Digital Economy Corporate Innovation and Corporate Finance Capabilities

Li, Na,Liu, Ziyang,Zhang, Xi 한국콘텐츠산업학회 2023 콘텐츠와 산업 Vol.5 No.2

The digital economy is a new driving force for China's high-quality economic development. Fully releasing the digital economy dividend to promote the innovation and development of the real economy is an important channel to realize the high-quality development of China's economy. This paper empirically analyzes the impact of digital economy development on enterprise equity financing and equity financing and its intrinsic mechanism of action based on the use of principal component analysis to construct an indicator system for the level of digital economy development at the provincial level in China, using sample data of A-share listed companies from 2013 to 2021. The research results show that: firstly, digital economy development can significantly enhance the equity financing and debt financing ability of enterprises, and the promotion effect on debt financing is more significant. Secondly, in terms of the influence mechanism, digital economy development can enhance corporate financing by improving the level of corporate innovation, which in turn affects the comprehensive strength and internal resources of enterprises. In the context of the rapid development of the digital economy, the combination of the digital economy and the real economy should be actively promoted, the innovation dividend of the digital economy should be fully released, and the role of the digital economy in promoting the level of corporate financing should be brought into play to promote high-quality economic development.

ASEAN 디지털경제 성장의 외부 영향요인에 관한 연구

조수영 한중사회과학학회 2023 한중사회과학연구 Vol.21 No.2

As digital technology is being applied in various fields, the trend of the global economy is rapidly transitioning from traditional industrial economy to digital economy. It is also serving as a driving force for the recovery of the economy, which has been sluggish due to the COVID-19 pandemic. While the ASEAN region is a latecomer to the digital economy, with relatively low levels of development in digital infrastructure and information technology, it is a rapidly growing region with great potential and has recently received significant attention. In particular, both the United States and China, which lead the global digital economy, are strategizing to utilize ASEAN as an important base for digital economic competition. Among them, ASEAN is a very important strategic base for cooperation in the internationalization and advancement of the digital economy, especially for China’s Belt and Road Initiative, a national core strategy. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the characteristics of digital economic cooperation between ASEAN and China and the impact of their cooperation on Korea. As China’s digital economy technology has achieved rapid growth and ASEAN has recently experienced fast economic growth, both parties have been collaborating on aspects such as digital infrastructure, platforms, and development direction in the future digital economy market. Digital economic cooperation is expected to provide a critical turning point for individual countries’ economic growth and play a key role in regional economic integration. Furthermore, the scope and proportion of cooperation are expected to expand further in the future. This digital economic cooperation between ASEAN and China is expected to have a complex impact on Korea. How well Korea can respond to the rapidly changing digital economic environment will determine the direction of the impact on Korea in the future. 디지털 기술이 광범위한 분야에 활용되면서 세계경제의 추세는 전통산업경제에서디지털경제로 빠르게 전환되고 있으며 코로나19 사태로 침체된 경기 회복의 원동력으로 작용하고 있다. ASEAN 지역은 디지털 경제의 후발주자로 디지털 인프라나 정보기술 분야의 발달수준은 상대적으로 낮지만, 경제성장이 매우 빠르고 큰 잠재력을 가진 지역으로서 최근큰 주목을 받고 있다. 특히, 글로벌 디지털경제에서 선두를 점하고 있는 미국과 중국모두 ASEAN을 경제패권 경쟁 중 디지털경제의 중요기지로 활용하기 위한 전략을 구사하고 있다. 그 중에서도 중국에게는 국가 핵심 전략으로 추진 중인 일대일로(一带一 路) 전략을 위해서도 ASEAN은 여러가지 측면에서 중요한 지역이며, 디지털경제의 국제화와 선진화를 위한 협력에 있어서도 매우 중요한 전략적 기지이다. 이에 본 연구는ASEAN과 중국의 디지털경제 협력에서 나타나는 특징과 양측의 협력이 한국에 미칠영향에 대해 분석하고자 하였다. 빠른 성장을 실현한 중국의 디지털경제 기술과 최근 빠른 경제성장을 이룬 ASEAN 이 미래 산업영역인 디지털경제 시장간 상호보완과 필요성에 의해 양측은 디지털 인프라, 플랫폼, 발전방향 등 측면에서 디지털경제 협력을 진행해 왔다. 또한, 디지털경제 협력이 개별 국가의 경제 성장에 있어 중요한 전환점을 제공함과 동시에 지역경제통합의 핵심 요소로 작용할 것으로 보고, 앞으로도 협력의 범위와 비중을 더욱 확대해나갈 것으로 예상된다. 이러한 ASEAN과 중국의 디지털경제 협력은 한국에게 복합적인 영향을 미칠 것으로전망되며, 한국이 빠르게 변화하는 디지털경제 환경에 얼마나 민첩하게 대응할 수 있을지가 향후 한국에 미칠 영향의 방향을 결정하게 될 것이다.

