http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
호혜적 개발협력을 위한 주요 국가의 STI 시스템 분석 및 협력방향 - 브라질, 인도를 중심으로 -
김왕동(Wangdong Kim),임덕순(Deok Soon Yim),선인경(Inkyoung Sun),김은주(Eun Joo Kim),이다은(Daeun Lee),유제현(Jehyun Yu),이정원(Jung-won Lee),김기국(Ki-Kook Kim),최용인(Yongin Choi),김원호(Wonho Kim),조충제(Chungje Jo),박민경(Minkyoung P 과학기술정책연구원 2021 정책연구 Vol.- No.-
Reciprocal development cooperation refers to “all activities in the public and private sectors that benefit the donor country’s national interest as well as poverty eradication and economic and social development in the recipient country”. The Korean governments development cooperation paradigm is expected to gradually shift from a humanitarian level to a reciprocal level. However, in the case of science and technology innovation, it is difficult to acquire information about countries that are subject to reciprocal development cooperation. Therefore, in this study, the conceptual framework for reciprocal development cooperation was established and STI systems of major countries were analyzed to provide basic STI data and to suggest directions for reciprocal development cooperation. In this study, two countries, Brazil and India, were selected for analysis by applying three criteria: “differentiation from existing research,” “relevance to national interests and national tasks,” and “possibility of securing data”. In this study, the STI system components of Brazil and India were classified and analyzed into macro-environment, STI governance, STI investment and achievements, STI human resources, STI innovative actors, and STI support organizations. The reciprocal development cooperation agenda was described focusing on three dimensions: “what”, “how” and “who”. First, in the perspective of “what”, climate change, digital transformation, infectious diseases, and other issues were derived as cooperation contents. Second, policy advice and joint research, human exchange, and so on, were suggested as cooperation methods. Third, universities, GRIs, and companies were suggested as cooperation partners. Brazils STI system is characterized by a weak national R&D budget, excellent research manpower and strong basic research, lack of connection and creation of innovation demand between universities and companies, weak industrial competitiveness, lack of science and technology policy and strategy, policy implementation, and coordination of inefficiency and slow-step administration. The characteristics of the Indian STI system include inefficient governance and lack of interconnection led by the government, insufficient investment in STI between the government and the private sector, abundant STI manpower and global talent, the pursuit of R&D activities centered on universities and public research institutes rather than the private sector, bureaucratic and bureaucratic An inefficient STI support organization was identified. In-depth interviews and consultations were conducted with experts from each country to derive the Korea-Brazil development cooperation agenda and the Korea-India development cooperation agenda. The interview and advisory groups were largely divided into policymakers(public officials) for each country, researchers(researchers and professors), and local experts(embassies and dispatchers). The detailed agenda contents are described in Chapters 6 and 7. This study is expected to contribute to the theoretical construction of the field of development cooperation, and to the derivation of the governments Korea-Brazil and Korea-India STI cooperation agenda. The study also can contribute to the demand for STI system information of Brazil and India. However, this study has limitations in responding to more demand by the government by selecting Brazil and India as two countries for reciprocal development cooperation. Therefore many more countries besides Brazil and India should be explored in the future. In addition, in order to improve the reliability and validity of the STI cooperation agenda between Korea-Brazil and Korea-India, interviews and consultations with more experts are required.
김왕동(Wangdong Kim),이정원(Jung Won Lee),임덕순(Deok Soon Yim),김기국(Ki Kook Kim),선인경(Inkyoung Sun),강희종(Hee Jong Gang),김은주(Eunjoo Kim),권소현(Sohyun Kwon),전병우(Byung Woo Jeon),이선아(Seona Lee) 과학기술정책연구원 2019 정책연구 Vol.- No.-
Korea"s ODA budget is rapidly increasing. In the domestic research community, interest in science and technology ODA has increased over the past 10 years. However, most of the research is being conducted in small scale and intermittent ways, and the systematic concept of ODA in science and technology is insufficient. There is a limit to the government"s efforts to establish and activate evidence-based policies. In particular, as the ODA paradigm has shifted from MDGs to SDGs since 2015, a new approach to science and technology ODA is required. The Korean government"s ODA paradigm shifts from short-term, small-sized, and segmented projects to long-term, large-scale, and convergent commercialization, and R&D"s interest in strengthening ODA linkages increases, as well as the need to respond to government issues. This study establishes the conceptual framework of science and technology ODA and responds to the government"s core issues quickly, contributing to establishing the identity of science and technology ODA, establishing evidence-based policies, and solving Korean government challenges. The contents of the study are largely composed of 5 modules. First, the concept, features and types of science and technology ODA are related to the establishment of the science and technology ODA concept framework. Second, it is related to ODA budget statistics of science and technology and critically examines measurement indicators and methodologies, and then presents ODA measurement indicators and methodologies that can be compared with developed countries (US, Japan, China, EU, etc.). Third, in-depth analysis of the major cases of science and technology ODA to derive success factors and policy implications of science and technology ODA. Fourth, the proposal of linking domestic R & D performance and science and technology ODA, one of the key issues of the current Korean government. Fourth, the proposal of linking domestic R & D performance and science and technology ODA, one of the key issues of the current government. Finally, as one of the key issues of the government, the analysis and case studies on the revitalization of science and technology ODA convergence project. In order to achieve the above objectives, this study performed qualitative methods such as literature review and interview and quantitative analysis methods such as case analysis and statistical analysis. In order to establish the science and technology ODA concept framework, literature review and interviews were mainly conducted. On the other hand, interviews were conducted to analyze cases of science and technology ODA, and qualitative methods such as literature reviews and interviews were used for ODA and R & D linkage and ODA convergence research.