한반도의 특수성을 고려한 한국의 군사전략 발전방안

송승준 ( Seung Joon Song ) 미래군사학회 2013 한국군사학논총 Vol.2 No.1

Considering the changes of Security environment such as the change of re cent war trend, modern warfare and ROK-Military Reform etc, these days a re debating for the developing of ROK-Milirarys strategy. The core of Requ irements according to following like these ; Firstly, Korea must establishes on the military strategy with playing a leading role, considering the changes of recent war tendency and ROK-Military Reform(reducing the scale of milit ary, reforming a technique forces), and the wartime OPCON Transition. Secondly, The new strategy must be made considering that a deceive war has purposes and objectives, How long the executing period is. where a dec eive war takes place, What is the way(means and ways=Art of war), What are the available assets for the deceive war. And according to the Art of war on the base of these military strategy must be developed and ROK Military m ust be trained. But Investigating the our statues, there are a lot of problems on linking with Military strategic concepts - Doctrines - Construction of Mil itary power - Education & Training. The ways of New ROK-Military Strategy insisting on this study have to i nclude the components( those are Purposes and Objectives, Means and Ways (Art of war), operating Military assets) of planning Military Strategy reflecting the Korean peninsula special environment and the changes of recent war tre nd. and I described as ; Firstly, Establishing new strategic purpose and obje ctive are similar the former one. the different focus is that this study is addi ng Defence of the border with other nations on the former concepts, such as the Occupation on north Korean area & Reunification and removing the nort h korean government. Campaign on the concepts of this study will be separa ted with several one, not one campaign. and Each campaign must define each purpose & objectives. Secondly, On the level of Art of war, When we consider the tendency of recent war, modern warfare, Available military assets, Reform of ROK-Milit ary, Environment of time and space, etc, this study insists that the campaign of Korean peninsula have to change several campaigns, improving that now Korean peninsula be defined as one campaign and separated with Main opera tions in the one. there are some reasons that After turning over the wartime OPCON, Korean military must carry out some decisive operations as a statu s of main operator with the wartime OPCON on the war, so have to fight wit h substantial available military assets. and the Art of war must be made con sidering those. For that reason, this study suggested that It is desirable that the campaign for Defense when north korea attack to the south korea have to be divided over 2 campaigns, and the campaign for seizing north-korea ar ea and reunification when we counter attack to the north-korea. have to be divided over 3 campaigns. On the focus of Military assets, The way of head for building new Military strategy have to meet next two demands ; First, Military assets have to be constructed on the bases of the Art of War of each campaigns. Because Art of war is quite different with Time and Space, and at this time Military asset s to be operated are different. Thus, The military assets operated at Now co ntacting area with enemy(the area of DMZ and FEBA), Deep area of north k orea, and The border with other nations have to be fixed and constructed ac cording to each Art of war concepts. Second, Our neighboring countries are Strong nations that can be heading for world hegemony. Our nation which is small nation can not build all of the military power requested for winning aga inst Our neighboring countries. Thus, we have to fix the appropriate constru ctive goal of the military power. and Those are linked with nation policy, nat ion strategy, military strategy. For overcoming the shortage of military asset s, those have to be reflected on the building plans of military power conside ring those possibility, and those can be arranged at the level of national stra tegy. At this time, we have to develop the plan that the shortage of military power make up with ally-nation``s military powers.

