http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이진홍,이정웅,조재영,배상원,이의형,이주연,Rhee, Jin-Hong,Lee, Jeong-Woung,Cho, Jae-Young,Bae, Sang-Won,Lee, Eui-Hyung,Lee, Ju-Youn 대한족부족관절학회 1997 대한족부족관절학회지 Vol.1 No.2
The fracture and fracture-dislocation of the neck of the talus (Hawkins' type I-IV) are uncommon injuries and represent only 0.12 to 0.32% of all fracures. Authors clinically evaluated in 12 cases Whom treated fracures of the neck of the talus, at department of orthopaedic surgery, Sun General Hospital, from 1990 to 1996, and the following results are obtained. 1. Of 12 cases, there were 11 males and 1 female, average age was 30 years. 2. Causes of fracture was fall down injury in 7 cases(58%), traffic accident in 4 cases(33%), direct trauma in 1 case(8%). 3. According to the classification by Hawkins' type I in 2 cases(17%), type II in 7cases (58%), type III in 3cases(25%). 4. Associated injuries were calcaneal fracture in 3 cases, fracture-dislocation of talus in 3 cases, subtalar dislocation in 3 cases, medial malleolar fracture in 5 cases, soft tissue injury in 3 cases, femur and tibia fracture in 1 case, and lumbar Spine compression fracture in 1 case. 5. Average time to operation after injury was 2.5 days. 6. In 2 cases were treated conservatively and 10 cases were treated open reduction and internal fixation with screw or K-wire. 7. Complications were avascular necrosis in 4 cases, post traumatic arthritis in 2 cases, skin necrosis in 4 cases, and then ankle fusion was done in 2 cases. 8. High rate of complication was seen in the talar neck fracture associated with calcaneal fracture. In the analysis of above results, evaluated by Hawkins' scoring system were excellent to fair in 75%.
자가 또는 동종 이식물을 이용한 후방 십자 인대 재건술 후의 결과
전재균,김의순,최보열,윤창훈,이정웅,선두훈,문명상,Chon Je-Gyun,Kim Eui-Soon,Choi Bo-Yeul,Yoon Chang-Hoon,Lee Jeong-Woung,Sun Doo-Hoon,Moon Myung-Sang 대한관절경학회 2001 대한관절경학회지 Vol.5 No.2
목 적 : 후방 십자 인대 손상의 치료로서 관절경적 후방 십자 인대 재건술을 시행하여 임상 결과를 분석하고자 하였으며, 특히 추시상 후방 불안정의 재발 여부와 자가 골-슬개건-골을 이용하여 재건한 경우 및 동종 이식물을 이용한 결과를 비교 분석하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 1994년 1월부터 1999년 5월까지 본원에서 수술 치료한 총 34례의 후방 십자 인대 손상의 환자 중에서 전외측 다발만을 관절경적으로 재건술을 시행하고 12개월 이상 최종 추시가 가능했던 25례 중 자가 반건양건을 이용한 1례를 제외한 24례를 대상으로 하였으며, 24례 중 자가 골-슬개건-골을 이용하여 재건한 경우를 제 I군(11례), 동종 아킬레스 건을 이용하여 재건한 경우를 제 II군(7례), 동종 골-슬개건-골을 이용하여 재건한 경우를 제 III군(6례)으로 하였다. 평가 방법은 24례 모두를 International Knee Documentation Committee(IKDC) knee ligament standard evaluation form, Lysholm knee scoring scale을 이용하여 세 집단을 비교하였으며 전 후방 안정도의 측정을 위해서 $KT-2000^{TM}$ knee ligament arthrometer MED metric, USA(KT-2000)를 사용하였다. Kruskal-Wallis test와 Mann-Whitney U(Wilcoxon Rank Sum) 검정법을 이용하여 세 집단을 비교 통계 분석하였다. 결과 : IKDC 최종 평가상 B(거의 정상)이상은 전체 24례 중 11례$(46\%)$로 만족스러운 결과는 아니었고, KT-2000으로 측정시 양측 비교하여 6mm 이상 차이가 나는 경우는 제 I군 4례$(36\%)$, 제 II군 2례$(29\%)$, 제 III군 2례$(33\%)$에서 후방 불안정성을 보였다. Lysholm knee scoring scale을 이용한 평가 결과는 제 I군이 평균 78점 (fair), 제 II군이 75점(fair), 제 III군이 76점(fair)이었다. 재료에 따른 각 군간의 객관적, 주관적 결과의 차이는 보이지 않았다. 결론 : 후방 십자 인대 손상시 불안정의 정도가 심하지 않은 단독 손상을 제외하고는 관절경적 재건술이 보편화 되는 추세이나, 보다 정확한 수술 술기와 동반 손상에 대한 치밀한 치료 계획이 요구되며, 새로운 시도와 그에 따른 많은 연구가 필요할 것으로 생각된다. Purpose : The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical results after arthroscopic PCL reconstruction and to compare the clinical results after arthroscopic PCL reconstruction using BPTB(bone patellar tendon bone) autograft(Group I : 11 cases), Achilles tendon allograft(Group II : 7 cases) and BPTB allograft(Group 111.6 cases). Materials and Methods : We reviewed the result of 24 patients who had been managed with arthroscopic reconstruction using different graft materials such as BPTB autograft, Achilles tendon allograft and BPTB allograft. Twenty-four patients(average age, 37 years) with PCL rupture were retrospectively evaluated more than one year(average, 31 months) after having arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The clinical results were evaluated by IKDC ligament standard evaluation form, using $KT-2000^{TM}$ knee ligament arthrometer and also evaluated Lysholm knee scoring scale. Results : The final evaluation was nearly normal in 11 patients($45\%$ in Group I, $43\%$ in Group II, $50\%$ in Group III). The corrected posterior sagging was abnormal(side to side difference more than 6mm) in 8 patients($36\%$ in Group I, $29\%$ in Group II, $33\%$ in Group III). We could not find significant difference among three groups by IKDC scale. Conclusion : Comparing with other reports, our overall results were not satisfactory. And also, we could not find any remarkable difference among the three groups. Further research is necessary to evaluate new surgical approaches as well as improved techniques for capsular and collateral ligament injuries.
이식물에 따른 전방 십자 인대 재건술의 결과 비교 - 자가 골 - 슬개건 - 골 , 동종 골 - 슬개건 - 골 그리고 동종 아킬레스건의 비교 -
전재균(Je Gyun Chon),김의순(Eui Soon Kim),이장근(Jang Geun Lee),고염규(Youm Gyu Ko),최원태(Won Tae Choi),최호림(Ho Rim Choi),이정웅(Jeong Woung Lee) 대한슬관절학회 2001 대한슬관절학회지 Vol.13 No.2
Purpose : To compare the long-term results of reconstruction for the anterior cruciate ligament used by BPTB autograft, BPTB allograft and Achilles tendon allograft. Materials and Methods : We reviewed the results of 147 patients who had been managed with arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using different graft such as BPTB autograft, Achilles tendon allograft and allograft BPTB. Thirty two patients(average age, 34 years) were retrospectively evaluated. The follow-up period was more than two years(average, 35 months). Results were evaluated with IKDC knee ligament standard evaluation form, KT-2000^TM arthrometer, and Lysholm knee scoring scale. Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test(Wilcoxon Rank Sun) were used for statistical analysis. Results : On IKDC scale, the final evaluation was nearly normal in all patients. We could not find statistical difference among the three groups by KT-2000TM arthrometer. Conclusion : The use of allografts may be an acceptable choice for ACL reconstruction.