담론 201 을 창간하며 ( 한국사회역사학회 , 담론 201 , 제 1 권 2 호 )

김성건 한국사회역사학회 1998 담론 201 Vol.1 No.2

N/A

기조강연 : 한국사회역사학회 2007년도 추계 학술대회 기조강연 : 세계화와 민족주의를 생각하면서 -우리 시대의 학문하기-

진덕규 ( Duk Kyu Jin ) 한국사회역사학회 2007 담론 201 Vol.10 No.3

3⋅1운동 100주년, 역사전쟁과 고종 독시(毒弑)

이영재 한국사회역사학회 2019 담론 201 Vol.22 No.2

This paper especially focuses on the hypothesis of poisoning Emperor Gojong, because the intensity of the ideological rejection of poisoning of Emperor Gojong on the 100th anniversary of the 3⋅1 movement. There is a concern about the historical war that makes history a tool for certain ideologies. The ideological denial of the poisoning of Gojong is likely to extend to the exclusion of Gojong and the Korean Empire in relation to the interpretation of political modernization in Korea. The purpose of this study is a dual purpose, the one is to watch out for the concern that the hypothesis of poisoning Emperor Gojong will be instrumentalized as part of the ‘historical war’. The other is to examine the controversy over the political necessity of Japan to assassinate Gojong, the actual issue of the poisoning of Gojong, the point of time of death of Gojong and the cause of death, and to overcome the contributing to the elimination of exhaustion controversy. 이 논문이 특히 고종 독살설에 주목한 것은 3⋅1운동 100주년을 맞아 유독 고종 독살설에 대한 부정의 강도가 실체적 진실이 아닌 이념적 강도를 더해가며 증폭되고 있기 때문이다. 자칫 특정 이념에 역사를 도구화하는 역사전쟁의 우려가 나타나고 있다. 고종 독살설에 대한 이념적 부정은 한국의 정치적 근대화 해석과 관련하여 고종과 대한제국에 대한 배제로까지 확대될 가능성이 높다는 점에서 유의할 필요가 있다. 이 연구의 연구목적은 이중적인 데 하나는 역사가들의 이념에 따라 역사적 사실을 주조하는 근현대사 ‘역사전쟁’의 일환으로 고종독살설이 도구화될 우려를 경계하는 것이다. 다른 하나는 고종독살설의 실체적 쟁점인 고종을 암살해야 할 일본의 정치적 필요성, 고종의 사망시점 및 사망원인 등에 대한 논란을 검토해 고종 독살설의 실체에 다가감으로써 최근 ‘야사’로까지 치부되고 있는 고종 독살설과 관련한 소모적 논란을 해소하는데 있다.

담론 201 의 지향점 ( 한국사회역사학회 , 담론 201 제 2 권 3 호 , 1999 )

김왕식 한국사회역사학회 1999 담론 201 Vol.2 No.3

N/A

삶의 역사성과 추체험 -딜타이의 의미 이론과 해석학적 재구성 방법론-

신진욱 ( Jin Wook Shin ) 한국사회역사학회 2009 담론 201 Vol.12 No.1

Wilhelm Dilthey, who made a critical contribution to the establishment of modern hermeneutics, tried to develop epistemological, logical, and methodological ideas for interpreting the meaning on the ground of the ontological understanding of meaningfully mediated symbolic interactions. Although his Geisteswissenschaften made a deep influence upon the sociological theory and methodology of some classical sociologists like Weber and Simmel, the contemporary sociology did not go beyond a superficial and one-sided understanding that Dilthey`s hermeneutical methodology depends upon romanticist conceptions of empathy, sympathy, or psychological identification with others. The present article, however, draws some significant insights that may contribute to the sociological theory and interpretive methodology by reintrepreting Dilthey`s Geisteswissenschaften and hermeneutics. Firstly, the life of human actors is nothing but a continuous process of experiencing the social interaction and interrelatedness with others, and the `meaning` emerges through the interpretive practices of weaving a system of connection from the individual experiences. Secondly, the life and the meaning is historical in its nature, because the world of meaning is constructed by interlinking individual past experiences to constitute a unitary narrative of the whole life-history. Thirdly, for the hermeneutical explication of the process of meaning-making and the system of meanings, one cannot depend upon empathy and sympathy, but should make an inversive operation of Nacherleben the methodological core of which resides in reconstructing the action environment of actors, the proceedings of their life-history, and the system of meanings that emerge out of the very lived experiences of life itself.

