An Effective Bioinformatics Tool for Multiple Sequence Acquisition and Translation

이혜리(Hye Ri Lee),이승희(Seung-Hee Lee),이건명(Keon Myung Lee),김성수(Sung-Soo Kim),이찬희(Chan-Hee Lee),이성덕(Sung-Duk Lee) 한국지능시스템학회 2008 한국지능시스템학회논문지 Vol.18 No.1

많은 바이오인포매틱스 관련 데이터베이스와 도구가 네트워크를 통해서 제공되고 있고, 이들을 효과적으로 활용하면 생물학적 분석을 적은 비용으로 우수한 결과를 얻을 수 있다. 이 논문에서는 주어진 질의에 대해서 잠재적으로 관련된 DNA 서열 정보를 획득하고, 분석자가 관심있는 항목을 선택하면, 선택된 항목에 대한 모든 DNA 서열 정보를 확보하고, 이들에 대해서 아미노산 서열로 자동변환하여 ORF라는 정보를 활용하여 가장 가능성이 큰 것을 추천하는 도구를 소개한다. 해당 도구에는 웹 로봇 기법과 ORF 검색등을 위한 생물학적 지식을 활용한다.

시내면세점의 점포분위기, 인지적 평가, 감정적 평가 및 행동반응간의 관계에 대한 연구 : 중국 소비자 대상으로

이혜리(Hye-Ri Lee),홍광희(Kwang-Hee Hong),채명수(Myung-Su Chae) 한국외국어대학교 지식출판콘텐츠원 글로벌경영연구소 2017 글로벌경영연구 = Journal of global business research Vol.29 No.1

최근 쇼핑을 목적으로 방한하는 중국 관광객들의 꾸준한 증가로 인해 국내 면세점산업의 성장세에 맞춰 관광활성화를 위한 마케팅전략이 무엇보다 필요한 시점이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 면세점(duty-free shop)의 점포분위기가 소비자의 인지적 평가, 감정적 평가 및 행동반응에 미치는 영향 관계를 분석하였다. 본 연구 모형의 기본적인 바탕으로 S-O-R(Stimulus-Organism-Response)모델을 이용하였으며, 특히 유기체(organism)중 소비자들이 감정적 평가를 하는 경우 PAD(Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance)척도 각각의 상호 인과관계를 살펴보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 한국에 방문하여 서울 시내 면세점을 이용한 경험이 있는 중국 관광객 219명을 대상으로 설문조사를 하였으며, SPSS(19.0 version)와 AMOS(19.0 version)을 사용하여 수집된 자료를 분석하였다. 연구 결과 첫째, 면세점의 점포분위기 요인들 중 소비자의 인지적 평가에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 요인으로는 레이아웃 & 디자인(Layout and Design factor), 구매시점(Point-of-Purchase factor), 인적 요인(Human factor)으로 나타났지만 일반적 인테리어 요인(General Interior factor)은 유의한 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 인지적 평가는 감정적 평가인 환기와 지배력에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤으며, 즐거움은 환기와 지배력을 매개한 감정 차원인 것으로 밝혀졌다. 이러한 결과를 토대로 본 연구에서는 3가지의 감정 유형에 따라 상호 인과 관계가 형성되는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 셋 째, 감정적 평가의 즐거움은 소비자의 행동반응 중 접근(approach)행동에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. Duty-free shop industry is booming recently due to the continuous increasing numbers of Chinese tourists for their shopping in Korea and relevant marketing strategies is desparately needed to cope with this trend. This research analyzes effects of store atmosphere of a duty-free shop over consumer’s cognitive and affective evaluation as well as behavior response. This research is based on S-O-R Model, and especially focused on the factors of casual relationship within PAD (Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance) measure of the consumers’ affective evaluation which is also a factor of an Organism. 219 Chinese tourists who have shopping experiences at duty-free shops in Seoul were surveyed and SPSS (v.19.0) and AMOS (v.19.0) were used to analyze collected data. First, this research discovered layout & design, point-of-purchase and human factors of shop atmosphere had positive influence on consumers’ cognitive evaluation whereas general interior factor was insignificant. Second, cognitive evaluation has positive effect on arousal and dominance, which are the factors of affective evaluation. Further, the relationship between cognitive evaluation and pleasure was mediated by arousal and dominance. Based on these results, this study identified 3 factors of affective evaluation has causal relationship between one another. Lastly, analysis confirmed that pleasure, an affective evaluation, had positive effects on approach behavior of consumers’ behavior response.

