http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
유광흠(Yu, Kwang-Heum),김민지(Kim, Min-Ji) 대한건축학회 2018 대한건축학회논문집 Vol.34 No.10
As the life cycle of buildings is expected to increase, new constructions will decrease and the proportion of remodeling and repair will increase. Therefore, there is an increasing need for overall performance management of old buildings. In 2020, the proportion of buildings over 30 years old is expected to reach a half. As a result, the demand for securing and improving the performance in the stage of using the building is increasing due to the change in the demand for the building, such as the decrease in the construction permit and the increase in the use of the existing building. From this perspective, the study sought to consider institutional measures to organize the preventive and conservative maintenance of buildings. For this purpose, the conceptual goals of inspection for building maintenance were set through a literature review, and the status and problems associated with building maintenance were analyzed to suggest ways to improve the inspection system for building maintenance.
유광석 ( Kwang Suk Yoo ) 한국사회역사학회 2013 담론 201 Vol.16 No.2
This article deals with how and why rational choice theory is different from the secularization thesis concerning the stability of religious demand, which is one of the most important differences between the two sides, as representative of the new paradigm and old paradigm respectively. Basically, the latter sticks to the declining influence of or interest in religion and hence assume that the whole religious demand in a society is not stable. As religious pluralism deepens the process of secularization, religious institutions are considered to experience a reduction of their authorization, legitimacy, and social functions. The old paradigm argues that the decline of religious demand is unavoidable in any modernized societies because religion and modernization is basically incompatible. In contrast, rational choice theorists suppose that the whole stock of religious demand is stable in any societies, even if religious preference differs from person to person. A variety of religious preference is discouraged by religious monopoly or oligopoly, but encouraged by religious competition. Religious vitality in society is made and kept by free competition among various religious firms which strive to survive a religious market. The new paradigm emphasizes the quantity and quality of religious service that religious firms supply in order to attract potential or current religious demanders, ranging from atheists to fundamentalists. Supply-side factors such as religious organization, preaching, marketing strategy, and fellowship program are the primary determinant of religious change. Without the assumption of the stability of religious demand, therefore, the new paradigm cannot explain the importance of the supply-side factors. Differences between secularization theory and rational choice theory stem from how each theory sees the stability of religious demand. They are two major paradigms of the sociology of religion interested in understanding how and why religions change in contemporary societies. Nonetheless, the latter seems more helpful with our making religious enactment and policy about a socio-structural orientation where our religious economy should move toward.