iRINGTools를 활용한 기자재 분류체계의 구축 절차

김봉철(Bongcheol Kim),박상진(Sangjin Park),문두환(Duhwan Mun) 한국기계가공학회 2016 한국기계가공학회 춘추계학술대회 논문집 Vol.2016 No.4

계획법상 대규모사업에서의 조기적 공중참여에 관한 연구

김봉철(Kim BongCheol) 한국토지공법학회 2016 土地公法硏究 Vol.73 No.1

계획법상 공중참여제도는 계획형성과정의 투명성과 공개성이라는 민주주의 요소와 실효적인 주민의 권익보호라는 법치주의 요소를 포함하고 있다. 이러한 공중참여는 다수인의 이익을 합리적으로 조정하는 절차로서 행정의 민주화와 행정에 대한 신뢰를 확보하기 위한 절차이다. 이러한 인식하에 독일 연방행정절차법은 계획확정절차에서의 공중참여를 규정함으로써, 사업에 이해관계가 있는 공중의 사익과 사업을 통해 추구하는 공익이 조화될 수 있는 여지를 제공하고 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 대규모사업계획의 경우에는 계획확정절차에서의 공중참여만으로는 공중참여의 그 절차적 의의를 실질적으로 구현하기 어렵다는 한계가 있다. 왜냐하면 이미 계획확정단계에서의 대규모사업계획은 이미 상당할 정도로 구체화된 계획이기 때문에 공중참여를 통한 계획의 수정·변경은 사실상 기대하기 힘들기 때문이다. 이러한 인식을 바탕으로 독일은 연방행정절차법 제25조 제3항에서 사업주체에 의한 대규모사업계획의 내부적 형성단계에서 사전적으로 공중이 참여하는 것을 내용으로 하는 조기적 공중참여제도를 규정하고 있는 것이다. 사업주체의 계획형성단계에서의 공중의 초기적 개입은 계획안의 변경 및 수정여지를 실질적으로 형성하는 것이다. 조기적 공중참여제도는 연방행정절차법상의 계획확정절차와는 달리 사실상 대규모사업에 관심이 있는 모든 자연인과 단체를 그 참여주체로 하여 계획형성의 동반자로서의 공중의 지위를 더욱 강화하고 있다. 또한 조기적인 공중참여는 사업의 차질없는 수행을 위한 다양한 정보를 사업주체가 계획형성단계에서 사전적으로 획득할 수 있는 기회를 제공함으로써 사업의 차질없는 수행에 기여하는 기능도 수행한다. 이러한 조기적 공중참여의 의의와 그 기능을 볼 때, 대규모사업에서의 조기적 공중참여 제도도입에 관한 논의가 본격적으로 시작될 필요성이 있다. 현행 행정절차법에 계획확정절차를 도입하면서 사전적 공중참여제도를 도입하거나 또는 대규모사업과 관련되는 개별법에 도입하는 방안도 고려될 수 있다. 비록 독일 연방행정절차법이 사업주체의 조기적 공중 참여의 실시를 의무화하지 않고, 더 나아가 행정청의 노력의무만을 규정하고 있지만, 조기적 공중참여제도의 실행에서의 사실상의 강제력과 그 제도적 유용성이 과소평가되어서는 안될 것이다. Die planungsrechtliche Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung enthält sowohl ein demokratisches Element wie die Transparenz bei dem Gestaltungsverfahren der Planung und die Öffentlichkeit als auch ein rechtsstaatliches Element wie den effektiven Rechtsschutz der EInwohner. Die Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung ist ein Verfahren, das die Interessen der Mehrheit vernünftig reguliert und dadurch die Demokratisierung der Verwaltung erzielt. Damit wird auch das Vertrauen an die Verwaltung sichergestellt. Durch die Regelung der Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung beim Planfeststellungsverfahren bereitet das Bundesverwaltungsverfahrensgesetz einen Raum für die Harmonisierung der Privatinteressen der betroffenen Öffentlichkeit, die sich an dem Vorhaben interessieren, und der Öffentlichkeitsinteressen. Bei allem ist es schwierig, im Falle eines ein Großvorhaben betreffenden Planes durch die Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung lediglich beim Planfeststellungsverfahren die Bedeutung des Beteiligungsverfahrens der Öffentlichkeit materiell zu verwirklichen. Denn ein Plan des Großvorhabens ist beim Planfeststellungsverfahren bereits beträchtlich konkretisiert, so dass die Nachbesserung bzw. Änderung des Planes durch die Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung praktisch nicht zu erwarten ist. Aufgrund solcher Erkenntnis regelt Deutschland im § 25 Abs. 3 Bundesverwaltungsverfahrensgesetz die Institution der frühen Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung, die bei der inneren Gestaltungsphase der Planung eines Großvorhabens durch den Vorhabenträger die Beteiligung der Öffentlichkeit vorschreibt. Mit der Institution der frühen Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung am Anfang der Plangestaltungsphase des Vorhabenträgers wird der Nachbesserungs- und Änderungsraum des Planungsentwurfs materiell gestaltet. Anders als bei dem Planfeststellungsverfahren im Bundesverwaltungsverfahrensrecht können jede natürliche Person und Vereinigung, die sich an dem Großvorhaben interessieren, an der Institution der frühen Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung, teilnehmen. Dadurch wird die Stellung der Öffentlichkeit als Begleiter der Plangestaltung gestärkt. Ferner bietet die frühe Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung dem Träger des Vorhabens die Gelegenheit an, vielfältige Informationen für die Vorhabensdurchführung frühzeitig zu erhalten und somit kann das Vorhaben problemlos durchgeführt werden. Angesichts der Bedeutung und der Funktion der frühen Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung, ist es notwendig darüber zu diskutieren, bei einem Großvorhaben die Institution der frühen Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung einzuführen. Die Institution der frühen Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung kann mit dem Planfeststellungsverfahren in das bestehende Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz oder jene in ein Sondergesetz, das die Großvorhaben betrifft, eingeführt werden. Obwohl das Bundesverwaltungsverfahrensgesetz Deutschlands dem Vorhabensträger die Praktizierung der frühen Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung nicht verpflichtet, und nur die Hinwirkungspflicht der Verwaltung regelt, sollte der materielle Zwang bei der Durchführung der Institution der frühen Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung und deren institutionellen Nutzbarkeit nicht unterschätzt werden.

