국가정보학의 학문적 발전을 위한 과제

이기덕 한국국가정보학회 2013 국가정보연구 Vol.6 No.2

National Intelligence Studies is aimed systemizing the related knowledge of national intelligence activities to promote its systematic understanding, improving rationality and effectiveness, and offering its desired direction. Since 1990 when academia showed their interests in National Intelligence Studies, the subject has been considered as a new academic field. Currently, bringing reform to the national intelligence organization is a hot topic in Korea, and this enhances our need to develop National Intelligence Studies academically in order to nurture experts through improving education about theories and practices of national intelligence activities and to develop the organization in a desired direction. This research analyzes the development trend of National Intelligence Studies, the efforts of intelligence community for academic improvement specially in the advanced countries such as the U.S. and the U.K. Also, it exams the current situation of the intelligence study in Korea and suggests alternatives for academic development of National Intelligence Studies by applying advanced cases to our country. The alternatives this study suggests are: establishing a thinktank specialized in national intelligence study and education, securing an expanded national budget to support intelligence research, establishing a department of intelligence and expanding intelligence courses in universities, more support for the Korea Association of National Intelligence Studies(KANIS), developing special fields of National Intelligence Studies, training professors, adopting more National Intelligence Studies subjects in various government staff employment exams, and expanding more access to the research material. Thus, this paper emphasizes not only the government’s proactive support but also close cooperation between intelligence agencies and academia with an expect that this will contribute to academic development of National Intelligence Studies. 국가정보학은 국가의 정보활동을 체계적으로 이해할 수 있도록 관련지식을 체계화하고, 국가정보활동의 합리성과 효율성을 제고하는 한편, 국가정보활동이 지향해야 할 바람직한 방향을 제시해 준다. 1990년대 들어서서 학계에서 국가정보학에 대해 관심을 보이기 시작하면서 국가정보학은 새로운 학문분야로 다루어지기 시작하였다. 국가정보기관에 대한 개혁이 화두가 되고 있는 우리나라의 현 상황에서 국가정보활동에 대한 실무적용 가능한 이론연구와 교육 강화를 통해 관련 전문가를 양성하고, 국가정보기관이 바람직한 방향으로 발전해 나갈 수 있도록 하기 위해서 국가정보학의 학문적 발전이 절실하다. 본 연구는 정보선진국 특히 미국과 영국을 중심으로 국가정보학 발전동향과 학문적 발전을 위한 노력 등에 대해 분석하고 우리나라의 현 실태를 진단하는 한편, 선진국의 함의를 우리나라에 적용하여 국가정보학의 학문적 발전을 위한 대안들을 제시하였다. 본 논문에서 국가정보학의 학문적 발전을 위한 대안으로 국가정보 전문연구기관의 설치, 정부의 재정지원 확충, 대학 내 국가정보학과 개설과 강좌개설 등을제시하는 한편, 국가정보학회 지원, 국가정보학 각론 개발, 교수요원 양성, 공무원채용시험에 국가정보학 과목채택 확대, 연구자료에 대한 접근성 확대 등 정부차원에서의 적극적인 지원 조치와 함께 정보기관과 학계간의 긴밀한 협력의 필요성 등을강조하였는 바, 향후 국가정보학의 학문적 발전에 기여할 수 있길 기대한다.

