RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        태권도 남자 우수 품새 선수의 금강 회전 동작의 성공 판단 기준에 관한 연구

        박수철(Park, Su-Cheol),김용호(Kim, Yong-Ho),남기정(Nam, Ki-Jeong),이종훈(Lee, Chong-Hoon) 한국체육과학회 2019 한국체육과학회지 Vol.28 No.5

        The object of this study is to provide a basis of fair scoring system by analyzing excellent male Taekwondo Poomsae player’s Keumgamg Poomsae rotation movement to see if the scoring system is quantifiable as the scores are made with qualitative scoring system of expressiveness. The experiment was performed slope for experts while the kinematic three dimensional data was recorded and analyzed. Result value is a movement quantified result with Jerk-cost, that judges the movement is swift when the value is closer to zero(0). In Keumgang Poomsae rotation movement, the resultant of Jerk-cost value on the hand of the excellent 5 players came out the same. Rather than from success to failure, the resultant of Jerk-cost value was statistically showing the meaningful difference.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • 지혜 깊어지는 건강_우리 아이를 위한 1분 건강: 평생 보는 눈 더 잘 보이게 바로바로 점검하기

        박수철,Park, Su-Cheol 한국건강관리협회 2011 건강소식 Vol.35 No.7

        건강한 눈 관리는 어릴 때부터 이루어져야 한다. 과거에는 TV, 어두운 곳에서 독서, 눕거나 엎드려서 책보기 등이 아이 눈을 피로하게 해 근시를 유발했으나 요즘은 컴퓨터 게임, 닌텐도, DMB 방송 등 아이들의 눈을 피로하게 하는 요인이 많아졌다. 아이들의 눈 건강을 위해 알아두어야 할 것은 무엇이 있을까?

      • KCI등재

        일본 중학교 역사교과서의 중ㆍ근세사 서술과 역사인식

        박수철(Park Su-Cheol) 한국사연구회 2005 한국사연구 Vol.129 No.-

        While Korean scholars have consistently pointed out the problems associated with Japanese history textbooks, such distortions of history have become a seemingly annual problem since 2001. We as Koreans have now reached the stage where we must objectively ask ourselves how much longer we will have to deal with this issue. However even more important for Koreans right now is the issue of, how should we describe history in our own textbooks'. This is because in the end Korean history textbooks are much more important to us than Japanese ones. While this paper analyzed Korean history textbooks for middle school students, a special focus was placed on the sections dealing with events that occurred during the middle ages and modern era such as Japanese marauders, the Hideyoshi Invasions of 1592, and the T´ongsinsa (通信使, Chos?n special envoy to Japan). The descriptions contained in these Korean history textbooks have for the most part been focused on the political aspects of history. Moreover, the contents of these history textbooks are not as diversified as is the case with the Japanese ones. There is also a lack of reference materials such as paintings, documents, and pictures included in these works, and the section in which activities of a more investigative sort can be undertaken is quite limited in nature. As such, these aspects of the Korean history textbooks should be improved. Generally speaking, Korean history textbooks are focused on descriptions of foreign powers encroachment on the Korean peninsula and the national resistance against these foreign powers. In this regards, there is a need to scale back the sections dealing with political history, the history of resistance against the foreign powers, and minjung history, while enhancing those concerned with our nations social and everyday history. In addition, the current Korean history textbooks are overly concentrated on the history of Korea itself. For example, the section dealing with the Mongolian invasion of Korea should include relevant materials on the Mongols, such as a picture of Kublai Khan, and a map of the Mongolian territory. The currents history textbooks are set up in such a way that the barrier between Korean and World history is too wide. As such, it is necessary to describe Korean history in a manner that connects it to trends in world history.

