RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
자동완성 버튼

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력
    あ ぁ か が さ ざ た だ な は ば ぱ ま や ゃ ら わ ゎ ん い ぃ き ぎ し じ ち ぢ に ひ び ぴ み り う ぅ く ぐ す ず つ づ っ ぬ ふ ぶ ぷ む ゆ ゅ る え ぇ け げ せ ぜ て で ね へ べ ぺ め れ お ぉ こ ご そ ぞ と ど の ほ ぼ ぽ も よ ょ ろ を
    ア ァ カ サ ザ タ ダ ナ ハ バ パ マ ヤ ャ ラ ワ ヮ ン イ ィ キ ギ シ ジ チ ヂ ニ ヒ ビ ピ ミ リ ウ ゥ ク グ ス ズ ツ ヅ ッ ヌ フ ブ プ ム ユ ュ ル エ ェ ケ ゲ セ ゼ テ デ ヘ ベ ペ メ レ オ ォ コ ゴ ソ ゾ ト ド ノ ホ ボ ポ モ ヨ ョ ロ ヲ ―

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    ㅥ ㅦ ㅧ ㅨ ㅩ ㅪ ㅫ ㅬ ㅭ ㅮ ㅯ ㅰ ㅱ ㅲ ㅳ ㅴ ㅵ ㅶ ㅷ ㅸ ㅹ ㅺ ㅻ ㅼ ㅽ ㅾ ㅿ ㆀ ㆁ ㆂ ㆃ ㆄ ㆅ ㆆ ㆇ ㆈ ㆉ ㆊ ㆋ ㆌ ㆍ ㆎ
    Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ ν ξ ο π ρ σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω
    á à Á À é è É È ç Ç ê
    Ä Ö Ü ä ö ü ß
    ְ ֳ ֲ ֱ ָ ַ ֵ ֶ ִ ֹ ּ ֻ ׂ ׁ ּ פ ם ן ו ט א ר ק ף ך ל ח י ע כ ג ד ש ץ ת צ מ נ ה ב
    ‘ ’ “ ” 〔 〕 〈 〉 「 」 『 』 【 】 ＂ （ ） ［ ］ ｛ ｝
    ± × ÷ ≠ ≤ ≥ ∞ ∴ ♂ ♀ ∠ ⊥ ⌒ ∂ ∇ ≡ ≒ ≪ ≫ √ ∽ ∝ ∵ ∫ ∬ ∈ ∋ ⊆ ⊇ ⊂ ⊃ ∪ ∩ ∧ ∨ ￢ ⇒ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∮ ∑ ∏ ＋ － ＜ ＝ ＞
    、 。 · ‥ … ¨ 〃 ― ∥ ＼ ∼ ´ ～ ˇ ˘ ˝ ˚ ˙ ¸ ˛ ¡ ¿ ː ！ ＇ ， ． ／ ： ； ？ ＾ ＿ ｀ ｜
    ½ ⅓ ⅔ ¼ ¾ ⅛ ⅜ ⅝ ⅞ ¹ ² ³ ⁴ ⁿ ₁ ₂ ₃ ₄
    Æ Ð Ħ IJ Ł Ø Œ Þ Ŧ Ŋ æ đ ð ħ ı ij ĸ ŀ ł ø œ ß þ ŧ ŋ ʼn
    А Б В Г Д Е Ё Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я а б в г д е ё ж з и й к л м н о п р с т у ф х ц ч ш щ ъ ы ь э ю я
    ′ ″ ℃ Å ￠ ￡ ￥ ¤ ℉ ‰ ＄ ％ Ｆ ￦ ㎕ ㎖ ㎗ ℓ ㎘ ㏄ ㎣ ㎤ ㎥ ㎦ ㎙ ㎚ ㎛ ㎜ ㎝ ㎞ ㎟ ㎠ ㎡ ㎢ ㏊ ㎍ ㎎ ㎏ ㏏ ㎈ ㎉ ㏈ ㎧ ㎨ ㎰ ㎱ ㎲ ㎳ ㎴ ㎵ ㎶ ㎷ ㎸ ㎹ ㎀ ㎁ ㎂ ㎃ ㎄ ㎺ ㎻ ㎽ ㎾ ㎿ ㎐ ㎑ ㎒ ㎓ ㎔ Ω ㏀ ㏁ ㎊ ㎋ ㎌ ㏖ ㏅ ㎭ ㎮ ㎯ ㏛ ㎩ ㎪ ㎫ ㎬ ㏝ ㏐ ㏓ ㏃ ㏉ ㏜ ㏆
    § ※ ☆ ★ ○ ● ◎ ◇ ◆ □ ■ △ ▽ → ← ↑ ↓ ↔ 〓 ◁ ◀ ▷ ▶ ♤ ♠ ♡ ♥ ♧ ♣ ⊙ ◈ ▣ ◐ ◑ ▒ ▤ ▥ ▨ ▧ ▦ ▩ ♨ ☏ ☎ ☜ ☞ † ‡ ↕ ↗ ↙ ↖ ↘ ♭ ♩ ♪ ♬ ㉿ ㈜ № ㏇ ™ ㏂ ㏘ ℡ ＃ ＆ ＊ ＠ ª º
    ⅰ ⅱ ⅲ ⅳ ⅴ ⅵ ⅶ ⅷ ⅸ ⅹ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ
    ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک ل م ن ه و ی
    닫기