조례안 적법성 심사에서의 법원의 사법적극주의 경향에 관한 연구

김봉철(Bongcheol Kim) 한국지방자치법학회 2024 지방자치법연구(地方自治法硏究) Vol.24 No.2

지방자치 도입 이후 법원은 사법심사를 통하여 지방자치제에 관한 많은 법리를 제시하였고, 지방자치법의 개정과 그 집행 및 개별 지방자치단체의 조례제정에도 많은 영향을 주었다. 우리 헌법 제117조 제1항은 지방자치단체의 조례제정권을 보장하고 있는데, 이러한 지방자치단체의 권한은 자치사무수행과 관련된 구체적인 법적 근거를 이루고 있어 지방자치제의 실현을 위한 가장 핵심적인 사항이다. 따라서 법원의 조례안 적법성 심사의 문제는 지방자치의 형성과 활성화에 관련된 매우 중요한 사항이다. 이 연구에서는 대법원의 주요 판례를 통하여 조례안에 대한 법원의 적법성 심사를 중심으로 사법적극주의적 경향에 관하여 알아보고, 이를 바탕으로 지방자치제의 구체적 형성과 활성화에 관련된 법원의 역할에 관하여 알아보았다. 이 연구를 위하여 우선 조례안에 대한 사법심사의 의의와 지방자치에서의 사법적극주의에 관하여 살펴보았고(Ⅱ), 지방자치법 제28조 제1항과 관련한 법원의 사법심사에서의 사법적극주의적 경향을 자치사무와 기관위임사무의 구분, 법률우위의 원칙, 법률유보의 원칙과 관련한 주요 판례를 중심으로 살펴보았다(Ⅲ). 더 나아가 지방자치제의 강화와 활성화의 관점에서 문제가 될 수 있는 판례에 관해서도 알아보았다(Ⅳ). 이 연구를 바탕으로 볼 때, 법원은 조례안 무효확인소송을 통한 조례안에 대한 적법성 심사에서 사법적극주의를 바탕으로 지방자치의 구체적인 형성과 활성화에 대한 역할을 수행하였다. 지방자치제의 의의와 기능을 고려할 때, 헌법적 제도로서의 지방자치제는 더욱 강화되고 활성화될 필요가 있다. 법원은 이러한 시대적 흐름에 맞추어 지방자치의 의의와 기능에 대한 근본적인 고려를 바탕으로 헌법이 보장하고 있는 지방자치의 실질적 실현을 위하여 더욱 적극적으로 사법심사를 할 필요성이 있다. 마지막으로 연구방법론과 관련하여 이 논문에서는 최신 판례보다는 대법원의 조례안 적법성 심사와 관련한 대표적인 판례(leading case)를 선별하여 분석하였다. 현재 이 판례들은 후속 판례의 형성에도 많은 영향을 끼치고 있기 때문이다. After the introduction of local autonomy, the court presented many legal principles on the local autonomy system through judicial review, and had a great influence on the revision of the Local Autonomy Act, its enforcement, and the enactment of ordinances of individual local governments. Article 117 (1) of the Korean Constitution guarantees the authority of local governments to enact ordinances, and this authority of local governments is the most important matter for the realization of the local government system as it forms a specific legal basis related to the performance of autonomous affairs. Therefore, the issue of the court's judicial review on the ordinance is a very important matter related to the formation and revitalization of local autonomy. In this study, the court's judicial activism trend was investigated, focusing on the court's legality examination of the ordinance through major precedents of the Supreme Court, and based on this, the court's role in the specific formation and revitalization of the local government system was investigated. For this study, we first looked at the significance of judicial review on the ordinance bill and judicial activism in local autonomy (II), and the judicial activism trend in the court's judicial review related to Article 28 (1) of the Local Autonomy Act was examined, focusing on major precedents related to the division of autonomous affairs and agency delegation affairs, the principle of legal superiority, and the principle of legal reservation (III). Furthermore, we looked at precedents that could be problematic from the perspective of strengthening and revitalizing the local autonomy system (IV). Based on this study, the court played a role in the specific formation and activation of local autonomy based on judicial activism in examining the legality of the ordinance through a lawsuit to confirm the invalidity of the ordinance. Considering the significance and function of the local autonomy system, the local autonomy system as a constitutional system needs to be strengthened and activated. In line with this trend of the times, the court needs to conduct a more active judicial review for the practical realization of the local autonomy guaranteed by the Constitution based on fundamental consideration of the significance and function of local autonomy.

