RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      은유의 개념화에 대하여 = On the Metaphoric Conceptualization

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40011946

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper aims to seek to compare the views of the metaphoric conceptualization, which can be classified into two models, i.e. two-domain model and many-space model.
      Metaphor has been regarded as one of the cognitive mechanisms whereby one experiential domain is partially mapped(i.e. projected) onto a different experiential domain, so that the second domain is partially understood in terms of the first one. The domain that is mapped is called the source domain, and the domain onto which source is mapped is called the target domain. Both domains have to belong to different superordinate domains.
      This is called two-domain model, which is basically the cognitive concept of metaphor propounded by George Lakoff, Mark Johnson, and Mark Turner and by other cognitive linguists who have been investigating the field. This model claims that the projection is unidirectional from the source to the target.
      The other model, which is an extension of Gill Fauconnier's earlier work on mental spaces and has been developed by Fauconnier and Turner, subsumes metaphor as a special case of more general mental mapping mechanisms. This new model basically claims that in conceptual mapping, as it proceeds in discourse, the source and target domains(or input spaces) are mapped onto a blended space or blend, whose conceptual structure is not wholly derivable from both input spaces. There is also a fourth "generic space", which contains skeletal conceptual structure taken to apply to both source and target. This model is a network model consisting of two input spaces, a blended space, and a generic space, and points to the existence of multiple projections, that is, projections from both inputs to the blend, and projections of the principal inferences from the blend to the target.
      In conclusion, the many-space model seeks to explain how speakers and hearers build new inferences throughout discourse by constructing provisional conceptual domains or "blends". However, it is not compatible with the two-domain model, because it presupposes it.
      번역하기

      This paper aims to seek to compare the views of the metaphoric conceptualization, which can be classified into two models, i.e. two-domain model and many-space model. Metaphor has been regarded as one of the cognitive mechanisms whereby one experient...

      This paper aims to seek to compare the views of the metaphoric conceptualization, which can be classified into two models, i.e. two-domain model and many-space model.
      Metaphor has been regarded as one of the cognitive mechanisms whereby one experiential domain is partially mapped(i.e. projected) onto a different experiential domain, so that the second domain is partially understood in terms of the first one. The domain that is mapped is called the source domain, and the domain onto which source is mapped is called the target domain. Both domains have to belong to different superordinate domains.
      This is called two-domain model, which is basically the cognitive concept of metaphor propounded by George Lakoff, Mark Johnson, and Mark Turner and by other cognitive linguists who have been investigating the field. This model claims that the projection is unidirectional from the source to the target.
      The other model, which is an extension of Gill Fauconnier's earlier work on mental spaces and has been developed by Fauconnier and Turner, subsumes metaphor as a special case of more general mental mapping mechanisms. This new model basically claims that in conceptual mapping, as it proceeds in discourse, the source and target domains(or input spaces) are mapped onto a blended space or blend, whose conceptual structure is not wholly derivable from both input spaces. There is also a fourth "generic space", which contains skeletal conceptual structure taken to apply to both source and target. This model is a network model consisting of two input spaces, a blended space, and a generic space, and points to the existence of multiple projections, that is, projections from both inputs to the blend, and projections of the principal inferences from the blend to the target.
      In conclusion, the many-space model seeks to explain how speakers and hearers build new inferences throughout discourse by constructing provisional conceptual domains or "blends". However, it is not compatible with the two-domain model, because it presupposes it.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 은유의 구조
      • Ⅲ. 개념적 은유 이론
      • 1. 두-영역 모형
      • 2. 다-공간 모형
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 은유의 구조
      • Ⅲ. 개념적 은유 이론
      • 1. 두-영역 모형
      • 2. 다-공간 모형
      • 3. 두 모형의 비교
      • Ⅳ. 결론
      • <참고문헌>
      • <Abstract>
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