http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
우수선수와 비 우수 선수들의 스포츠 심리기술의 차이 검증
허정훈 한국스포츠리서치 2004 한국 스포츠 리서치 Vol.15 No.5
The purpose of this study was to investigate how different athletes' sports psychological skill very according to sex and level. To measure it, KSPSQs were distributed to 169(male 81, female 88) athletes in 2 events. Two-way Manova was used to document the differences by each group, and Univariate Test was used for a Post-Hoc Test. Male athletes significantly had higher levels of self-conficence than females. Elite athletes had higher score in Mental Toughness, Team unity, Goal Setting and Self Confidence than non-elite athletes. These results were discussed with various precedent resarches.
허정훈 제주대학교 사범대학 2001 백록논총 Vol.3 No.1
In Kant's ethics, will is the faculty of determining our causality through a conception of rules. Namely, will is the faculty of acting according to a conception of law, which is not a product or discovery of understanding but of reason. Kant's most important discovery is that the law is not a mere restriction on freedom but is itself a product of freedom. Precisely this conception marks the chief advance of the second Critique over the first Critique. L. W. Beck says that this is the Copernican Revolution in Kant's Moral philosophy. But .there is a problem in this context. If the law of practical reason determines the will, then how can we say that the latter is free? A will must be the independent of the mechanism of nature and all bindings. And the will must obey the law of reason. To say other words, reason demands absolute and necessary obedience. There seems to be a conflict of freedom of will and necessity of reason. Of course, Kant says that a being that cannot act except under the Idea of freedom is really free in a practical respect and is obligated by the laws which follow from that Idea, regrdless of whether we can prove theoretically that he is free or not. What freedom is warranted by this argument?
허정훈,김영호 고신대학교(의대) 고신대학교 의과대학 학술지 2009 고신대학교 의과대학 학술지 Vol.24 No.1
Typical cancer treatments including chemotherapy and radiation therapy has a limitation to eradiate cancer cells completely, which results in recurrence of cancer after treatment. Cancers have been known as morphologically and functionally heterogeneous population of cells. While majority of cells are the differentiated cancer cells that have limited proliferation, minority of cells, termed cancer stem cells have the ability to self-renew and to initiate cancer. Cancer stem cells express drug transporters and DNA repair systems, which allow a cancer stem cells to resist against chemotherapy or radiation therapy. To eradiate cancer completely, therefore, cancer stem cells rather than mature cancer cells should be targeted. This review describes the general concept and specific property of cancer stem cells and suggests novel strategies for cancer stem cell treatment.
허정훈 제주대학교 1990 논문집 Vol.31 No.1
Happiness is not an object of practical reason in Kant's ethics. If an acion is determined by the ground of happiness, it is necessarily heteronomous on Kant's moral pirinciple. Such action is of no moral value and is ignored as irrelevant. Nevertheless Kant does not exclude the possibility to pursue happiness as an object of an action and suggests that happiness is an object to be pursued as a part of the highest good. Therefore, Kant seems to be inconsistant on happiness. This papper shows that Kant's argument is twofold and inconsisteat on the matter of happiness, and examines how Kant's twofold points are related. This paper indicated that happiness was understand from the two different sides in Kant's ethics. One is the matter of the possibility of moral action and the other peculiarity of man as sensible being. Since the principle of happiness does not produce the practical law from the former point of view, it can not be the object of practical reason. But from the latter point of view, from the side of the function of human reason in sensible world, it can be the object of practical reason. At this time, happiness is the conditional object only in human reason as a sensible being. In other words, it can be pursued on condition that it does not violate moral good. Therefore,the relation to be looked as contradition between happiness and the moral is not contradictory, but conditional one.