http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
소유자 요구를 고려한 자동차 등록 번호판 개선에 관한 연구
김병남,박지현 대한인간공학회 2006 대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.- No.-
기존의 연구는 번호판의 정보체계를 유지한 채 진행되어 그 목적과 범위가 배우 한정적이다. 현대의 정보 및 통신 기술의 발달로 주소지 정보, 차량 종류, 용도 등에 대한 정보를 번호판에 기재하지 않더라도 데이터의 관리에 어려움이 없을 것이므로 자동차 소유자 개성을 표현을 하거나, 공공의 메시지를 표현하는 다양한 역할을 하는 번호판으로의 개선이 요구된다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 시대적 요구에 부응하여 판독성이 뛰어나고, 사용자의 참여로 만들어지는 번호판 제도를 제안하였다. 새로운 번호판의 판독성을 검증하기위해 ①가시거리 측정실험 ②순간판독실험 ③주행측정실험을 실시하여 기존의 번호판과 오독률을 비교 분석하였다. 분석결과 본 연구에서 제안한 번호판은 충분한 용량을 가질 뿐만 아니라, 기존의 번호판에 비해 탁월한 판독 능력이 있음을 입증하였다.
김병남 한국인물사연구소 2014 한국인물사연구 Vol.21 No.-
Boksin as a diplomatic representative of Baekje was dispatched to Tang in 627 for a mission making a favorable international environment for expansion policy to Silla with which King Mu of Baekje actively had pursued. But King Taizong of Tang sent to Boksin a letter in which he deprecated a military act of Baekje, so Boksin became left the political stage with taking the responsibility for a diplomatic failure. Ironically, it was because of a Baekje`s misfortune that Boksin who had been forgotten for over 30 years rose to main power. He took the lead at once in Baekje`s forces of the revival movement which have been in the crunch, and built foundation which could fight against Silla and Tang by establishing Juryu-fortress(Buan) centered system. Then, he spread the movement to all the Baekje`s area with winning both battles of Duryangi-fortress and Gosabi-fortress in April 661. But, on his way Dochim, companion of the movement, made effort to withdraw Tang`s troops through a negotiation, the forces be faced with crisis such as Ongsan-fortress, a major hotspot for defense, were taken to Silla, a military alliance with Tang, in the end of september 661 and some areas surrendered to it, etc. Boksin made it as an opportunity, removed Dochim and was able to change the political situation. Then he caught the political power entirely after he subdued Pungchang who came back to Baekje in December 661. From then, Boksin took the lead in all forces of the movement. But he lost again the main fortresses one after another owing to attacks of Silla and Tang forces resumed from July 662. Besides, though he tried to transfer capital to Pi-fortress in December 662 for changing this situation, this plan failed because of the loss of the `Important Places,` e.g. four southern provinces and Dukan-fortress, in February 663. In the end, Boksin driven into a corner was killed by the coup of King Pung.
김병남 (사)한국인물사연구회 2014 한국인물사연구 Vol.21 No.-
Boksin as a diplomatic representative of Baekje was dispatched to Tang in 627 for a mission making a favorable international environment for expansion policy to Silla with which King Mu of Baekje actively had pursued. But King Taizong of Tang sent to Boksin a letter in which he deprecated a military act of Baekje, so Boksin became left the political stage with taking the responsibility for a diplomatic failure. Ironically, it was because of a Baekje’s misfortune that Boksin who had been forgotten for over 30 years rose to main power. He took the lead at once in Baekje’s forces of the revival movement which have been in the crunch, and built foundation which could fight against Silla and Tang by establishing Juryu-fortress(Buan) centered system. Then, he spread the movement to all the Baekje’s area with winning both battles of Duryangi-fortress and Gosabi-fortress in April 661. But, on his way Dochim, companion of the movement, made effort to withdraw Tang’s troops through a negotiation, the forces be faced with crisis such as Ongsan-fortress, a major hotspot for defense, were taken to Silla, a military alliance with Tang, in the end of september 661 and some areas surrendered to it, etc. Boksin made it as an opportunity, removed Dochim and was able to change the political situation. Then he caught the political power entirely after he subdued Pungchang who came back to Baekje in December 661. From then, Boksin took the lead in all forces of the movement. But he lost again the main fortresses one after another owing to attacks of Silla and Tang forces resumed from July 662. Besides, though he tried to transfer capital to Pi-fortress in December 662 for changing this situation, this plan failed because of the loss of the 'Important Places,' e.g. four southern provinces and Dukan-fortress, in February 663. In the end, Boksin driven into a corner was killed by the coup of King Pung.