한국 종교교단의 `국학 운동`

강돈구(Donku Kang) 한국종교학회 2013 宗敎硏究 Vol.70 No.-

Discourses on ‘national studies’ have taken place in three North Asian countries from early on. This paper examines the current discourses on ‘national studies’ in the academia in these countries and points out their peculiarities in Korea where some religious groups have played a role in ‘the national studies.’ With regard to the contents of ‘the national studies’, Japanese scholars focus on Shinto and Chinese ones on Confucianism. However, Koreans identify ‘the national studies’ as Korean studies or they relate them to Confucianism. Unlike Japan and China, Korea assumes that a goal of ‘the national studies’ is the establishment of a national identity, so Korean scholars have failed to reach an agreement on the concepts and contents of ‘the national studies.’ Instead, some religious groups set a goal of pursuing a national identity, try to define the concepts and contents of ‘the national studies’ and promote ‘national studies movement’. Daejonggyo and Danworld are religious groups that actively participate in the ‘national studies movement’ in Korea. This paper states that the ‘national studies’ mentioned by Daejonggyo are Daejonggyo itself, and the ‘national studies’ indicated by Danworld are Danworld itself. This paper also notes that the religious groups like Daejonggyo and Danworld in Korea are actively involved in the recent ‘national studies movement’, which is an important factor to understand the current shape of Korean religions.

American Studies from National to Transnational

Yu Jung Lee 한국아메리카학회 2021 美國學論集 Vol.53 No.1

This paper aims to ponder what it means ‘to do national studies’ in the era of transnationalism, going over the past and the present of American Studies over one century from the nation-centered focus of historiography to transnational turns. How do we set the boundaries of each national studies such as American Studies or Korean Studies, when the recent paradigm moves forward to transnational approaches by decentering or reinforcing the national framework? Can each national studies cross within the diverse transnational possibilities? What does a new regional unit of scholarships such as Asia and the Pacific studies beyond the national studies represent in the paradigm shift of American Studies? What should Americanologists in Korea prepare for this change, if any? Based on such questions, this paper aims to point out that we need a new direction of national studies in the very place where the border between national studies, such as American Studies and Korean Studies, becomes ambiguous.

식민지 관제대중잡지 <신민>의 국학 지면 연구

권채린 우리어문학회 2023 우리어문연구 Vol.77 No.-

Shinmin was a magazine that produced rich and colorful discourses and issues on Joseon's national culture throughout its publication period. Shinmin occupied a distinct role and position that could not be overlooked in the geographic map of Korean Studies at the time through vigorous papermaking covering creative work-theory-policy and special projects. This article paid attention to the position and implications of Joseon's Korean Studies pages in the media identity of Shinmin, which was a government-controlled magazine or a quasi-official press of the empire. The 'balance of non-balance', which puts the Joseon people's eyes on the front and the empire's interests on the back, was an invisible principle that constituted the pages of Korean Studies. Through this, Shinmin tried to capture both the 'justification' as a magazine for Koreans and the 'practical benefit' as an indirect implementation of the colonial strategy. Shinmin projected or applied the colonialist understanding and strategy of Japanese imperialism in the countless bases and contexts of magazine production that had not surfaced. The pragmatic line that clearly penetrated the pages of Korean Studies, the hybrid nature of discourses and the hybrid projects, etc. were all the results derived from the strong bond that Shinmin had with the real colonialism behind the magazine media. Shinmin actively tolerated and coexisted Joseon/Imperial, Classical/Modern, Joseon/Oriental/World, etc. In doing so, Shinmin expanded Korean Studies diachronically and synchronically. Ultimately, Shinmin moved toward the frame of 'Oriental Korean Studies' and 'World classics'. Korean Studies were not only parallel to the national studies of ‘China’ and ‘Japan’, but also placed in a structure of convergence, inclusion, and integration. Active production and active discovery of 'Joseon-like things' were ultimately positioned as part of the 'regional studies' of the empire, not in the direction of proving their individual identity and modernity. In the end, it can be said that the pages of Korean Studies in Shinmin were not for the construction of the unique identity of the Joseon people, but a larger ideological and cultural sketch to inspire the greatness of the Eastern spirit. This article comprehensively reviewed the close production sites that Korean Studies, as a national style, shared with the media of the empire. By doing so, I tried to empirically identify the aspects of complex powers in the difficulties or attempts of colonial national studies.