일본의 군사전략과 우리의 대응

권태환 ( Kwon Tae Whan ) 한국군사학회 2020 군사논단 Vol.100 No.1

최근 일본은 인도-태평양 전략을 토대로 미일 동맹을 강화하는 한편, 집단적 자위권 행사 용인과 해병대와 항모 전력 배비 등 새로운 군사전략을 추진하면서 보통국가 행보를 지속하고 있다. 이러한 움직임은 일대일로 구상을 통해 역내 패권을 추구하는 중국의 군사력 증강과 해양진출, 북한의 핵 및 미사일 발사 등 군사적 위협 증대와 맞물리며 역내 군비경쟁을 가속화시키고 있다. 일본은 전후 냉전 해체 등 급변하는 국내외 안보환경 변화 가운데 「적극적 평화주의」를 내세우면서, 미일 동맹을 중심으로 보통국가를 적극 추진하고 있다. 지난 1960년 미일 상호안보조약을 체결하고, 미일 동맹에 의존하는 국가안보를 추진해 왔던 일본은 1976년 방위계획대강과 1978년 미일 가이드라인을 채택한다. 이후 방위계획대강은 2018년 5번째, 미일 가이드라인은 2015년 2번째 개정하고, 2013년 국가안보전략을 발표하며 국가안보체계를 갖춘다. 이러한 관점에서 본다면 일본의 군사전략은 안정된 미일 동맹을 토대로 일관성을 유지하면서도, 정세변화 등 다양한 변화를 반영하여 발전되어 왔다. 일본의 군사전략 분석을 위해 ① 국가안보전략 차원에서 방위계획대강과 미일 가이드라인, 안보법제, 미일 인도-태평양 전략 ② 자위대의 편성과 배치, 방위비 운용, 육해공 전력평가, 방위산업 측면을 대상으로 분석하였다. 도출된 일본의 군사전략은 ① 미일 일체화 전략 ② 미래 선점 군사전략 ③ 독자적 원거리 전력투사가 가능한 자기완결 군사전략 ④ 동맹 네트웍 군사전략 ⑤ 다차원 통합 군사전략이며, 향후 전망과 과제로서 ① 미중 관계의 변화 ② 동북아 군비경쟁의 가속화 ③ 일본 국민들의 안보의식 변화 ④ 한반도 통일 한국의 가능성이다. 결론적으로 우리의 대응을 한일 및 한미일 안보협력 관점에서 제시한다면 ① 한미 동맹 차원에서 한미일 안보협력을 적극 추진 ② 한반도 유사 억제와 대처를 위한 실효적 한일 및 한미일 안보협력 추진 ③ 한일 국방장관 상호방문 등 협력증진 추진 ④ 유엔을 비롯한 우방국과의 연합작전 능력 확대 ⑤ 한일 국민적 공감대 확산이다. 한일 관계는 만들어 지는 것이 아니라 만들어 나가는 것이다. 전쟁은 준비하는 자에게만 승리를 보장한다. 최근 동북아 지역 내 군사적 긴장 고조와 불확실성이 우려되는 상황 가운데 위기를 기회로 만들기 위해 일본 군사전략 분석이 한일은 물론 한미일 안보협력 개선 노력에 도움이 될 수 있기를 기대한다. In recent years, Japan has continued its normal state by strengthening the US-Japan alliance based on the Indo-Pacific strategy, while promoting new military strategies such as concession of collective self-defense rights, and the distribution of marine Corps and aircraft carrier forces. These activities accelerate the arms race in the region, coupled with increased military threats such as China's 「one belt-one road」 for pursuit of regional hegemony and sea-going North Korean nuclear and missile launches. Japan is actively pursuing normal nations based on the USJapan alliance, with [active pacifism] among the rapidly changing domestic and international security environments, such as the dissolution of the Cold War. Japan, which signed the US-Japan Security Treaty in 1960, and has pursued national security that relies on the US-Japan alliance, adopts the 1976 National Defense Prom Guideline, and the 1978 US-Japan guidelines. Afterwards, the defense plan outline was revised five times in 2018, and the USJapan guideline was revised two times in 2015, and 2013 announced a national security strategy and equipped with a national security system. From this point of view, Japan's military strategy has been developed to reflect various changes, including changes in the situation, while maintaining consistency based on a stable USJapan alliance. To analyze Japan's military strategy 1) At the national security strategy level, defense plan outline, US-Japan guideline, security legislation, Japan-India-Pacific strategy. 2) Performance Deployment of Self-Defense Forces Defense Cost Management Analysis of the defense industry by land and air power evaluation. Japan's military strategy was: 1) US-Japan unification strategy; 2) future-first military strategy; 3) self-contained military strategy capable of independent remote power projection; 4) alliance network military strategy; 5) multidimensional integrated military strategy. The future prospects and challenges are: 1) changes in USChina relations, 2) accelerated arms competition in Northeast Asia, 3) changes in security awareness among Japanese people, and 4) the possibility of Korean Peninsula unification. In conclusion, if we present our response from the perspective of Korea-Japan and Korea-US-Japan security cooperation, 1) actively promote Korea-US security cooperation at the ROK-US alliance level. 2) Promote effective Korea-Japan and Korea-USJapan security cooperation in order to suppress and cope with the Korean peninsula. 3) Promote cooperation, including mutual visits by the defense ministers. 4) Expanding capacity for allied operations with the United Nations and other allies. 5) Korea-Japan national consensus spreads Korean-Japanese relations are not just created, but to be created. War guarantees victory only to those who prepare. It is hoped that the analysis of Japan's military strategy will help not only the perspective of Korea and Japan but also Korea-US-Japan security cooperation actually improve their relations in order to turn the crisis into an opportunity amid rising military tensions and uncertainties in Northeast Asia.

