http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김수구(Kim, Soo-Goo) 한국교육재정경제학회 2009 敎育財政 經濟硏究 Vol.18 No.3
이 연구는 나이스 교무업무시스템의 경제적 효율성을 알아보기 위하여 나이스교무업무시스템에 대해 비용편익분석을 실시하였다. 연구 수행을 위해 교무업무시스템의 비용과 편익 요소를 선정한 후 비용과 편익 요소의 지표를 추정 및 계산하여 2005년부터 2014년(10년간)까지 교무업무시스템의 비용과 편익을 산출하였다. 또한 산출된 비용과 편익에 10%의 할인율을 적용하여 비용편익평가기준인 편익비용비율(B/C), 순현재가치(NPV)를 계산하였으며, 할인율 변화(8%-15%)와 비용 및 편익의 변동(-20%~+20%)에 따른 민감도를 분석하였다. 연구결과 편익비용비율(B/C)은 9.90이었으며, 순현재가치(NPV)는 3조 2,857억원으로 나타났다. 그리고 민감도 분석 결과 최고 할인율 15%에서 가장 낮은 편익비용비율(B/C)은 7.92이고, 편익이 -20%로 적게 산출될 경우 가장 낮은 순현재가치(NPV)는 2조 6천만원이었다. 이러한 연구의 결과에 기초하여 이 연구는 나이스 교무업무시스템이 경제적인 관점에서 효율성과 수익성이 높고 장기적인 안목에서 지속적으로 투자할 만한 가치가 있는 것으로 평가하였다. The purpose of this study was to measure the result and efficiency of the NEIS(National Education Information Service) Academic Affairs System which was reestablished in 2006, using the Cost Benefit Analysis. This study analyzed 10 School Affairs segments, 3 Admission segments, and 5 Health segments from elementary, middle and high schools. The analysis period was between 2005 and 2014. The calculated total expenses were 551 billion won and the calculated total benefit for a year is expected to be 753.6 billion won. Applying 10% discount rate and 10 years of analysis period to the calculated total expenses and the total benefits, the expenses were calculated at 365.5 billion won and the benefit was calculated at 36.6 trillion won. So, the Rate of Expense and Benefit was 9.90, the Net Present value was 3.3 trillion won. The results obtained from this study on the NEIS Academic Affairs System's economic effectiveness and investment validity were that the NEIS Academic Affairs System is an invest-worthy National Education Information System with its high economic effectiveness and profitability from a long-term investment perspective.
교육재원의 구조결정 모델 수립을 위한 계량경제학적 접근
김수구(Kim Soo-Goo) 한국교육재정경제학회 2008 敎育財政 經濟硏究 Vol.17 No.1
이 연구는 1962년부터 2006년까지 45년간의 교육재정에 관한 시계열자료를 계량경제학적인 방법을 이용하여 한국의 교육재원 구조변화를 결정하는 요인들을 찾아보고 요인들 간의 관계들을 연립방정식모델로 제시하였다.<BR> 연립방정식모텔을 회귀분석으로 추정한 결과 교육재원 중 조세재원교육비의 결정 요인은 교원당인건비가 가장 중요한 요인으로 나타났으며, 비조세재원교육비는 총학생수로 나타났다. 그리고 조세재원, 비조세재원, 정부재원, 교원당인건비 모두 전년도 재정규모가 당해년도의 재정규모에 영향을 주고 있어 한국교육재원의 구조변화는 점증주의적 가설을 따르고 있으며 또한 한국교육재원의 구조 변화를 결정하는 중요한 변인은 재정ㆍ경제적인 요인으로 나타났다. This study searched the factors to determine the structural changes of educational financial resources in Korea and illustrated the simultaneous equation model of the relations between the factors, using the econometrics method with the time series in educational finance over the forty-five years from 1962 to 2006.<BR> As the results of the study, the following the regression analysis of the simultaneous equation model were estimated:<BR> TAXEX=9.7181+0.5233×TAXEX{1}-0.8543×STUD+1.0696×SAL+0.0732×BUD-0.0361×D1-0.0714×D2+0.0105×D3ㆍBUD-0.0070×D4ㆍBUD<BR> NOTEX=-23.4751+0.1890×NOTEX{1}+1.8703×STUD+0.1378×COST+0.3511×GDP-0.1932×D5<BR> BUD=-1.1304+0.6749×BUD{1}+0.3239×GDP+0.6308×TAXR-0.4115×TAXR{1}<BR> SAL=-6.2350+0.5114×SAL{1}+0.4700×BUD-0.2463×BUD{1}+0.0223×PTR+0.6346×TEA<BR> *Notes of each variables<BR> TAXEX : educational resources form the tax<BR> NOTEX : educatonal resources form other than the tax<BR> BUD : government budget<BR> SAL : unit personal cost per teachers<BR> STUD : number of students<BR> COST : average tuition/fees