(Lee, Seongchang) 한국도시설계학회 2017 도시설계 : 한국도시설계학회지 Vol.18 No.1

본 연구는 서울의 도시기본계획인 ‘2030서울플랜’이 2014년에 확정ㆍ고시됨에 도시기본계획의 물리적 계획인 중심지계획에 따라 중심지가 재대로 관리ㆍ육성되는지를 검증하고, 중심지 형성요인을 파악하여 향후 계획시 검토방향을 제시하는 것이 목적이다. 중심지는 기존 시가지에 중심지를 지정하는 방식과 신규개발지에 중심지를 지정하는 방식으로 구분할 수 있다. 신규개발 중심지는 상암, 문정을 들 수 있으며 이들은 공공주도 사업으로 조성되어 10~20년 내에 물리적인 변화가 나타났다. 기존 시가지를 중심지로 지정한 경우는 청량리ㆍ왕십리, 창동상계, 미아 등으로 성장가능성 등을 고려하여 지정했음에도 불구하고 물리적인 변화가 나타나지 않았다. 이외에도 도시기본계획상 중심지가 아님에도 자생적으로 성장하여 중심지를 형성한 신사, 서초, 양재, 동대문이 있다. 이들은 대부분 상업용도의 비율이 높은 지역으로 관광객 등이 유동인구가 많아 도시가 자생적으로 변모한 경우이다. 이를 통해 중심지를 형성하는 요인을 살펴보면 신규개발지는 도시계획적 수단이 매우 효과적인 것으로 나타났고, 기존 시가지는 도시계획적인 수단보다는 집객이나 도시활동 등이 중심지 형성에 더 많은 영향을 끼치는 것으로 나타났다. 이와 같이 지역의 성격에 따라 그에 적합한 중심지계획을 수립하여야 할 것이다. According to the confirmation and notification of ‘2030 Seoul Plan’ in 2014, this study aims to examine the current status of the urban centers and build up the framework for future plan based on the factors forming the urban center. The urban centers were categorized based on the realization of plan and purpose of designation. The findings for this study are as followed: newly-developed centers such as Sangam, MunJung have been greatly changed in urban environment for the last 10-20 years by public development projects. In the case of designating the existing city area as the urban center, the physical change did not occur even though the designation was made considering the possibility of growth as Cheongryangri/Wangsinri, Changdong Sanggye and Mia. Though these centers had growth potential, there has no physical changes noticeably. Yangjae, Seocho, Shinsa, Dongdaemun, etc. are not the urban centers of Seoul urban basic planing have experienced substantial growth with high agglomeration of neighborhood commercial facilities and a large floating population. The principal influencing factors to form urban center are urban policy or city planning for newly-developed areas. The growth of urban centers in old city, on the other hand, are influenced by visitor attraction factors, urban activities, etc. The findings suggest that considering the characteristics of urban center is a key factor for effective urban planning.

서울시 대중교통 이용현황과 비주거 용도지역의 비교분석을 통해 본 도시계획 실효성 검증 연구

서주옥(Suh, Ju Ok),김도년(Kim, Do Nyun),이성창(Lee, Seong Chang) 한국도시설계학회 2019 도시설계 : 한국도시설계학회지 Vol.20 No.3