CFIHOS 표준 기반 디지털 핸드오버 데이터 모델과 산업 데이터 관리 모델의 매핑

김봉철(Bongcheol Kim),강병국(Byeong Guk Kang),천상욱(Sanguk Cheon),문두환(Duhwan Mun) 대한기계학회 2024 대한기계학회 춘추학술대회 Vol.2024 No.5

[법원 인물사] 조진만 전 대법원장

김봉철 ( Kim Bongcheol ),김대홍,양은상,최유나 사법정책연구원 2018 연구보고서 Vol.2018 No.9

The late CHO Jin-man, former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court was born in 1903 and died in 1979. It is not easy to study the footsteps of him at about 40 years after his death. Nonetheless, this study has great significance in showing his life and achievements, the history and process of development of the judiciary and judicial system, and the appearance of desirable judge to the ordinary people as well as to the lawyers living today. The contents of this study are largely composed of his 'footsteps before being chief justice', 'footsteps as the chief justice', and various evaluations about him as a legal person as well as a general person. In his footsteps before being Chief Justice, his life was illuminated as a student who participated in the March 1st Movement, a young man who passed the high-ranking civil service examination, and the first Korean chief judge during the Japanese colonial era. In addition, his life as a lawyer having his own conviction and the Minister of Justice who tried to guarantee human rights were described based on the situation at that time. In his footsteps as the chief justice, his accomplishments such as contribution to the modernization of the judiciary and the development of the judicial system after his inauguration as chief justice were mainly dealt with. Above all, he made efforts to translate judgments into Korean so that the general public could easily understand the rulings and provided an opportunity to use easy legal terms in Korean. He also reduced the workloads of judges by streamlining the writing of judgment papers, and changed the witness interrogation method from ex officio interrogation to the alternation interrogation by the parties. He established the High Court Appeal Department and the District Court Appeal Department to deal with the burden of the court cases and to handle the cases quickly. He also introduced a trial researcher system to the Supreme Court, established the Seoul Family Court to provide professional and efficient judicial services, and contributed to the introduction of a judicial graduate school for advanced legal education system. Furthermore, he improved the judge’s robe by establishing “regulations on judge’s robe”. In addition, he worked hard to secure public confidence in the court when he was Chief Justice. He practiced an honest and moderate life for this. In describing the evaluation about him, much objective materials were used to maintain a balanced view rather than a subjective evaluation of the researcher. He lived as a lawyer from the Japanese colonial era until the government of Park Chung Hee. His life as a legal person, especially his life as the 34th Chief Justice, coincided with the history of the modernization of the judiciary. It is difficult for this study to contain everything about him, but his life can give a lot of thought for all of us living in this age.

