http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이승렬 한국근현대사학회 2006 한국 근현대사 연구 Vol.36 No.-
This essay discusses the first generation of Korean Bourgeoise by examining the cases of Cho Jin-t’ae and Paek Wan-hyǒk, prominent bankers in the time of late Imperial Korea through Japanese colonialism. Cho and Paek, originally merchants in Seoul, worked as the executives and stockholders of Taehan Ch’ǒnil Bank which was institutionalized as part of financial reform by Kwangmu regime and especially Cho served as executive of central bank which Kwangmu regime tried to establish in 1903. They did their works as bankers in the financial reform of the regime with other merchants in Seoul, Kaesǒng and Inch’ǒn. This constituted the process where traditional merchants in dependency upon Chosǒn dynasty transformed themselves into bourgeoise by participating in the conservative modernization initiated by the state. Japanese imperialism, occupying Korea after the outbreak of the Russo-Japanese war, hurried to re-organize the financial and monetary practices to its benefit. Monetary reform project(貨幣整理事業) collapsed Korean monetary and financial system which was based upon nickel coin(白銅貨). Faced with this situation, Cho and Paek initiated the organization of Kyǒngsǒng Commercial Chamber while participating in the colonial financial system established by Japanese imperialism. Their practice remained unchanged also in the colonial days, which took it much to form good relation with the political power. That is, they solidified their good relations with powerful pro-Japanese politicians and Japanese. This tells us that the colonial modernization was based upon the legacies of Kwangmu Reform. While they kept their social status and financial foundations as a return to their cooperation with Japanese colonialism, they couldn’t wield their ideological hegemony upon Korean nationalist movements and also Korean society.
이승렬 한국비교문학회 2004 比較文學 Vol.0 No.33
A new concept of empire has come into being since the nd ofimperialism. A core of that concept lies in the deteritorization of empire.English, the language of empire is a medium in which empire isembodied.This paper undertakes to examine the way in which the mpire isdeteritorized and reteritorized through the medium of English. Inconjunction with the theory of the mpire of English, the paper wil touchupon what English education does with its emphasis upon "practicalnes".It also tries to explain how argument for English as a comon languagein Korea is related with the mphasis upon the practical English. As a resistance to the abuse of English, the paper suggested two things: 1) we must search for the weak points in the networking of empire. University education is one of them. 2) We must relocated English in the movement of the anti-globalization.