조지훈의 한국사 연구 ―민족 정신사 수립의 길―

조형열 ( Cho Hyong-yerl ) 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 2021 民族文化硏究 Vol.90 No.-

자신의 학문을 민족문화운동의 일환으로 이해했던 조지훈은 신칸트학파의 영향 아래 한국학과 한국사 연구에 들어섰다. 한국사는 한국학을 구성하는 핵심이었으며 그의 실천의 식을 드러내는 중요한 수단이었다. 조지훈은 전통을 계승의 대상이자 가치 창조의 주체로 삼아 민족주체성을 바로 잡고자 했고, 한국사의 체계화를 모색했다. 또한 한국사의 독자성을 찾고 세계사와 견주기를 시도하는가 하면, 자연적·외적 조건에 인한 영향을 조화·융합하면서 한국사가 발전한다고 보았다. 원효의 철학과 동학사상을 이와 같은 전범으로 내세웠으며 한국사를 보는 주체적·개성적 시선을 갖는 것이 ‘한국적’ 방법이라고 집약했다. 조지훈의 한국사 연구 영역은 문화사, 그 가운데 정신사(精神史)에 해당했다. 그는 민족이 조선 세종대에, 민족의식은 왜란·호란을 거치며 형성된다는 것을 시작으로, 실학운동-홍경래의 난-삼정 소요-갑신정변-동학혁명-갑오경장을 통한 민족의식 발달사를 체계화했다. 또한 독립운동도 정신사의 범위로 끌어들여 3·1운동-6·10만세운동-광주학생운동 등 민중의 독립투쟁을 높게 평가했고, 사회주의도 민족의식의 범위 안에서 수용하고자 했다. 이와 같은 조지훈의 한국사 서술은 민족의식에 절대성을 부여하는 규범적·윤리적 성격이 강했으며, 이는 사회 모순으로 인한 역사발전을 강조한 당시 소장 연구자의 내재적 발전론과 차이가 있었다. 조지훈은 한국학이 처음으로 공론화되던 1960년대 초에 한국사 연구를 통해 한국학의 역사적 흐름을 확인하고, 정신사 연구의 경험을 통해 한국학의 방향을 모색했다. 따라서 조지훈의 한국사 연구는 민족 중심 한국학과 민족문화운동의 설계도로서 의미가 있었다. Cho Ji-hoon, who understood his scholarship as part of the national cultural movement, began to study Korean history under the influence of neo-Kantians. Korean history was the core of Korean studies, and an important means of revealing his practical consciousness. Cho Ji-hoon wanted to make tradition the target of succession and the subject of value creation, and rectify the national identity, and sought to systematize Korean history. He also attempted to find the identity of Korean history and compare it with the world history, and believed that Korean history would develop through harmonization and convergence with natural and external conditions. He thought of Wonhyo’s philosophy and the thought of Donghak as examples thereof, and said in summary that having the subjective and individualistic viewpoint of Korean history is the ‘Korean’ method. The research area of Cho Ji-hoon’s Korean history corresponded to cultural history, and particularly, intellectual history. Having started with the formation of the nationality under the reign of King Sejong and the formation of national consciousness during the Japanese and Manchu invasion, he systematized the history of the development of national consciousness through the Silhak Movement, Hong Gyeong-rae’s Rebellion, the Samjeong Riot, the Gapsin Coup, the Donghak Revolution, and the Gabo Reformation. He also included the independence movement in the range of the intellectual history, and thought highly of people’s struggle for independence, e.g. the March 1st Movement, the June 10th Independence Movement and the Gwangju Student Independence Movement, and tried to accommodate socialism within the scope of national consciousness. Cho Ji-hoon’s description of national consciousness had a strong normative and ethical personality that gives absoluteness to national consciousness, which was different from the internal development theory of the young researchers of those days who emphasized the development of history due to the contradictions in our society. Cho Ji-hoon verified the historical genealogy of Korean studies through the research of Korean history in the early 1960’s when Korean studies came under the spotlight for the first time, and sought for the direction of Korean studies through the experience of studying intellectual history. As a result, Cho Ji-hoon’s study of Korean history became the blueprint of the nation-centric Korean studies and national cultural movement.

