http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : SunHwa Yeon (검색결과 25 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
-
-
Applications of Hydrochemical Models for the Assessment of Groundwater
( Jong Yeon Hwang ),( Sunhwa Park ),( Moon-su Kim ),( Hun-je Jo ),( Gyeong-mi Lee ),( In Kyu Shin ),( Sang Ho Jeon ),( Da Hee Song ),( Deok-hyun Kim ),( Tae-seung Kim ),( Hyen Mi Chung ),( Hyun-koo Ki 한국환경분석학회 2017 환경분석과 독성보건 Vol.20 No.3
In this study, we focused on the evaluation and comparison of the physico-chemical characteristics and distribution of cations and anions in groundwater sampled from 2015 (485 samples) to 2016 (145 samples) in rural provinces of Korea. The major objectives of this study were as follows: 1) quality assessment of groundwater for special usage, such as agricultural or industrial applications; 2) the determination of groundwater types; and 3) the tracing of ion sources in groundwater. The assessment of the groundwater qualities from 2015 (n=480 samples) to 2016 (n=145 samples)) for agricultural usages were conducted using SAR (Sodium Adsorption Ratio), Na(%), RSC (Residual Sodium Carbonate), PI (Permeability Index), SSP (Soluble Sodium Percent), MH (Magnesium Hazard), KR (Kelly’s Ratio) and PS (Potential soil Salinity). Furthermore, the results of samples in 2015 were classified as SAR [Excellent (100%)], Sodium [(Excellent (34%), Good (55%), Permissible (9%), Doubtful (1.6%), Unsuitable (0.4%)], RSC [(Good (95.7%), Medium (3.5%), Bad (0.8%)], PI [(Excellent (40.6%), Good (59%), Unsuitable (0.4%)], SSP [(Excellent (26.3%), Good (59.8%), Fair (13.1%), Poor (0.8%)], MH [(Acceptable (94.4%), Non-Acceptable (5.6%)], and Kelly’s Ratio [(Permissible (93%), Non-Permissible (7%)], PS [(Excellent to Good (98%), Good to Injurious (1.2%), and Injurious to Unsatisfactory (0.2%)]. In addition, the groundwater sampled in 2016 was classified as SAR [Excellent (100%)], Sodium [Excellent (2.1%), Good (51.1%), Permissible (39.3%), Doubtful (6.2%), Unsuitable (0.7%)], RSC [Good (100%)], PI [Excellent (100%)], SSP [Excellent (0.7%), Good (37.2%), Fair (61.4%), Poor (0.7%)], MH [Acceptable (96.6%), Non- Acceptable (3.4%)], KR [Permissible (69.7%), (Non-Permissible (30.3%)], and PS [Excellent to Good (100%)]. Evaluations based on the Wilcox diagram were classified as “excellent to good” or “good to permissible” and the water quality evaluated using the U.S. Salinity Laboratory’s Diagram was classified as C1S1 (Excellent/ Excellent) and C2S1 (Good/Excellent) for all samples from 2015 to 2016. Moreover, in the application of two factors of the Langelier Saturation Index (LSI) and Corrosive ratio (CR), we obtained similar results for defining the suitability of groundwater for industrial purposes.
-
Assessment of Inorganic Chemicals in Groundwater in Rural Provinces of Korea
( Jong Yeon Hwang ),( Sunhwa Park ),( Moon-su Kim ),( Hun-je Jo ),( Gyong-mi Lee ),( Sang Ho Jeon ),( Da Hee Song ),( Deok-hyun Kim ),( Tae-seung Kim ),( Hyen Mi Chung ),( Hyun-koo Kim ) 한국환경분석학회 2017 환경분석과 독성보건 Vol.20 No.2
In this study, we focused on the evaluation, comparison of the physiochemical characteristics, and distribution of cations and anions in groundwater sampled in rural areas of Korea. The on-site measurements of pH, EC, DO, and ORP (average, minimum, and maximum) respectively ranged as follows: 5.7~8.7, 49~1,224 μS/cm, 0.5~11.8 mg/L, and -53.0~697 mV. The assessments of water quality for agricultural usages were evaluated using SAR, sodium (%), RSC, PI, SSP, MH, PS, and Kelly`s ratio (KR) and were classified as SAR [Excellent (100%)], Sodium [Excellent (2.1%), Good (51.1%), Permissible (39.3%), Doubtful (6.2%), Unsuitable (0.7%)], RSC [Good (100%)], PI [Excellent (100%)], SSP [Excellent (0.7%), Good (37.2%), Fair (61.4%), Poor (0.7%)], MH [Acceptable (96.6%), Non-Acceptable (3.4%)], KR [Permissible (69.7%), (Non-Permissible (30.3%)], and PS [Excellent to Good (100%)]. In addition, classifications of groundwater based on the Piper diagram showed that the groundwater was grouped into the Ca<sup>2+</sup>-(Cl<sup>-</sup>-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>) and Ca<sup>2+</sup>-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> types, which are general features of groundwater in Korea. Moreover, the tracking of dominance types (classified as evaporation, rock, and precipitation) based on the Gibbs diagram showed that the origins of anions and cations in the groundwater are of rock dominance.