      • SCOPUSKCI등재

        성인에서 발생한 대장의 Aganglionosis 1 예

        박수철(Su Cheol Park),김병관(Byeong Gwan Kim),김 원(won Kim),우열근(Yeol Keun Woo),이종열(Jong Yeul Lee),이상협(Sang Hyub Lee),예병덕(Byong Duk Ye),김주성(Joo Sung Kim),박규주(Kyu Joo Park),김우호(Woo Ho Kim),정현채(Hyun Chae Jung 대한소화기학회 2001 대한소화기학회지 Vol.37 No.6

        Aganglionosis is a rare form of neuronal intestinal malformation, which includes hypoganglionosis, neuronal intestinal dysplasia A (NID type A), B (NID type B) or combined type. Classic aganglionosis, or Hirschsprung’s disease is a neurogenic form of neonatal bowel obstruction characterized by a congenital absence of ganglionic cells in the submucosal and myenteric plexus, and presents in childhood with symptoms of constipation, colonic obstruction or sepsis due to enterocolitis. However, aganglionosis can be diagnosed first in adult due to short segment Hirschsprung`s disease with mild symptom and maybe also due to acquired process. We experienced a case of adult type aganglionosis assumed to be acquired type without malignancy or other neurological involvement. (Korean J Gastroenterol 2001;37:470-474)

      • KCI등재

        ‘公武體制’의 政治理念

        朴秀哲(Park, Su-Cheol) 역사교육연구회 2015 역사교육 Vol.133 No.-

        While the Muromachi era(Ashikaga era: 1338-1573) emphasized the ideology of k?(公; official authority), the Muromchi sh?gun(將軍; general) could not monopolize the title of k?, either. Moreover, the ideology of ten(天; heaven) such as tend?(天道; heavenly law), too, was stressed, and k? was unable to occupy absolute ascendancy over watakushi(私; private), as in the early modern era. Nor were the bushi(武士; warriors) able to monopolize the ideology of bu (武; martialism). Following the Nanboku-cho era(Northern and Southern Courts era; 1336-1392), there emerged the kuge(公家; court nobles) who participated directly in battles as did the bushi. What well illustrates such political ideology of the Muromachi era is Sh?dan Chiy?(樵談治要; A Woodcutter’s Talks on Good Government) by Ichij? Kaneyoshi(一條兼良; 1402-1481). Ichij? understood the roles of the tenn?(天皇; emperor), who played the ceremonial function of being in charge of good harvests, and the sh?gun, who was responsible for the secular politics of the peace of all people, as divided. The two had a common goal in that they both pursued the peace and stability of the people. Such synthesis of the kuge and the bushi was generally expressed by contemporaries as itt?(一統; unified or of one lineage).

      • KCI등재

        織田정권의 '武家神格化'와 天皇

        朴秀哲(Park Su-Cheol) 歷史敎育硏究會 2012 역사교육 Vol.121 No.-

        Earlier research on the Oda regime focused mainly on the determination of the latter's nature: whether the regime constituted early modern or medieval power. In recent years, certain studies have seen the relationship between the Oda regime and the Emperor not as one of confrontation but as one of cooperation. However, research perspectives that concentrate on whether the Oda regime was early modern or medieval or whether it confronted or cooperated with the Emperor are but dichotomous perspectives that merely stress only one aspect of the regime. According to the generally accepted perspective of Naohiro Asao and others, the key to the Oda regime lay in "military power" (bui : 武威), which could be expanded to deify those including Nobunaga. The present study focused on the term "honorable power" (goikō : 御威光), found in historical materials, as in "Nobunaga's honorable power" and on the relationship between "military power" and "honorable power." According to the generally accepted perspective, goikō has been understood as identical in meaning to bui. In the present study, however, "honorable power" was understood as a concept encompassing not only "military power" but also virtues such as "mercy" (jihishin : 慈悲心). Consequently, unlike existing research, it wasn't seen the expansion of military power as directly leading to deification. As in the passage "Nobunaga is one who is well versed in the ways of both arms and virtue" (信長公御武德兩道御達者), deification became possible only when military power was combined with virtue such as mercy. The present study examined the aspect that compelled the relationship between Nobunaga and the Emperor to be confrontational yet cooperative at once. While, according to Asao, Nobunaga "transcended" and "overcame" the Emperor's authority, there is no clear proof that he in fact denied the latter's authority. On the contrary, Nobunaga made use of the god-like (Shinto) and Buddha-like elements of the Emperor to control the populace and warriors and did not deny the Emperor's rights. However, as far as Nobunaga was concerned, the goal lay in his own "honorable power," and the protection of the Emperor's rights was neither his final target nor destination.