[총론] 近代 韓國學의 형성 : ‘實學’의 전통과 연희전문의 ‘國學’

김도형(Kim, Do Hyung) 연세대학교 강진다산실학연구원 2015 다산과현대 Vol.8 No.-

근대개혁 과정에서의 ‘국학’은 민족문제를 해결하는 이념 속에서 형성되었다. 특히 일제 식민지하에서는 ‘조선학’이라는 이름으로 식민지배 논리를 비판하고, 새로운 근대학문으로 성장하였다. 학술운동으로서의 조선학운동을 이끌던 사람은 연희전문학교 교수 정인보였다. 정인보의 학문은 한말 근대개혁 과정에서 형성된 변법개혁론의 전통에 서 있었다. 그는 변법개혁론에 속했던 박은식, 신채호의 양명학과 역사학을 계승하고, 또 다른 한편으로 1920-30년대 국내에서 전개되던 부르주아 민족운동의 민족문화론을 결합하였다. 청일전쟁 후 ‘개신유학자’를 중심으로 형성된 변법개혁론은 유학자의 보수성과 더불어 무분별한 서양 문명 수용을 비판하였다. 이에 대한 대안으로 조선후기 실학의 개혁론을 계승하고, 이를 신학문과 결합하였다. 그들은 실학파의 역사연구, 자국사 연구를 발전시키면서, 동시에 구래의 주자학을 비판하고 양명학을 근대적인 이념체계로 정립하고자 하였다. 역사를 통해 형성된 우리의 국혼(國魂), 국수(國粹)를 보존하여 민족문제를 해결하고자 하였다. 이런 학문적 전통 위에서 정인보는 구래의 주자학을 허학(虛學)으로 비판하며 ‘실학’으로서 양명학을 주장하고, 그 ‘실심’이 담긴 우리 역사를 ‘조선의 얼’이 성쇠하는 과정으로 정리하여 「5천년간 조선의 얼」을 썼다. ‘동서 화충’으로 표현된 연희전문학교의 교육방침은 정인보의 학문적 자세를 그대로 표현한 것이었다. 한국의 근대한국학은 실학 연구를 중시한 연희전문의 ‘국학’에서 비롯되었던 것이다. National studies(國學) was developed with the ideology of nationalism in the process of modern reformation of Modern Korea. National studies, especially named ‘Joseon studies(朝鮮學)’ under the Japan`s colonial rule. It was Jeong In-bo (정인보, 1893~1950), a professor of Yonhi College(Chosen Christian College) who led ‘Joseonhak movement’. His theory was under the influence of the pyonbop ron(變法改革論)which was formed at the end of the Taehan Imperial period. Jeong In-bo succeeded Yangming studies of Park Eun-shik(박은식, 1859~1925) and Historiography of Shin Chae-ho(신채호, 1880~1936), and combined National culture theory of the Bourgeois Nationalist Movement in 1920s~1930s with them. The Reformation movement which was developed among ‘reform-minded Confucianists(改新儒學者)’, criticized conservativeness of the Confucian and thoughtless acceptance of Western civilization. They insisted to succeed the Sirhak and combined it with New studies. They also tried to develop National historiy studies that preserve national spirit(kukhon, 國魂) and national characteristics(kuksu, 國粹), seeking solution of national problem and make Yangming studies modern while criticizing Neo Confucianism. Jeong In-bo wrote 「Joseon‘s spirit(Eol, 얼) during Five thousands in Korea」 arranging national history including ‘practical mind(silsim, 實心)’ while criticizing Neo Confucianism as impractical study(hurhak, 虛學), insisting Yangming studies as ‘practical learning(實學)’. An educational policy of Yonhi College, directly reflected Jeong In-bo‘s academic attitude. Modern Korean studies began with ‘Korean studies(國學)’ of Yonhi College, concerned Sirhak.