-
-
-
Dahee Song,Sunhwa Park,Sang-Ho Jeon,Ki-In Kim,Jong Yeon Hwang,Moonsu Kim,Hun-Je Jo,Deok-hyun Kim,Gyeong-Mi Lee,Hye-Jin Kim,Tae-Seung Kim,Hyen Mi Chung,Hyun-Koo Kim 한국토양비료학회 2017 한국토양비료학회지 Vol.50 No.5
For this study, groundwater samples for 3 years from 2011 through 2013 were collected at 106 groundwater monitoring site in Korea. These groundwater samples were analyzed for 13 pesticides such as cabofuran, pentachlorobenzene, hexachlorobenzene, simazine, atrazine, lindane (gamma-HCH), alachlor, heptachlor, chlordane (total), endosulfan (1, 2), dieldrin, endrin, 4,4-DDT. The objectives of this study were to determine the detection frequency and their concentrations of 13 pesticides and evaluate the health risk level considering ingestion, inhalation, and skin contact using concentrations of 13 pesticides in groundwater samples. An analysis was used for the simultaneous determination for 13 pesticides using GC-MS. GC-MS was performed on HP-5ms, using helium (1 ml min<SUP>-1</SUP>) as carrier gas. The average recoveries of the pesticides were from 92.8% to 120.8%. The limits of detection (LODs) were between 0.004 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP> and 0.118 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP> and the limits of quantification (LOQs) were between 0.012 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP> and 0.354 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP>. 106 groundwater wells were selected. 54 wells were from well to monitor background groundwater quality and 52 wells were from well to monitor groundwater quality in industrial or contamination source area. Eight pesticides including pentachlorobenzene, lindane (Gamma-HCH), heptachlor, chlordane (total), Endosulfan (1, 2), dieldrin, endrin, and 4,4-DDT were not detected in groundwater samples. The detection frequency for hexachlorobenzene, alachlor, carbofuran and simazine was 23.4%, 11.4%, 7.3%, and 1.0%, respectively. Atrazine was detected once in 2011. The average concentrations were 0.00423 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP> for carbofuran, 0.000243 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP> for alachlor, 0.00015 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP> for simazine, and 0.00001 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP> for hexachlorobenzene. The detection frequency of hexachlorobenzene was high, but the average concentration was low. In the contaminated groundwater, the detection frequency for hexachlorobenzene, alachlor, carbofuran, simazine and atrazine was 26.1%, 21.3%, 7.1%, 1.9% and 0.3%, respectively. In the uncontaminated groundwater, detection frequency for hexachlorobenzene, carbofuran and alachlor were 20.2%, 7.5%, and 1.9% respectively. Simazine and atrazine were not detected at uncontaminated groundwater wells. According to the purpose of groundwater use, atrazine was detected for agricultural groundwater use. Hexachlorobenzene showed high detection frequency at agricultural groundwater use area where the animal feeding area and golf course area were located. Alachlor showed more than 50% detection frequency at cropping area, pollution concern river area, and golf course area. Atrazine was detected in agricultural water use area. By land use, the maximum detection frequency of alachlor was found near an orchard. For human risk assessment, the cancer risk for the 5 pesticides was between 10<SUP>-7</SUP> and 10<SUP>-10</SUP>, while the non-cancer risk (HQ value) was between 10<SUP>-4</SUP> and 10<SUP>-6</SUP>. For conclusion, these monitoring study needs to continue because of the possibility of groundwater contamination based on various purpose of groundwater use.