미국법상 약속적 금반언에 기한 전계약적 책임

이혜리(Hye-Ri Lee) 한국비교사법학회 2008 비교사법 Vol.15 No.4

Since parties in entering the contract strongly wish to maximize the possibility of its successful completion, they spent substantial amount of time in negotiation. During this negotiation, a party often might mislead other party to think the contract would be entered although they have not formalized the contract yet. Relying on such appearance, the other party might result in incuring the expense in preparing so that he or she can successfully enter the contract. Under such circumstance, Korean law provides the remedy for the other party based on tort law since there is no contract has been established. On the other hand, the American law classifies the different basis for precontractual liability(unjust enrichment resulting from the negotiations, misrepresentation made during the negotiations, agreement to negotiation in good faith, specific promise made during the negotiations-promissory estoppel). Especially the American case(Hoffman v. Red owl Stores) has found the precontractual liability by ruling that the act of reliance by the promisee to his detriment provided a substitute for consideration and promissory estoppel. furthermore, such promissory estoppel originally was invoked as a substitute for consideration rendering a gratuitous promise enforcible as a contract. However, under Hoffman case, it is not clear when promissory estoppel should be applied. Not only that, the court does not illustrate the extent of damage the court could provide under promissory estoppel. After Hoffman case, there are many different theories relating to promissory estoppel in precontractual liability. Different theories argue whether promissory estoppel is based on torts law or contract law or both or either. However, it seems that which part of civil law that promissory estoppel is based on does not matter if promissory estoppel provides the basis for remedy under precontractual liability. In order to accomplish the above goal we need to come up with more stable and definite formular for its application and damages for the loss.

개인파산에 있어서 신용상담제도 도입의 필요성

이혜리(Hye-Ri Lee) 한국비교사법학회 2007 비교사법 Vol.14 No.2

  On Sept. 23rd, 2004, the new Korean ‘the Act on Debtor"s Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy" was newly modified in order to solve the problems caused by the previous Act on Bankruptcy. However, it unlikely includes any kind of aids to help debtors to walk through the process in filing for bankruptcy so it often tends to lead the uneducated debtors to use the bankruptcy as an escape rather than a last resort for their economic crisis. In order to prevent the abusive use of filing for bankruptcy, the United States"s law makers already introduced ‘credit counseling" in ‘the Bankruptcy Abuse and Consumer Protection Act of 2005". ‘Credit counseling" is to require a debtor to be counseled respect to his financial situation and consequence of filing for bankruptcy before filing it. This paper mainly discusses the necessity of ‘credit counseling" process in Korean bankruptcy law, practice of credit counseling in the U.S. and finally its application to Korean bankruptcy law.<BR>  Firstly, why Korean bankruptcy law should adopt the ‘credit counseling", since: ① Debtors can be aware of any other alternatives to bankruptcy, ② Debtors can use this counseling to financially rehabilitate himself, ③ By preventing the abuse of bankruptcy, it reduces the loss on social costs. Secondly, the practice of the credit counseling in the U.S. is; ① What? When a debtor files for bankruptcy, he or she has to get briefing that outlined the opportunities for available credit counseling and assisting in performing a related budget analysis. ② Where? When a debtor gets such counseling, he or she should get it in an approved nonprofit budget and credit counseling agency. ③ When? 180 days before a debtor files for bankruptcy. Nextly, the credit counseling in the U.S. has caused the following problems; ① When a debtor receives any advices from credit counselor, even though the issues addressed by the counselor involves legal aspect of the debtor"s financial situation but the counselors are not legal professionals, ② costs and expenses for providing credit counseling, ③ Supervision of the approved nonprofit budget and credit counseling agencies. Finally, this paper discuss how the credit counseling can be legislated into Korean bankruptcy law. It is necessary to make the credit counseling mandatory to prevent the abuse of bankruptcy but some adjustment should be made to be more appropriate to Korean society and legal system. For example, not only the nonprofit agency but also Korean Legal Aid Cooperation takes responsibility together in administering credit counseling so that the contents of the counseling would be more professional and unbiased. Furthermore, range of counseling of agency should be limited to drafting a plan for payment of debts and the rest of legal aid should be left to Korean Legal Aid Cooperation. Credit counseling is more practical and fundamental solution to a debtor"s financial crisis and national problem caused by the increased number of bankrupted individuals, therefore, it should be adopted.