박 보리스의 생애와 한국학 연구

박벨라보리소브나 ( Bella B. Pak ) 인하대학교 한국학연구소 2013 한국학연구 Vol.0 No.29

This article attempts to describe the life and activity of the outstanding scientist of Korean studies Boris Dmitrievich Pak, major milestones of his career in science, shaping him as a scholar, an important focus of his research, the most important works. assess his contribution to Korean studies, to the forming the new generation of scientists, his social activities, to show his place in the domestic and the international scientific community, to tell about a time when he had to live and work, the difficulties that he as a son of the “enemy of the people” and a representative of the repressed people had to overcome. The author also wanted in addition to the analysis of B. D. Pak ‘s works to help to get to know him, to reveal some features of his personality, human side, based on her personal experiences. The article describes the childhood years, deportation, education in the Central State University, postgraduate studies, the first monograph. It described period after the move to Moscow and work at the Institute of Oriental Studies, analyzes his main works. The author gives the characteristic of the school of B. D. Pak, his international and social activities. Boris D. Pak was born on January 4th, 1931 in Vladivostok, in the family of Pak Dynnen and Choi Yon Ai. In 1937, his father was arrested “as a Japanese spy” and shot. He was posthumously rehabilitated in 1958. Boris’s family survived the deportation of the Korean population in Kazakhstan and Central Asia. Being a “son of an enemy of the people” B. D. Pak from the early years experienced enormous hardships, was forced to do hard physical labor. But despite this he graduated from high school with honors in 1950 and joined the faculty of the Eastern Central Asian State University in Tashkent, as a history major. Already during his studies at the university he showed a great aptitude for scientific research. He took part in student conferences. His paper on the Japanese Communist Party in 1954, was published in the proceedings of the students. The collection opened with his article. Undoubted leadership qualities, excellent achievements in learning, talent, and a great capacity for work soon attracted attention and he was elected leader of the Young Communist League. After graduating with honors in 1956, B. D. Pak worked as a teacher of history and director of the school № 13 with the famous collective farm “Polar Star” in Middle-Chirchik district of Tashkent region. In 1962, Boris D. Pak enrolled in postgraduate studies at Moscow State Pedagogical Institute named after V. I. Lenin. This became possible with the death of Stalin, when for the Koreans in Central Asia and Kazakhstan the restrictions on studying and living outside the Central Asian republics were eased. In 1965 he defended his Ph. D. thesis “The liberation struggle of the Korean people on the eve of the First World War.” In 1967, it was published by the publishing house “Science”. After finishing graduate school, B. D. Pak was sent as a lecturer in the history of the East to Irkutsk State Pedagogical Institute. The most prolonged and intense “Siberian period” in the scientific activities of Boris Pak began. In September 1968, Boris Dmitrievich received academic rank of assistant professor and was elected Dean of the Faculty of History. In 1972, B. D. Pak enrolled in doctoral studies at Moscow State Pedagogical University, and in 1974 he defended his doctoral thesis on “Russia and Korea in the middle of XIX - early XX century.” After that, he was elected chair of World History. In 1977 he was awarded the title of professor. He becomes the leading scientist in Siberia on Korea and East Asia. B. D. Pak is the author of over 200 scientific papers. His writings on the history of Russian-Korean relations, the history of Russian Koreans recognized classic, translated into many languages. Boris D. Pak is the founder of the trend in Korean Studies - History of Russian-Korean relations. His book “Russia and Korea” examines Russia's policy in Korea, the Russian-Korean relations since their inception in the thirteenth century until the annexation of Korea in 1910. A major landmark in his work since the mid 90's was the study of Korean anti-Japanese national liberation movement. On this issue he wrote his monographs, “the March First Movement in 1919 in Korea through the eyes of a Russian diplomat (1997)”(in collaboration with Pak Thegyn) and “The Recompence in the Harbin Railway Station”(1998) - the first monographic study of the An Junggeun. The name Boris Dmitrievich Pak linked with the development of the