http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
어문학부(語文學部) : 동아시아 문명권에서 "주권"과 "국제" 개념의 탄생 -『만국공법』의 판본 비교와 번역
강상규 ( Sang Gyu Kang ) 한국중국학회 2010 中國學報 Vol.62 No.-
In our daily life in the sovereign nation, we are faced with international and global phenomena. These expressions, ``sovereign state`` and ``international relations`` are so much familiar to us; however, they became used in the East Asian Hanja (Chinese character) culture not too long ago. ``When`` were these terms introduced into the East Asian Hanja culture, and ``what process`` did they undergo to get established? What does it politically entail that the phenomena, which are called by these terms, become universal? This paper addresses these questions. For the purpose of the discussion, this paper initially examines the account and significance of such concepts as ``sovereignty`` and ``international`` that emerged in Europe. Then it looked into how such new notions were translated, disseminated, and accepted into the Hanja culture in the 19th century, when the ``West moves to dominate the East.`` It was the books of Mangukgongbeop, which correspond to the international law of today that played a matrical role to the birth of new political concepts in the great transformation of the 19th century. In this light, the paper investigated the various editions of Mangukgongbeop of those days. Based on this research, the analysis of historical context and meaning is presented with regard to the fact that a ``sovereign nation`` has appeared in the East Asian culture as a new concept for country, and the relationship ``among`` countries has changed into the ``international`` relationship which connotes independent and mutually parallel relations.
강상규 ( Sang Gyu Kang ) 한국사회사학회 2006 사회와 역사 Vol.0 No.71
Diplomatic history is not a chronology of negotiations between international actors. Rather, it analyzes the actor``s mental structure or weltanschauung. In the 19th century there was a clash of two different world order what is called Chinese world order and modern international order in East Asia. Paradigm shift of East Asia in the 19th century is the transformation from world order on the basis of ceremony to modern international order by a sovereign state. This means that a reversal of "standard of civilization" occurred from the viewpoint of East Asia. That granted, why the Korean intellectual wasn``t able to concentrate on ``rich state and strong army`` building? This article is to analyze what king of historical, psychological elements, and how disturbed Korean in their positive reception of the new paradigm in the 19th century.
강상규(Kang Sang Gyu) 한국동양철학회 2006 동양철학 Vol.0 No.25
19세기 동아시아 지역에서는 중국적 세계질서와 근대국제질서라는 상이한 두 개의 대외질서관념이 교착하였다. 이때 근대국제질서라는 새로운 패러다임을 상징하는 것이 바로 국제법 곧 ‘만국공법’이었다. 본 연구는 중국에서 이러한 만국공법이 번역되고 수용되는 양상을 살펴봄으로써 중화질서의 지속과 변용과정에서 나타나는 특징을 고찰하였다. 그 결과 중국이 만국공법을 적극적으로 수용할 수 없었던 데는 어떠한 역사적, 구조적, 심리적 요인 등이 자리잡고 있었는지를 밝힐 수 있었다. In the mid 19th century there was a clash of two different world order what is called Chinese world order and modern international order in East Asia. Under the circumstances, Mangukgongbeob(萬國公法, the Chinese Edition of Henry Wheaton"s Elements of International law) symbolized new paradigm, that is, modern international order. Therefore, in this study, I tried to explore the translation and reception process of international law in China. In conclusion, this research investigates what kind of historical, structural, psychological elements, and how disturbed Chinese in their positive reception of international law.
강상규 ( Kang Sang Gyu ) 한국방송통신대학교 통합인문학연구소 2017 통합인문학연구 Vol.9 No.2
21 매우 긴박하게 돌아가고 있다. 각국은 경쟁과 협력의 길보다 갈등과 대결 양상으로 나가고, 공격적인 민족주의자의 주장들이 언론을 통해 자극적으로 소개되고 있다. 경색된 남북관계, 북핵문제, 한-미, 한-중, 한-일관계는 얽혀서 해결의 실마리가 보이지 않는다. 이러한 상황에서 한국은 어떻게 국제관계를 풀어가며, 어떻게 미래를 대비해야할 것인가? 이용희 박사는 백 년 전 한반도에서 태어나 격동의 시대를 경험하면서 한반도의 미래를 고민했던 학자였다. 그는 서양의 정치학이나 국제정치학이 한반도의 미래를 해결하는 답안을 제시하지 못한다는 문제의식을 갖고, 우리의 문제를 깊게 파고들었다. 그러나 그의 학문세계와 통찰력은 한국의 학계에 널리 확산되지 못하였다. 이 논문은 이용희 박사의 탄생 백주년을 맞아, 그의 정치학이 갖는 큰 틀과 깊이를 이해하는데 도움이 될 수 있도록, 그의 방대한 학문체계를 `국제정치학`과 `민족주의`를 씨줄과 날줄로 삼아 핵심체계를 재구성한 글이다. The international situation surrounding the Korean Peninsula in the 21<sup>st</sup> century is highly tense. Each country opts for conflicts and confrontations, rather than competition and cooperation. Aggressive nationalists` opinions have been introduced provokingly on the media. There seems to be no clue to the solution to the tightly tangled South-North relations, North Korean nuclear problem, and the respective relations of South Korea-U.S., South Korea-China, and South Korea-Japan. In the current situation, how could South Korea disentangle the international relations and how should it prepare for the future? Dr. Lee, Yonghee was a scholar, born on the Korean Peninsula a hundred years ago. He experienced the age of turbulence and agonized over the future for the Peninsula. He was aware of the problem that the western politics or science of international politics did not provide an answer for the Peninsula`s future, and he burrowed deep into our problem. However, Dr. Lee`s research and insights do not appear to have spread in the academia of Korea. This paper, commemorating the centennial anniversary of Dr. Lee`s birth, recasts his extensive study and research, consisting mainly of `international politics` and `nationalism` which serve as the weft and warp. It would help to understand the vast framework and depth of Dr. Lee`s politics.