
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Yoon-kyoung Joh 서울대학교 언어교육원 2020 語學硏究 Vol.56 No.1
This paper claims that adorning materials in middles can commonly be translated into adverbials since modality, negation, and focus can all be expressed using various types of adverbials. Through the analytical lens that views middle constructions as distributivity constructions that are essentially reduced to plurality, this common property among adorning materials in middles is highly interesting. Thus, this paper accounts for the adorning materials in middles in Joh’s (2016) analysis, which treats adverbials in middles as one of distributivity’s core arguments. This paper also discusses how adverbials that are implicitly inserted in middle sentences can be conditioned. To answer this question, this paper relies on the differentiating effect that Sohn (2003) examined, extending the previously proposed unexpectedness condition.
Syntactic Differences of Plurality Markers
Joh,Yoon-kyoung 한국영미어문학회 2011 영미어문학 Vol.- No.98
There are two crucial syntactic differences found among plurality markers. Dependent plurals and anti-quantifiers work at the phrasal level as opposed to ordinary plurals that apply to the lexical level. More specifically, ordinary plurals are adjoined to the X level while anti-quantifiers attach to the full-fledged XP level. Dependent plurals, however, have the in-between status syntactically and combine with the X'-structure. Another difference is found between ordinary plurals and dependent plurals, on the one hand, and anti-quantifiers, on the other, in the respect that the former is a morpheme while the latter is a phrase that can take its own complement. These different statuses seem to account for why plural forms are intrinsically ambiguous whereas anti-quantifiers are unambiguously more expressive in their semantics as well as in their syntax than ordinary plurals and dependent plurals.
Yoon-kyoung Joh 서울대학교 언어교육원 (구 서울대학교 어학연구소) 2008 語學硏究 Vol.44 No.2
This paper treats the inverse scope reading of the Inverse-Linking Construction under a new perspective that distributivity is reduced to plurality based on Landman (2000). The immediate advantage is that my analysis canexplain the inverse scope reading of the Inverse-Linking Construction that does not contain a universal quantifier, the data that previous approaches could not explain. Second, my analysis can account for why there is no inverse scope reading when the first NP in the Inverse-Linking Construction is definite, without missing the generalization that indefiniteness licenses distributivity. Third, my analysis is compositional throughout the process of producing the distributive reading, without reinterpreting the prepositional phrase that contains a quantifier phrase. In addition to putting forth the analysis, I further characterize the inverse scope reading as NP-internal, backward, and embedded distributivity.

Yoon-kyoung Joh 경희대학교 언어정보연구소 2018 언어연구 Vol.35 No.3
1. Introduction 2. Semantics of the progressive 3. A pragmatic account 4. Proposal 5. Discussion
Causative Verbs and Economy Metaphors
Yoon-kyoung Joh 한국영어학학회 2021 영어학연구 Vol.27 No.1
This paper claims that the causative verbs such as make, have and get acquire their causation meanings through the metaphor CAUSATION IS AN ECONOMIC DEAL. This claim can be evidenced by the fact that the basic meanings of the verbs all concern economic deals such as production, possession, and purchase. Furthermore, this paper argues that we can identify further detailed metaphorical entailments of the metaphor which are manifested by the different conceptualizations for the semantic extension of each causative verb. The metaphorical entailments are based on non-constituent correspondences between forcing and producing, between requesting and possessing, and between persuading and buying. We further claim that these different correspondences can address different statistical patterns previously observed with respect to the three causative verbs.