by students<BR> GDP : Gross domestic products<BR> TAXR : tax ratio as of GDP<BR> PTR : pupil/teacher ratio<BR> TEA : number of teachers<BR> D1/Dummy 1 : 1 for the policy of education financing based on the total amount of domestic tax; 0 for the particular tax<BR> D2/Dummy 2 : 1 for the policy of an instant education tax from 1982 to 1990 ; 0 for the otherwise<BR> D3/Dummy 3 : 1 for the fixed rate of grant allocation; 0 for the flexible rate<BR> D4/Dummy 4 : 1 for the reduction of teacher"s retirement age(from 1999); 0 for other wise<BR> D5/Dummy 5 : 1 for school support fees system of elementary and a secondary schools(form 1970); 0 for otherwise<BR> each{1}: one-year-before data of each variable<BR> Implications from the models were described as following.<BR> First, in educational financial resources, it was showed that the salary level(labor costs) of teachers on tax resource and the total number of students on non-tax resource in determining the educational cost are playing the most influencing roles.<BR> Second, the structural changes of educational financial resources in Korea is based on the incrementalism hypothesis, as the budget amount (financial scale) of the year before including tax resource, non-tax resource, government"s support, and teacher"s salaries have an influence on the budget amount(financial scale) of this year.<BR> Third, it showed that the important variable to determine the structural changes of educational financial resources in Korea is the factor of economic financial ability.<BR> In conclusion, this study based on time series of extended period in comparison with the preceded study showed the updated simultaneous equation model of the structural of educational financial resources.
NEIS 교무업무시스템 활용 과정상의 장애요인 분석 -NEIS 지원서비스의 질의내용을 중심으로-
김수구 ( Soo Goo Kim ) 충남대학교 교육연구소 2008 교육연구논총 Vol.29 No.1
본 연구는 NEIS 교무업무시스템 활용 과정상의 장애요인을 분석하기 위해 NEIS 지원서비스의 질의 현황과 질의내용을 분석하였다. 연구방법에 있어서는 질의현황은 기술통계를, 질의내용의 분석은 질적 연구방법을 사용하였다. 분석 결과 첫째, 초등학교와 중학교의 경우는 학적업무와 고등학교의 경우는 성적업무에서 활용상의 문제가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 업무처리 면에서는 세부적인 업무처리 방법의 미숙과 전자결재업무처리 방법에서 활용상의 문제가 가장 많은 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 일반적인 장애의 요인들은 시스템 오류, 운영상의 기술적 미숙, 훈령파악 미숙, 업무파악의 미숙으로 나타났다. The purpose of this study is to analyze the inhibiting factors of using the academic affairs system of NEIS in school. To accomplish this purpose, the Q&A data which had been accumulated on a bulletin broad of NEIS support system were collected. This study used the frequencies analysis and qualitative research method. The results of the analysis are as follows: First, There were some problems on school affair part in element and middle schools and on record affair part in high schools. Second, Using the academic affair system in NEIS, the teachers didn`t know exactly a conducting method to manage the academic affair in their office duties Third, The electronic approval system, which was newly appended in academic affairs system of NEIS is making the problems in using. Fourth, the inhibiting factors of the academic affairs system of NEIS are 1) system error, 2) unskilled operation of the academic affairs system of NEIS, 3) not to understand the instruction about student cumulative record, and 4) not to understand the mechanism at academic affair.