    공간어에 관한 인지의미론적 연구 = (A) Cognitive semantic study of spatial terms

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11724379

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      청주 : 충북대학교, 2009

    • 학위논문사항
    • 발행연도

      2009

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • KDC

      710.7 판사항(4)

    • 발행국(도시)

      충청북도

    • 형태사항

      vii, 195 p. : 삽도 ; 26 cm

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 충북대학교 도서관 소장기관정보

    • 0

      상세조회

    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    영어
    한국어
    This study, from the cognitive semantic point of view, examined the words related to space, one of the physical categories, which people perceive most basically in their linguistic life.
    It is considered useful for explaining the consciousness structure related to the language of the users of the modern Korean language, who have new experiences in daily life, to examine the cognitive process of spatial terms and the appearance of extend meaning. Also, referring to the cognitive process of the previously discussed spatial terms and the appearance of extend meaning, I established the model for teaching vocabulary of spatial terms and explored the concrete methods of vocabulary teaching.
    As the linguistic data of the language used in actual life are considered appropriate in examining the consciousness structure related to the modern Korean language users, the 21st Century Sejong Plan bundle of words data were used for discussion materials. The contents discussed in this study are summarized as follows.
    This study analyzed the meaning of spatial terms from the cognitive point of view and set up prototype meaning and attempted to examine the appearance of extend meaning.
    First, after spatial terms are classified according to [dimension], this study presents primary and basic meaning quality based on the order of meaning items of the words related to space included in the dictionary and set up prototype meaning referring to the results of experimenting degreeness search. The results of examining spatial terms showed that people recognized most of the prototype meaning of spatial terms which form polar oppositions based on a specific criterion as physical and specific dimension. After examining the form of extend meaning of spatial terms based on a criterion of [dimension], it could be confirmed thatthe meaning is extend commonly through a metaphoric form. Particularly, it could be seen that the direction of the meaning extension followed these quence of space domain ∪time domain ∪abstract domain.
    The results of examining the form of the meaning extension according to ‘direction’, ‘distance’ and ‘location’ in the case of the first dimension spatial terms showed that in the spatial terms of vertical dimension related to ‘direction’, the prototype meaning of physical space concept was most frequently used. The meaning extension of spatial terms related to ‘distance’ smoothly followed the sequence of space domain ∪time domain ∪abstract domain, and the frequency of the use also was evenly spread over each domain. This shows that people use the spatial terms related to ‘distance’by utilizing them into diverse meaning according to contextual circumstances. Frequency in use of the words ‘inside ?C outside’ which are related to ‘location’ is very high but it is peculiar that in the word ‘outside’there was no usage related to ‘time domain.’
    In the second dimension spatial terms ‘broad?Cnarrow’, ‘thick?Cthin’, the meaning extension in the space domain and abstract domain proceeded normally but the meaning extension in the ‘time domain’ does not happen. In all of the second dimension spatial terms, concrete domains of spatial dimension were highly revitalized. Among the third dimension spatial terms, it is characteristic that the words ‘thick ?C thin’are not active in extending from the space domain to other domains. On the other hand, it could be seen that the words ‘big?Csmall’ are revitalized in all domains and their meaning is spread evenly over and used.
    This study also analyzed the asymmetry of the spatial terms from structural, frequency and cognitive point of view. First, it could be confirmed that the structural asymmetry of the spatial terms acts as a datum point through deriving words or combining words in the morphologic aspect compared with spatial terms' prototype meaning and extend meaning on the physical dimension. Also, in the case of combining case particle, or of expressing as head names and fragmented sentences in the syntactic aspect, there were limitations in the extend meaning. Accordingly, it could be seen that asymmetric relations in the morphologic aspect orsyntactic aspect exist between spatial terms' prototype meaning and extend meaning.
    And the results of examining the asymmetry in frequency of the spatial terms through frequency distribution by domain showed that in most items of vocabulary related to space, the words expressing space domain were found to be high. This shows that people revitalize the prototype meaning of the expressions related to the spatial terms more than extend meaning of those expressions and use those expressions, and here also the asymmetry of the spatial terms in terms of frequency in use could be confirmed. As for the cognitive asymmetry of the spatial terms, the response resulting from experimenting search for the degreeness of spatial terms showed that people recognize expressions in the physical and concrete domains as easier and more basic meaning than in the types of meanings in the time or abstract domains.
    This study also examined the asymmetry of the spatial terms with focus on the semantic markedness. It was found out that as forthe form of recognizing the spatial terms, people have a tendency to give value concept based on sensory experiences of bodily organs. It was also found out that, when people perceive and recognize the objects of the natural world, theyperceive, positively recognize, revitalize and use big things more easily and strongly than short and small things in their language life since the former is more prominent than the latter.
    The effective vocabulary teaching methods with focus on the spatial terms are divided into instrumental viewpoint and cognitive viewpoint depending on how the vocabularies to be taught are understood. But we cannot quickly concludewhich of the two viewpoints is more effective teaching methods, since both methods have advantages and disadvantages. It can only be said that, when considering the characteristics and level of learners, in vocabulary teaching in the level of middle and high school students, the cognitive viewpoint, which is related to qualitative aspects that can expand composite thinking power rather than the quantity of vocabularies, is considered more effective. The significance of this study lies in the fact that with focus on the vocabularies used in daily life this study examined, from the cognitive viewpoint, the form in which the users of the modern Korean language recognize and conceptualize the objects and circumstances in the space, and based on such basic concepts, are expanding their meanings.
    The contents discussed above can be data to prove that the existing viewpoints of cognitive linguistics which is based on empiricism can be generally applied to the modern Korean language. I expect cognitive researches on the spatial terms based on ample data will be made systematically and continuously going forward.
    번역하기