독일 법관법에 관한 연구 - 직업법관의 신분과 법적 지위를 중심으로 -

김봉철 ( Kim Bongcheol ) 사법정책연구원 2020 연구보고서 Vol.2020 No.12

Among the studies related to the judiciary, studies on the status and legal position of judges are research materials that are closely related to the independence of judges in the Korean Constitution, as well as the status of judges within the judiciary, people's confidence in the judiciary, and good trials. Judges are responsible for ensuring the rights of the people through trials and realizing constitutional values. These responsibilities can only be achieved if the independence of judges is guaranteed. The German Judiciary Act (Deutsches Richtergesetz), which was enacted on September 8, 1961, and currently remains in force, aims to secure the independence of judges by guaranteeing the status and legal position of judges. Thus, it is necessary to make a close study of the status and legal position of judges stipulated in the Act in a comprehensive and systematic way. Matters prescribed by the German Judiciary Act, such as the formation, change, and termination of job relations for judges, the contents of their services, supervision of judges, the jurisdiction and role of the service court which ensures the status and legal position of judges, types and details of the obligations of judges, judicial discipline, and the participation of judges in judicial administration through the judicial representative body are based on the grand principle of guaranteeing the independence of judges, and laid down in a way that can be consistent with this principle. In particular, according to the German Judiciary Act, the independence of judges are clarified as a limit on the exercise of supervisory authority and the unfavorable disposition of the judges are required to be made at least based on consent derived from the judge's voluntary will or judicial proceedings rendered by the court. Also, shortened working hours and leave of absence are viewed in terms of the rights of judges, and with the establishment of a service court, the scope of the supervisory disposition that affects the status and legal position of judges and the independence of the judges, and disputes over high-powered acts of the job supervisor based on other service relationships, has been widening dramatically. Furthermore, in Germany, fairness and transparency of judicial administration have been secured by ensuring the participation of the judicial representative body through the German Judiciary Act and the Court Organization Act thereby barring judicial administration controlled by a few monopolies. This research focuses on theoretical discussions and actual cases based on the main provisions of the German Judiciary Act, which contains the most essential and comprehensive information on the status and legal position of judges in Germany. Furthermore, the research covers the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany, the Court Organization Act, the constitutions and judiciary laws of each state, as well as other related laws and regulations for a more systematic and in-depth study on the status and legal position of German judges. However, since it is difficult to properly grasp the actual cases and current situation in Germany with the aforementioned research method alone, various matters related to the status and legal position of German judges are reviewed in a comprehensive and systematic way by referring to surveys, statistics, and news articles related to German judges. Furthermore, although not directly regulated by the German Judiciary Act, matters related to the status and legal position of German judges, such as external evaluation of judges, division of affairs through the Court Steering Committee, and activities of the Association of German Judges are also included as the subject of the study.  The reinforcement of the status and legal position of judges does not end by simply improving the people's confidence in the judiciary by realizing good trials by meas of securing the independence of judges. This ultimately contributes to the guarantee of the freedom and rights of the people. Therefore, strengthening the status and legal position of judges is a goal that should be jointly pursued not only by the judiciary but also the National Assembly, the government, and judicial organizations based on the will of the judges.

