RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        지방자치단체 사업예산 성과관리 실태분석 - 충청남도 사례를 대상으로 -

        최웅선(Woong-Seon Choi),주운현(Woon-Hyun Joo) 한국지방행정학회 2017 한국지방행정학보 (KLAR) Vol.14 No.3

        From 2016, the fiscal Performance Goal Management System(PGMS) was implemented for the local governments. This study tried to analyse the performance management of program budget of local governments with Chungnam case and to suggest policy implications. Considering that the fiscal PGMS has just been introduced, this study analysed the program budget and performance plan of Agricultural Policy Bureau and Welfare Health Bureau of Chungnam focusing on consistency of target system, link between performance plan and program budget, and relevance of performance indicators. The main findings are summarized as follows. It was found that the strategic goals did not include the program objectives and some program objectives did not adequately established as a means of achieving the strategic goals. The terminology used in the target name was not appropriate, so it made the target system less clear. In the structure of the program budget, there was a problem that the hierarchy was inadequate or the logic was insufficient. Most of the performance indicators are mainly composed of output indicators, making it difficult to grasp the achievement of program objectives. Also, they did not have enough validity to grasp the program objectives. In order to solve these problems, it is important that the organization manager pays attention to the performance budgeting. At the same time, it is necessary to increase the acceptability of the organization members for the system and to actively use the performance evaluation expert advisory group.

      • KCI등재

        공공부문의 재정지출 증가요인에 관한 연구

        최웅선(Choi, Woong Seon),이용모(Lee, Yong-Mo) 서울행정학회 2012 한국사회와 행정연구 Vol.23 No.1

        Using Baumol’s model of unbalanced growth, this study has attempted to empirically analyze whether the rising costs of public services affects the increases in public sector spending. To this end, using a panel data of the 25 OECD member nations during the period from 1990 to 2010. we have estimated the effects of the increases in production cost of public services on the increases in public sector spending. As the analysis subjects, four areas of public spending were selected: education, health care, public order and safety, and social welfare. Feasible Generalized Least Squares were used in order to eliminate heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation observed in the first OLS regression. The main findings are summarized as follows. First. the per capita real wage growth was found to have significant positive (+) effects on spending on education, health care, public order and safety, and the growth rate of real expenditure in the field of social welfare. Also, the coefficients were seen to be high, suggesting that the impact of wage increases is very large. Second, the per capita real GDP growth was seen to have no significant effects on any of these spending, except on social welfare spending. And the coefficients were found to show values close to zero. In social welfare spending, the per capita real GDP growth was found to have significant negative (-) effects. This result seems attributable to the fact that. in social welfare spending. cash payments such as low-income cost of living support and unemployment benefits are included. In sum, these findings, as illustrated in Baumol’s model, support the claim that the rises in the costs of production of public services have large effects on the increases in public sector spending.

      • KCI등재

        무조건부 보조금의 감소가 지방정부 지출에 미친 영향 분석 -시,군 지역을 중심으로-

        최웅선 ( Woong Seon Choi ),이용모 ( Yongmo Lee ) 한국정책학회 2015 韓國政策學會報 Vol.24 No.4

        본 연구의 목적은 무조건부 보조금의 감소가 시ㆍ군 자치단체의 재정지출에 미치는 영향을 분석하는 것이다. 무조건부 보조금 감소로 인한 재정압박 상황에서 지방정부가 어떠한 반응을 보이는지를 총 지출액과 정책영역별 지출액으로 구분하여 실증적으로 분석하였다. 분석 자료의 기간은 2008년부터 2013년까지로 설정하여 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 분석결과를 종합하면 다음과 같다. 무조건부 보조금이 감소하면 시ㆍ군 자치단체는 총 지출액에서 교체효과를 발생시키는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 시ㆍ군 자치단체가 지방채, 임시적 세외수입 등의 자체재원으로 재정감소에 대응한다는 것을 의미한다. 정책영역별 지출에 대한 분석결과에서는, 시 자치단체의 경우 개발정책과 재분배정책 지출에서 교체효과가 나타났고 할당정책 지출에서는 대칭효과가 나타났다. 반면, 군 자치단체의 경우에는 개발정책 지출에서만 교체효과가 나타났고, 재분배정책과 할당정책지출에서는 대칭효과가 나타났다. 이를 통해 무조건부 보조금 감소로 인한 재정압박상황에서 지방정부는 정책영역별, 자치단체 유형에 따라 차별적으로 대응한다는 것을 확인할 수 있다. This study aims to examine the effects of a reduction in unconditional grants on local government spending. This paper empirically examined how local governments deal with fiscal distress caused by reduced unconditional grants by looking at changes in total expenditure and expenditures by different policy areas. This paper conducted regression analysis using data for 2008-2013 and found the evidence for replacement effects, indicating that local governments tend to address fiscal distress caused by reduction in unconditional grants by using their own fiscal resources such as local bond or temporary nontax revenue. Specifically in case of city governments (Si), the replacement effect was found in the areas of economic development policies and redistribution policies whereas the symmetric effect was found in the area of allocation policies. In case of county governments (Gun), the replacement effect was found in the area of economic development policies while the symmetric effect was found in the areas of redistribution policies and allocation policies. These findings show that the way in which local government address fiscal distress varies between different types of local governments as well as different policy areas.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