    This study, from the cognitive semantic point of view, examined the words related to space, one of the physical categories, which people perceive most basically in their linguistic life. It is considered useful for explaining the consciousness struc...

    This study, from the cognitive semantic point of view, examined the words related to space, one of the physical categories, which people perceive most basically in their linguistic life.
    It is considered useful for explaining the consciousness structure related to the language of the users of the modern Korean language, who have new experiences in daily life, to examine the cognitive process of spatial terms and the appearance of extend meaning. Also, referring to the cognitive process of the previously discussed spatial terms and the appearance of extend meaning, I established the model for teaching vocabulary of spatial terms and explored the concrete methods of vocabulary teaching.
    As the linguistic data of the language used in actual life are considered appropriate in examining the consciousness structure related to the modern Korean language users, the 21st Century Sejong Plan bundle of words data were used for discussion materials. The contents discussed in this study are summarized as follows.
    This study analyzed the meaning of spatial terms from the cognitive point of view and set up prototype meaning and attempted to examine the appearance of extend meaning.
    First, after spatial terms are classified according to [dimension], this study presents primary and basic meaning quality based on the order of meaning items of the words related to space included in the dictionary and set up prototype meaning referring to the results of experimenting degreeness search. The results of examining spatial terms showed that people recognized most of the prototype meaning of spatial terms which form polar oppositions based on a specific criterion as physical and specific dimension. After examining the form of extend meaning of spatial terms based on a criterion of [dimension], it could be confirmed thatthe meaning is extend commonly through a metaphoric form. Particularly, it could be seen that the direction of the meaning extension followed these quence of space domain ∪time domain ∪abstract domain.
    The results of examining the form of the meaning extension according to ‘direction’, ‘distance’ and ‘location’ in the case of the first dimension spatial terms showed that in the spatial terms of vertical dimension related to ‘direction’, the prototype meaning of physical space concept was most frequently used. The meaning extension of spatial terms related to ‘distance’ smoothly followed the sequence of space domain ∪time domain ∪abstract domain, and the frequency of the use also was evenly spread over each domain. This shows that people use the spatial terms related to ‘distance’by utilizing them into diverse meaning according to contextual circumstances. Frequency in use of the words ‘inside ?C outside’ which are related to ‘location’ is very high but it is peculiar that in the word ‘outside’there was no usage related to ‘time domain.’
    In the second dimension spatial terms ‘broad?Cnarrow’, ‘thick?Cthin’, the meaning extension in the space domain and abstract domain proceeded normally but the meaning extension in the ‘time domain’ does not happen. In all of the second dimension spatial terms, concrete domains of spatial dimension were highly revitalized. Among the third dimension spatial terms, it is characteristic that the words ‘thick ?C thin’are not active in extending from the space domain to other domains. On the other hand, it could be seen that the words ‘big?Csmall’ are revitalized in all domains and their meaning is spread evenly over and used.
    This study also analyzed the asymmetry of the spatial terms from structural, frequency and cognitive point of view. First, it could be confirmed that the structural asymmetry of the spatial terms acts as a datum point through deriving words or combining words in the morphologic aspect compared with spatial terms' prototype meaning and extend meaning on the physical dimension. Also, in the case of combining case particle, or of expressing as head names and fragmented sentences in the syntactic aspect, there were limitations in the extend meaning. Accordingly, it could be seen that asymmetric relations in the morphologic aspect orsyntactic aspect exist between spatial terms' prototype meaning and extend meaning.
