RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        IMPROVEMENT OF DOSE CALCULATION ACCURACY ON kV CBCT IMAGES WITH CORRECTED ELECTRON DENSITY TO CTNUMBER CURVE

        안범석,우홍균,유숙현,박종민 대한방사선방어학회 2015 방사선방어학회지 Vol.40 No.1

        To improve accuracy of dose calculation on kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (kV CBCT) images, a custom-made phantom was fabricated to acquire an accurate CT number to electron density curve by full scatter of cone beam x-ray. To evaluate the dosimetric accuracy, 9 volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for head and neck (HN) cancer and 9 VMAT plans for lung cancer were generated with an anthropomorphic phantom. Both CT and CBCT images of the anthropomorphic phantom were acquired and dose-volumetric parameters on the CT images with CT density curve (CTCT), CBCT images with CT density curve (CBCTCT) and CBCT images with CBCT density curve (CBCTCBCT) were calculated for each VMAT plan. The differences between CTCT vs. CBCTCT were similar to those between CTCT vs. CBCTCBCT for HN VMAT plans. However, the differences between CTCT vs. CBCTCT were larger than those between CTCT vs. CBCTCBCT for lung VMAT plans. Especially, the differences in D98% and D95% of lung target volume were statistically significant (4.7% vs. 0.8% with p = 0.033 for D98% and 4.8% vs. 0.5% with p = 0.030 for D95%). In order to calculate dose distributions accurately on the CBCT images, CBCT density curve generated with full scatter condition should be used especially for dose calculations in the region of large inhomogeneity.

      • 규칙적으로 배열된 균열에 의한 파동 산란

        安範錫 수원대학교 산업기술연구소 1994 산업기술연구소논문집 Vol.9 No.-

        The wave reflection by the peoriodic array of cracks is investigated by means of boundary element method. With the formulation of the boundary integral equation the reflected wave is calculated and are compared with the reflection coefficient of the zero-th order wave mode as the frequency is changed. By the comparison the transition of the wave modes at the cut-off frequency revealed itself very important for the characterization of the creak distance of the peoriodic array of cracks by the ultrasonic testing.

      • 직장암 치료 시 치료계획에 따른 선량평가 연구

        정현학,안범석,김대일,이양훈,이제희,Jeong, Hyun Hak,An, Beom Seok,Kim, Dae Il,Lee, Yang Hoon,Lee, Je hee 대한방사선치료학회 2016 대한방사선치료학회지 Vol.28 No.2

