http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 조학행 (검색결과 38 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
조학행 대한언어학회 1995 언어학 Vol.3 No.-
Jo, Hak-haeng(1995). On Verifying the Adequacy of 'Holomeric' Phonology.' Linguistics vol. 3. This paper presents a certain unknown aspect of phonological reality, namely, the holomeric one. Up to the present, when we study natural language, the analysis and investigation of given data has been realized within a confined sphere in both structural and transformational grammar theories. But an axiomatic approach to phonological reality allows to infer theorems which seem to shed light on the holomeric one. The holomeric principle operating within the structure of an entity presupposes that the whole entity is encoded in each of its parts. This makes it possible to reproduce the whole from the information present in any part of this whole. Holomeric aspects of phones, phonetic dimensions and phonological relations are discussed. And the adequacy of holomeric phonology as a universal one is also verified.
-
-
-
조학행,서정민 대한언어학회 2003 언어학 Vol.11 No.1
This paper investigates the emergence of the unmarked (henceforth, TETU) in reduplication according to Correspondence Theory. In the original Correspondence Theory (McCarthy & Prince, 1995a), which is universally quantified, the alternation in the base for TETU brings about opacity. The opacity arises when the reduplicant contains materials which are not present in the base. In this paper the modified Correspondence Theory (Struijke, 2000) will be compared with the original Correspondence Theory (McCarthy & Prince, 1995a). We think these two correspondence models differ in their account of TETU. To explain the difference, first we will analyse TETU in Kwakwala according to Correspondence Theory (McCarthy & prince, 1995a). However, though the model can explain TETU in the reduplicant, it cannot analyse TETU in the base. Therefore, we apply a new TETU approach to Kwkwala according to the modified Correspondence Theory (Struijke, 2000). which is existentially quantified.
-
조학행,정병균 조선대학교 인문학연구소 2000 外國文化硏究 Vol.23 No.1
The main purpose of this paper is to reveal that by-phrase in passive is an adjunct, not an optional complement and to analyse the passive constructions on the basis of hypotheses of Bouma, Malouf & Sag(1999). Passive type has its various subtypes such as general-passive, pseudo-passive, ditransitive-passive, raising passive, etc. And they are constrained according to their distinct properties. Traditionally, by-phrase in passives has been assumed to be an optional complement of passive verbs. But, considering quantifier scoping, distributional behaviour and binding of by-phrase, it is hard to regard it as a pure complement. So the prepositional phrase, by-phrase, has been treated as adjunct in previous studies so far: Kiparsky (1987), Grimshaw(1990) and Wechsler (1995). We present the various mechanisms within the framework of HPSG, especially Manning & Sag (1998), Bouma, Malouf & Sag (1999), introduce the specific constraints on our various passive types, and then formulate the passive type hierarchy.
-
-
-
영어 수동구문의 by-phrase와 한국어 수동구문의 -에/에게
조학행,정병균 조선대학교 인문학연구소 2001 인문학연구 Vol.25 No.-
The main purpose of his paper is three-fold: First, we summarize the arguments that by-phrase in English passives is an adjunct, not an optional complement and analyse the passive constructions on the basis of hypotheses of Bouma, Malouf & Sag(1998). That is, the prepositional phrase, by-phrase, has been treated as an adjunct in previous studies so far: Kiparsky(1987), Grimshaw(1990),Wechsler(1995) and Jo & Chung(2000). Second, we point out that the dative particle -ey/eykey shows that it is a postposition rether than a morphological case-marker. We use the various tests to see if -ey/eykey is a case or a postposition. Third, on the basis of Urushibara(1991), O'Grady(1991) and Chung(1995), we argue the -ey/eykey in Korean passives should not be a complement but an adjunt. Empirically, we have also demostrated that our argument enable us to analyse further Korean passive types in Korean.(Chosun University)
-
趙鶴行 조선대학교 교육연구소 1978 교과교육연구 Vol.1 No.-
It has been assumed in the standard theory of phonology that rules apply extrinsically ordered in natural language. However, some years ago this assumption has been challenged. Koutsoudas, Sanders, and Noll(1974) (henceforth KSN), in particular, have argued that no phonological rules need to be ordered, and that the relative order of rule application is predictable by universal principles, thereby dispensing with language-specific ordering statements. On the contrary, in recent years, Cathey and Demers(1976) (henceforth CD), have claimed that the KSN hypothesis for unordered rules does not have linguistically significant universals. The purpose of this paper is to compare the two hypotheses of KSN and CD and also to confirm the justification for the extrinsic rule order. It is shown in section one that some types of rule ordering relationships are explained according to KSN's theory. It is hown in section two that whether or not the method used by KSN to make the simulataneous application principle workable is theoretic-ally motivated. In section three, CD's proposals for extrinsic ordering against the KSN theory are also introduced. It is shown in section four that some evidence for extrinsic rule ordering in Korean phonology is investigated. At the end of this paper it is verified that the extrinsic rule ordering in natural language is more natural and more descriptively adequate.
-
KCI연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