    And the results of examining the asymmetry in frequency of the spatial terms through frequency distribution by domain showed that in most items of vocabulary related to space, the words expressing space domain were found to be high. This shows that people revitalize the prototype meaning of the expressions related to the spatial terms more than extend meaning of those expressions and use those expressions, and here also the asymmetry of the spatial terms in terms of frequency in use could be confirmed. As for the cognitive asymmetry of the spatial terms, the response resulting from experimenting search for the degreeness of spatial terms showed that people recognize expressions in the physical and concrete domains as easier and more basic meaning than in the types of meanings in the time or abstract domains.
    This study also examined the asymmetry of the spatial terms with focus on the semantic markedness. It was found out that as forthe form of recognizing the spatial terms, people have a tendency to give value concept based on sensory experiences of bodily organs. It was also found out that, when people perceive and recognize the objects of the natural world, theyperceive, positively recognize, revitalize and use big things more easily and strongly than short and small things in their language life since the former is more prominent than the latter.
    The effective vocabulary teaching methods with focus on the spatial terms are divided into instrumental viewpoint and cognitive viewpoint depending on how the vocabularies to be taught are understood. But we cannot quickly concludewhich of the two viewpoints is more effective teaching methods, since both methods have advantages and disadvantages. It can only be said that, when considering the characteristics and level of learners, in vocabulary teaching in the level of middle and high school students, the cognitive viewpoint, which is related to qualitative aspects that can expand composite thinking power rather than the quantity of vocabularies, is considered more effective. The significance of this study lies in the fact that with focus on the vocabularies used in daily life this study examined, from the cognitive viewpoint, the form in which the users of the modern Korean language recognize and conceptualize the objects and circumstances in the space, and based on such basic concepts, are expanding their meanings.
    The contents discussed above can be data to prove that the existing viewpoints of cognitive linguistics which is based on empiricism can be generally applied to the modern Korean language. I expect cognitive researches on the spatial terms based on ample data will be made systematically and continuously going forward.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 서론 1
    • 1.1. 연구 목적 1
    • 1.2. 선행연구 검토 2
    • 1.3. 연구 방법과 구성 7
    • 제1장 서론 1
    • 1.1. 연구 목적 1
    • 1.2. 선행연구 검토 2
    • 1.3. 연구 방법과 구성 7
    • 제2장 공간어의 인지과정과 의미확장 15
    • 2.1. 공간어의 인지과정 15
    • 2.2. 공간어의 의미확장 18
    • 2.2.1. 의미확장의 원리 18
    • 2.2.2. 의미확장의 기제 19
    • 제3장 공간어의 인지적 의미분석 35
    • 3.1. 공간어의 원형의미 36
    • 3.1.1. 1차원 공간어 43
    • 3.1.2. 2차원 공간어 57
    • 3.1.3. 3차원 공간어 61
    • 3.2. 공간어의 확장의미 66
    • 3.2.1. 의미확장의 양상 66
    • 3.2.2. 공간어의 은유적 확장 양상 114
    • 제4장 공간어의 비대칭성 128
    • 4.1. 구조적 비대칭성 128
    • 4.1.1. 형태적 측면 128
    • 4.1.2. 통사적 측면 136
    • 4.2. 빈도적 비대칭성 138
    • 4.3. 인지적 비대칭성 141
    • 4.4. 공간어의 유표성 143
    • 4.4.1. 위치 144
    • 4.4.2. 길이 148
    • 4.4.3. 넓이 153
    • 4.4.4. 부피 154
    • 제5장 공간어의 어휘지도 157
    • 5.1. 어휘지도의 방법 158
    • 5.1.1. 도구적 관점의 어휘지도 방법 158
    • 5.1.2. 인지적 관점의 어휘지도 방법 160
    • 5.2. 인지적 관점을 적용한 공간어의 어휘지도 160
    • 5.2.1. 공간어의 어휘지도 모형 161
    • 5.2.2. 공간어의 어휘지도 방법과 실제 162
    • 제6장 결론 176
    • 참고문헌 180
    • ABSTRACT 192
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1. 은유, 이정화, , 2003