        목 적 : 직장암 방사선 치료 시 대퇴골두의 선량을 최소화하기 위해, 보편적인 치료방법인 3문 입체조형치료계획(3D Conformal radiation therapy)과 5문 입체조형치료계획 그리고 용적변조방사선치료(Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, 이하 VMAT) 계획의 유용성을 비교, 평가하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법 : 본원에서 21EX(Varian Medical Systems, USA)를 이용하여 치료 받은 직장암 환자 10명을 대상으로 3문, 5문 입체조형치료계획과 VMAT 전산화치료계획을 각각 세우고 이에 대한 선량분포를 비교분석하였다. 전산화 치료계획은 Eclipse(Ver 10.0.42, Varian, USA)를 이용하였으며, 선량계산을 위해 PRO3(Progressive Resolution Optimizer 10.0.28), AAA(Anisotropic Analytic Algorithm Ver 10.0.28) 알고리즘을 사용하였다. 3문 치료계획은 6MV POST field 와 15MV LT, RT field를 갠트리 각도 $0^{\circ}$, $270^{\circ}$, $90^{\circ}$로 구성하였고, 5문 치료계획은 6MV POST field와 15MV RAO, RPO, LAO, LPO field를 갠트리 각도 $0^{\circ}$, $95^{\circ}$, $45^{\circ}$, $315^{\circ}$, $265^{\circ}$ 로 환자 체표면을 감싸는 형태로 구성하였다. VMAT 치료계획은 갠트리 회전반경이 $360^{\circ}$인 1개의 ARC를 이용하여 수립하였다. 처방선량은 30회에 걸쳐 직장에 총 선량이 54Gy가 되도록 하였다. VMAT 치료계획시 최적화(Optimization) 과정에서 나타나는 선량 차이의 무작위성을 최소화하기 위하여 2회의 최적화와 선량계산과정을 거쳤으며 처방선량의 100%가 표적용적의 95%를 포함할 수 있도록 Plan normalization을 조절하였다. 각 치료 계획의 Total MU, 대퇴골두와 acetabular fossa의 최대선량, PTV의 H.I. (Homogeneity Index), C.I.(Conformity Index)를 평가 지표로 설정하였고, 전자영상유도장치를 이용하여 임상 적용 가능 여부 확인을 위한 IMRT verification Q.A. (Gamma test)를 실시하였다. 결 과 : Rt. femoral head 최대선량은 3문, 5문, VMAT 치료계획 순으로 평균 53.08 Gy, 50.27 Gy, 30.92 Gy를 나타냈다. 마찬가지로 Lt. femoral head 에서도 같은 순으로 평균 53.68 Gy, 51.01 Gy, 평균 29.23 Gy를 나타냈다. Rt. Aceta fossa 의 최대선량은 3문, 5문, VMAT 치료계획 순으로 평균 54.86 Gy, 52.40 Gy, 30.37 Gy의 값을 보였다. Lt. Aceta fossa에서 또한 같은 순으로 평균 54.90 Gy, 52.77 Gy, 평균 31.79 Gy를 나타내어, both femoral head 와 aceta fossa의 최대선량이 3문, 5문, VMAT 치료계획 순으로 높았다. PTV에 대한 H.I.는 모두 서로 비슷한 결과를 나타냈고, C.I.는 3문, 5문, VMAT 치료계획 순으로 평균 1.64, 1.48, 평균 0.99로 VMAT 치료계획이 가장 낮은 것으로 나타났다. Total MU는 VMAT 치료계획이 3문과 5문 치료계획에 비해 각각 평균 124.4MU, 299MU 더 많이 사용하는 것으로 나타났다. VMAT 치료계획에 대한 IMRT verification Q.A. 결과 2mm / 2%, Gamma pass rate 90.0% 기준을 모두 초과하여 통과하였다. 결 론 : VMAT 치료계획은 3D 치료계획과 비교하여 대부분의 평가지표에서 우수한 것으로 나타났다. 특히 대퇴골두의 선량을 크게 감소 시켰으며, 저선량 영역에서는 소장이 받는 선량이 증가 하였으나 오히려 고선량 영역에서는 우수한 선량분포를 보였다. 하지만 VMAT을 지원하지 않는 장비와 치료계획 시 추가되는 Contouring, 그리고 정도관리에 관한 수고 등의 현실적인 제약 때문에 VMAT 치료계획을 선택하기 어려운 경우가 있을 수 있다. 5문 치료계획은 기존 3문 치료계획에 비해, 추가적인 문제에 구애받지 않고 대퇴골두의 선량을 줄일 수 있는 장점이 있다. 따라서 각 병원 상황에 맞게 Purpose : In order to minimize the dose of femoral head as an appropriate treatment plan for rectal cancer radiation therapy, we compare and evaluate the usefulness of 3-field 3D conformal radiation therapy(below 3fCRT), which is a universal treatment method, and 5-field 3D conformal radiation therapy(below 5fCRT), and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Materials and Methods : The 10 cases of rectal cancer that treated with 21EX were enrolled. Those cases were planned by Eclipse(Ver. 10.0.42, Varian, USA), PRO3(Progressive Resolution Optimizer 10.0.28) and AAA(Anisotropic Analytic Algorithm Ver. 10.0.28). 