영국법상 절차보조인에 관하여

이혜리(Lee Hye Ri) 한국가족법학회 2016 가족법연구 Vol.30 No.3

On 2016.2.3. the Korean Civil Procedure Act has been modified. According to modified Civil Procedure Act art. 55(1), a minor, a quasi-incompetent person, or an incompetent person may conduct procedural acts only through his/her legal representative: Provided, that the same shall not apply to cases where a minor or a quasi-incompetent person is able to independently conduct procedural acts. Although the act granted the ability to sue to a minor, a quasi-incompetent person, or an incompetent person, however, they may have a hard time to proceed the lawsuit since their physical and mental capacity is challenged. Therefore, the article 143-2 allows a person, who is mentally or physically challenged to state words necessary to carry on the legal case, to appoint an assistive personnel for appearing at the court. However, the act is silent on the rights, duties, and qualifications of the assistant. This paper has reviewed different types of assistive personnels in a law suits or matters related to law under United Kingdom law since it has recently passed the Mental Capacity Act 2005. There are assistive personnels in legal cases and matters such as a litigation friend, an intermediary, independent mental capacity advocate, and so forth. Among these, the intermediary seems similar to an assistive personnel under the article 143-2 of Civil Procedure Act because it is to help a witness in communication at the court. However, an intermediary under UK law is mainly for child victims for sexual crimes. So it seems that further study is necessary to make a regulation for the rights, duties, and qualifications of an assistive personnel under 143-2 of Civil Procedure Act.

연구논문(硏究論文) : 과실에 기한 잘못된 정보제공으로 인한 책임

이혜리 ( Hye Ri Lee ) 법조협회 2013 法曹 Vol.62 No.1

잘못된 정보의 제공으로 인한 불법행위책임에 관한 기존의 판례와 학설은 책임 성립을 위한 요소를 단순히 나열하는 것에 그치고 논리적 근거나 체계적 정합성이 부족한 면이 있었다. 이에 본고는 기존의 판례 및 학설과 함께 독일, 영국, 미국에서의 법리를 비교하고 논리적으로 분석함으로써 잘못된 정보제공으로 인한 책임의 요건을 우리 민법의 체계에 맞게 구체화하고자 하였다. 잘못된 정보제공으로 인한 책임 역시 불법행위책임이므로 민법 제750조에 따라 가해자의 고의 또는 과실, 책임능력, 가해행위의 위법성, 가해행위에 의한 손해 발생 등이 요건이 된다. 그 중 위법성이 가장 문제가 되는데, 매수자 위험부담주의(Ceveet Emptor)의 원칙상 잘못된 정보제공 그 자체만으로는 위법하다고 할 수 없고 별도의 위법성 표지가 필요하다. 위법성, 즉 의무위반은 법령이나 계약상의 의무가 있는 경우 외에도 정보수령자의 ``정당한 신뢰``가 있는 경우에도 인정될 수 있다. 정당한 신뢰가 있는지 여부는 영국의 Hedley 판결에서 제시된 내용처럼 정보수령자의 신뢰의 합리성과 정보제공자의 예견가능성을 기준으로 판단해야 한다. 신뢰의 합리성 여부를 판단할 때 이용될 수 있는 중요한 자료로는 정보제공자가 공신력과 전문성이 있는지 여부, 정보의 진실성에 대하여 보증 내지는 특별한 신뢰를 부여하였는지 여부, 정보제공을 통하여 금전적 이익을 얻게 되는지 여부, 제공된 정보가 중요한 사항에 관한 것인지 여부, 정보수령자가 정보를 직접 수령했는지 여부 등이 있다. 특히, 정보제공자의 책임이 인정되는 사례의 범위는 간접적 정보수령이라는 사정을 어떻게 평가할 것인지에 따라 큰 영향을 받는데, 정보제공자가 정보의 간접적 수령자에 대하여 의무를 부담하는지 여부는 정보의 목적 범위와 정보제공자의 예견가능성에 의하여 판단하는 것이 온당하다. 잘못된 정보제공이 위법하다고 평가되는 경우에도 고의나 과실 등 다른 불법행위의 요건들이 요구된다. 이 때 과실, 즉 주의의무 위반은 예견가능성과 회피가능성을 전제로 하는데, 여기서의 예견 및 회피의 대상은 잘못된 정보의 제공 그 자체에 관한 것이므로, 정보수령자의 신뢰 및 처분에 관한 예견가능성을 주된 내용으로 하는 위법성 요소로서의 예견가능성과는 주안점이 다르다. Ceses end studies ebout tort liebility on supplying felse informetions, which ere mede end done so fer, heve been merely listing the fectors for edmitting the liebility, end they cennot provide the logicel ground or the structurel consistency. Therefore, this peper enelyzes the Koreen ceses & theories end comperes them with the lews of Germeny, Englend, end the United Stetes, therefore, it eims to come up with the specific elements for edmitting liebility which fit to our Koreen civil lew system. Since liebility on supplying felse informetions is elso besed on tort liebility, eccording to Koreen Civil Cede erticle 750, the elements such es the tortfeesor`s intent, responsibility, unlewfulness of the hermful ect, end demege ceused by the hermful ect must be proven. Emong them, unlewfulness metters the most, end besed on principle of Ceveet Emptor, supplying felse informetion itself cennot be considered es unlewful. Therefore, it is necessery to heve the seperete elements to edmit its unlewfulness. Unlewfulness, in other words, breech of duty of cere cen be esteblished when there is not only stetutory or contrectuel duty to supply informetions, but elso ``reesoneble relience`` on e recipient of the informetion. In order to decide whether there is reesoneble relience or not, the court should consider reesonebleness of relience on e recipient of the informetion end predictebility on e supplier of the informetion es it is showed in Hedley cese in Englend. It is importent to consider the following things in order to decide reesonebleness of relience; whether the supplier hes the creditebility end professionelity, whether the supplier give the guerenty or speciel relience ebout the truthfulness of the informetion, whether the supplier hes pecuniery interest in supplying the informetion, whether the supplied informetion is on the importent metter, whether the recipient received the informetion directly or not. Especielly, the scope of the ceses in which the supplier`s liebility is edmitted, depends on how the court views the circumstence thet the informetion is received indirectly. Therefore, when the court decide whether the supplier is lieble for the recipient who receives informetions indirectly, it should consider the purpose of informetion, its intended renge end the supplier`s foreseeebility. Even when supplying felse informetion is considered es unlewful, other elements for torts such es intent or negligence is required. Here, negligence, in other words, breech of duty is premised on predictebility end evoidebility. Within-nemed predictebility end evoidebility is ebout the supplying felse informetions itself, so they ere different from the predictebility es en element for unlewfulness beceuse the letter focuses on the recipient`s predictebility on relience end the disposition.