    2. Semantics, Leech, Geoffrey N, Penguin, , 1981

    3. 어휘론, 조항범, , 1992

    4. World order, Cooper, Ross, , 1975

    5. Frame Semantics, Fillmore, , 1982

    6. 은유구조론, 김옥순, , 1989

    7. 인지심리학, Matlin, Margaret W, 중앙적성 출판사, , 1974

    8. 인지언어학, 이기동, Croft, W., , 2000

    9. 인지의미론, 임지룡, 탑출판사,

    10. 시각적 사고, Arnheim, Rudolf, 이화여자대학교출판부, , 1981

    1. 은유, 이정화, , 2003

    2. Semantics, Leech, Geoffrey N, Penguin, , 1981

    3. 어휘론, 조항범, , 1992

    4. World order, Cooper, Ross, , 1975

    5. Frame Semantics, Fillmore, , 1982

    6. 은유구조론, 김옥순, , 1989

    7. 인지심리학, Matlin, Margaret W, 중앙적성 출판사, , 1974

    8. 인지언어학, 이기동, Croft, W., , 2000

    9. 인지의미론, 임지룡, 탑출판사,

    10. 시각적 사고, Arnheim, Rudolf, 이화여자대학교출판부, , 1981

    11. 언어와 인지, 이기동, 한국언어학회, 한신문화사, , 1982

    12. 은유와 환유, 김욱동, 민음사, , 1999

    13. 은유의 세계, 김종도, 은유의 세계』, , 2004

    14. 의미론 서설, 이기용, 이정민, 심재기, , 1991

    15. Cognitive mapping, Kitchin, Freundschuh, , 2000

    16. 우리말큰사전, 한글학회, 어문각, , 1995

    17. Cognitive semantics, Lakoff, , 1988

    18. 마산리의 지명, 정민영, , 2008

    19. 한국어와 인지, 이수련, 박이정, , 2001

    20. Cognitive psychology, Solso, Robert L., Allyn and Bacon, , 2001

    21. 지명연구방법론, 김진식, 박이정, 지명연구방법론, , 2008

    22. Psychology and Languge, Clark, , 1977

    23. 개념적 혼성이론, 김동환, , 2002

    24. 겨레말 용례사전, 박용수, , 1996

    25. 인지언어학 입문, 임지룡, Lee, D., , 2003

    26. 한국어 은유연구, 박영순, 고려대학교 출판부, 한국어 은유 연구』, , 2000

    27. 方向性 表示의 格, 洪允杓, 국어학회, , 1978

    28. 물고기 이름 연구, 노재민, 충북대학교 교육대학원, , 2000

    29. 시의 이론과 창작, 박덕은, , 1989

    30. 어휘 의미와 문법, 남기심, , 1995

    31. 청원군 지명 유래, 김진식, , 2008

    32. 인지문법의 디딤돌, 김종도, 박이정, , 2002

    33. 인지언어학과 의미, 김동환, 태학사, , 2005

    34. 인지언어학의 이해, 이수련, 동의대학교 국어국문학과 새얼어문학회, , 2000

    35. Principles of Cateorzation, Rosch, , 1978

    36. 우리말의 인지 표현, 변정민, 월인, , 2005

    37. 은유의 신체적 근거, 나익주, 담화·인지 언어학회, 『담화와 인지 1』. 담화인지언어학회, , 1995

    38. 은유의 의미와 구조, 鄭元溶, 경성대학교, , 1996

    39. The Principles of Semantics, Ulmann, , 1957

    40. 비교와 비유의 의미 , 하길종, 한국어학회, , 1998

    41. 현대국어의미론연구, 김진식, 박이정, 현대국어의미론연구, , 2007

    42. 공간표시어의 의미론, 노대규, , 1988

    43. 시각형용사의 어휘론, 김창섭, , 1985

    44. 틀의미론과 의미구조, 김동환, 언어과학회, , 1999