북한의 제한전 하 군사전략 변화에 관한 연구

김광현(KwangHyun Kim) 한국정치사회연구소 2023 한국과 국제사회 Vol.7 No.1

북한의 군사전략에 대해 기존대로 한반도 전 지역을 석권한다는 군사전략이 지속 되고 있다는 주장과 변화 하고 있다는 주장이 아직도 맞서고 있는 상황이다. 연구 목적은 최근 안보환경의 변화와 김일성-김정일-김정은으로 이어지는 집권자의 변화 기간 동안 북한 군사전략의 변화를 분석하고, 핵무력 완성 이후 경제건설에 집중하겠다는 북한의 군사전략의 변화를 제한전 하 군사전략 으로 전망해 보고자 하였다. 연구 방법은 문헌조사를 통한 질적연구를 주로 실시하였고, 김일성 집권 이후부터 현재까지의 시기를 망라하여 군사전략의 구성요소를 중심으로 분석하였다. 연구 결과 김정은은 체제안정을 최우선으로 기존의 전면전 보다는 핵무기 사용을 위협하며 제한전을 추구하는 군사전략을 채택할 것으로 분석되었고, 이를 군사전략의 구성요소를 중심으로 전망해 보았다. 이에 대비하여 한국군은 기존의 전면전 중심에서 북한의 제한전 하 군사전략 에 대응하는 군사전략을 병행하여 발전시킴이 요구되고 있다. So far, the claim that North Korea’s military strategy is ‘continuing’ to dominate the entire Korean Peninsula as usual and that it is ‘changing’ are confronting each other. The purpose of the study is to analyze the changes recent security environment and in North Korea’s military strategy during the period of change in power leading to Kim Il-sung, Kim Jeng-il, and Kim Jeng-un and predict the change in North Korea’s military strategy to focus on economic construction after the completion of nuclear power as a military strategy under the situation of limited war. The research method mainly conducted qualitative research through literature research. It covers the period since Kim Il Sung took power. The focus of the analysis was on the components of the military strategy. According to the study, Kim Jeng Un will pursue a military strategy with the stability of the regime as his top priority. It was analyzed that the military strategy that could be adopted would threaten the use of nuclear weapons and seek limited warfare. In addition, under the situation of North Korea’s limited warfare, the military strategy was predicted centering on the components of the military strategy. In contrast, the South Korean military is required to develop a military strategy in parallel in response to North Korea’s ‘restricted charge military strategy’ from the center of the existing all-out war.

