http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Mueller, Wolf-Detrich,Koo B. Chin Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resource 2003 한국축산식품학회지 Vol.23 No.4
The objectives of this study were to develop restructured meat products(RMPs) using a transgluta-minase(TGase) and to improve the textural characteristics of RMPs manufactured with pale, soft, exudative(PSE) pork hams. The pH values of RMPs with PSE and normal pork were 5.94 and 6.07, respectively, and their water activity value was approximately 0.981. The RMPs had 70∼72% moisture, 4∼5% fat, 19∼20% protein, and approximately 3% ash contents. No differences in pH, water activity, chemical composition, and hunter color values were observed between RMPs manufactured with normal and PSE pork(p>0.05). However, RMPs containing PSE pork hams had higher drip loss(%)(p>0.05) than those with normal pork hams after 10 days of refrigerated storage. Although no differences were observed in the texture profile analysis(TPA) hardness and sensory evaluation, RMPs with PSE pork hams tended to have more pores and lower binding capacity those with normal pork. This result indicated that additional substrates or longer tumbling time(>4 hr) for the manufacture of RMPs containing PSE pork were required for the products to have similar palatability to those with normal pork.
The Iraq Syndrome: American Policy and Opinion after Debacle
( John Mueller ) 국방대학교 안보문제연구소 2004 The Korean Journal of Security Affairs Vol.9 No.2
Since World War II, American foreign policy has endured the Vietnam Syndrome and the Somalia Syndrome, and it seems likely that the United States is now in the process of embracing the Iraq Syndrome, triggered by what seems to be debacle in that country. This is likely to have significant repercussions in American foreign policy toward other areas including Korea. Among the consequences are likely to be the end of the Bush Doctrine, empire, unilateralism, preemption, and any sort of crusading efforts to remake the world by military force. There will probably be new pressures to reduce the military, to withdraw American troops from overseas including and especially from Korea and to pay less attention to the Israel-Palestine dispute. The chief beneficiaries of the Iraq Syndrome are the rogue/axis of evil states of Iran and North Korea: the likelihood of any coherent application of military action or even of focused military threat against them has already substantially diminished, as it also has against countries like Syria. Intelligence suggesting such states have become threatening will be deeply questioned, moves to apply military force to them will be met with widespread dismay and opposition, and additional persecution by such regimes of their own people will be tolerated and ignored. Since World War II, American foreign policy has endured, or wallowed in, several perspectives, often labelled syndromes, that have been triggered by foreign policy debacles. One of these was the Vietnam Syndrome that began around 1975, and another was the Somalia Syndrome ?that began around 1992. It seems likely that the United States is currently in the process of embracing a third: the Iraq Syndrome. This is likely to have indeed, already has had significant repercussions in the country`s foreign policy toward other areas including Korea.
Theater der Potentialität -Brecht, Benjamin und das experimentelle Theater der Gegenwart-
Nikolaus Mueller-Schoell 한국브레히트학회 2013 브레히트와 현대연극 Vol.0 No.29
베르톨트 브레히트와 발터 벤야민이 1926년과 1933년 사이에 제시한 연극이론과 연극의 현재성이란 어디에 근거하는 것일까? 발터 벤야민의 「브레히트에 대한 시도」가 출간되고, 하이너 뮐러가 교훈극을 재발견했을 당시인 60년대 말 브레히트에게 남겨진 것은 무엇인가? 지난 세기 연극 및 문예학자들이 현대연극 및 이론논쟁에 새롭게 들고 왔던 ‘또 다른 브레히트’의 현재성이란 과연 무엇인가?본 논문은 브레히트와 벤야민을 중심으로 이러한 질문들에 대한 답을 규명해 보고자 한다. 주제적인 측면에서 본 논문은 크게 세 부분으로 나누어진다. 1. 1926년 브레히트의 서사극에서 1930년대 교훈극에 이르기까지 가능성에 대한 또 다른 생각이 브레히트의 연극의 발전단계를 결정하고 있다는 점이다. 2. 브레히트와 마찬가지로 벤야민에게 있어서 실제적은 것은 현대 실험극과 연관되어 있으며, 이는 미셀 푸코와 조르조 아감벤의 입장에서 볼 때 연극의 ‘장치’에 관한 논쟁이라 할 수 있다. 3. 앞에서 제기한 논쟁들을 현대연극의 새로운 사례들을 통해 알아보는 것이다. 우선, “모방성의 연극에 관한 발터 벤야민의 이론”이라고 제목이 붙은 첫 번째 부분에서는 브레히트의 서사극에 관한 벤야민의 이론을 그의 역사의 개념과 연관해서 고찰하고 있다. 벤야민의 시각에서 볼 때, 브레히트의 서사극은 현재에는 실현될 수 없지만 언제든지 계속해서 일어날 수 있는 잠재성의 연극으로서 이해될 수 있다. “대중과 국가 - 서사극에서 교훈극까지”라는 제목이 붙은 두 번째 부분에서는 벤야민이 제시한 잠재성의 연극을 중심으로 1926년 브레히트의 서사극에서부터 1930년대 그의 교훈극에 이르기까지 브레히트의 연극에 나타난 잠재성의 요소를 고찰하고 있다. “잠재성의 연극으로서의 오늘날의 형식들 - 재현의 장치에 관한 논쟁들”이라고 제목이 붙은 세 번째 부분에서는 브레히트와 벤야민이 제시한 잠재성의 연극은 미셀 푸코와 조르조 아감벤의 ‘장치’의 개념과 밀접히 연관되어 있으며, 연극에서 나타나는 장치적 특징을 현대연극의 새로운 사례들을 중심으로 살펴보고 있다.
Antiproliferation Policy as a Hindrance to Resolving Korea : Some Policy Proposals
John Mueller 국방대학교 국가안전보장문제연구소 2019 The Korean Journal of Security Affairs Vol.24 No.2
Although alarmed antiproliferation efforts have proved to be exceedingly costly, leading to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people, the consequences of nuclear proliferation itself have been substantially benign: those who have acquired the weapons have “used” them simply to stoke their egos or to deter real or imagined threats. It therefore doesn’t really matter much whether North Korea has nuclear weapons or not. However, the obsession about proliferation potentially stands in the way of an extremely important development. It is entirely possible (but not certain) that Korea is at a historic turning point: because North Korean leader Kim Jong-un seems to be genuine about wanting to see his country become developed, there is a good prospect of forging a potentially permanent normalization of relations on the peninsula. This would markedly reduce the prospect of armed conflict there while finally relieving the perpetual suffering of the North Korean people. Accordingly, policy should involve backburnering the nuclear issue, actively exploring the possibilities for normalization, relaxing or removing the sanctions, letting South Korea take the lead, and waiting.