본 연구는 대중교통 이용현황과 비주거 용도지역의 분포를 비교 · 분석하여, 중심기능을 수행하도록 계획한 비주거 용도지역에서 그에 상응하는 도시활동이 일어나는지를 검증하고자 한다. 이에 대표적 대중교통인 지하철과 버스의 이용현황과 패턴을 분석하여 두 교통수단간의 특성을 검토하고, 그에 따라 대중교통 이용량이 높고, 출근시간대 하차, 퇴근시간때 승차인원이 높은 지역을 대중교통 중심지로 선정하였다. 업무, 상업 등의 중심기능 도입이 가능한 상업지역, 준공업지역, 준주거지역을 비주거 용도지역으로 설정하여 대중교통 중심지와 일치여부를 비교 · 분석하였고 그 원인을 파악하였다. 대중교통 중심지와 비주거 용도지역은 대체적으로 일치했으나 비주거 용도지역임에도 불구하고 대중교통 중심지가 위치하지 않는 지역은 불광 · 응암, 천호 · 길동, 구의 · 자양, 신림 · 봉천 등으로 이 지역들은 계획적으로 중심지로 육성하고자 했으나 중심지로 성장하지 못했음을 알 수 있다. 비주거 용도지역은 아니었으나 버스 이용중심지인 공릉2동과 대학동은 대학교가 위치하여 대중교통 이용률이 높음을 알 수 있다. 종합하면 용도지역이 중심지를 계획 · 관리하는 수단 중 하나로 중심지 육성의 기반을 제공할 수는 있으나 실질적으로는 그에 상응하는 도시 활동, 인간 활동이 수반되어야 중심지가 형성됨을 알 수 있다. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of land use zoning by assuming that areas with high traffic volumes with public transportation service may be active urban centers. We analyzed use patterns of subway trains and buses, and reviewed the characteristics of both major means of public transportation. Following this, the data was analyzed to look for areas where there is considerable usage of public transits as well as specifically locate active zones with high population flow during rush hours. To prove the effectiveness of land use zoning, we collectively defined commercial, semi-industrial and semi-residential districts as non-residential areas where business and commercial activities are their major functions. We analyzed and compared those areas with active urban centers to find overlapping regions and hypothesized reasons for when there were no overlaps. We found that active urban centers coincided overall with non-residential areas. We also noted that, towns such as Bulgwang · Eungam, Cheonho · Gil, Guui · Jayang and Sillim · Bongcheon, where there were no active urban centers despite being non-residential areas, were originally planned to be developed into urban centers according to local urban planning, showing failure in achieving the goal set out during planning. Despite not being considered non-residential areas, Gongneung-2-dong and Daehak-dong have been embracing universities and have high densities of commuters using buses around their regions. In summary, though land use zoning may provide a framework for developing urban centers and be a means of designing and managing new urban centers, results indicate that areas should be accompanied by corresponding human activity to grow into urban centers.

장기공공임대주택 리모델링 활성화를 위한 계획요소 개발 연구

서주옥(Suh, Ju-Ok),이성창(Lee, Seong-Chang),김도년(Kim, Do-Nyun),민승현(Min, Seung-Hyeon) SH도시연구원 2017 주택도시연구 Vol.7 No.1

Many public rental housings which have been supplied since 1989 in Seoul are confronting the stage for remodeling. ‘Act on the Support for Improving the Quality of Lives of Tenants in Long-Term Public Rental Housing’ enacted in March 2009 enabled to establish the systematic basis for the remodeling of public rental housing. Thus, this study aims to develop design elements for the remodeling for the long-term public rental housing in Seoul. The subject of this study is 23 complexes of long-term public rental housing which are located in Seoul and managed by SH. This study proposes three strategies for the remodeling of long-term public rental housing : improvement of settlement environment considering resident characteristics, improvement of negative image by planning better facade and open housing complex, implementation of ‘Low-cost and High-efficiency’ strategies on existing long-term public rental housing. It is recommended that further study to establish systematic basis such as the precise and synthesized examination system and financial scheme to support the remodeling of long-term public rental housing.