중국 군사전략 변화의 안보적 함의

이상택 한국동북아학회 2018 한국동북아논총 Vol.23 No.1

China's Defense Ministry defines the concept of a military strategy as “Planning, preparing and proceeding with the entire war by the nation." In other words, military strategy is the way to win the war. China developed ‘Active Defense’ into its military strategy ideas through numerous combat experiences with government forces as Mao Zedong led Chinese Red Army during a Chinese revolutionary war. ‘Defense’ generally implies passive military operation, but China's active defense is aggressive defense. It is estimated that the meaning of defense here includes aggressive military operations. China's military strategy has been changing by the timing based on military strategy ideas. Mao Zedong had adopted a ‘Strategy of People's Wars' since the establishment of China until Reformation open in the 1970s. Deng Xiaoping adopted ‘Strategy of Limited Local Wars' in the 1980s. Jiang Zemin adopted ‘Strategy of Win Local Wars under the Advanced Technology' in the 1990s. Since 2000s, Hu Jintao adopted ‘Strategy of Win Local Wars under the Conditions of Informationization’ in the 2000s. Xi Jinping, the president of the People's Republic of China have continued to maintain their respective positions by adopting the policy of ‘Strategy of Win Informationized Local Wars.’ Let's analyze the military implications of China's change in its military strategy for Korea. First, China's military strategy changes are contributing to the modernization of the Chinese military. Second, China's security threats against Korea are inherent. Third, it serves as a factor to encourage neighboring countries to devise countermeasures to deal with changes in China's military strategy. Fourth, South Korea is in a position to simultaneously prepare for military threats from China and North Korea. Korea needs to grasp the implications of China's military strategy ideas ‘Active Defense' and its current policy ‘Strategy of Win Informationized Local Wars’ and prepare for them. 중국 국방부는 군사전략의 개념에 대해 “국가가 전쟁의 전체를 계획하고 준비하고 진행하는 것”이라고 정의하고 있다. 다시 말하면 군사전략은 전쟁에서 이기는 방법인 것이다. 중국은 마오쩌둥(毛澤東)이 혁명전쟁 시기에 홍군을 이끌면서 정부군과의 수많은 전투경험을 통해 ‘적극적 방어’를 중국의 군사전략 사상으로 발전시켰다. 일반적으로 ‘방어’는 소극적인 군사력 운용의 의미를 담고 있지만 중국의 적극적 방어는 공세방어로서 여기서 방어의 의미는 공세적인 군사력 운용을 포함하고 있는 것으로 평가된다. 중국의 군사전략은 적극적 방어 사상을 기반으로 시기별로 변화되어 오고 있다. 마오쩌둥은 중국 국가성립 이후부터 1970년대 개혁개방 이전까지 ‘인민전쟁전략’을, 1980년대 덩사오핑(鄧小平)은 ‘제한 국지전쟁전략’을, 1990년대 장쩌민(江澤民)은 ‘첨단기술조건하 국지전승리전략’을 채택하였다. 2000년대 후진타오(胡錦濤)는 ‘정보화조건하 국지전승리전략’을, 2010년대 시진핑(習近平) 국가주석은 ‘정보화 국지전승리전략’을 채택하여 현재까지 견지해 오고 있다. 중국의 군사전략 변화가 한국에 주는 군사적 함의를 도출하면 첫째, 중국의 군사전략 변화는 중국군의 현대화를 촉진하는 요인이 되고 있다. 둘째, 한국에 대한 중국발 안보위협이 증대될 가능성이 내재되어 있다. 셋째, 중국의 군사전략 변화에 대응하기 위한 주변국가의 대비책 강구를 촉진하는 요인이 되고 있다. 넷째, 한국은 중국과 북한의 군사위협에 동시 대비해야 하는 입장에 놓여 있다. 한국은 중국의 군사전략 사상인 ‘적극적 방어’와 현재의 군사전략인 ‘정보화 국지전승리전략’에 내재된 의미를 정확히 파악하고, 이에 대한 대비책을 강구해 나가야 할 것이다.

