慶山 一帶의 斜面形成에 關한 硏究

劉宰臣 陸軍士官學校 1980 한국군사학논집 Vol.20 No.-

This paper is a study on slope process at Gyeong-san area, Korea. Slope forms making topography, slope and climate, rock, regolith, tectonic movement and drainage are main agencies of forming topography. From the view of point of the climates, weathering is relatively active and rocks which have strong resistant forces against weathering make steeper than weak rocks. Generally, the top areas of mountains much weathered were rounded off and convex slopes have been processed when streams make down-cutting if rise processes faster than erosion, concave slopes under the opposite conditions by rill flows or valley streams and straight slopes 엳 새 unconcentrated slope wash and removal of clays and others. Rates of process and slope change may be controlled by the slope angle, or slope angle may be controlled by rates of processes. If we study slope processes quantitively, we prevent much damage due to mass wasting.

가와바타 야스나리의 「파란 바다 검은 바다(青い海黒い海)」論 : 신감각파적 사상과 문장표현

유재신 한국일본문화학회 2008 日本文化學報 Vol.0 No.39

노인돌보미 바우처제도의 발전 방안 모색

유재신 원광대학교 대학원 2008 論文集 Vol.41 No.-

The purpose of this study is to make issues in order to expanding of the Public Assistance which has been a major way of helping people with aging, dementia, paralysis. those social services of cause, were designed to focus on the poor based on the government, social responsibility In a modern society, everybody could be a victim of those unexpected ailment such as long term need caring disease. thus the whole society has to be one to face with those social risks. In this paper I have compared the cases of the voucher system of our country and the other countries as well because before enact the voucher system for the aging care, and assert that we should make standard criteria for selecting clients

寧越, 雙龍里-淵堂里一帶의 karst地形에 관한 硏究

劉宰臣 건국대학교 1977 論文集 Vol.6 No.1

Ssangryongri-Yeondangri located in the southern part of Gangweondo, Korea, have been developed various kinds of karst phenomena. All of them are not distributed in this area, but some make a remarkable progress as follows. 1.Karst phenomena have been developed at the limestone region of Chosun group of Cambro -Ordovician period. 2.The form of land is Bedeckte karst. The conspicuous karst phenomena are Terra Rossa, Doling, and Uvala etc. 3.Lapie´s is exposed where dip is relatively gradual. The solution ditches are growing now. 4.Most Dolines are solution Dolines. Dolines of Yeondangri were developed after gravelly alluvial deposits. 5.Karst cycle corresponds to the end of maturity.

캐나다(토론토)의 한국인과 캐나다에서의 한국연구

유재신 연세대학교 동서문제연구원 캐나다 연구센터 1990 캐나다 연구 Vol.2 No.-

영월 쌍용리 연당리 일대의 Karst 지형에 관한 연구

유재신 한국동굴학회 1979 동굴 Vol.5 No.-

우리나라에는 캠브로-오오도비스기에 속하는 조선누층군의 석회암이 넓게 분포되어 있는데 그들은 3개의 분포지역으로 구분된다. 즉 평안지향사, 삼척지향사 및 옥천지향사와 기타 소규모의 분포를 이루는 지역들이다. 이들 지역에는 국지적으로 Karst지형의 특징이 잘 관찰된다. 우리나라의 Karst 지형에 대한 연구는 개략적인 조사와 연구에 의하여 발표된바 있다.(중략)

Karst landforms의 지구화학적 연구

유재신 한국동굴학회 1991 동굴 Vol.25 No.-

Jeongsun limestone formations with good geochemical solution of limestone and physical environments have been developing many Karst landforms. Especially, there are many dolines and most of them elliptical shapes of planes. At present, they have been transformed into uvala toward their long diameter directions. The period of landscape processing is a Quaternary Epoch and Karst cycle corresponds to a stage from late maturity to old stage.

불교와 기독교

유재신 장로회신대학교 2000 敎會와 神學 Vol.40 No.-

불교

유재신 장로회신학대학교 세계선교연구원 2000 선교와 신학 Vol.6 No.-

퇴직금분할약정의 법리에 대한 비판적 검토

유재신 노동법이론실무학회 2017 노동법포럼 Vol.- No.20

As the severance payment is imperative in our legal system, it is hardly appropriate to consider the severance payment by installment agreement, which is a contract for an employer to provide all or part of legal severance pay periodically along with the wage before the employee's retirement and for an employee not to ask for another severance pay after her retirement, to be valid. Before we start, it is much more reasonable to distinguish whether there's a severance payment by installment "agreement" between the employer and the employee firstly and, if we find the agreement is exist, to distinguish between the case where the "severance payment" is substantially a part of the wage and the case where the "severance payment" exists separately to decide whether the claim for restitution of unjust enrichment from the employer against the employee is admittable. In the latter case, assuming that we just follow present case law, there's no injustice when the severance pay already provided is the same as legal severance pay or less but unbearable injustice in terms of specific validity or labor protection when it exceeds legal severance pay because present cases impute the risk from severance payment by installment agreement which is mostly advantageous to employers to the employee, not the employer. To solve this problem, we should see that the employer's claim for restitution of unjust enrichment against the employee can only be sustained as much as legal severance pay, not all the severance pay already provided in the case where the "severance payment" exists separately from the wage and the severance pay already provided exceeds legal severance pay on the grounds of "good faith doctrine(estoppel doctrine)" or "principle of equity", which means some change of present case law. Further, as for the setoff defense by an employer, it is not allowed when the employer's claim for restitution of unjust enrichment can not be sustained. And even in the case where the employer's claim for restitution of unjust enrichment is admittable, in my opinion, we should not allow the setoff defense by the employer considering the principle of complete payment wages and there's no compelling reason to allow exceptions for it even allowing for the logic of precedents. As the severance payment is imperative in our legal system, it is hardly appropriate to consider the severance payment by installment agreement, which is a contract for an employer to provide all or part of legal severance pay periodically along with the wage before the employee's retirement and for an employee not to ask for another severance pay after her retirement, to be valid. Before we start, it is much more reasonable to distinguish whether there's a severance payment by installment "agreement" between the employer and the employee firstly and, if we find the agreement is exist, to distinguish between the case where the "severance payment" is substantially a part of the wage and the case where the "severance payment" exists separately to decide whether the claim for restitution of unjust enrichment from the employer against the employee is admittable. In the latter case, assuming that we just follow present case law, there's no injustice when the severance pay already provided is the same as legal severance pay or less but unbearable injustice in terms of specific validity or labor protection when it exceeds legal severance pay because present cases impute the risk from severance payment by installment agreement which is mostly advantageous to employers to the employee, not the employer. To solve this problem, we should see that the employer's claim for restitution of unjust enrichment against the employee can only be sustained as much as legal severance pay, not all the severance pay already provided in the case where the "severance payment" exists separately from the wage and the severance pay already provided exceeds legal severance pay on the grounds of "good faith doctrine(estoppel doctrine)" or "principle of equity", which means some change of present case law. Further, as for the setoff defense by an employer, it is not allowed when the employer's claim for restitution of unjust enrichment can not be sustained. And even in the case where the employer's claim for restitution of unjust enrichment is admittable, in my opinion, we should not allow the setoff defense by the employer considering the principle of complete payment wages and there's no compelling reason to allow exceptions for it even allowing for the logic of precedents.