http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
임일한 대한갑상선학회 2013 International Journal of Thyroidology Vol.6 No.1
Radionuclide therapies have been applied in the diverse fields of medicine, and it has been demonstrated the usefulness of it, especially in the field of oncology. Accurate dosimetric assessment is imperative during radionuclide therapy, in order to optimize the treatment efficacy for target sites and to minimize the radiation exposure for normal organ. Recent advancement in imaging technology permits the precise determination of the absorbed dose non-invasively. This imaging based dosimetry can be routinely applicable to the bedside in the near future.
임일도(Rim, Il-Do),김범기(Kim Beom-Gi) 한국국가법학회 2011 공법논총 Vol.7 No.1
인간의 생명은 인간 존엄의 생물학적 기초이자 모든 개별 기본권의 주체인 인간의 지위를 유지시켜 주는 핵심적인 법익이다. 그러므로 인간의 생명은 최대한 존중받아야 하고, 어떠한 침해로부터도 보호되어야 한다. 또한 우리 헌법의 최고이념인 인간으로서의 존엄과 가치 및 행복을 추구할 권리에는 자신의 삶을 스스로 결정할 수 있는 인간의 인격적 자율성이 당연한 전제이자 본질적인 구성요소가 된다고 보아야 하고, 그에 따라 인간의 존엄을 실현시키는 자기결정권도 보장된다. 국가는 헌법에 의하여 인정되는 국민의 기본권을 보장하여야 할 의무가 있고, 이를 위하여 구체적인 입법을 통하여 기본권을 구체화할 필요가 있는바, 위와 같은 상황에서 연명치료 중단 등의 문제를 아무런 기준의 제시 없이 당해 의사나 환자 본인, 가족들의 판단에만 맡겨두는 상황이 지속되는 것은 바람직하지 않다 할 것이다. 그러므로 ‘연명치료 중단에 관한 자기결정권’을 보장하는 방법에 대해서는 사회적 논의가 무르익고 공론절차를 거친후 신속하게 국회가 입법을 추진하여야 한다. The right to refuse treatment should be recognized as a part of constitutional right of self-determination under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and under the Article 10 of the Korea Constitution. The right to refuse treatment should neither be associated with the death with dignity, nor euthanasia. The decision of the Court, the Supreme Court Korea, in Supreme court en banc Decision 2009Da17417 decided May 21, 2009, also concluded that a patient who reaches the irrevocable death stage is allowed to ask descontinuance of life-sustaining treatment exercising the constitutional fundamental right of self-determination. It is now settled in the Korean constitutional law that there is a ‘constitutional fundamental right of self-determination to refuse life-sustaining treatment’ even though descontinuance of the treatment may result in the death of the patient. The majority opinion decided that in case where it is acknowledged that, in state of irreversible coma, the patient exercises the right to self-determination based on human dignity, value and the right to pirsuit of happiness, the withdrawal can be allowed. And it also stressed that in case where, under a patient’s usual sense of value or belief, etc., it can be scknowledged that since removing the life-sustaining treatment objectively corresponds to the patient’s best interests, the patient would choose not to mauntain the treatment, even if the patient were given an opportunity of exercising his ir her right to self-determination, then his or her intention can be presumed. The fight to die with dignity means that all human beings have the right to decide the time and method of dying on the basis of autonomy. The right to die with dignity also includes not only the right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment but also under some strict conditions the right to ruquire active aid in dying. Like other rights the right to die dignity can be restricted by harm principle and right abuse prohibition principle.
임일도(Lim Il-Do) 한국부동산법학회 2003 不動産法學 Vol.9 No.-
Public Works for the Complementary and Purchase of Land Law was made on February 4, 2002 and it is enforced from January 1, 2003. We have two kinds law before this law made. One is the Acquisition of Public Land and Complementary Act is belong to the private law. The other is the Compulsory Purchase of Land Law is belong to the public law. There was the section which was duplicated each other, and the two law caused disorder. Therefore, scholars and lawyer hoped to be unified in the law that two law was one. According to this law to have been unified is to be born in this time. But, the above problem has not been solved satisfactorily yet. That was did not reflected expert opinion. Therefore, this law is going to indicate a problem to have. the First, It must exchange the protection which property rights are reasonable for the term that was just protection of property rights in this law article 1. the Second, It will elide "to use must delete land according to other law except" in this law article 4, section 7. the Third, It deleted a signature seal rule of the public employee who participated in the spot in new law, or an owner of he pertinent land deleted the rule that had to be included above 30% in this with configuration of a commissioner of a deliberation committee and did not leave a detailed rule of execution by proxy. This is because the side preserving private property rights grows weak. the Fourth, local Committee of Expropriation have same power of the National Committee of Expropriation. Therefore, it must do it in order to be able to Local Committee with an independence legislative organ. The fifth, this judge's robe article 91, section 6 must be elide. the Lastly, range of a Compensation must be expanded.
The Effect of the Personalized Settings for CF-Based Recommender Systems
임일,김병호 한국지능정보시스템학회 2012 지능정보연구 Vol.18 No.2
In this paper, we propose a new method for collaborative filtering (CF)-based recommender systems. Traditional CF-based recommendation algorithms have applied constant settings such as a reference group (neighborhood) size and a significance level to all users. In this paper we develop a new method that identifies optimal personalized settings for each user and applies them to generating recommendations for individual users. Personalized parameters are identified through iterative simulations with ‘training’ and ‘verification’ datasets. The method is compared with traditional ‘constant settings’ methods using Netflix data. The results show that the new method outperforms traditional, ordinary CF. Implications and future research directions are also discussed.