数字经济下中国跨境税收征管制度研究

金香?(Jin Xianglan),?非凡(Zheng Feifan) 동아대학교 법학연구소 2022 東亞法學 Vol.- No.94

최근 몇 년 동안 디지털경제가 비약적으로 발전함에 따라 많은 국가와 지역에서 디지털경제의 발전을 실물경제의 질과 효율성을 높이는 요소로 하여 핵심 경쟁력을 재편하는 중요한 조치를 취했고 다국적 기업은 전통적인 상업방식의 혁신 및 글로벌 가치사슬을 재건했다. 이는 국제적 조세에서 조세 표준의 확정, 조세 관할권의 구분, 이중 과세 및 소득이전을 통한 세원잠식(BEPS) 등과 같은 문제를 초래했다. 이러한 맥락에서 많은 국가와 국제기구는 이미 디지털화의 다국적 조세 관리 제도를 개혁하여 일정한 경험을 축적했으며 이는 중국이 다국적 조세 관리 제도를 개혁함에 있어 중요한 참고적 가치를 지닌다. 다자간 디지털경제 조세규정과 관련하여 경제협력개발기구(OECD)는 “BEPS 행동계획 보고서”를 발표했고 국가 간 경제의 디지털화를 기반으로 한 새로운 국제조세규칙을 수립했으며 이러한 기초에서 제기한 쌍지주(雙支柱, Two Pillars) 방안은 회원국 간의 조세분쟁을 해결한다. 지역적 디지털경제 조세규정과 관련하여 EU는 대형 인터넷 기업에 대한 과세규정을 조정하고 디지털경제 활동에 대한 공정한 과세의 촉진을 위해 장단기 계획을 발표했다. 단독적 디지털경제 조세규정과 관련하여 영국과 프랑스가 대표적이고 이미 자국 디지털경제의 과세문제를 해결하기 위해 디지털 서비스 세를 부과하기 시작했다. 디지털경제의 맥락에서 디지털화 및 가상화가 주요 특징이고 기존의 조세제도는 신흥 경제형식과 상업방식에 적응할 수 없게 되었으며 조세 주체와 객체, 세율 등과 같은 요소들을 명확하게 확정하기 어렵다. 현재 중국은 디지털경제하에서의 다국적 조세 관리제도는 불완전하고 과세소득 및 조세관할권의 확정이 명확하지 못하고, 조세분쟁 해결방식이 단일하며, 국제조세규칙의 조정에 적극적인 대응 조치가 부족한 등의 중요한 문제가 존재한다. 중국이 디지털경제 조세에 대응하고 디지털경제에 관한 과세 및 관리 능력을 향상시키기 위해 국제적 경험을 참조하여 중국의 다국적 조세 관리제도의 개혁을 촉진하고, 중국 특색의 디지털경제 조세제도를 형성하고, 상설기관의 인정규칙을 개혁하고, 다국적 조세분쟁 해결체제를 개선 할 것을 제기한다. 또한, 많은 국가와 국제기구들이 잇달아 디지털 서비스 세를 부과하는 배경 하에서 중국에 상응한 대응책을 마련하여 중국의 디지털경제시대 조세개혁을 심화하고 디지털경제의 보다 적극적이고 포괄적이며 지속 가능한 고품질 발전을 촉진하기 위한 참고 자료를 제공한다. In recent years, the digital economy has flourished. Many countries and regions have taken the development of digital economy as an important measure to improve the quality and efficiency of the real economy and reshape the core competitiveness.Simultaneously, the innovations of traditional business model and the reconstruction of global value chain of multinational enterprises have also brought challenges to international taxation. Such as difficulty in determining tax standard,difficulty in determining tax jurisdiction,difficulty in solving the problem of double taxation,regulation of base erosion and profit shifting(BEPS).In this context, China’s relevant cross-border tax collection and management system is in urgent need of reform. Throughout the world, many countries and international organizations have gained some experience in the reform of the digital cross-border tax collection and management system, which can provide an important reference for the reform of China’s cross-border tax collection and management system.In the multilateral digital economy tax rules, OECD has released the ‘BEPS Action Plan’. Which constructed a set of new international tax rules based on cross-border economic digitization. It proposed the ‘Two Pillars’ scheme to solve the tax disputes between its member countries. In the area of tax rules for the regional digital economy, the EU has released long-term and short-term programmes for fair taxation of digital economy and intends to adjust tax rules for large Internet companies to promote fair taxation of digital economy activities in the EU.In terms of unilateral digital economic tax rules, Britain and France have begun to levy unilateral digital service tax to solve their digital economic tax problems. In the context of digital economy, digitization and virtualization have become the main characteristics, which will have some problems on the tax system, such as the existing tax system is difficult to adapt to the business format and business model of emerging economy, and it is difficult to clarify the tax subject, object, tax rate and other factors. At present, China"s cross-border tax collection and management system mainly has some main problems. Such as the uncertainty of taxable income and tax jurisdiction,a single way to resolve tax related disputes, lack of systematic provisions, and so on. In view of the above problems, China should learn from the international experience of digital economy taxation and carry out reforms on the identification rules of permanent organization, improve the settlement mechanism of cross-border tax disputes, create China"s countermeasures under the background of foreign international organizations and countries levying digital service taxes one after another, further deepen the tax reform in the era of the digital economy and promote a more positive, inclusive and sustainable high-quality development of the digital economy.