history of Russian Koreans as a scientific discipline. On this issue in the second half of the 90's he published the books: “The Koreans in the Russian Empire”(1994), “Koreans in Soviet Russia”(1995). They first examined the history of Korean immigration to the Russian Empire since the 50's XIX century up to 1937. From October 1999 until his death on December 24, 2012 B. D. Pak worked in the Department of Korea and Mongolia of the Institute of Oriental Studies Russian Academy of Sciences. In creative terms, these years have been extremely fruitful in the life of B. D. Pak. Written with Ninkolay F. Bugai the book “140 years in Russia. Essay on the history of Russian Koreans”(Moscow, 2004), dedicated to the 140 anniversary of the resettlement of Koreans in Russia, has been translated into Korean and became one of the most important works on the history of Russian Koreans. In 2006, Boris Dmitrievich Pak has published the book “USSR, the Communist International and the Korean liberation movement. 1918~1925”. B. D. Pak is the founder of the series of monographs “Russian Koreans” dedicated to outstanding representatives of the diaspora of Russian Koreans. He is the author-compiler and editor of books in this series(“Kim Mangym”, “Khan Myonse”, “Lee Bomjin”, “140 years in Russia”(in co. with N.F. Bugai), “Kim Pen Hwa”, “Alexandra Kim-Stankevich”, “Choi Jaehyen”, “Russian Koreans struggle for the independence of Korea. 1905~1919”, “Soviet Koreans in the Great Patriotic War of 1941~1945”). Within this series first appeared detailed biographies of the most prominent representatives of Koreans in prerevolutionary period and Soviet era, including those who have been subjected to repression during the Stalinist era. Great work led B. D. Pak and as archivist. Together with Y. V. Vanin prepared for publication, and was editor of the compiler of collections of documents and materials “Korea through the eyes of Russians, 1895~1945” and “The first news about Korea. 1675~1884”. B. D. Pak contributed greatly to the scientific training of historians. Under his leadership, 12 candidates and doctors of history were prepared. B. D. Pak contributed to the development and emergence in Russia, Korea, Japan and China of publications, which have based their approaches on the principles laid down by him. Attention to historical sources, the highest professionalism in their study are a distinctive feature of his research school. B. D. Pak created the International Centre for Asian Studies at the Irkutsk State Pedagogical University, that become one of the most famous centers for the study of Asia in Siberia. He developed the International relations of Irkutsk Pedagogical Institute with foreign research centers. He directed five international conferences with the participation of eminent scientists. As the editor published 12 issues of “Bulletin of the International Centre for Asian Studies IGPU.” B. D. Pak has worked hard to establish scientific cooperation between scientific institutions of Russia and South Korea. He is the Member of the National Institute study of national history(Kuksa phyonch'an wiwonhve) and “outstanding researcher” of the Institute of the independence movement of Independence Memorial(Tonnip kinyomgwan). He was an active participant in international scientific conferences in the Republic of Korea, Japan, Hungary, USA. He was the scientific adviser of documentaries KBC(Yoksa Special). B. D. Pak actively cooperated and helped Korean organizations abroad, was honorary president of the Korean Association of Irkutsk. He led an active social and political work. Elected to the Council of the city of Irkutsk, he was a brilliant lecturer in international studies. Scientific and public activity of B. D. Pak was highly appreciated both at home and abroad. He was the first Russian Korean who was awarded the title “Honored Worker of Science of the Russian Federation”(1992), member of the Academy of Humanities(1995), was awarded the “Friendship” order, medals of the Russian Federation, Mongolia and the Republic of Korea. Interest in the works of B. D. Pak continues unabated even after his death. In 2011, Seoul “Russia and Korea”, translated into Korean, and in September “Soviet Koreans in the Great Patriotic War” were published. In October 2012 the book “An Junggeun - National Hero of Korea” was issued. B. D. Pak can be put on a par with people whose ideas laid the foundation of modern Korean studies. Many scholars of Russian-Korean relations, the Korean national liberation movement, the history of Russian Koreans call him their spiritual mentor. His great contribution to the development of Korean widely recognized.

