http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
하기용,김기원,장정호,원지윤 대한척추외과학회 1997 대한척추외과학회지 Vol.4 No.2
Study Design : A retrospective analysis was performed on 40 patients who had had previous lumbar spine surgeries. Objective : To determine what factors most influenced surgical outcome and to analyze results in a series of revision lumbar surgeries. Summary of Background Data : Satisfactory surgical outcome of the revision lumbar surgery range from 28% to 82% and are rarely comparable to primary surgery. Many factors predicting outcome from repeat lumbar surgery have been listed. Methods : Forty patients were analyzed who had had previous lumbar surgeries. The patients were classified into 5 groups according to diagnosis: 3 Infection, 5 instability, 8 nonunion, 14 HNP and 10 spinal stenosis. Of 40 patients, 33 patients(82.5%) underwent fusion with instrumentation for repeat surgery. Their clinical course was followed for a minimum of 1 year. The number of surgery on each patient was 1.3 times on an average. Results : Overall, 80% of patients had a satisfactory result. Obviously extruded or sequestrated HNP in MRI findings, complete block of contrast with severe radiculopathy and/or myelopathy in spinal stenosis, complete decompression, neurolysis and fusion with instrumentation, and longer than 6 month pain relief after previous surgery were correlated with satisfactory outcome. However, the number of previous operation, age, repair of pseudarthrosis, no abnormality at surgery and combined multiple degenerative joint disease were significantly correlated with poor surgical outcome. The most common complication during repeat surgery was dural tear in 5 cases(12.5%). Conclusions : Success rate of revision surgery was low as compared to primary operation. Therefore, erroneous diagnosis and faulty surgical technique understandably lead to failure, and precise attention to preoperative and intraoperative detail can minimize these sources of error.