서울시 장기공공임대주택 리모델링을 위한 전략도출 및 모델개발

이성창(Seong-Chang Lee),박현찬(Hyun-Chan Bahk),정상혁(Sang-Hyeok Jeong),서주옥(Ju-ok Suh) 서울연구원 2010 서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서 Vol.- No.-

서울시 장기공공임대주택 리모델링을 위한 전략도출 및 모델개발

이성창 ( Seong Chang Lee ),박현찬 ( Hyun Chan Bahk ),정상혁 ( Sang Hyeok Jeong ),서주옥 ( Ju Ok Suh ),오지연,김도년,민승현,강경남,이준형 서울시정개발연구원 2010 연구보고서 Vol.2010 No.62

Many public rental housings began to be supplied since 1989 in Seoul are confronting the stage for remodeling. At Mar. 2009, an ``Act on the Support for Improving the Quality of Lives of Tenants in Long-Term Public Rental Housing`` was enacted, which established the systematic basis for the remodeling of public rental housing. It is necessary to furnish the direction and strategy for the remodeling of long-term public rental housing in Seoul adopting the remodeling schemes such as vertical and household extension used by the private. Therefore, the study aims to develop strategies and models for the remodeling and to help the establishment of the policies that suits for the long-term public rental housing in Seoul. The research drew the problems of the long-term public rental housing and the necessity for the remodeling. The long-term public rental housings have the problems in the aspects of dwelling unit, complex circumstances and management, community, and the policy, such as deterioration due to the low cost construction and poor management, a unit based on the old minimum space standard, insufficient parking lots, inadequate welfare facilities, and etc. Therefore, the necessity for the remodeling are suggested in the aspects of lives of the inhabitants, public, the needs of the times, and legal system. The basic direction for the remodeling of long-term public rental housing in Seoul is 『low-cost and high-efficiency remodeling that secures the residence environment corresponding to the change of socioeconomic circumstances, and that is connected with the housing policy that harmonizes healthfully with local society by new images without prejudice』. To realize this basic direction, the principles and sub strategies in four categories are suggested. The first category is residence environment. The principle is the improvement of living environment considering the characteristics of tenants. The sub strategies are 1) supply of tenants-specific residences, 2) improvement of the complex environment through reorganizing the facilities, 3) utilizing the construction cycle for the security of the settlement. The second category is the region and community. The principle is harmonization with the region through upgrading the image. The sub strategies are 4) overcoming the negative image through improvement of the design, 5) unification with local society changing the closed complex to the open complex, 6) creation of foothold of local society through introduction of necessity facilities. The third category is housing policy. The principle is maximum utilization of existing stocks for low-cost and high-efficiency effect. The sub strategies are 7) additional supply of public rental housing, 8) social mix through introduction of residences for new social classes, 9) extension of the durability through systematic management scheme. For the selection of case complexes to develop the model of remodeling, the complexes of permanent rental housing and rental housing for 50 years were investigated based on the criteria such as density, deterioration level, size, residential complex facility, placement of residential complex. Accordingly two complexes were selected: the complex 4 of Junggye and the complex 2-1 of Banghwa. Basic conception, a master plan, realization schemes are developed for each cases. The policy recommendations are also suggested by three categories. The first category is promotion scheme of the project. Based on the remodeling principles, limit of the finance, urgency, and the effect of the project, orders of planning elements are suggested. The first-order planning elements are improvement of the efficiency within the household, and security of enough parking spaces, safety, and additional rental housing, which are directly related to the remodeling principles. The second-order planning elements are expansion of bike/wheelchair station, security of storage for the pile-up, improvement of the garbage disposal box, improvement of the environment of under-ground parking lots, security of the valid space of passage and community space, and finally accommodation of diverse types of household, which are the elements for the improvement of residence complex environment. The third-order planning elements are improvement of the deteriorated stores and incidental facilities, improvement of the dull facades, entrance of complex and apartment housing, and energy efficiency within the residence complex, linkage and enhancement of community, and finally specialization of the ground and top floor, which are the elements related to the urban landscape, energy, and community aspects. The second category is modification of the system. It is recommended to establish the precise and synthesized examination system of long-term public rental housing. Based on the examination system, it is recommended to prepare the management master plan, remodeling manual, and institution. The third category is the plan to prepare a source of revenue. It is recommended to prepare a scheme to utilize the existing funds to support the remodeling of long-term public rental housing. In addition, it is recommended to organize the long-term public rental housing fund.