메타버스-디지털경제 뉴 서킷에 관한 연구

형천,장조혜 한국경영실무학회 2022 한국경영실무학회지 Vol.8 No.2

메타버스 경제는 디지털 화폐의 탄생과 디지털 법정화폐의 발전, 디지털 자산을 둘러싼 일련의 새로운 경제 생산과 비즈니스 모델에서 비롯된다는 것이 주된 논리다. 블록체인 분산 회계 기술에 의존하는 새로운 디지털 자산은 메타버스에서 NFT 또는 NFR 형태로 존재하며, 일련의 비즈니 스 모델 변화와 경제 생산, 유통, 소비 모델의 재편을 가져올 것입니다. 본문은 메타버스와 디지털 경제의 관계를 탐구하는 것에서 출발하여 메타버스와 디지털 경제의 각각의 경계를 명확히 한 동 시에 메타버스와 디지털 경제의 관계는 기술과 정의 등 다차원적 관점에서 요약된다. 문장의 마지 막으로 메타버스는 기술 통합의 경로를 통해 디지털 경제의 고품질 발전을 주도해야 하며 동시에 메타버스의 장면 형성은 디지털 경제와 기업을 심층적으로 융합하는 효과적인 방법입니다. 특히, 디지털 트윈, 가상 연구개발 플랫폼, 디지털 공장 등의 장면은 제조업의 디지털 업그레이드에 최적 의 경로를 제공했다. Metaverse economy is a new type of digital economy different from the previous digital economy. The main logic comes from the birth of digital currency and the development of digital legal currency (legal digital currency), as well as a series of new economic production and business models around digital assets. New digital assets based on blockchain distributed ledger technology exist in the form of NFT or NFR in the metauniverse, which will bring a series of business model changes and the reorganization of economic production, circulation and consumption patterns. This paper starts from the discussion of the relationship between the metauniverse and the digital economy, and then clarifies the boundary between the metauniverse and the digital economy. At the same time, it summarizes the relationship between the metaverse and the digital economy from the perspectives of technology and definition. In the end, the metauniverse should lead the high quality development of digital economy through the path of technology integration. At the same time, the scene shaping of the metauniverse is an effective way for the deep integration of digital economy and entity enterprises. In particular, scenarios such as digital twin, virtual R&D platforms and digital factories offer the best path for the digital upgrade of the physical manufacturing industry.

Spatial Characteristics and Driving Factors Toward the Digital Economy: Evidence from Prefecture-Level Cities in China

Haita WANG,Xuhua HU,Najabat ALI 한국유통과학회 2022 The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Busine Vol.9 No.2

The digital economy is becoming an increasingly important source of regional competitiveness enhancement. The purpose of this research is to examine the spatial distribution characteristics of China’s digital economy from 2016 to 2019. Moran’s I analysis was performed to see if China’s digital economy has spatial self-correlation. The Getis-Ord General G test was used to determine the clustering type of China’s digital economy. In addition, we used OLS and GWR methodologies to figure out what drives China’s digital economy level. The findings show that the digital economy is rapidly expanding throughout China; yet, there is a significant regional imbalance in the digital economy level in China, and the agglomeration of the digital economy is increasing over time. Furthermore, the findings reveal that human capital, information staff, telegram income, and Internet access are vital factors in the development of the digital economy. To close the digital economy gap, policymakers must invest in human capital and technology innovation. Simultaneously, the government must speed up the development and implementation of electronic information services.