朝鮮初期 武經講習制

윤훈표(Yoon Hoon-Pyo) 역사실학회 2007 역사와실학 Vol.32 No.-

A system, which routinely trains the book on strategy(武經) and appoints and extracts(黜陟) depending on its score, was finally held with entering Joseon. Even in Goryeo was carried out the education on military science(兵學) in the national dimension, and was executed thoroughly a military measure based on a book on strategy. However, it was not operated a system that allows a book on tactics to be compulsorily read targeting the military nobility, and appoints and extracts depending on its score. Entering the Joseon dynasty, separately from a selection examination like the military examinations(武科) or a military training test(都試), it was formally introduced a system that routinely trains the book on strategy(武經) at ordinary times and then reflects its score in evaluation of merits. That was closely associated with the propulsion of policy that tries to bring up the military nobility appropriate for a new system while changing a method of organizing and commanding an army. In an early stage, it was administered duties such as training military arts and educating a book on strategy by newly installing in the Hullyeongwan(Military Training Command, 訓練觀). And, it was sent to the Ministry of War(兵曹) to be appointed by performing educating a book on strategy and training military arts and then by choosing an excellent person. Like this, the military service examination, educating a book on strategy and training military arts were integrated and operated as one course, not with being separated respectively and being carried out. By the way, the policy was largely changed while a faction of King Taejong came into power. The book on strategy(武經) was tested while carrying out the military service examination. However, it was not directly associated with educating a book on strategy in the Hullyeongwan. Instead, the book on strategy(武經) was educated targeting all the military officers. In the wake of this, Mugyeong-Gangseup-Je(武經講習制) was held, which is operated separately from an examination of exposition of ancient writings in the military service examination, and since then, was positioned as a basic frame in operation. Mugyeong-Seupdokgwan-Je(武經習讀官制) was installed in a bid to raise an effect on educating the book on strategy(武經) during King Sejong. And, an interest was heightened by arranging several kinds of preferential measures. Due to this, the education was routinely carried out, thereby having been solidified further the operation of a system that appoints and extracts depending on its score. Meanwhile, diverse books on strategy were published while passing through the period of King Munjong and King Sejo, in which the drastic modification work was resolutely carried out over the whole of a military system, and additionally, educating the book on strategy(武經) in several branches was attained. Due to it, the government, which was concerned about occurrence of confusion, again consolidated a training system. Finally, together with compilation of GyeongGukDaeJeon(National Code, 經國大典), tile work, which systematizes a training system, was driven in earnest during King Seongjong. At this time, rather than making a new thing, the existing tiling was reinforced centering on Seupdokgwan-Je(習讀官制), and it came to be faced with enthusiasm for training up to Soldiers(諸色軍士) as well as tile military nobility. In the wake of this, the military nobility class(武班層), which has a full knowledge of the book on strategy(武經), came to be slowly formed.

군사적 실패와 전략적 적응: 제3차 인도-파키스탄 전쟁과 카르길 전쟁을 통한 파키스탄 군사전략 변화 사례

이진기,손한별 (재)한국군사문제연구원 2021 한국군사 Vol.9 No.-

This study aims to examine issues pertaining to the ‘Military Failure’ as the element of changing military strategy. This case study, in particular, focuses on Pakistani military strategy that would be a model applicable to the North Korean nuclear strategy. The phrase “military failure” refers to a state in which the desired goal cannot be achieved as a result of an unsuccessful application of military ways and means to analyze and respond to threats in order to achieve its strategic goal. More generally speaking, military failure means defeat in war. Therefore, military failure is the greatest stimulus of change in military strategy. In order to understand changes in military strategy, this study tries to critically review literature to identify the determinants of military strategy, and then suggests that ‘military failure’ and ‘strategic adaptation’ are key elements to establish the framework for planning military strategy. Lastly, this study presents specific examples of military failure found in the Third India-Pakistan War of 1971 and the Kargil War of 1999, and then analyzes the extent to which Pakistani military strategy had changed through strategic adaptation.

