http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : Xu Ling(徐陵) (검색결과 4 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Xu Bao Yu 중국학연구회 2017 중국학연구 Vol.- No.79
Xu Ling and Yu Xin were the most famous authors in the Six Dynasties since Zhao Ming-Wenxuan(昭明文選). No more research work has been carried out in the comments of their paralled prose(駢文). In this paper we just only discuss the comments in the theory of paralled prose and Fu(賦). In the theory of paralled prose, Wang Wenlu’s(王文祿) Wen-Mai(文脈), Lang Zhangju’s(梁章鉅) Tui-An’s Lunwen(退庵論文), Sun Mei’s(孫梅) SiLiu-Conghua(四六叢話) and Sun Deqian’s(孫德謙) Liucao-Lizhi(六朝儷指) were the important books. Among them, the two Sun’s was the master work. They basically hold positive attitude toward Xu-Yu’s(徐庾) paralled prose, which in accord with their views about paralled prose and essay. So they could break through the time, heap praise on Xu-Yu’s creation, not affected by ancient prose movement(古文運動), Song-Ming neo-confucianism(宋明理學) and the trend of classicism. In the theory of Fu(賦), there were some different judgements. The blame, such as Zhu Yao’s(祝堯) Gufu-Bianti(古賦辨體), objected the comic(俳體), modern(侓體) and Si-Liu style(四六體), defended the old form(古體). On the other side, the praise, such as Li Diaoyuan’s(李調元) Fuhua(賦話), broke away from traditional ideas and affirmed Xu-Yu’s contributions. On the whole, Qing Dynasty’s people could give the positive evaluations on Xu-Yu for their awareness of stylistic. It’s because they attached importance to it. However, since the last century new culture movement(新文化運動), the trend of criticism appeared again. They had an obvious inclination of the emphasis on content rather than on form, which still existed in the most histories of literature written by modern researchers.
-
남조 서문(序文)의 문학성 ― 서릉(徐陵)의 「옥대신영서(玉臺新詠序)」를 중심으로
이성현 중국어문학연구회 2019 중국어문학논집 Vol.0 No.117
This thesis is a study of stylistic analysis of the genre of Xu(序). In particular, Xu Ling’s work was to show some unique characteristics that were different from the past. But it is true that his research on prose is still lacking. There is a lot of research on Yutai Xinyong, but very little about Xu Ling’s Preface to Yutai Xinyong. In this paper, the literary features of Xu Ling’s works are analyzed, and his writings give us a glimpse of the delicate depiction of women. This is a literary description of time and space, it leads us from the real world to the ambiguous world.
-
서릉(徐陵) 시가의 궁체시적(宮體詩的) 성격에 관한 연구
권혁석 영남중국어문학회 2021 중국어문학 Vol.- No.86
Until now, Xu Ling has been known as the representative writer of Palace Style Poetry. This is because he worked with Xiao Gang, the representative writer of Palace Style Poetry, and also compiled “Yu Tai Xin Yong” to expand the appearance of Palace Style Poetry according to the purpose of Xiao Gang. The name Palace Style Poetry was never originated from Xu Ling, and the period of Xiao Gang centered creation of Palace Style Poetry was also short throughout its life. In addition, his strong character, which is handed down in his biography, does not fit with the representative writer of Palace Style Poetry with amorous content. And his literary perspective, which values both the substance of the content and the beauty of the form, does not fit with Palace Style Poetry of poor content. The contents of his poems vary widely. Although there are also works of amorous content, which is typical of Palace Style Poetry, there are also poems of various contents, including Frontier Poetry, Scenery Poetry, and Farewell Poetry, it has the closest form of modern style poetry compared to other poets of its time. In conclusion, Xu Ling's poem contains the formal characteristics of Palace Style Poetry rather than the content characteristics of Palace Style Poetry, and the content is also far from the amorous content of Gungche City, which are the focus of criticism. Xu Ling is not a typical poet of Palace Style Poetry, and even if Xu Ling's poems are included in Palace Style Poetry, his poems are a pioneer of modern style poetry, which is the literary significance of Xu Ling's poetry.
-
서보여 ( Xu Bao-yu ) 중국어문연구회 2017 中國語文論叢 Vol.0 No.79
Xu Ling(徐陵) and Yu Xin(庾信) are the most important authors in the Six Dynasties, who developed formal skills, rhetoric effects and phonetic beauty to the highest level. But the later evaluations were very difficult to balance in appraise. Some comments based on the ritual, music and political education, so they imputed the duty of national ruin to Xu Yu(徐庾). Some other based on the relationship between literary achievements and personality, debased their achievements since their some errors in the political integrity. In the Song Dynasty, with the emergence of Li Xue(理學), Xu Yu`s parallel prose got attacked once again as the sinner of literary. They despised the parallel prose just the style couldn`t accord with the principle named by Dao(道). Peoples in the Ming Dynasty liked returning to the ancient. So Xu Yu was to be discovered by the proofreading, note-offering, and annotating. The positive evaluations were increased more than before. To Qing Dynasty, the parallel prose was very flourishing. In the debating on parallel prose and prose, Xu Yu`s parallel prose was viewed as the orthodox form and taken unprecedented seriously. How to see the value of Xu Yu`s parallel prose, that formed a criticism history of Chinese literature. In some way, the level to praise or censure Xu Yu`s parallel prose reflects the level to recognize Chinese literature.
KCI
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