      • KCI등재

        1582년 本能寺의 變과 <兼見卿記> : 일본 中近世移行期 記錄文化의 特質

        박수철(Park, Su-Cheol) 일본사학회 2021 일본역사연구 Vol.56 No.-

        현재 일본사학계는 고문헌 자료를 크게 편지류인 고문서(古文書), 일기류인 고기록 (古記錄), 서적류인 고전적(古典籍)으로 구분한다. 사료라는 측면에서는 고문서와 고기록(일기)이 가장 중요하다. 요시다 가네미(吉田兼見)의 일기인 􋺷가네미경기(兼見卿記)􋺸는 시기적으로 중복된 두 종류의 일기가 존재한다는 점에서 특이하다. 1582년 6월 2일 혼노지(本能寺)의 변(變)을 일으킨 아케치 미쓰히데(明智光秀)가 패배하자, 그와 한통속으로 몰린 것을 염려한 가네미는 기존 일기(별본)에서 자신에게 불리한 내용을 삭제・수정하여 새로운 일기(정본)를 작성하였다. 본고는 이 두 일기의 내용을 상호 비교・분석하여 다음과 같은 사실을 밝혔다. 첫째, 가네미의 두 일기는 나중에 작성된 정본뿐만 아니라 기존 별본 역시 과장되거나 왜곡된 서술이 들어 있었다. 별본 내용이 사실이며 정본은 이를 왜곡한 것이라는 선행 연구의 시각은 재고를 요한다. 이 시기 일기 자료를 史料로 쓸 때 매우 신중해야 한다는 점을 지적하였다. 둘째, 선행 연구에서 전혀 다루어지지 않았던 정본의 작성 시점을 추정하여 6월 15일~6월 20일(혹은 22일) 사이에 작성된 것으로 보았다. 셋째, 이러한 대규모 일기 개찬 사례는 전례가 없으며, 이것을 전국시대 빈번한 날조와 기록 조작을 행해온 요시다 가문의 특질이란 측면에서 파악하였다. 넷째, 가네미는 무사층도 이제 글을 볼 수 있는 대상으로 인식하고 이에 대비하여 새로운 일기 작성에 나섰다. 그러나 기존 일기를 없애지는 않았다는 점에서 ‘가택수색’ 등 무사층의 철저한 개입을 염두에 둔 것은 아니었다 Kanemi-kyō ki, the diary of Kanemi Yoshida, has two different versions that overlap in time. When Mitsuhide Akechi was defeated in the June of 1582, Kanemi, worried that he would be considered an active collaborator, wrote a new diary by deleting and editing parts that were unfavorable to him in his existing diary. By comparing and analyzing the two diaries, this study identified the following facts. First, this study found that the new diary and the existing diary by Kanemi both exaggerated and distorted the facts. The perspective of previous studies that posited that the content of the existing diary is accurate while the new version distorted the facts should be reconsidered. Second, this study estimated that the new diary was written between June 15 and June 20, which has not been covered in previous studies. Third, this study confirmed that such a large-scale rewriting of a diary has been unprecedented and found that this aspect was characteristic to the Yoshida Clan, which frequently fabricated and manipulated records in the Early Modern period. Fourth, Kanemi decided to write a new diary because he presumed that the samurai were also literate at that time. However, the fact that he did not dispose of the diaries showed that he did not anticipate a thorough intervention, such as a “house search” from the samurai class

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