The Influence of Factors on the Level of Digitalization of World Economies

Pyroh, Olha,Kalachenkova, Kateryna,Kuybida, Vasyl,Chmil, Hanna,Kiptenko, Viktoriia,Razumova, Oleksandra International Journal of Computer ScienceNetwork S 2021 International journal of computer science and netw Vol.21 No.5

The advanced development of the world's economies requires a detailed study of the impact of factors on the level of digitalization, to ensure economic growth and promote the use of information and communication technologies in the digital economy. Digitalization of the world's economies is ensured through the implementation of relevant regulations and policy decisions to implement public policy and strategy of the digital economy. The purpose of the study is to establish the pattern of the impact of factors on the level of digitalization of world economies by conducting a regression analysis to reflect the dependence of the impact of factors on the level of digitalization in 25 economies (by IMD digital competitiveness), to check the level of digitalization of the world's economies. It is necessary to analyze the ranking of countries in the world according to the DiGiX Index, IMD, and DESI Digital Competitiveness Rating. Research methods: information synthesis method; regression analysis; systematization, and generalization. Results. It was found that because of regression analysis, the value of the coefficient of determination indicates that the regression model by 78% explains the relationship between future readiness of countries to implement digital technologies and information and communication technologies, but there are still a small number of other factors not included in the regression model. It is determined that the greatest progress among EU member states for the period 2015-2020 according to the DESI index belongs to Ireland, the Netherlands, Malta, and Spain. It is established that Estonia, Spain, and Denmark are in the lead in the DESI rating, in terms of e-government implementation. The study found that the impact of factors on the level of digitalization of world economies contributes to solving current economic problems through further implementation of information and communication technologies and improving legislation in the digital economy, which will ensure the implementation of effective digital policy. It is established that ensuring the appropriate level of digitalization of the world's economies should solve the problems in the digital economy sector faced by governments and businesses, which requires the implementation of measures to regulate and ensure the continued operation of the digital economy.

全球数字治理下中韩数字经济法律制度的比较研究

郭文强,涂波 대한중국학회 2024 중국학 Vol.86 No.-

当今数字经济逐渐成为了推动中国经济增长的新引擎。然而,数字全球化在为中国经济注入新动能的同时,也给中国带来了数据安全、数字鸿沟、数字平台无序竞争和产权保护机制的缺失等一系列问题,凸显了中国对数字经济进行有效监管和系统性治理的能力不足。相比之下,韩国政府为促进数字经济产业的发展,已实施了《大韩民国数字战略》和《数据产业振兴和利用促进基本法》。这些措施有效解决了数字产业发展和治理问题,进而完善了韩国数字经济的法律制度体系。为此,本研究通过比较分析的方法,比较了中韩两国数字经济法律制度的建设情况,总结了韩国数字经济法律制度建设的经验,并为中国数字经济法律制度的建设提供了三个方面的启示。第一,中国应强化数字经济法律制度的整合,避免重复立法和多头立法,提升立法的科学性与权威性;第二,中国应加强数字经济的系统立法和综合治理,确保制度的系统性;第三,中国应强化基础研究,注重伦理与法律结合,持续做好法律制度的更新工作,以确保法律实效性。 Today’s digital economy has gradually emerged as a new engine of innovation for China’s economic growth. However, while injecting new vitality into the Chinese economy, digital globalization has also brought a series of challenges to China, such as data security, digital divide, unregulated competition among digital platforms, and a lack of mechanisms for protecting property rights. These issues underscore China's insufficient capacity for effectively regulating and systematically governing the digital economy. In contrast, South Korean government has implemented the ‘Korea Digital Strategy’ (KDS) and the ‘Basic Law for Promoting the Revitalization and Utilization of Data’ (Data Industry Act) to foster the development of the digital economy industry. These measures effectively solve the problems of digital industry development and governance, and thus improve the legal system of South Korea’s digital economy. Therefore, this study compares the construction of digital economy legal system in China and South Korea through comparative analysis, summarizes the experience of digital economy legal system construction in South Korea, and  offers three insights for the development of China’s digital economy legal system. Firstly, China needs to improve the coordination of its laws for the digital economy, avoid repetitive and overlapping legislation, and enhance the scientificity and authority of legislation; Secondly, China needs to adopt a systematic and comprehensive approach to legislating and governing the digital economy, ensuring the consistency and coherence of the system; Thirdly, China needs to conduct more basic research, pay attention to the ethical and legal implications, and keep the legal system up to date, so as to ensure the effectiveness of the law.