우리나라의 행정형 ADR 개선방안에 관한 연구

김봉철 ( Kim Bongcheol ) 사법정책연구원 2019 연구보고서 Vol.2019 No.12

A growing number of complex disputes requiring specific expertise on diverse subject matters in a modern society are, in many situations, making traditional lawsuits impractical. In response to this, administrative ADR―a system of alternative dispute resolution methods that increase the autonomy of involved parties―has been growing in use in the Republic of Korea, as well as in many other countries around the world, including countries with advanced litigation systems. The administrative ADR system involves relevant administrative agencies in resolving disputes between parties, either directly or indirectly through their affiliated organizations. This system serves an important function of reducing social costs arising from disputes because it facilitates the resolution of disputes in different social sectors with the involvement of various experts. This system can also ultimately contribute to social stability and integration. From a judicial policy making perspective, the administrative ADR system reduces the workload burden of the court and thereby creates an environment in which individual judges could concentrate more on individual cases, which is closely related to an appropriate (and effective) allocation of judicial resources. Acknowledging the contributive effect of the administrative ADR system on judicial policy making, this research identifies the current state and problems of the administrative ADR system in Korea and offers recommendations for improvement. In addition, this research provides suggestions for promoting use of administrative ADR systems. With this purpose in mind, this research begins by providing an overview of the administrative ADR system and then conducts a comparative legal analysis of different countries, including the United States, Germany, France and Japan―all of which employ different ADR systems. The comparative research is conducted to examine how these countries have designed and developed their ADR systems (including administrative ADR systems), what special features their administrative ADR systems have, and how their systems could shed light on the improvement of the Korean system. This research then reviews specific laws and regulations of Korea that govern different kinds of mediation committees that are responsible for ADR administrations and examines the operating status of some selected mediation committees that could be deemed as representative committees, in order to identify problems of the administrative ADR systems in Korea. Based on this analysis, this research offers suggestions for improving and promoting the administrative ADR system in Korea. The suggestions for improvement address issues relating to the independence, neutrality, and expertise of the members of the mediation committee, the autonomy and the parties’ rights to make statements in the mediation procedures, the relationship between mediation procedures and litigation procedures, the effect of a concluded mediation, the organization of administrative ADR agencies, the expertise of the secretariat, and the enactment of the Framework Act for Administrative ADR. Additionally, the proposed recommendations for promoting the administrative ADR system deal with issues relating to the promotion of the administrative ADR system, externally linked mediation, access to mediation, the partial introduction of the mediation-prepositive principle, the proactive utilization of a single person mediation panel, and the rationalization of the concluded value of reparation for damage through mediation.

주민자율조정을 통한 이웃분쟁 해결에 관한 연구

김봉철 ( Kim Bongcheol ) 사법정책연구원 2021 연구보고서 Vol.2021 No.15

With the increasing number of disputes in various areas in the world today, the number of disputes between neighbors who live in the same community has been on the rise. To resolve these neighborhood disputes, some local governments in Korea have recently partially introduced community mediation as an alternative dispute resolution. Community mediation resolves disputes by using members of the local community as mediators. It has institutional significance in that it contributes to fundamentally restoring the relationship between neighbors and establishing a more harmonious local community by voluntarily resolving disputes at the neighborhood level. Furthermore, the resolution of disputes between neighbors through community mediation also reduces the caseload for the court because it resolves potential legal disputes before they reach the court. Therefore, it is worth studying neighborhood dispute resolution through community mediation not just in terms of fundamentally restoring the relationship between neighbors and reducing social costs, but also for establishing judicial policies. This study comprehensively examined neighborhood dispute resolution through community mediation and suggested various options to establish and promote dispute resolution through community mediation in Korea. To this end, this study reviewed at general aspects of neighborhood disputes and community mediation: the definition and types of neighborhood disputes, concept and acceptability of community mediation, characteristics and functions of community mediation, and advantages and disadvantages of community mediation. This study also addressed neighborhood dispute resolution systems based on community mediation in various foreign countries where community mediation has already been established and promoted, and further dealt with neighborhood dispute resolution practices via major mediation systems in Korea. Lastly, after the above review, this study proposed specific and diverse measures to establish and promote neighborhood dispute resolution through community mediation system. First, this study explored how to ensure the independence, neutrality, and expertise of the community mediator. Then, this study reviewed the procedures and effects of community mediation, including confidentiality in community mediation, the status of dispute parties in the community mediation procedure (the active right to statements by dispute parties and the right to choose a community mediator), the proceeding period of community mediation and the deadline for the acceptance or deemed acceptance of the mediator's proposal, the relationship between community mediation and litigation (introduction of pre-litigation mediation principles and the interruption of prescription for mediation petition), the relationship between mediation procedure and litigation procedures, and the effect of agreement reached by community mediation. In addition, this study examined third party-linked community mediation and other options to establish and promote neighborhood dispute resolution such as strengthening better public relations for community mediation organizations, ensuring local residents’ access to community mediation organizations, securing funding sources, and introducing a legal basis for community mediation. It is hoped that this study will serve as a cornerstone to establish and promote neighborhood dispute resolution through community mediation in Korea.