한국에 있어서 발전국가의 전환

안승국 ( Seung Gook Ahn ) 한국사회역사학회 2009 담론 201 Vol.12 No.1

The main question of the paper is what the role of the state demands a change in order to achieve development. Korea was integrated into the international division of labor and has taken advantage of the opportunity to industrialize with proper strategies. In this process of industrializing, the state performed a relatively broad range of roles leading and regulating the market. The state provided companies credit on favorable terms and tax benefits in order to drive exports. The transformation of the developmental state is neither an interventionist state nor a regulatory state. Instead, it follows a third alternative that satisfies both the need to form actual market principles and allows appropriate state intervention. In other words, deregulation is necessary but overall regulation is also needed to promote economic reform. Therefore, the transformation of the developmental state depends on blocking excessive state interference, while finding the appropriate level of state intervention.

담론201을 창간하며

김성건 한국사회역사학회 2009 담론 201 Vol.12 No.2

A Korean Colonial Intellectual`s View of Western Europe in the Early 1930s

( Young Suk Lee ) 한국사회역사학회 2009 담론 201 Vol.12 No.2

Soon-Tak Lee(李順鐸), a Marxist professor of Yonhee Higher College, traveled around the world during his sabbatical year of 1933. After his return to Korea, he published a travel book, Essays on the Recent World Travel(1934), which is considered the first world-travel literature in Korea. He studied at Kyoto Imperial University under the guidance of Hazime Kawakami(河上肇), a famous Marxist scholar. Professor Kawakami had also traveled in Europe in the 1910s, wrote a trave l book titled Looking back Fatherland(1915). This is quite a coincidence between these two scholars` careers. Kawakami`s book is an important source that provides us with a Marxist intellectual`s view of Western Europe. On the other hand, Lee`s book represents an East Asian scholar`s views of Western Europe, and at the same time, includes a colonial intellectual`s attitude towards imperialism in the early twentieth century. The purpose of this paper is to examine some differences inherent in the two scholars` views on Western Europe and modern civilization. While Kawakami tried to reflect the cultural pattern and type of the West and the East comparatively, Lee was interested in understanding European culture itself.

문화적 세계화와 한국사회의 문화전쟁

김성건 ( Sung Gun Kim ) 한국사회역사학회 2009 담론 201 Vol.12 No.2

This study is based on two premises. First, there would be a complex relationship among globalization, traditional culture and contemporary culture. Second, cultural conflict is mainly about the struggle for domination. This paper examines the mutual confrontation between cultural conservatives, including such religious groups as Protestant, and cultural liberals, most of whom are non-religious and reform-oriented lefts, within the present turbulent Korean society. Both of two groups are continuously struggling over such issues as conscientious objection against military service, infidelity and homosexuality, traditional family registration and adultery, etc. In this study the author has used a lot of relevant newspaper materials. The main purpose of the study is to show that confronting world-views is not a generational clash but a kind of cultural war into which develops from class struggles among groups, whose economic interests are quite different. By considering the preponderant influence of cultural globalization over Korea at the moment, the author asserts that the secular liberals are attached to such western values as diversity, equality, and human rights, whereas the conservatives to such intrinsic old values as tradition, family, and order, and that these conflicting social values are ideology and faith through which each of two groups gain hegemonic power. Following Hunter`s culture wars theory and Gramsci`s hegemony theory, the author concludes that there is a definite class struggle ongoing in the sphere of culture within contemporary Korean society.

가족실태와 가족체계이론의 괴리에 대한 비판적 검토 -청소년 관련 가족 연구를 중심으로-

조정호 ( Jong Ho Joh ) 한국사회역사학회 2009 담론 201 Vol.12 No.3

The purpose of this paper is to provide development tasks of family studies related with Korean youth by a critical examination on the separation between family reality and family systems theory. To achieve it, this paper reviewed the trends of theoretical changes and domestic family reality changes, and analyzed the characteristics of family studies related with Korean youth. As a result, it reveals that established family studies have some limitations connected with old-fashioned systems theories and/or Korean traditional family norms. In terms of research methods and viewpoints, Korean youth studies of family structure and function have been mainly conducted by quantitative research, whose study plans were framed by variables derived from family systems theory, thus not reflecting changes of family structure and function fostered by new communication in information society. As an attempt of overcoming such limits with family systems theory oriented approaches, this paper suggested that Korean youth studies of family should explore diverse issues and factors, and employ varying theories and methods, such as critical or feminist perspectives, constructionist or deconstructionist analyses, and phenomenological or hermeneutic approaches.