3fCRT and 5fCRT plan has $0^{\circ}$, $270^{\circ}$, $90^{\circ}$ and $0^{\circ}$, $95^{\circ}$, $45^{\circ}$, $315^{\circ}$, $265^{\circ}$ gantry angle, respectively. VMAT plan parameters consisted of 15MV coplanar $360^{\circ}$ 1 arac. Treatment prescription was employed delivering 54Gy to recum in 30 fractions. To minimize the dose difference that shows up randomly on optimizing, VMAT plans were optimized and calculated twice, and normalized to the target V100%=95%. The indexes of evaluation are D of Both femoral head and aceta fossa, total MU, H.I.(Homogeneity index) and C.I.(Conformity index) of the PTV. All VMAT plans were verified by gamma test with portal dosimetry using EPID. Results : D of Rt. femoral head was 53.08 Gy, 50.27 Gy, and 30.92 Gy, respectively, in the order of 3fCRT, 5fCRT, and VMAT treatment plan. Likewise, Lt. Femoral head showed average 53.68 Gy, 51.01 Gy and 29.23 Gy in the same order. D of Rt. aceta fossa was 54.86 Gy, 52.40 Gy, 30.37 Gy, respectively, in the order of 3fCRT, 5fCRT, and VMAT treatment plan. Likewise, Lt. Femoral head showed average 53.68 Gy, 51.01 Gy and 29.23 Gy in the same order. The maximum dose of both femoral head and aceta fossa was higher in the order of 3fCRT, 5fCRT, and VMAT treatment plan. C.I. showed the lowest VMAT treatment plan with an average of 1.64, 1.48, and 0.99 in the order of 3fCRT, 5fCRT, and VMAT treatment plan. There was no significant difference on H.I. of the PTV among three plans. Total MU showed that the VMAT treatment plan used 124.4MU and 299MU more than the 3fCRT and 5fCRT treatment plan, respectively. IMRT verification gamma test results for the VMAT plan passed over 90.0% at 2mm/2%. Conclusion : In rectal cancer treatment, the VMAT plan was shown to be advantageous in most of the evaluation indexes compared to the 3D plan, and the dose of the femoral head was greatly reduced. However, because of practical limitations there may be a case where it is difficult to select a VMAT treatment plan. 5fCRT has the advantage of reducing the dose of the femoral head as compared to the existing 3fCRT, without regard to additional problems. Therefore, not only would it extend survival time but the quality of life in general, if hospitals improved radiation therapy efficiency by selecting the treatment plan in accordance with the hospital's situation.

