http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Who Are the DPJ?: Policy Positioning and Recruitment Strategy
Mari Miura,이갑윤,Robert Weiner 경남대학교 극동문제연구소 2005 ASIAN PERSPECTIVE Vol.29 No.1
This article examines where the Democratic Party of Japan situates itself vis-à-vis the Liberal Democratic Party through a novel analysis of the two parties’ election mani- festos and legislative behavior. Personnel data show a grad- ual growth of conservative forces within the DPJ. We might expect a conservative turn in policy to have been the result, but we find that the DJP consistently places itself in a more liberal position than the LDP, especially on social issues. Although the DPJ has become a more conservative organiza- tion, our data suggest that the need for product differentia- tion pushes the DPJ leftward. Still, the DPJ has not yet suc- ceeded in establishing a clear and stable party label, and this may contribute to further party dealignment.
Evaluation of the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test for diagnosing mesalazine allergy
( Daisuke Saito ),( Mari Hayashida ),( Taro Sato ),( Shintaro Minowa ),( Osamu Ikezaki ),( Tatsuya Mitsui ),( Miki Miura ),( Akihito Sakuraba ),( Tadakazu Hisamatsu ) 대한장연구학회 2018 Intestinal Research Vol.16 No.2
Background/Aims: Mesalazine is an effective drug for treating ulcerative colitis (UC), but causes allergic symptoms in a few cases. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) for the diagnosis of mesalazine allergy. Methods: Patients with UC treated with mesalazine with or without a history of associated adverse events (AEs) were enrolled at Kyorin University Hospital from July 2016 to April 2017. Results: The DLST was performed in 104 patients with UC, of which 24 had a history of AEs due to mesalazine treatment. The control value of DLST was 337.4±296.3 counts per minute (cpm) in the AE<sup>+</sup> group and 408.0±371.9 cpm in the AE<sup>-</sup> group. The measured value of DLST was 578.8±424.7 cpm in the AE<sup>+</sup> group and 476.5±471.8 cpm in the AE<sup>-</sup> group. The stimulation index (SI) was 243.9%±291.1% in the AE<sup>+</sup> group and 119.8%±53.0% in the AE<sup>-</sup> group. The SI value and DLST positivity were significantly higher in the AE<sup>+</sup> group than in the AE<sup>-</sup> group (P=0.030 and P=0.029, respectively). The test sensitivity and specificity were 0.240 and 0.805, respectively, and the false-positive and false-negative rate was 0.195 and 0.760, respectively. Conclusions: The DLST for mesalazine showed low sensitivity and high specificity, suggesting that it may be useful for the definitive diagnosis of allergy to mesalazine. (Intest Res 2018;16:273-281)
Keiji Yagisawa,Taku Kobayashi,Ryo Ozaki,Shinji Okabayashi,Takahiko Toyonaga,Miki Miura,Mari Hayashida,Eiko Saito,Masaru Nakano,Hajime Matsubara,Tadakazu Hisamatsu,Toshifumi Hibi 대한장연구학회 2019 Intestinal Research Vol.17 No.1
Background/Aims: Oral mesalazine is an important treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), and non-adherence to mesalazineincreases the risk of relapse. Controlled-release (CR) mesalazine has 2 formulations: tablets and granules. The relative acceptabilitiesof these formulations may influence patient adherence; however, they have not been compared to date. This studyaimed to evaluate the acceptabilities of the 2 formulations of CR mesalazine in relation to patient adherence using a crossoverquestionnaire survey. Methods: UC patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in each group tookeither 4 g of CR mesalazine tablets or granules for 6 to 9 weeks, and then switched to 4 g of the other formulation for a further 6to 9 weeks. The acceptability and efficacy were evaluated by questionnaires, and adherence was assessed using a visual analogscale. The difference in acceptabilities between the 2 formulations and its impact on adherence were assessed. Results: A totalof 49 patients were prospectively enrolled and 33 patients were included in the analysis. Significantly more patients found thetablets to be less acceptable than the granules (76% vs. 33%, P=0.0005). The granules were preferable to the tablets when the 2formulations were compared directly (73% vs. 21%, P=0.004), for their portability, size, and numbers of pills. The adherence ratewas slightly better among patients taking the granules (94% vs. 91%) during the observation period, but the difference was notsignificant (P=0.139). Conclusion: CR mesalazine granules are more acceptable than tablets, and may therefore be a better optionfor long-term medication. (Intest Res 2019;17:87-93)
Sanuki, Takuro,Mishima, Gaku,Kurata, Shinji,Watanabe, Toshihiro,Kiriishi, Kensuke,Tachi, Mizuki,Ozaki, Yu,Okayasu, Ichiro,Kawai, Mari,Matsushita, Yuki,Miura, Keiichiro,Ayuse, Takao The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2015 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Vol.15 No.3
Background: We hypothesized that ketamine, when administered as the anesthetic induction agent, may prevent cardiovascular depression during high-dose remifentanil administration, unlike propofol. To test our hypothesis, we retrospectively compared the hemodynamic effects of ketamine, during high-dose remifentanil administration, with those of propofol. Methods: Thirty-eight patients who underwent oral surgery at the Nagasaki University Hospital between April 2014 and June 2015 were included in this study. Anesthesia was induced by the following procedure: First, high-dose remifentanil ($0.3-0.5{\mu}g/kg/min$) was administered 2-3 min before anesthesia induction;next, the anesthetic induction agent, either propofol (Group P) or ketamine (Group K), was administered. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the heart rate were recorded by the automated anesthesia recording system at four time points: immediately before the administration of high-dose remifentanil (T1);immediately before the administration of propofol or ketamine (T2);2.5 min (T3), and 5 min (T4) after the administration of the anesthetic induction agent. Results: In Group P, the MAP at T3 ($75.7{\pm}15.5mmHg$, P = 0.0015) and T4 ($68.3{\pm}12.5mmHg$, P < 0.001) were significantly lower than those at T1 ($94.0{\pm}12.4mmHg$). However, the MAP values in the K group were very similar (P = 0.133) at all time points. The heart rates in both Groups P (P = 0.254) and K (P = 0.859) remained unchanged over time. Conclusions: We showed that ketamine, when administered as the anesthetic induction agent during high-dose remifentanil administration, prevents cardiovascular depression.