    45. 한국어현상-의미분석, 신현숙, , 1990

    46. Reference-point constructions, Langacker, , 1993

    47. 공간어와 시간적 의미, 김선희, 목원대학교 국어교육과, , 1988

    48. 공간의 인지론적 고찰, 이수련, , 1997

    49. 은유의 언어학적 연구, 이영길, , 1985

    50. 은유의 의미구조 고찰, 박보경, , 1997

    51. 은유의 의미론적 분석, 김성일, , 1995

    52. 은유의 해석에 대하여, 정희자, , 1998

    53. 은유의 화용론적 접근, 배승호, 韓國語文學會, , 1996

    54. 은유이론에 대한 고찰, 고연희, , 1994

    55. 체험주의 철학의 전개, 노양진, , 1995

    56. 합성어의 은유와 환유, 송인동, , 1995

    57. 우리말 의미 확장 연구, 배도용, 한국문화사, , 2002

    58. 은유에 의한 의미 확장, 유경민, 한국어의미학회, , 1999

    59. 인지언어학키워드사전, 임지룡, , 2004

    60. 서울대 국어교육연구소, 국어교육사전, , 1999

    61. 우리말본: 네 번째 펴냄, 최현배, , 1971

    62. 인지의미론과 어휘의미, 김명숙, , 2005

    63. Cognitive foundations of grammar, Heine, Bernd, Oxford University Press, , 1997

    64. Image-Schematic Bases of Meaning, Johnson, , 1989

    65. Islands and syntactic prototypes, Ross, , 1987

    66. Mappings in thought and language, Fauconnier, , 1997

    67. Metaphor on idiom comprehension', Gibbs, , 1997

    68. 공간감각어의 의미 특성, 임지룡, 배달말학회, , 1984

    69. 우리말의 인지론적 분석, 이기종, 역락, , 2001

    70. 은유와 어휘의 의미확장, 최도순, , 1997

    71. 은유의 개념화에 대하여, 정희자, , 1999

    72. 은유의 인지적 의미특성, 임지룡, 계명대학교 한국학연구소, , 1995

    73. 현대국어의 시간어 연구, 김선희, 延世大學校, , 1987

    74. 개념적 은유에 관한 연구, 권경원, , 1999

    75. 공간 개념의 은유적 확장, 임혜원, 한국문화사, , 2004

    76. 청주 토박이말 조사?연구, 조항범, , 2008

    77. 충북 방언의 단어 변천사, 전철웅, , 1999

    78. {안/밖/속/겉}의 의미 연구, 이정애, 한국언어문학회, , 1996

    79. 원형이론과 의미의 범주화, 임지룡, 국어학회, 국어학 23. 국어학회, , 1993

    80. 의미의 인지언어학적 탐색, 임지룡, 한국문화사, , 2008

    81. 인지문법의 국어에의 적용, 김종도, 한국어학회, 『한국어학 6』. 한국어학회, , 1997

    82. 합성명사의 형성에 관하여, 신희삼, 국어국문학회, , 1995

    83. 청원군 지명의 명명 유연성, 김진식, , 1998

    84. Lexical Semantics. 『어휘의미론, Cruse, 류희수, 임지룡, , 1989

    85. Prototype theory and lexical semantics, Cruse, , 1990

    86. 범주분석과 단어의 의미구조, 조신호, , 1985

    87. 시간어와 공간어의 상관성(1), 閔賢植(Min Hyeon-sik), 국어학회, , 1990

    88. 영상도식의 인지적 의미분석, 임지룡, , 1996

    89. 현대국어의 의미확장 연구”, 이건환, , 2002

    90. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads, Barcelona, , 2000

    91. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, Gibbs, , 1994

    92. 개념적 은유의 공간론적 고찰, 김충욱, 동의대학교, , 2000