      • ViewRay MRIdian System을 이용한 MRI only based plan의 유용성 고찰

        전창우,이호진,안범석,김찬용,이제희,Jeon, Chang Woo,Lee, Ho Jin,An, Beom Seok,Kim, Chan young,Lee, Je hee 대한방사선치료학회 2015 대한방사선치료학회지 Vol.27 No.2

        목 적 : MRI를 기반으로 한 CT fusion plan과 MRI only based plan을 비교함으로써 MRI only plan의 유용성을 평가하고, 나아가 Simulation과 치료계획을 포함한 방사선치료의 전 과정을 CT 촬영 없이 MRI 영상으로 구성하여 실시간 MR-IGRT를 구현하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법 : 본원에서 사용중인 BBB CT (Brilliance Big Bore CT, 16slice, Philips)와 Viewray MRIdian System (Viewray, USA)으로 환자 11명(Head and Neck 1명, Breast 5명, Lung 1명, Liver 3명, Prostate 1명)을 대상으로 CT & MR simulation 및 치료계획을 세웠다. Head and Neck, Breast, Prostate환자는 자유호흡(Free Breathing) 상태로, Lung과 Liver 환자는 흡기 호흡중지(Inhalation Breathing Holdng)상태로 Simulation을 진행하였다. Viewray의 Bore 크기 및 Coil 위치를 고려하여 환자 자세 및 고정기구를 동일한 조건을 유지하여 CT simulation을 시행하였다. Viewray MRIdian 시스템을 이용하여 MR 영상을 기반으로 한 CT fusion plan과 CT fusion 없이 [ICRU 46]에서 권고하는 폐, 공기, 뼈의 전자밀도를 입력한 동일한 조건의 MR only plan을 세웠다. Head and Neck, Breast, Prostate는 IMRT, Lung과 Liver 는 Gating치료계획을 세웠고, 치료계획의 평가는 PTV의 균질성 지표 (Homogeneity Index, HI)와 일치성 지표 (Conformity Index, CI), 그리고 각 PTV와 OAR의 DVH와 선량차이를 각각 비교하였다. 결 과 : 두 치료계획간 치료부위별 PTV에 대한 HI 값의 차이는 Head and Neck, Breast, Lung, Liver, Prostate 부위별로 각각 0.089, 0.26, 0.67, 0.2, 0.4%로 나타났으며, CI 값의 차이는 부위별로 각각 0.043, 0.84, 0.68, 0.46, 0.3%로 두가지 평가 값 모두 Head and Neck 부위가 가장 작은 차이를 나타냈다. PTV에 대한 평균선량 차이는 치료부위별로 각각 0.07, 0.29, 0.18, 0.3, 0.18 Gy로 나타났다. 이를 백분율로 나타냈을 때 0.06, 0.7, 0.29, 0.69, 0.44%으로 모두 1% 이하의 차이를 보였다. 두경부암의 각 OAR은 전체적으로 0.01~0.12 Gy의 평균선량 차이를 보였으며, 유방암은 0.04~0.06 Gy, 폐암에서는 0.01~0.21 Gy, 간암은 0.06~0.27 Gy, 전립선암은 0.02~0.23 Gy의 평균선량 차이를 나타냈다. 결 론 : MR 영상을 이용한 치료계획은 연부조직에서 탁월한 대조도를 나타낼 뿐만 아니라 CT fusion한 MR 치료계획과 비교했을 때 PTV의 HI, CI, 선량차이 모두 1%미만의 차이를 보였으며, OAR의 경우 비균질한 조직이 많은 부위일수록 최대 0.89 Gy 선량차이를 보였다. 이결과를 토대로 두경부암, 부분적 유방암이나 전립선암등 비균질도 차이가 적은 부위에는 CT촬영 없이 MR 영상만을 이용한 방사선치료의 가능성을 확인 할 수 있었다. Purpose : By comparing a CT fusion plan based on MRI with a plan based on only MRI without CT, we intended to study usefulness of a plan based on only MRI. And furthermore, we intended to realize a realtime MR-IGRT by MRI image without CT scan during the course of simulation, treatment planning, and radiation treatment. Materials and Methods : BBB CT (Brilliance Big Bore CT, 16slice, Philips), Viewray MRIdian system (Viewray, USA) were used for CT & MR simulation and Treatment plan of 11 patients (1 Head and Neck, 5 Breast, 1 Lung, 3 Liver, 1 Prostate). When scanning for treatment, Free Breathing was enacted for Head&Neck, Breast, Prostate and Inhalation Breathing Holding for Lung and Liver. Considering the difference of size between CT and Viewray, the patient's position and devices were in the same condition. Using Viewray MRIdian system, two treatment plans were established. The one was CT fusion treatment plan based on MR image. Another was MR treatment plan including electron density that [ICRU 46] recommend for Lung, Air and Bone. For Head&Neck, Breast and Prostate, IMRT was established and for Lung and Liver, Gating treatment plan was established. PTV's Homogeneity Index(HI) and Conformity Index(CI) were use to estimate the treatment plan. And DVH and dose difference of each PTV and OAR were compared to estimate the treatment plan. Results : Between the two treatment plan, each difference of PTV's HI value is 0.089% (Head&Neck), 0.26% (Breast), 0.67% (Lung), 0.2% (Liver), 0.4% (Prostate) and in case of CI, 0.043% (Head&Neck), 0.84% (Breast), 0.68% (Lung), 0.46% (Liver), 0.3% (Prostate). As showed above, it is on Head&Neck that HI and CI's difference value is smallest. Each difference of average dose on PTV is 0.07 Gy (Head&Neck), 0.29 Gy (Breast), 0.18 Gy (Lung), 0.3 Gy (Liver), 0.18 Gy (Prostate). And by percentage, it is 0.06% (Head&Neck), 0.7% (Breast), 0.29% (Lung), 0.69% (Liver), 0.44% (Prostate). Likewise, All is under 1%. In Head&Neck, average dose difference of each OAR is 0.01~0.12 Gy, 0.04~0.06 Gy in Breast, 0.01~0.21 Gy in Lung, 0.06~0.27 Gy in Liver and 0.02~0.23 Gy in Prostate. Conclusion : PTV's HI, CI dose difference on the Treatment plan using MR image is under 1% and OAR's dose difference is maximum 0.89 Gy as heterogeneous tissue increases when comparing with that fused CT image. Besides, It characterizes excellent contrast in soft tissue. So, radiation therapy using only MR image without CT scan is useful in the part like Head&Neck, partial breast and prostate cancer which has a little difference of heterogeneity.