북한 군사전략의 역사적 고찰

이상택 국방부군사편찬연구소 2019 군사 Vol.- No.112

Military strategy is a sort of military action plan and a way of action for the creation and operation of military means to effectively support the achievement of national interests and national goals. Therefore, the impact on South Korea's security is enormous, depending on the military strategy what the North Korea chooses. This military strategy consists of three elements such as military objectives, military strategic concepts, and military resources. North Korea's consistent military objectives has been to communize the Korean Peninsula since the government was established on the 9th of September in 1948. To achieve this military objectives, the concept of military strategy adopted by North Korea is an offensive strategy. North Korea has continued to develop military resources to realize the concept of military strategy called offensive strategy, and is now believed to be in the final stage of developing nuclear weapons. South Korea should know exactly that the North Korea's military strategy lies in communizing the entire Korean Peninsula. It also calls for an integrated countermeasure to prepare for North Korea's military threats and strengthening South Korea's national security. 군사전략은 국가이익과 국가목표 달성을 효과적으로 지원하기 위하여 군사적 수단을 조성 및 운용하기 위한 군사행동 계획이자 행동방책이다. 따라서 북한이 어떤 군사전략을 선택하느냐에 따라 한국의 안보에 미치는 영향은 실로 지대하다. 이러한 군사전략은 군사목표, 군사전략개념, 군사자원의 3요소로 구성된다. 북한이 1948년 9월 9일 정권수립 이후 지금까지 변함없이 추구하고 있는 군사목표는 한반도의 공산화이다. 이러한 군사목표를 달성하기 위하여 북한이 채택한 군사전략개념은 공세전략이다. 북한은 공세전략이라는 군사전략개념을 실현하기 위해 군사자원을 지속적으로 발전시켜 오고 있으며, 현재는 핵무기 개발이 완성단계에 이른 것으로 평가된다. 한국은 북한의 군사전략이 한반도 전체를 공산화하는 데 있다는 점을 정확히 알아야 한다. 또한 북한의 군사위협에 대비하고 국가안보를 튼튼히 하기 위한 통합적인 대응책 마련이 요구된다.

한국군 군사전략의 역할과 전략구상에 대한 담론

오순근,공형준 한국국방연구원 2018 국방정책연구 Vol.34 No.4

The security environments in the Korean peninsula has been rapidly changing. Increase in the fog of uncertainty evidently requires the important role of military strategy in national security. That is because the role of strategy is to provide directions in midst of the uncertainty. So far there has been a low level of linkages between strategy and operation / force planning. Due to North Korea’s persistent military threat and repeated provocations, the military strategy - which requires a deep thinking and a long-term perspective - had difficulty in fully engaging with the operation and force planning processes. Thus both had developed their own independent territories outside of the influence of military strategy. Now is the time to revisit and reexamine the role, position, and function of military strategy as well as strategy planning process. This study suggests that the role of military strategy lies on all realm of government policies, not only security and defense arena, but also political, economy, societal, and cultural arena. This paper also defines the position and function of military strategy by explaining interaction between the horizontal evolution and the vertical diversification of military strategy. Lastly, the study underscores the importance of the three elements of military strategy in the planning process - ends, ways, and means - and how the interact with each other to develp valid strategic concepts.

미.중의 군사전략과 한반도 안보

손도심,Son, Do-Sim 대전대학교 군사연구원 2006 군사학연구 Vol.4 No.-

The world has been rapidly restructured in an agenda of national security from center of military strength to that of economic strength since the post cold-war era China military leadership-division carried out RMA through learning of a lesson from Gulf war in 1990 -1991 and Iraq war in 2003, thus the leadership-division made an attempt to convert the military system to a technical intensive system. The principle based on RMA of China military is (National defense strategy) drafted by the central military committee 1985 and (Four modernization general principles) 1978. China has introduced Russian high-technological arms and equipment in order to build up the military arms greatly thanks to an economical development, and they take pragmatism line as chinese socialism with their strategy to make secure a position as military powers such as they successfully launched a manned spacecraft and are building an air-craft carrie and soon. USA has a theory of dichotomy whether a country is a cooperator for USA, or not. and also enemy or friend since 9.11terror, thus USA is different from their direction of police. This is because USA stands a position as the superpower of the supremacy hegemony of the world. We must be carefully aware that USA considers as important area for Middle east, West south Asia, Central Asia and Northwest Asia to meet the demands of 2lcentury. Accordingly, the focus of USA's military strategy will be probably concentrated at the above mentioned four areas. On the other hand, USA enjoys such a superpower position due to collapse of USSR which was the past main enemy since the post cold war era. We could give an conclusive example as fact that USA has recurred to unilateralism But USA carry on the military operations to the terror groups at global around by converting thje military strike strategy to pre-emptive strike strategy since9.11 terror, 2001. USA seeks for transformation to the mobile military forces with light-quantity oriented in order to carry on such the military operations and makes progress GPR, And the USA forces in Korea makes progress a military renovation as part of such a military strategy. On the other hand, USA promotes the measures of choose for the countries standing at the crossroads of strategy and carries forward a main scheme of provision for four priority aims that the leaders of a hostile country and mis-country shall be prohibited from use and obtainment of weapons of mass destruction. Accordingly, this treatise found out a significant meaning to have an effect on the national security in the korean peninsula.