현미 중 Metazosulfuron의 잔류 분석법 확립

이혜리 ( Hye Ri Lee ),김은혜 ( Eun Hye Kim ),도정아 ( Jung Ah Do ),오재호 ( Jae Ho Oh ),김정한 ( Jeong Han Kim ) 한국환경농학회 2012 한국환경농학회 학술대회집 Vol.2012 No.-

보증인 보호를 위한 특별법에 관한 검토

이혜리(Lee Hye-Ri) 성균관대학교 법학연구소 2011 성균관법학 Vol.23 No.3

The Korean Congress has passed "An Special Act on the Protection of Guarantors" in 2008. The purpose of this Act is to contribute to the solid establishment of a credit society by providing for special cases to the Civil Law with regard to guarantees to protect guarantors who provide guaranties without consideration but only out of courtesy from suffering economic and mental harm and to establish reasonable practices for contract on guaranty for pecuniary obligation. The above act only applies to a guarantor who provides guaranties without consideration. According to the Act, the contract of guaranty has to be on writing and the range of its obligation should be specified. Furthermore, if the creditor is an bank or the similar institute, then the Act requires such creditor to provide an information about the debtor's credit status to a guarantor. This article is to examine and criticize the contents of the Act through comparing it with the 2004's the amendment draft of Civil Law because the Act shares the similar features of the amendment draft. Meanwhile, this paper would introduce the relevant law in other countries such as Japan, Germany, and Switzerland in order to analyze the main provisions on the Act.