      • Non-PFOA Surfactant with a Short Fluorocarbon Branch as an Alternative of PFOA based Fluorinated Surfactant

        이수현,강은경,안범석,이주호,김태동,박수열,이은호,이병민 한국공업화학회 2019 한국공업화학회 연구논문 초록집 Vol.2019 No.0

        Fluorinated surfactants derived from PFOA (Perfluorooctanoic acid) have excellent surface activities. In spite of these characteristics, PFOA is being subjected to global regulations because of high toxicity and bioaccumulation problem. In this study, we synthesized non-PFOA surfactants having excellent physical properties, and the products were identified by H-NMR, C-NMR, and FT-IR. Surface activities and physical properties such as surface tension, CMC, and emulsion stability were measured. Our non-PFOA fluorinated surfactants have superior surface activities compared to PFOA fluorinated surfactants.

      • Lung SABR plan시 AAA의 Calculation resolution 변화에 의한 Target dose 영향 연구

        김대일,손상준,안범석,정치훈,유숙현,Kim, Dae Il,Son, Sang Jun,Ahn, Bum Seok,Jung, Chi Hoon,Yoo, Suk Hyun 대한방사선치료학회 2014 대한방사선치료학회지 Vol.26 No.2

        목 적 : Lung SABR plan 에서 AAA의 calculation grid를 변화시켜 선량변화를 분석하고 그에 따른 영향을 연구하여 적절한 적용 방안에 대해 고찰한다. 대상 및 방법 : 모든 plan에 이용된 4D CT image는 Brilliance Big Bore CT(Philips, Netherlands)에서 촬영되었으며 10 건의 Lung SABR plan($Eclipse^{TM}$ ver 10.0.42, Varian, the USA)에서 anisotropic analytic algorithm (AAA, ver. 10, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA)을 이용하여 각각 1.0, 3.0, 5.0 mm의 calculation grid로 계산하였다. 결 과 : 10 건의 Lung SABR plan에서 1.0 mm calculation grid를 사용한 경우 $V_{98}$이 각각 처방선량의 약 $99.5{\pm}1.5%$ 였으며 Dmin이 각각 처방선량의 약 $92.5{\pm}1.5%$ 였고 Homogeneity Index(HI)는 약 $1.0489{\pm}0.0025$로 나타났다. 3.0 mm calculation grid를 사용한 경우 $V_{98}$이 각각 처방선량의 약 $90{\pm}4.5%$였으며, Dmin이 각각 처방선량의 약 $87.5{\pm}3%$ 였고 HI가 약 $1.07{\pm}1$로 나타났다. 5.0 mm calculation grid를 사용한 경우 $V_{98}$이 각각 처방선량의 약 $63{\pm}15%$ 였으며, Dmin이 각각 처방선량의 약 $83{\pm}4%$ 였고 HI가 약 $1.13{\pm}0.2$로 나타났다. 결 론 : 1.0 mm calculation grid의 계산 시간이 3.0 mm, 5.0 mm 보다 오래 걸렸지만 grid의 간격이 좁을수록 상대적으로 작은 PTV를 갖는 plan의 정확성을 향상시키는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 Lung과 같이 비교적 넓게 퍼져 있으며 밀도가 낮은 장기의 작은 PTV를 치료해야 하는 경우에는 1.0 mm의 calculation grid를 사용하는 것이 좋을 것으로 사료된다. Purpose : Changing the calculation grid of AAA in Lung SABR plan and to analyze the changes in target dose, and investigated the effects associated with it, and considered a suitable method of application. Materials and Methods : 4D CT image that was used to plan all been taken with Brilliance Big Bore CT (Philips, Netherlands) and in Lung SABR plan($Eclipse^{TM}$ ver10.0.42, Varian, the USA), use anisotropic analytic algorithm(AAA, ver.10, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and, was calculated by the calculation grid 1.0, 3.0, 5.0 mm in each Lung SABR plan. Results : Lung SABR plan of 10 cases are using each of 1.0 mm, 3.0 mm, 5.0 mm calculation grid, and in case of use a 1.0 mm calculation grid $V_{98}$. of the prescribed dose is about $99.5%{\pm}1.5%$, $D_{min}$ of the prescribed dose is about $92.5{\pm}1.5%$ and Homogeneity Index(HI) is $1.0489{\pm}0.0025$. In the case of use a 3.0 mm calculation grid $V_{98}$ dose of the prescribed dose is about $90{\pm}4.5%$, $D_{min}$ of the prescribed dose is about $87.5{\pm}3%$ and HI is about $1.07{\pm}1$. In the case of use a 5.0 mm calculation grid $V_{98}$ dose of the prescribed dose is about $63{\pm}15%$, $D_{min}$ of the prescribed dose is about $83{\pm}4%$ and HI is about $1.13{\pm}0.2$, respectively. Conclusion : The calculation grid of 1.0 mm is better improves the accuracy of dose calculation than using 3.0 mm and 5.0 mm, although calculation times increase in the case of smaller PTV relatively. As lung, spread relatively large and low density and small PTV, it is considered and good to use a calculation grid of 1.0 mm.