김병남 백제학회 2019 백제학보 Vol.0 No.27
This study is to review the success and failure of Baekje’s reconstruction movement for grasping the meaning of the movement of a capital to Pi-fortress at that time. It is to seach for the former situation, the background and main agent, and the result of the movement of a capital. The reconstructed Baekje temporarily moved the base from Juryu-fortress to Pi-fortress in December, 662. It is assumed that Pi-fortress was in Kimje, a part of Gobu-myun, Jeongeup-si, Jeollabuk-do. At that time, Baekje concentrated on organic networking with regional powers which responded to Juryu leading forces after April, 661. But as this powers was descending into a power struggle, regional reconstruction army not banded together yet was left alone. So Baekje lost most of strategic bases in eastern part of Gum-river. For this made slack and broken to reconstruction army who confronted Silla-Tang coalition forces. In this situation, movement of a capital to Pi-fortress was a political strategy for resolving the crisis of the Reconstructed Baekje. It might bring psychological stability to people in the Reconstructed Baekje who was overwhelmed with nervousness for an attack of Silla-Tang coalition forces and solve a problem about food provision. So the issue of movement was formulated and carried out by Boksin who seized political power in December, 662. But in spite of the movement, Baekje lost 4 southern and 1 eastern provinces in February 663, so it brought crisis to Baekje. An attempt at movement ended in failure, and Boksin’s political position was dwindling. Finally it served as a momentum to overthrow Pung king by his bodyguards in June 663. 본고는 백제 부흥운동기에 단행된 피성 천도의 의미를 파악하고자 부흥백제국의 천도 전 상황, 천도의 배경과 주체, 그리고 천도의 결과 등을 다각도로 살펴봄으로써 백제 부흥운동의 성패에 대해 재음미해 보려는 것이다. 부흥백제국은 662년 12월에 근거지를 주류성에서 피성으로 일시 옮겼다. 이 피성은 ‘辟城’·‘碧骨’ 등과 연관된 곳으로, 백제의 中方인 古沙城(전북 정읍 고부면)의 일부인 김제 지역으로 추정된다. 당시 백제 땅은 661년 4월 이후 주류성 체제에 각 지역 세력들이 호응하면서 이들의 결속에 주력하는 중이었다. 하지만 일정 정도의 성과를 얻은 부흥백제 주도세력이 권력 다툼에 빠지면서 아직 공고하지 않은 지역 부흥군을 방치하였다. 이로 인해 나·당군과 직접 대치하는 최전선의 부흥세력에게 긴장감 해이와 결속력 와해를 불러와 지라성·윤성·대산책·사정책 및 진현성·내사지성 등 금강 이동 지역의 전략적 근거지 대부분을 상실하고 말았던 것이다. 이러한 상황 속에서 ‘피성 천도’는 부흥백제국의 위기를 타개하기 위한 정치적 셈법이었다. 나·당군의 공세에 대해 불안감에 휩싸인 부흥백제국 구성원들의 심리적 안정감을 갖게 하고, 더불어 지속되는 전쟁 상태로 인한 식량 수급을 원활하게 유지하는 문제가 함께 작용한 것이었다. 따라서 662년 12월에 복신 주도로 피성 천도가 공식화 되었고, 정국을 장악한 복신의 의도에 따라 단행되었다. 하지만 피성 천도에도 불구하고 오히려 663년 2월 거열·거물·사평 등 남반4주와 동방 덕안성을 공략 당함으로써 부흥백제국에게 총체적 위기만 야기하였고, 피성 천도를 무위로 돌리고 말았다. 따라서 복신 주도의 천도는 실패하였고, 그 후유증은 서서히 권력 기반마저 잠식하였으며, 마침내는 663년 6월 풍왕의 친위정변까지 초래하는 계기로 작용하였다.