http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
재발성 기침과 천명을 가진 소아환아의 알레르기 검사에 대한 고찰
이석규(Suk Kyeu Lee),이기창(Ki Chang Lee),박찬정(Chan Jung Park),조현정(Hyeon Jung Cho),김광우(Kwang Woo Kim) 대한소아알레르기호흡기학회(구 대한소아알레르기 및 호흡기학회) 1995 소아알레르기 및 호흡기학회지 Vol.5 No.2
N/A Asthmatic bronchitis and asthma are very common allergic diseases in the pediatric age group. These are lower respiratory disease which shows cough, wheeze and shortness of breath. Various rales and wheezing can be heard in asthma and asthmatic bronchitis if superimposed with pneumonia. It is often difficult to diagnosis clearly. So, we intended to know the allergic characteristics in these disease (asthma, asthmatic bronchitis, pneumonia) together. Eight hundred ninety eight cases (male; 587, female; 311) were taken allergic skin tests, peripheral eosinophil counts, serum total IgE, specific IgE and symptom scores who were admitted or visited outpatient clinic. 1) In the allergic skin tests, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp) shows 39.2% over 2 positive and 4 positive reactivity was 42.3% in positive group, Dp reactions shows more sensitive than Df reactions. The skin reaction on egg was greater than milk but only about one percent in all cases. 2) Total IgE was shown no correlation with age, sex, PB eosinophil count, wheal and erythema on allergic skin test. 3) Total IgE and specific IgE for Dp, Df made gradual increment in percentage in according to going to upper class of IgE. 4) The Class 2 and Class 3 of total IgE appeared three-forth in all patients (class 2: low to moderate, class 3: high). Also, the rates were increased with age increment. In conclusion, total IgE and specific IgE (especially in Dp, Df) are more specific diagnostic tools in early age group compare to adult and old children who have asthma, pneumonia and other lower respiratory diseases.
이석규(Suk Kyoo Lee),이재기(Jae Ki Lee),변영덕(Yung Duk Pyun) 한국경영학회 2001 經營學硏究 Vol.30 No.3
This paper aims to research for the model that supports logical and theoretical back grounds of expressway toll charge decision, to investigate whether the model can reflect comprehensively various interests of persons concerned with expressway, and to analyze practical applicability of the model in short time perspectives. The major findings of this study can be summarized as follows. First, the model suggested by this study furnishes logical frameworks which can explain how the equilibrium toll charge of expressway can be attained. Second, the model of this study presents theoretical logics and practical methods that can calculate the basic toll charge and the variable toll charge which are key concepts in the two-part tariff system. Third, the model of this study has powerful practical applicabilities in the reasonable toll charge decision and in the explanation for the balance of interests among persons concerned with expressway.
이석규 ( Suk Gyu Lee ) 단국대학교법학연구소 2009 법학논총 Vol.33 No.2
Partnership Taxation System has been taken effect on January 1st, 2009. It is more advanced than the Joint Enterprise Taxation System in the respect that the application of the law has been extended. The Joint Enterprise Taxation System has been applied only to the Joint Enterprises between the individuals, but in comparison to the Joint Enterprise Taxation System, the Partnership Taxation System can be applied to the Joint Enterprises between the residents, non-residents, domestic corporations, and foreign corporations. However, it has the potential to become a very complicated law because the income distributed to the residents and non-residents are subject to the income tax, while the income distributed to the domestic corporations and foreign corporations are subject to the corporation tax. Because it is a law which is enacted recently, there is no knowing if it is legislated based on the conciseness of the law. However, although it had been discussed a lot about the problems caused by the inadequacy of the Joint Enterprise Taxation System, the Partnership Taxation System also has inadequate regulations about that problems. For this reason, it has a possibility of falling into confusion. For example, there is a regulation about the assignment income in the Partnership Taxation System. It is applied when an investor invests actual things(goods)-which is subject to the capital gains tax-in a partnership. Although the investments in kind are subject to the capital gains tax, it is very obscure to see it as the capital gains because of the vague regulation, especially in many cases which are mentioned below. The investments in kind are sometimes transferred to the third party, returned in cash or in kind to the investor, or returned in the residual property caused by the withdrawer from the partnership. Also, sometimes the shares of the partners which have withdrawn are returned to the partnership or transferred to another partner. As noticed, the regulation concerning the investments in kind which is subject to the capital gains tax is very ambiguous in the current Partnership Taxation System. Therefore, I wish we could legislate the clear regulations about it.