      • Synthesis and Surface Activities of Glycerol-based Surfactants as an Alternative of Alkyl phenol derivatives

        강은경,이수현,안범석,김기호,박수열,이은호,이병민 한국공업화학회 2019 한국공업화학회 연구논문 초록집 Vol.2019 No.1

        Alkylphenol Ethoxylate (APE) is a nonionic surfactant widely used in various industrial fields because of its good cleaning power and low price. The APE is difficult to decompose, and its residues are released into rivers. Linear alcohol ethoxylates are environmentally superior to alkylphenol ethoxylates, but have limited performance in the absence of phenyl groups in the molecule. To solve these problems, we synthesized glycerol-based nonionic surfactants. New surfactants were elucidated by H-NMR, C-NMR, and FT-IR. and studied by measuring surface properties.

      • Short Chained Fluoro-surfactants; their synthesis and surface activities

        이수현,강은경,안범석,김태동,이은호,박수열,이병민 한국공업화학회 2019 한국공업화학회 연구논문 초록집 Vol.2019 No.1

        Fluoropolymers have unique characteristics, for example outstanding thermal stability, low surface energy, excellent dielectric properties, nonadhesive properties and etc.. Emulsion polymerization in practice is a very simple process and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) derivatives, especially ammonium salt have been used as emulsifiers. Due to their high toxicity and bioaccumulation problems, PFOA and theirs derivatives are designated as prohibited substances by environmental groups such as the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In this study, potential alternatives with shorter fluorocarbon chains have been synthesized. The products were structurally characterized, and their surface active properties were systematically analyzed. It was found that these new surfactants have superior surface activities compared to PFOA derivatives.

      • Conventional, IMRT, VMAT을 이용한 CSI 치료시, Setup 오차에 따른 각 Junction부의 선량변화측정을 통한 치료계획 비교

        이호진,전창우,안범석,유숙현,박소연,Lee, Ho Jin,Jeon, Chang Woo,Ahn, Bum Suk,Yu, Sook Hyeon,Park, So Yeon 대한방사선치료학회 2014 대한방사선치료학회지 Vol.26 No.2