"National Studies" in 20th Century East Asia: Reflections for an East Asian Perspective

( Hyong Taek Lim ) 성균관대학교 동아시아학술원 2004 Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies Vol.4 No.1

The present paper discusses the historical background of field known as "national studies國學" in Korea, China, and Japan. In Korea and China, interest in national studies as an established concept only began in modern history. In Japan, however, it was a subject of interest as early as the 17th century, only to be disregarded yet internalized as ideology in modern times. I discuss some of the reasons that necessitated the different experiences with "national studies" as a formal scholarly pursuit. Ultimately my goal is to consider the need for an "East Asian perspective" that goes beyond the borders of each country, in the context of the history of "national studies."

해외 한국학 연구의 새로운 시각과 연구 지평의 확대

김경호 수선사학회 2023 史林 Vol.- No.83

Korean studies overseas have grown based on their environment, social systems, and culture in each country, as a subject of Asian studies. Specifically, Korean studies overseas started from a part of regional studies. However, current Korean studies overseas tends to be seeking its own development, independent from regional Asian studies, closely interacting with domestic Korean studies. Recently, its broad expansion in research areas have diversified the research themes and interest topics in the field. Accordingly, Korean studies overseas need strategic approaches conducted in the basis of cultural differences and both academic and practical demands of each region. To this end, this paper classified Korean studies overseas into four regions applying its major characteristics; leading areas, developed areas, developing areas, and recently introduced areas. Furthermore, it is necessary to establish the strategic concept of ‘universal-comparative-intelligence’ of Korean studies according to the stage of development. In order to establish strategic approaches to Korean studies overseas in several countries or regions, Korean studies needs to Korean studies needs major shift from “unilateral spread and distribution of research results by domestic Korean studies centered on Korean language studies” to “presentation of academic Hallyu realizing the identity of Korean culture”. To this end, this paper makes specific proposals presented below. First, Korean studies overseas should develop in a continuous exchange with the achievements of neighboring studies such as humanities and East Asian studies for the new “academic Korean Wave.” Second, it is necessary to emphasize the importance of classical studies that have been neglected in Korean studies overseas. Second, this paper suggests that Korean studies should expand its research subjects to Korean classical studies written in Chinese letters even in the regions where they do not use Chinese characters. Through this convergence research with modern Korean studies and Korean classical studies, we can gain deeper understandings on Korean traditions, modern culture and even its future vision, extending our perspectives not only to humanities but also to social sciences. Lastly, The use of IT-based convergence research platforms will maximize the influence of traditional Korean studies and Korean studies overseas beyond their research methods. It is an important opportunity for its transition from ‘peripheral’ studies to ‘central’ studies in each overseas region. At the same time, it is hoped that Korean studies will become reflections and practical learning of current society. .

7차 교육과정의 고등학교 사회 교과서에 대한 분석 연구

박인옥 ( In Ock Park ) 한국사회과교육학회 2002 시민교육연구 Vol.34 No.2

The purpose of this study is to analze the characteristics of the Social Studies` authorized textbook foe High School in the 7th National Curriculum of Social Studies. To analyze validity, pertinency and learning capability in the connection with the 7th national curriculum of social studies, this study focuses on the contents of ` XⅡ. Political Life and Nation` and divides into the external system, organizational system and contents. The result of analyzing the `Social Studies` authorized textbook for High School is that the external system and organizational system will improve students` interest and achievement while studying with this authorized textbook. Though the `Social Studies` authorized textbook has more positive things than the preceding textbook, the contents of the `Social Studies` authorized textbook are still inadequate for validity, pertinency and learning capability because it shows a few problems. Therefore validity, pertinency and learning capability of contents have to be considered as well as the external system and organizational system for the development of authorized textbooks. This study will provide usefulness in choosing authorized textbooks, help produce qualified textbooks, and will suggest a possibility for qualitative improvement of teaching and learning.