중국의 디지털 경제에 관한 연구 - 정의, 범위 및 측정을 중심으로 -

원혜련 중국지역학회 2023 중국지역연구 Vol.10 No.1

China’s digital economy is growing rapidly and its share of GDP rose to about 40% in 2021. The digital economy is becoming new growth engine for China and COVID-19 has sped up digital transformation. This study examines the definition, framework and measurement of China’s digital economy. In China, digital economy is defined as digital industrialization, Industry digitization, digital governance, and data valuelization development. Digital industrialization is ICT industry and Industry digitization refers to the production quantity and efficiency improvement brought by the application of digital technology in traditional industries such as smart agriculture and smart manufacturing. According to this definition, the National Bureau of Statistics of China classifies the digital economy into digital industrialization and industrial digitalization to measure the value added at each digital industry level for National Accounts. In measuring industry digitization that is difficult to capture in economic statistics, CAICT use the growth accounting framework (KLEMS). The scale of the digital economy is the sum of digital industrialization and industry digitalization. Based on China’s rapid digital transformation that affects rules of world digital trade and global digital economy, it derives some implications for Korea. 중국의 디지털 경제는 빠르게 성장하여 2021년 기준 디지털 경제는 GDP의 약 40% 를 차지한다. 디지털 경제는 중국의 새로운 성장 동력으로 부상하고 있으며, 코로나 19 팬데믹으로 인해 디지털 전환은 한층 가속화되는 추세이다. 본 연구는 중국 디지털 경제의 정의와 범위를 알아보고, 국내총생산(GDP) 반영을 위한 측정 방법을 중심으로 살펴본다. 중국은 디지털 경제를 디지털 산업화와 산업의 디지털화, 디지털 거버넌스, 데이터 가치화로 정의한다. 디지털 산업화는 일반적으로 ICT산업을 말하고, 산업의 디지털화는 스마트농업, 스마트제조업과 같이 전통 산업에 디지털 기술을 응용하여 생산 증가와 효율성 증대 부분을 의미한다. 중국 국가통계국은 이러한 정의에 따라 디지털 경제를 디지털 산업화와 산업의 디지털화로 분류한 후 각 산업의 부가가치를 추정하여 국민계정에 반영한다. 기존 국민경제 계정에 해당하지 않아 통계적으로 포착되기 어려운 산업의 디지털화는 KLEMS모형으로 총요소생산성을 통해 추산한다. 중국에서 발표하는 디지털 경제의 규모는 디지털 산업화와 산업의 디지털화의 총합이며, 산업의 디지털화의 빠른 성장 추세는 중국의 디지털 전환 속도를 나타낸다. 중국은 적극적인 디지털 경제 육성 정책 시행과 국내 발전을 기반으로 향후 디지털 무역과 글로벌 디지털 경제에 영향을 미칠 것이므로 지속적으로 이를 분석하고 대응해야할 것이다.

Research on the Pattern of "Dual Circulation" Development in Zhejiang Province Under Regional Integration Taking Digital Economy as an Example

Xinyi Ding,Liying Lou,Shirong Xie,Tianlan Wei,Cong Cao 한국경영정보학회 2021 한국경영정보학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.2021 No.11