협력적 관점에서 본 집시법상 사전적 신고의무

김봉철(Kim, Bongcheol) 한국토지공법학회 2013 土地公法硏究 Vol.63 No.-

집회 및 시위에 관한 법률은 민주주의의 근본요소로서의 적법한 집회를 최대한 보장하고 위법한 집회로부터 국민을 보호함으로써 집회의 권리와 공공의 안녕질서가 적절히 조화를 이루도록 하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이러한 목적을 달성하기 위하여 동법 제6조는 옥외집회의 사전적 신고의무를 규정하고 있다. 집시법상의 신고는 관할경찰관서의 장이 집회의 자유와 공공의 안녕질서의 유지라는 이 두 가지의 목적들이 양립할 수 있는 계기를 마련하기 위해, 행정상 필요한 정보수집차원에서 최소한의 규제로서 도입된 것이다. 헌법상 보장되는 집회의 자유의 관점에서 볼 때, 집시법상 신고의무는 관할경찰관서와 집회주최자간의 상호협력을 그 전제로 한다. 따라서 신고의무의 주된 목적은 집회를 사전에 제한하는 것이 아니라, 집회의 자유와 공공의 안녕질서가 양립할 수 있는 가능성올 찾는 것에 있다. 우리의 판례와 학설들은 사전신고의무를 우선적으로 집회주최자의 협력집회의무로 보는 경향이 있다. 그러나 집회의 자유를 보장함과 동시에 이로부터 발생할 수 있는 공공의 안녕질서에 대한 위험의 예방은 우선적으로 관할 경찰관서의 임무이다. 따라서 집시법상 사전신고에 있어서의 협력의무의 우선적인 부담주체는 관할 경찰관서의 장에게 있다고 할 것이다. Es ist Zweck des Gesetzes über Versammlungen und Aufzüge, die gesetzmäßige Versammlung als Grundelement der Demokratie möglichst maximal zu gewährleisten und das Recht auf Versammlungen unddie öffentliche Ordnung amgemessen einander harmonieren zu lassen. Um diesen Zweck zu erreichen, schreibt § 6 Versammlungsgesetz bei der öffentlichen Versammlung unter freiem Himmel die vorherige Anmeldepflicht vor. Die versammlungsrechtliche Anmeldung ist notwendig, um den Gesetzgebungszweck, die Erhaltung der versammlungsrechtliche Freiheit und der öffentliche Ordnung nebeneinander bestehen zu lassen. Und sie wird als minimale Regulierung eingeführt, die notwendige Daten zur Erhaltung der versammlungsrechtliche Freiheit und der öffentliche Ordnung zu erheben. Aus Sicht der verfassungsrechtlich gewährleisteten Versammlungsfreiheit betrachtet, setzt die versammlungsrechtliche Anmeldepflicht die gegenseitige Kooperation zwischen der zuständigen Polizeibehörde und dem Veranstalter der Versammlung voraus. Daher besteht der Hauptzweck der Anmeldepflicht darin, die Versammlungsfreiheit und die öffentliche Ordnung nebeneinander bestehen zu lassen. Die koreanische Rechtsprechung und Theorie nomalerweise dazu hinneigen, die versammlungsrechtliche Anmeldepflicht für die Rechtspflicht des Veranstalters zu erachten. Dennoch ist es Hauptaufgabe der zuständigen Polizeibehörde, die versammlungsrechtliche Freiheit sicherzustellen und zugleich die Gefahr aus der Versammlung vorzubeugen. Aus diesem Grund liegt die Kooperationspflicht hinsichtlich der versammlungsrechtlichen Anmeldung zunächst in der zuständigen Polizeibehörde.

지방자치와 법원의 사법심사에 관한 연구

김봉철 ( Kim Bongcheol ) 사법정책연구원 2023 연구보고서 Vol.2023 No.13