http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이현림(Lee, Hyun-Rim),오정석(Oh, Jung-Seok),심영미(Sim, Young-Mi) SH도시연구원 2014 주택도시연구 Vol.4 No.2
In this study, we compared the public rental housing policy of China and South Korea. We have derived suggestions such as the following. First, in order to structure the target occupancy, simplify the type of public rental housing must be clearly defined goals for public rental housing policy. It has been simplified in the residential housing for the house of the lowest living line below, housing for low-income, according to the policy and purpose of removal into three types in the case of China. However, in the case of South Korea, Seoul's administration and the ministry have different classification system at the types of public rental housing. It is necessary to simplify the types, organize the criteria for selecting tenants. Second, the government must increase the rent subsidy for the socially disadvantaged and low-income families. In the case of South Korea, rent subsidy will be transferred to the Land and Transportation Ministry from October this year. In Chine, in addition to these policies, tenants only pay 5% of the original rent, the government support the rest of the rent. Third, the government must simplify the delivery system of remuneration of housing and public rental housing. In the case of China, the supply of public rental housing, such as rent subsidy has been simplified in charge of the company that has been approved by the government and the government. Fourth, the government must increase the financial support of construction of public rental housing. Finally, the supply of public rental housing should be considered from the perspective of the consumer.