http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
CoA 설정 시간 단축을 통한 빠른 핸드오버 제공 메카니즘
진성호,최지형,김동일,Jin, Sung-Ho,Choi, Ji-Hyoung,Kim, Dong-Il 한국정보통신학회 2007 한국정보통신학회논문지 Vol.11 No.11
최근 이동 통신 기술의 발달과 이동 단말의 보급률이 증가하면서, 사용자들은 휴대 및 이동 시에 빠르고 끊김없는 서비스를 요구하게 되었다. 이러한 요구 사항을 충족시키기 위해 IETF에서는 FMIPv6(Fast Handoff for Mobile IPv6)를 제안하였다. FMIPv6의 핸드오버 과정은 크게 이동 감지, 새로운 CoA 설정, 바인딩 갱신 과정으로 나뉜다. 하지만, 각각의 과정에서 지연이 생기고, CoA 설정 과정의 DAD(Duplicate Address Detection) 실행 시 큰 지연이 생긴다. 본 논문에서는 DAD 절차를 생략하고 AR(Access Router)에 이동 단말의 CoA에 관련된 정보를 저장하여 핸드오버 시 지연을 줄이는 방안을 제안한다. Recently the diffusion of the advancement of mobile communication technique and mobile terminal increased, The users were demanded seamless services when carrying and moving. It proposed the FMIPv6(Fast Handoff for Mobile IPv6) from the IETF like this meeting this requirement. The handover procedure of the FMIPv6 causes to defecate with movement detection, new CoA configuration and binding update. But, the delay occurs from each process, when the DAD(Duplicate Address Detection) of the CoA executing, the big delay occurs. This paper proposes a scheme of delay reduction, it omits DAD process and stores in the AR(Access Router) relates in the CoA of the mobile terminal information.
The thickness of alveolar bone at the maxillary canine and premolar teeth in normal occlusion
진성호,박준범,김남량,박서진,김경재,김윤지,국윤아,고영경 대한치주과학회 2012 Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science Vol.42 No.5
Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to investigate bone thickness on the buccal and palatal aspects of the maxillary canine and premolars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The differences between left- and right-side measurements and between males and females were also analyzed. Methods: The sample consisted of 20 subjects (9 males and 11 females; mean age, 21.9±3.0) selected from the normal occlusion sample data in the Department of Orthodontics, The Catholic University of Korea. The thickness of the buccal and palatal bone walls, perpendicular to the long axis of the root were evaluated at 3 mm and 5 mm apical to cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and at root apex. Results: At the canines and first premolars regions, mean buccal bone thickness of at 3 mm and 5 mm apical to CEJ were less than 2 mm. In contrast, at the second premolar region, mean buccal bone thickness at 3 mm and 5 mm apical from CEJ were greater than 2 mm. Frequency of thick bone wall (≥2 mm) increased from the canine to the second premolar. Conclusions: This result should be considered before tooth extraction and planning of rehabilitation in the canine and premolar area of maxilla. Careful preoperative analysis with CBCT may be beneficial to assess local risk factors and to achieve high predictability of success in implant therapy.