    93. 어휘력의 재이해와 지도 방법, 김명순, 청람어문교육학회, 청람어문학 27. 청람교육어문학회, , 2003

    94. 한국어 감정표현 관용어 연구, 김향숙, , 2001

    95. 현대국어 시간표현 어휘 연구, 김상태, , 2005

    96. Conceptual projection and middle spaces', Turner, Fauconnier, , 1994

    97. The Origin of interlligence in the child, Piaget, , 1965

    98. 개념의 원형 이론에 의한 연구, 이현근, 한국현대언어학회, , 1990

    99. 떡[餠] 명칭 분절 구조 연구 Ⅰ, 김진식(Kim Jin-sik), 한국중원언어학회, , 2003

    100. 충북방언의 어휘음운론 서설(2), 전철웅, 충북대학교 외국어교육원, , 2000

    101. 한국어 시간부사어의 의미분석, 권선옥, 啓明大學校, , 1985

    102. 현대국어 공간개념어 의미연구, 박경현, , 1986

    103. 현대국어 말[馬匹] 명칭 의미장, 김진식, , 1995

    104. Privative opposition"and Lexical Semantics, Kastovsky, "Privative opposition""and Lexical Semantics", , 1982

    105. (현행)한글맞춤법의 이해와 실제, 김정태, 충남대학교출판부, , 2005

    106. Grammaticalization : a conceptual framework, Heine, Bernd, University of Chicago Press, , 1991

    107. What's cogntive about cognitive Longuistics, Gibbs, , 1996

    108. 갓[妻]' 계열 어휘의 語源과 意味, 조항범, , 2003

    109. 공간개념 형성 발달에 대한 연구, 이상우, , 1982

    110. 공간의 객관적 인식에 관한 연구, 오채환, 동국대학교 철학회, , 1989

    111. 유아의 위치어 발달에 관한 연구, 김경아, , 1998

    112. 은유의 생성과 해석에 관한 연구, 정원용, , 1988

    113. 은유의 인지적 분석에 관한 연구, 김대식, , 1995

    114. 의미 확장에 있어서 도식의 역할, 이건환(Lee Keonwhan), 담화·인지언어학회, , 1998

    115. 전염에 의한 의미 변화에 대하여, 조항범, , 1999

    116. On Understanding Grammar. 『문법이해론, Giv?n, 이기동, , 1981

    117. 언어학습의 인지연구 패러다임들, 조명원, , 1997

    118. 보조동사 주다의 결합제약과 의미, 손세모돌, , 1991

    119. 지각동사 ‘보다’의 경험과 추정, 우형식, , 1986

    120. 지각동사 ‘보다’의 인지적 연구, 송효빈, , 2003

    121. 어휘력 신장에 영향을 미치는 요인, 박영목, 한국독서학회, , 2003

    122. 우리말 시간 계열어의 어원적 의미, 최창렬, 한글학회, , 1985

    123. 유아의 공간개념 발달에 관한 연구, 황소영, 중앙대학교 대학원, 석사학위논문. 중앙대, , 2000

    124. Cognitive Representations of SemanticCategories, Rosch, , 1995

    125. 개념적 은유 구조 분석에 관한 연구, 김영일, , 2000

    126. 공간말과 시간말의 의미론적 상관성, 정경숙, , 1989

    127. 공간어에 나타나는 개념적 은유연구, 서은, , 2004

    128. 한국어 풀이씨의 공간론적 의미연구, 이수련, , 1988

    129. 개념구조에 의한 단어의 다의성 연구, 이현근, 한국현대언어학회, , 1992

    130. 은유 이해의 인지적 요소에 관한 연구, 정규태, 정규태, 고려대학교, , 1996

    131. Knowledge of language : its nature, origin, and use, Chomsky, Noam, Praeger, "Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, , 1984