        목 적 : Conventional, IMRT, VMAT을 이용한 CSI치료 시, Setup 오차에 따른 각 Junction부의 선량변화측정을 통해 치료계획을 비교한다. 대상 및 방법 : 본원에서 CSI 치료환자를 대상으로 이클립스 10.0(Eclipse10.0, Varian, USA)를 이용하여 Conventional, IMRT, VMAT 치료계획을 세웠다. 또한 필름측정을 위하여 각 치료계획마다 IMRT QA phantom을 적용한 Verification plan을 생성하였다. 이때, 각 치료기법의 Setup 오차는 0, 머리방향으로 2, 4, 6mm, 다리방향으로 2, 4, 6mm로 적용하였다.(이하, '+'는 머리 방향, '-'는 다리방향을 의미한다.) IMRT QA Phantom과 EBT2 film을 이용하여, 각 치료기법별로 Junction부의 Setup 오차를 0, +2, +4, +6, -2, -4, -6mm로 이동하여 조사하였다. Film을 Scan하여 감마지수(Gamma index,${\gamma}$)를 도출하여, 측정된 Film과 치료계획상의 선량분포와의 일치성을 확인한 후, Setup 오차에 따른 Conventional, IMRT, VMAT 치료계획별 선량분포도를 비교하였고, Homogeneity Index(HI)를 계산하여 표적 내 선량분포의 균일성을 분석하였다. 결 과 : Film으로 측정하여 얻은 감마지수는 90.49%로 Film scan값과 치료계획상의 선량분포와의 일치성을 확인하였다. 또한, 거리에 따른 선량분포도에 따르면, Setup 오차를 머리 방향으로 2, 4, 6mm설정하면 Conventional의 $^*Diff$(%)는 3.1, 4.5, 8.1, IMRT는 1.1, 3.5, 6.3, VMAT은 1.6, 2.5, 5.7으로 나타났다. 같은 방법으로 Setup 오차를 다리방향으로 2, 4, 6mm로 설정을 하면 Conventional의 $^*Diff$(%)는 -1.6, -2.8, -4.4, IMRT는 -0.9, -1.6, -2.9, VMAT은 -0.5, -2.2, -2.5으로 나타났다. Homogeneity Index(HI)는 Conventional 1.216, IMRT 1.095, VMAT 1.069로 값을 얻었다. 결 론 : Dose homogeneity와 Junction 부위에 대한 완만한 Dose gradient의 장점을 가진 IMRT와 VMAT을 이용한 CSI치료는 Conventional 기법보다 Setup 오차에 따른 Junction 부위의 선량의 변화가 적었고, 균일성 또한 좋게 나타났다. 이러한 적은 선량의 변화는 CSI치료 시 발생하는 Setup 오차에도 환자에게 위험성이 적음을 의미한다. Purpose : Conventional, IMRT, at CSI treatment with VMAT, this study compare the treatment plan with dose changes measured at Junction field according to the error of Setup. Materials and Methods : This study established Conventional, the IMRT, VMAT treatment planning for CSI therapy using the Eclipse 10.0 (Eclipse10.0, Varian, USA) and chose person in Seoul National University Hospital. Verification plan was also created to apply IMRT QA phantom for each treatment plan to the film measurements. At this time, the error of Setup was applied to the 2, 4, 6mm respectively with the head and foot direction. ("+" direction of the head, "-" means that the foot direction.) Using IMRT QA Phantom and EBT2 film, was investigated by placing the error of Setup for each Junction. We check the consistency of the measured Film and plan dose distribution by gamma index (Gamma index, ${\gamma}$). In addition, we compared the error of Setup by the dose distribution, and analyzing the uniformity of the dose distribution within the target by calculating the Homogeneity Index (HI). Results : It was figured out that 90.49%-gamma index we obtained with film is agreement with film scan score and dose distribution of treatment plan. Also, depend on the dose distribution on distance, if we make the error of Setup 2, 4, 6mm in the head direction, it showed that 3.1, 4.5, 8.1 at $^*Diff$(%) of Conventional, 1.1, 3.5, 6.3 at IMRT, and 1.6, 2.5, 5.7 at VMAT. In the same way, if we make the error of Setup 2, 4, 6mm in the foot direction, it showed that -1.6, -2.8, -4.4 at $^*Diff$(%) of Conventional, -0.9, -1.6, -2.9 at IMRT, and -0.5, -2.2, -2.5 at VMAT. Homogeneity Index(HI)s are 1.216 at Conventional, 1.095 at IMRT and 1.069 at VMAT. Discussion and Conclusion : The dose-change depend on the error of Setup at the CSI RT(radiation therapy) using IMRT and VMAT which have advantages, Dose homogeneity and the gradual dose gradients on the Junction part is lower than that of Conventional CSI RT. This a little change of dose means that there is less danger on patients despite of the error of Setup generated at the CSI RT.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