한국군 군사우주전략 발전방향

조홍제,박상중,이성훈 한국항공우주정책⋅법학회 2021 한국항공우주정책·법학회지 Vol.36 No.2

With the advent of the 4th Industrial Revolution and the New Space era in the 21st century, the world is recognizing space as a new battlefield and spurs military space activities. In particular, the United States(U.S.) and China, as space powers, are entering into infinite competition for the militarization and weaponization of space. Military space strategy is a method of obtaining space superiority in order to achieve political purposes and military objectives through space warfare. In order to establish a military space strategy, it is necessary to consider that the capabilities and activities of space combat power must be simultaneously and integratedly utilized, and to prepare for hyper-connected, super-intelligent future warfare. The Republic of Korea(ROK) military's space strategy needs to be developed in preparation for the alliance's development of military space power and the transition of wartime operational control(OPCON). The military space strategy can be presented in six areas. First, the deterrence and denial strategy must be able to prepare for potential threats from neighboring countries as well as North Korea's nuclear and missile threats. Second, the offensive strategy must secure multi-domain operational capabilities capable of actively responding to the enemy's space and anti-space capabilities. Third, the defense strategy should strengthen the resilience of the universe. Fourth, the asymmetric strategy must be able to make full use of the space dominance for a specific point or time in the space domain. Fifth, the alliance strategy should expand the scope for space cooperation not only with the U.S. but also with neighboring countries. Lastly, as a civilian-military integration strategy, civilian space technology should be actively utilized into space military power in connection with the new space era. In conclusion, Republic of Korea, as a mid-country in space development, should prepare for the transition of OPCON on the basis of the strong ROK-U.S. Alliance and prepare the defense space policy and military space strategy early in parallel with the construction of military space power. 21세기 제4차산업혁명과 뉴스페이스(New Space) 시대의 도래와 함께 세계 각국은 우주를 새로운 전장으로 인식하고 군사적 우주활동에 박차를 가하고 있다. 특히 미국과 중국은 우주강대국으로서 우주의 군사화 및 무기화를 위한 무한경쟁에 돌입하고 있다. 군사우주전략이란 우주전을 통하여 정치적 군사적 목적을 달성하기 위해 우주우세를 획득하는 방법이다. 군사우주전략을 수립하기 위해서는 우주전력을 동시·통합적으로 운용하는데 필요한 능력과 활동을 고려해야 하며, 초연결, 초지능 미래전에도 대비할 수 있어야 한다. 한국군의 군사우주전략은 동맹의 군사우주력 발전과 전시작전통제권 전환에 대비하여 발전시킬 필요가 있다. 이와 같은 군사우주전략은 6개 분야로 제시할 수 있다. 먼저, 억제 및 거부전략은 북한의 핵·미사일 위협뿐만 아니라 주변국의 잠재적 위협도 대비할 수 있어야 한다. 둘째, 공격전략은 적의 우주 및 대우주능력에 적극적으로 대응할 수 있는 다영역 작전능력을 확보하여야 한다. 셋째, 방어전략은 우주의 회복탄력성(Resilience)을 강화하여야 한다. 넷째, 비대칭전략은 우주의 특정지점 또는 일정시간에 대해 우주우세권을 구사할 수 있어야 한다. 다섯째, 동맹전략은 미국뿐만 아니라 주변국 등과 우주협력을 위한 외연을 확대하여야 한다. 마지막으로, 민군통합전략으로 뉴스페이스시대와 연계하여 민간의 기술과 우주력을 유기적으로 활용할 수 있어야 한다. 결론적으로 한국은 우주개발의 중견국가로서 공고한 한미동맹을 근간으로 전작권 전환에 대비하여 군사우주력 건설과 병행하여 국방우주정책과 군사우주전략을 조기에 마련하여야 한다.