At present, the world economic situation is complex, and the epidemic has dealt a huge blow to global economic development. In this context, it is particularly important for China's economic construction to accelerate a pattern with the domestic circulation as the main body and the mutual promotion of domestic and double cycles between China and international cycles. From the perspective of the industrial chain, China is still in the middle and low end of the value chain, and the overall export competition and trade volume are low. Strengthening China's industrial chain with the help of regional economic integration is an important way to promote the "dual circulation", which can simultaneously stimulate the vitality of the two domestic and international markets, promote each other, and enhance the ability to resist risks. Among them, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (RCEP) has become a crucial platform for regional cooperation for China to build a current "dual circulation" development pattern. The development of digital economy relies on the rapid changes of digital technology. With this in-depth development of digital technology and the growing development trend of the digital economy, we are still deeply troubled by the data leakage, data abuse, digital security, network security and other technical issues, which also creates our trust in the digital economy. Studying the digital trust problem is also an indispensable step towards in achieving a healthy, efficient and sustainable digital ecological environment. Although scholars have conducted extensive studies on supply chain services in cross-border transactions and the development trend of the digital economy, the related research results have failed to address the following issues. First of all, due to cultural differences and customs, consumers in different countries often show differences in consumption behaviors. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a comparative study on consumers in different countries to understand their behavioral preferences and differences. Secondly, most of the current literature on trust issues in cross-border transactions mainly focuses on consumer privacy and information security. It is necessary to sort out the framework of supply chain services and explore consumers' choice strategies when facing different types of services. Finally, scholars often focus on one or several types of influencing factors and ignore the interaction and influence of different types of factors. Therefore, this topic believes that in the current research, the trust relationship management model for the inclusive development of digital trade in the regional integration environment has not been constructed wholly and systematically, and many essential components have not been included in the research framework, which restricts the further development of the research in this field. So, this project will carry out analysis in five dimensions, from the technology and development of the digital economy, the reshaping of services and consumption, the acceptance of the customer, the labor market and ethical and moral safety, to deconstruct the connotation and the pattern of digital economy. This can not only describe the development picture and mechanism of digital economy in each dimension, but also try to clarify the relevance and influence among the dimensions. This project takes the trust of different stakeholders in the digital economy as the entry point. Also, it takes the users and enterprises under regional integration as the research objects to explore the specific factors affecting the trust behavior of the surrounding destiny community. The research process focuses on analyzing the trust management model in the overseas development of Zhejiang enterprises and exploring the changes that RCEP will bring to the overseas development. This project conducted an empirical study based on questionnaires, using a structural equation model through which the measurement and structural models were evaluated. The project verifies information reliability through empirical studies, examines the trust transfer function of trusted third parties in the digital environment through laboratory experiments, and analyzes the factors that moderate trust transfer by relying on partial least squares multigroup analysis. Ultimately, this topic realizes the evaluation of the effectiveness and overall effectiveness of the trust model. The study results verify that RCEP will strongly support Zhejiang enterprises' foreign development, and at the same time, identify some challenges faced by some Zhejiang enterprises in the process of foreign development. Also, the results will be beneficial to discover some new ideas to promote economic development further with RCEP. The research described in this paper was supported by a grant from the National Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (File No. 202110337048).

유라시아경제연합과 디지털경제:경제연합의 촉매요인 분석

박지원 한양대학교 아태지역연구센터 2019 중소연구 Vol.43 No.3

The Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) is striving to strengthen its economic centripetal power among member countries through digital economic development. Russia is working on digital systems and standards in its national programs for digital economic development, while also promoting activities to build digital infrastructure by improving digital accessibility within the EAEU. Russian information and communication companies' activities improving their networks are helping to do this. The Russian government also created an online platform to build a digital base, led by state-run Sverbunk. Russia's digital economy and its strengthening of the EAEU's core strength are being achieved simultaneously in two ways: building digital infrastructure and building platforms.On the other hand, Kazakhstan's digital economy-building measures are different from Russia's digital economy, focusing on digitalizing its economy rather than strengthening its core power at the EAEU level. 유라시아경제연합(EAEU)은 디지털 경제육성을 통해 회원국 간 경제적 구심력을 강화하기 위해 노력하고 있다. 러시아는 자국의 디지털 경제 발전 국가프로그램에서 디지털 제도와 표준마련에 힘쓰면서 동시에 EAEU 내에서도 디지털 접근성을 개선하여 디지털 인프라를 구축하기 위한 활동을 추진 중이다. 여기에는 러시아 정보통신 기업들의 EAEU 진출 및 네트워크 개선 활동이 도움을 주고 있다. 또한 러시아 정부는 자국 디지털 기반의 공고화를 위해 온라인 플랫폼을 마련하였는데 국영기업인 스베르방크가 이것을 주도하였다. 러시아의 디지털 경제 구축과 이를 통한 EAEU의 구심력 강화는 이와 같이 디지털 인프라구축과 플랫폼 마련이라는 두 가지 방면에서 동시에 이루어지고 있다. 반면 카자흐스탄의 디지털 경제육성책은 EAEU 차원에서 구심력을 강화하기 보다는 자국경제의 디지털화에 초점을 두면서 러시아의 디지털 경제육성과는 다른 모습을 보이고 있다.