미국법상 부자관계에 있어서 친생추정의 법리

이혜리(Hye Ri Lee),이상용(Sang Yong Lee) 충남대학교 법학연구소 2018 法學硏究 Vol.29 No.4

캘리포니아법상 친생자 추정 제도는 확정적 추정과 번복 가능한 추정의 둘로 나뉘어 있다. 확정적 추정의 경우는 요건이 보다 까다롭지만 번복도 그만큼 어렵다. 번복 가능한 추정의 경우는 요건이 보다 완화되어 있지만 번복이 비교적 용이하다. 부성 추정을 위한 경로가 복수이므로 부성 추정의 경합과 그 우선순위에 관한 기준도 마련되어 있다. 캘리포니아법상 친생자 추정 제도는 단순히 자 개인의 보호에 그치는 것이 아니라 사회적으로 보호가치 있는 친자관계 자체를 보호하려는 태도를 취한다. 그리고 그러한 보호가 해체된 가정에도 미친다는 점은 혼인 중심의 규율을 벗어난 친자관계의 규율이 가능하고 또 바람직한 것일 수 있음을 보여준다. 한국의 친생자 추정 제도는 획일적 친생 추정에 관한 법규정과 이를 제한하여 일정한 경우에 추정의 번복을 허용하기 위한 이론으로 구성되어 있다. 대법원 판례는 전통적으로 외관설을 취해 왔지만 하급심 판례 가운데에는 혈연설을 취하는 것도 적지 않다. 일부 학설은 이혼 등 가정파탄이 인정되는 경우에 한해 혈연주의를 적용하여 친생 추정을 번복할 수 있게 한 절충적 입장을 취하기도 한다. 절충설이 비교적 합리적이기는 하나 관점과 판단기준에 있어서 오늘날의 사회적 요구에 부합하지 않는다. 즉, 종래의 절충설은 혈연관계의 존부에 과도하게 의존하고 있고, 부분적으로 혈연주의를 제한하기 위한 요소로서 실질적 부자관계의 존재 여부보다는 부부간 혼인관계의 존속여부를 중시하고 있다는 점에서 문제가 있다. 친생 추정의 번복에 관한 법리는 자의 복리 및 사회적 부자관계의 보호라는 관점에서 다시 설계될 필요가 있다. 이런 점에서 캘리포니아 법의 친생자 추정제도는 많은 시사점을 던져준다. The rule on presumption of legitimacy under California law is divided into conclusive presumption and rebuttable presumption. Under conclusive presumption, its elements are harder to satisfy and accordingly it is harder to rebut than the latter. Since there are more than one way to establish paternity, California law has the rule to identify which presumtion rule should apply. The rule on presumption of legitimacy under California law concerns not only the protection of the child as an individual but also the relationship between child and father if it is worthy to protect socially. Furthermore, such protection extends to dissolved family. So it is possible and desirable to regulate paternity by focusing on not marriage itself but paternal relationship. On the other hand, Korean law has a strong presumption rule and there are some theories to limit it. Supreme Court of Korea traditionally has followed the theory considering externals(which is similar to Lord Mansfield’s Rule to rebut the presumption only where married couple lived physically apart). On the other hand, some lower courts ruled to admit the blood-test based theory which is to admit the rebuttal of the presumption by blood-test. Some theory follows a compromise on conflicting views by arguing that if there is dismantle of family, then the court can rebut the presumption by applying the blood-test based theory. Although a compromise on conflicting views seems relatively reasonable but it does not accord with the preensocial need of the present time. In other words, the compromising theory is problematic, since it relies excessively on whether there is blood-oriented relationship and weights too much on the marital relationship than the practical paternal relationship as a factor to limit the blood-oriented relationship. It is necessary to reconstruct the presumption of legitimacy and its rebuttal from the viewpoint of the child’s interests and protection of social relationship between child and father. Study on California law on the presumption of legitimacy could be helpful to this endeavor.

고분자전해질연료전지에서 폴리이미드 강화 sPEEK막 MEA의 내구성

이혜리 ( Hye-ri Lee ),나일채 ( Il-chai Na ),오성준 ( Sung-jun Oh ),박권필 ( Kwon-pil Park ) 한국화학공학회 2017 Korean Chemical Engineering Research(HWAHAK KONGHA Vol.55 No.3

최근에 저가의 고분자 전해질 연료전지(Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells, PEMFC)용 비불소계 전해질 막 연구 개발이 활발히 진행되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone) (sPEEK) 막의 내구성을 증가시키기 위해 PI 지지체를 이용한 강화 막을 제조하였다. 단일(비강화) 막전극합체(MEA)와 강화막 MEA의 내구성을 시험하기 위해 열화 가속화 기법을 이용하여 MEA 열화 실험을 진행하였다. 열화 전과 후에 I-V 분극곡선, 수소투과도, 전극 활성 면적, 막 저항과 부하 전달 저항을 측정하여 열화 전과 후를 비교하였다. 그 결과, 강화 MEA가 단일 MEA에 비해 수소투과전류밀도가 낮으며, 내구성이 높음을 확인하였다. 특히 열화 후 강화 MEA에서는 단일 MEA에서 나타난 쇼트 현상이 나타나지 않았다. Recently, there are many efforts focused on development of more economical non-fluorinated membranes for PEMFCs (Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells). In this study, sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone) (sPEEK) membrane reinforced with poly imide was made to enhance of membrane durability. In order to test durability of single (un-reinforced) membrane and reinforced membrane MEA (Membrane and Electrode Assembly), degradation accelerated stress test was used. Before and after degradation, I-V polarization curve, hydrogen crossover current, electrochemical surface area, membrane resistance and charge transfer resistance were measured. As a result of experiments, hydrogen crossover current of reinforced MEA was lower than that of single MEA, therefor durability of reinforced MEA was higher than that of single MEA. There was not especially short phenomena in reinforced MEA after degradation accelerated stress test.