http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
가정내 인터넷 게임 사용 실태와 유아의 인터넷 게임 중독 경향성
조은정(Cho, Eun Joung),김지현(Kim, Jihyun) 한국생활과학회 2010 한국생활과학회지 Vol.19 No.6
This study examined preschoolers’ usage of internet-games in a family context as well as their level of addiction to these games. Participants in this study were 221 mothers of preschoolers (111 boys, 110 girls) in Seoul and Gyeonggi Province. Lee’s (2006) Internet-Game Addiction Scale for Preschoolers was used to assess preschoolers’ level of internet-game addiction. Cho’s (2010) questionnaire regarding home environment and internet-games was also administered. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, t-test, and ANOVA using SPSS WIN 12.0. Results were as follows: firstly, 74.7% of preschoolers were found to play internet-games. Secondly, the level of internet-game addiction was low, but boys showed higher levels of internet-game addiction than girls. Thirdly, preschoolers’ level of internet-game addiction was different according to their number of siblings, time spent using internet-games, that age at which internet-games were first used as well as mothers employment status. Based on the results of this study, the danger of preschoolers’ internet-game addiction and future directions of research are discussed.
The Evolving Policy Debate on Border Closure in Korea
Su-Jin Kang,Jihyun Moon,Heewon Kang,Heekyoung Nam,Sangwoo Tak,Sung-Il Cho 대한예방의학회 2020 Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health Vol.53 No.5
302 Copyright © 2020 The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine J Prev Med Public Health 2020;53:302-306 • https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.213 The Evolving Policy Debate on Border Closure in Korea SuJin Kang1, Jihyun Moon2, Heewon Kang1, Heekyoung Nam3, Sangwoo Tak1, Sung-il Cho1,3 1Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea; 2Samsung Advanced Institute of Health Science and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea; 3Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea Brief Report Objectives: In this paper, we aimed to investigate the evolving debate over border closure in Korea during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, to address the main themes associated with border closure, and to discuss the factors that need to be considered when making such decisions. Methods: We collated and reviewed previously conducted review studies on border closures during infectious disease outbreaks to derive relevant themes and factors. Results: According to our systematic review on border closures and travel restrictions, the effects of such containment efforts are limited. We suggest considering the following factors when determining whether to impose border closure measures: (1) disease characteristics, (2) timeliness of implementation, (3) transmission delay and the basic reproduction number, (4) globalization and pandemics, and (5) social and economic costs. Conclusions: Our assessment indicates that the effects of border closures are at best temporary and limited. Alternative measures must be contemplated and implemented to suppress the spread of COVID-19 in particular and infectious diseases more broadly.
I’M WATING FOR ‘IT’: ON THE PSYCHOLOGY OF STOCKPILING POINTS
Eunhee Cho,Jihyun Jin 글로벌지식마케팅경영학회 2016 Global Marketing Conference Vol.2016 No.7
Loyalty programs are one of the most widely used strategy to promote sales and manage consumer relationship. According to Stourm, Bradlow, and Fader (2015), loyalty programs are divided into two types: non-linear programs and linear programs. Of these two programs, linear loyalty programs are increasingly expanding thanks to the development of digital technology. However, it is doubtful whether the findings of previous researches investigating non-linear loyalty programs also hold true for linear loyalty programs. Our study aims to investigate what induces consumers to stockpile or use their points in linear loyalty programs. This is particularly important because it seems that consumers really have no economic incentive to stockpile points in such programs. They are not rewarded for their “stockpiling” behavior- the amount of points accumulated for 1 dollar remains the same regardless of whether a consumer has already accumulated 100 points or 10000 points. The present research shows that in linear loyalty programs, consumers stockpile points just for the sake of “it”. That is, our studies show that the degree to which consumers perceive their effort to invest until they reach certain point level (goal) to be high or low influences consumers’ stockpiling decision. Specifically, when consumers expect that they have to invest greater effort, they are more likely to accumulate points compared to when they expect they don’t have to invest a lot of effort. In the main study, we show that this effect was mediated by consumers’ anticipation utility. Also, we found an interesting phenomenon that shows even when a certain point level is not obviously given consumers still set their own goals and calculate their effort needed to reach the goal.
의약품 광고심의 기준 및 절차 개선을 위한 전문가 의견 조사
김지현(Jihyun Kim), 조우연(Wooyeon Cho), 신성환(Seonghwan Shin), 박지우(Jeewoo Park), 김주경(Ju Kyoung Kim), 정재훈(Jae-Hoon Cheong), 전하림(Ha-Lim Jeon) 한국보건사회약료경영학회 2023 한국보건사회약료경영학회지 Vol.11 No.1
BACKGROUNDS Since the number of drug advertisements is increasing due to the expansion of advertising markets and the emergence of a new type of advertisement, it is important to review drug advertisements accurately and efficiently. OBJECTIVE We aim to gather and analyze the expert’s opinions regarding the criteria and procedures of drug advertisement review. METHODS Survey questionnaire was sent to 42 members of the drug advertisement review committee. The questionnaire included the key principle of drug advertisement review, the importance of prohibition by type of advertisement, the necessity of permitting by type of advertisement, and questions about current procedures of drug advertisement review. RESULTS In total, 23 of 42 members participated (54.7% response rate). Survey results showed that the ‘Proper expression of efficacy and effectiveness’ and ‘Fair competition among drugs’ were important principles. Prohibition of ‘False advertisements’ and ‘Advertisements that distort facts’ were considered important. The degree of agreement in the need for permission was relatively low, but it was considered relatively necessary to allow ‘Advertisements that present drugs which have been recognized for safe use, such as vitamins.’ All respondents agreed that the number of drug advertisement reviews was high. Approximately 70% of respondents answered that current review fees are not adequate. CONCLUSION This study shows the degree of consensus of experts and provides evidence for further amendment on criteria and procedures of drug advertisement review.