http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
고광주 우리어문학회 2002 우리어문연구 Vol.19 No.-
This paper argus that 'N+V' compound verbs are not the lexical word which is formed by word-formation rule in morphology. Rather, theses compound verbs must be dealt with the syntactic word, which is formed by head movement in syntax. Because the compound verbs that are composed of noun and verb have the corresponding syntactic constructions. Furthermore, the two constituents of the syntactic construction corresponding to 'N+V' compound verb are in the relation of verb and its complement, but not of verb and its specifier. These specific property show us that the word formation process of 'N+V' compound verbs are sensitive to syntactic conditions. Owing to these facts, 'N+V' compound verbs have to be dealt with syntactic words. Concretely speaking, empty category principle is applied to the word formation process of 'N+V' compound verbs.
고광주 한국어의미학회 2007 한국어 의미학 Vol.24 No.-
Ko Seok-Ju. 2007. A Study on Korean Wordnet and Meaning Description in Dictionary. Korean Semantics, 24. The purpose of this paper is to suggest a point to be considered on constructing the Korean Wordnet, especially using a meaning description in Korean dictionary and, on describing the meaning of a word in dictionary. For this purpose, first I examine the conceptual structure of human nouns in Corenet and the defintions of human nouns in Standard Korean Grand Dictionary. And I indicate some problems in Corenet and the definitions of human nouns. Lastly, I present some points to be considered to construct Korean Wordnet and the definition of a word in dictionary.
고광주 ( Kwang Ju Ko ) 한말연구학회 2001 한말연구 Vol.- No.9
The aim of this article is to make clear the fact that the semantic property of verb gives rise to double subject construction (DSC). Because DSC depends on verb classification as to whether it is formed or not. In particular, (non)agentivity which is the semantic property of verb is the primary factor as to whether DSC is formed or not. For example, nonagentive predicates form DSC, whereas agentive predicates do not form. These phenomena occur owing to the fact that nonagentive predicates do not have external argument but agentive predicates have. DSC is divided into two classes according to the valency of nonagentive verb. That is to say, the nonagentive verb which take one argument can form genitive construction, compound construction and DSC optionally, whereas the nonagentive verb which take two argument have to form DSC obligatorily. These DSCs is formed syntactically by NP-movement. For example, the argument which nonagentive predicates take, whether it is one argument or two arguments, have to move into the position that structural case can be assigned. It is because nonagentive predicates can`t assign the case to their argument. Therefore the mutiple specifier structure which is generated by NP-movement gives rise to DSC.
고광주(Kwang Ju Ko) 한국어학회 2002 한국어학 Vol.15 No.-
This paper argues that Korean ‘tough’ constructions mustn’t be generated by transformational rule. Previous approaches to ‘tough’ constructions were, to my knowledge, almost syntactic. In other words, the previous studies have approached ‘tough’ constructions in terms of transformation. The reason why the previous studies have done syntactic analyses is that ‘tough’ constructions have the same meaning as corresponing constructions have. But the fact of the matter is that two constructions are in unlike meaning. Furthermore, ‘tough’ constructions differ from corresponding constructions in syntactic structure too. This difference will be made clear by means of the syntactic tests, i.e. the scope of adverbs, scrambling, the clefting, ellipsis, etc.