    132. 의미구성에 있어서 인지사상의 중요성, 이종열, , 2000

    133. 은유 표현에서의 단어의 의미론적 역할, 최경봉, 한국어의미학회, , 1997

    134. 은유와 환유에 의한 신체관련 표현연구, 조찬숙, , 2002

    135. 현대국어 야생조류 명칭의 명명 유연성, 김진식, , 1999

    136. 혼성을 통한 은유적 의미의 인지과정”, 이종열, , 2002

    137. Metaphor: Its cognitive Force and Lingustic Structure, Kittay, , 1987

    138. Recherches interlinguistiques en orientation spatiale, Hill, , 1991

    139. Semantics : An Introduction to the Science of Meaning, Ulmann, Stephen, Basil Blackwell & Mott, , 1981

    140. 은유 표현에서 단어의 선택과 해석 원리, 최경봉, 한국어의미학회, , 2000

    141. 원형의미확장에 따른 어휘의 다의성 분석, 심명숙, , 1997

    142. 일상국어에서의 은유적 표현에 대한 고찰, 박경현, , 1989

    143. 전의(轉義)합성명사의 인지의미론적 연구, 최지훈, 이화여자대학교 대학원, 전의(轉義) 합성명사의 인지의미론적 연구, , 1999

    144. (열린교육을 위한) 국어과 교수·학습 방법, 신헌재, 박이정, 열린 교육을 위한 국어과 교수-학습 방법, , 1997

    145. The axiological parametar in preconcetual image schemata, Krzeszowski, , 1993

    146. 환유와 은유의 인지적 상관성에 대한 연구, 이종열, , 2001

    147. Linguistic Cateorization, Prototypes in Linguistic Theory, Taylor, "Linguistic Cateorization, , 1989

    148. '가다' 의 다의성에 대한 인지의미론적 연구, 이종열, 한국어의미학회, , 1998

    149. 말하는 몸 : 감정 표현의 인지언어학적 탐색, 임지룡, 한국문화사, , 2006

    150. 인지언어학적 원근법에서 본 은유의 세계”, 김종도, , 2003

    151. 정신공간을 통한 합성어의 인지적 의미해석, 이종열, 언어과학회, , 1999

    152. 한국어 대화에 나타난 수직공간 개념화 은유, 임혜원, , 2003

    153. 형식의미론과 인지의미론에서 본 어휘의미론, 오예옥, 역락, , 2004

    154. Cognitive Linguistics：An Introduction인지언어학 입문, Savid, , 2001

    155. 선거기사문에 나타난 은유: [선거는 전쟁이다], 임혜원, , 1995

    156. 한국어 의미확장과 한국어 사용자의 인지모형, 신현숙, , 2000

    157. 현행 한글 맞춤법에 대한 대학생들의 의식고찰, 김정태, , 2001

    158. Mental Apaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction Natural Language, Fauconnier, , 1985

    159. 심리언 어학: 머리속 어휘사전의 신비를 찾아서, Aitchison, , 1993

    160. 은유를 통해서 본 생각(idea)의 개념화에 대하여”, 박영순, , 2000

    161. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol I: Theoretical Prerequisites, Langacker, "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, , 1987

    162. 은유에 대한 소고: Lakoff & Johnson의 견해와 관련하여, 박수경, , 1994

    163. 21세기 세종계획 현대국어 말뭉치 인터넷 검색 자료, 국립국어원, , 2008

    164. Marked and unmarked: A Choice between unequals in Semiotic Structure, Waugh, , 1982

    165. Toward a frame-based lexcon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbors, Atkins, Fillmore, , 1992

    166. 의미확장 현상의 개념화 과정: 동사 take의 의미분석, 김명숙, 담화·인지 언어학회, , 2003

    167. REalms of Meaning: An Introdustion to Semantics. 『의미 의 영역, 이선우, 박순혁, Hofmann, , 1993

    168. 파생어 형성에 있어서 어기의 의미와 파생어의 의미, 宋喆儀, 진단학회, , 1985

    169. 인지언어학적 접근방법에 따른 합성어의 의미변화연구, 이양혜, , 2005

    170. 운동경기 기사문에 나타난 은유: [운동경기는 전쟁이다], 임혜원, , 1998

    171. 충북 방언의 역사적 연구: 어형 및 음운변화를 중심으로, 전철웅, 서울시립대학교, , 1995

    172. 명사/동사/조사(N/V/P) 범주에 실현된 다의 현상과 의미확장, 이건환, , 2008

    173. 지각동사의 인지적 연구-한국어 동사 ‘듣다’를 중심으로, 지인영, , 2002

    174. 자연부락명의 명명 유연성 연구-청원군 북이면을 중심으로-, 김진식, , 2001

    175. Cognitive linguistics and Word meaning: Taylor (1989): Linguistic categorization, Cruse, 임지룡, 류희수, , 1989

    176. Meaning in Language: an Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. 『언어의 의미, Cruse, 임지룡?김동환, , 2002

    177. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. 인지의미론, Lakoff, 이기우, "Women, , 1994

    178. The Body in the Mind Chicago 마음 속의 몸-의미?상상력?이성의 신 체적 기초, Johnson, 이기우, , 1992

    179. “은유의 신체적 경험과 문화와의 관련성 연구: 정서은유를 중심으로”, 김태헌, 계명대학교, , 2001

    180. “현대 국어 사용 빈도 조사: 한국어 학습용 어휘 선정을 위한 기초 조사”, 국립국어연구원, 국립국어연구원, , 2002

    181. 은유해석에 있어서의 혼합공간의 역할; Turner와 Fauconnier의 이론을 중심으로, 구현정, , 1996

    182. Image, Concept, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar, 2nd ed. 개념?영상?상 징-문법의 인지적 토대, Langacker, 나익주, "Image, , 2002

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