-
Dahee Song,Sunhwa Park,Sang-Ho Jeon,Jong Yeon Hwang,Moonsu Kim,Hun-Je Jo,Deok-Hyun Kim,Gyeong-Mi Lee,Ki-In Kim,Hye-Jin Kim,Tae-Seung Kim,Hyen Mi Chung,Hyun-Koo Kim 한국토양비료학회 2017 한국토양비료학회지 Vol.50 No.4
In this study, we monitored 4 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as chloroform, dichloromethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, and tetrachloromethane in groundwater samples to determine the detection frequency and their concentrations and evaluated the health risk level considering ingestion, inhalation, and skin contact. 75 groundwater wells were selected. 24 wells were from monitoring background groundwater quality level and 51 wells were from monitoring groundwater quality level in industrial or contamination source area. In the results, the detection frequency for chloroform, dichloromethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, and tetrachloromethane was 42.3%, 8.1%, 6.0%, and 3.4%, respectively. The average concentrations of VOCs were high in the order of chloroform (1.7 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP>), dichloromethane (0.08 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP>), tetrachloromethane (0.05 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP>), and 1,2-dichloroethane (0.05 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP>). Chloroform had the highest detection frequency and average detection concentration. In the contaminated groundwater, the detection frequency of VOCs was high in the order of chloroform, dichloromethane, 1,2-dchloroethane, and tetrachloromethane. The average concentrations for chloroform, dichloromethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, and tetrachloromethane were 2.23 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP>, 0.08 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP>, 0.07 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP>, and 0.06 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP>, respectively. All the 4 compounds were detected at industrial complex and storage tank area. The maximum concentration of chloroform, dichloromethane, and 1,2-dichloroethane was detected at industrial complex area. Especially, the maximum concentration of chloroform and dichloromethane was detected at a chemical factory area. In the uncontaminated groundwater, the detection frequency of VOCs was high in the order of chloroform, dichloromethane, and 1,2-dchloroethane and tetrachloromethane was not detected. The average concentrations for chloroform, dichloromethane, and 1,2-dichloroethane were 0.57 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP>, 0.07 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP>, and 0.03 μg L<SUP>-1</SUP>, respectively. Although chloroform in the uncontaminated groundwater was detected the most, the concentration of chloroform was not exceeding water quality standards. By land use, the maximum detection frequency of 1,2-dichloroethane was found near a traffic area. For human risk assessment, the cancer risk for the 4 VOCs was 1<SUP>0-6</SUP>~10<SUP>-9</SUP>, while the non-cancer risk (HQ value) for the 4 VOCs is 10<SUP>-2</SUP>~10<SUP>-3</SUP>.
-
Song, Dahee,Park, Sunhwa,Jeon, Sang-Ho,Hwang, Jong Yeon,Kim, Moonsu,Jo, Hun-Je,Kim, Deok-Hyun,Lee, Gyeong-Mi,Kim, Ki-In,Kim, Hye-Jin,Kim, Tae-Seung,Chung, Hyen Mi,Kim, Hyun-Koo 한국토양비료학회 2017 한국토양비료학회지 Vol.50 No.4
In this study, we monitored 4 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as chloroform, dichloromethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, and tetrachloromethane in groundwater samples to determine the detection frequency and their concentrations and evaluated the health risk level considering ingestion, inhalation, and skin contact. 75 groundwater wells were selected. 24 wells were from monitoring background groundwater quality level and 51 wells were from monitoring groundwater quality level in industrial or contamination source area. In the results, the detection frequency for chloroform, dichloromethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, and tetrachloromethane was 42.3%, 8.1%, 6.0%, and 3.4%, respectively. The average concentrations of VOCs were high in the order of chloroform ($1.7{\mu}g\;L^{-1}$), dichloromethane ($0.08{\mu}g\;L^{-1}$), tetrachloromethane ($0.05{\mu}g\;L^{-1}$), and 1,2-dichloroethane ($0.05{\mu}g\;L^{-1}$). Chloroform had the highest detection frequency and average detection concentration. In the contaminated groundwater, the detection frequency of VOCs was high in the order of chloroform, dichloromethane, 1,2-dchloroethane, and tetrachloromethane. The average concentrations for chloroform, dichloromethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, and tetrachloromethane were $2.23{\mu}g\;L^{-1}$, $0.08{\mu}g\;L^{-1}$, $0.07{\mu}g\;L^{-1}$, and $0.06{\mu}g\;L^{-1}$, respectively. All the 4 compounds were detected at industrial complex and storage tank area. The maximum concentration of chloroform, dichloromethane, and 1,2-dichloroethane was detected at industrial complex area. Especially, the maximum concentration of chloroform and dichloromethane was detected at a chemical factory area. In the uncontaminated groundwater, the detection frequency of VOCs was high in the order of chloroform, dichloromethane, and 1,2-dchloroethane and tetrachloromethane was not detected. The average concentrations for chloroform, dichloromethane, and 1,2-dichloroethane were $0.57{\mu}g\;L^{-1}$, $0.07{\mu}g\;L^{-1}$, and $0.03{\mu}g\;L^{-1}$, respectively. Although chloroform in the uncontaminated groundwater was detected the most, the concentration of chloroform was not exceeding water quality standards. By land use, the maximum detection frequency of 1,2-dichloroethane was found near a traffic area. For human risk assessment, the cancer risk for the 4 VOCs was $10^{-6}{\sim}10^{-9}$, while the non-cancer risk (HQ value) for the 4 VOCs is $10^{-2}{\sim}10^{-3}$.
ScienceON연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
