On English Pronominalization

전병쾌 한국영미어문학회 1979 영미어문학 Vol.- No.26

英語의 複合名詞에 對한 硏究

全炳快 대구보건대학 1974 대구보건대학 論文集 Vol.2 No.1

Supraseg mental phonemes are composed of 4 stresses, 4 pitches, and 4 junctures. They are as important as segmental phonemes (vowels and consonants). In this thesis the focus is pointed at the stress patterns on compound nouns. There are 4 stresses; primary stress//, secondary stress//, tertiary stress//, week//. The meanings in a sentence change whether it is a compound noun or a phrase. Compound nouns usually take a primary… tertiary stress pattern/´`/. But sometimes they many take a double stress partern /′′/; (1) Appositive (ge´entleman + fa´rmer), (2) When the second element is special(ga´s+sto´ve), (3) Material noun+Noun (iron cu´rtain), (4) Present Participle+Noun (fiying sa´ucers), (5) Predicator/Object Nexus. And a small number of words, especially proper names, may take the poststress pattern /`´/. On the contrary, phrases may take a secondary-primary stress pattera /^´/. Compound nouns and phrases are distinguished by these stress patterns. But these stress patterns are not marked on the written English books except a few special books. But when we speak, we must always keep these in our minds. When we do not know these stress patterns correctly, we can not deliver our ideas to others and can't understand other's words correctly. In this thesis I want to solve ambiguities in copound nouns contrasted with phrases.

英語의 前提에 對하여

全炳快 慶北大學校 1984 論文集 Vol.37 No.-

For the last decade, Presupposition has interested many linguists and a lof of papers about presuppostion have been written. The term "presupposition" was used for the first time by Frege. The definition of presupposition is 'A sentence S logically presupposes a sentence S' just in case S logically implies S' and the negation S, ∼S also logically implies S'. In other words, the truth of S' is a necessary condition on the truth or falsity of S'.' Presupposition and entailment are both related to the time-axis, that is, the former is related to before the time-axis, and the latter after the time-axis. In universal languages, verbs are divided into modality verbs and cognitive verbs, and among cognitive verbs only facitive and neg-factive verbs have presuppositions, but non-factive verbs and modality don't have. When we compare factive predicates with non-factive predicates, we can observe the following: (i) only factive predicates allow the fact with a sentential complement consiting of a that-lause or a gerund to replace the simple that-chause. (ii) Only factive predicates allow the full range of gerundial constructions and adjectival nominalizations in-ness, to stand in place of the that-clause. (iii) For the verbs in factive predicates, extraposition is optional, whereas it is obligatory for the verbs in non-factive predicates. (iv) Only non-factive predicates allow the accusative and imperative constructions.

韓國語 否定文에 對한 硏究 : 심층구조 설정 및 특성을 中心으로 Focused on the Establishment of Deep Structure and Its Characteristics

全炳快 慶北大學校 1983 論文集 Vol.35 No.-

Since Chomsky's generative-transformational grammar, many Korean linguists have attempted to apply transformational grammar to Korean. They are especially interested in Korean negation. There are two kinds of Korean negation, that is, a short form negation called 'Type Ⅰ Neg'-negation element 'ANI' or 'MOT' is located before the main verb, and a long form negation called 'Type Ⅱ Neg'-negation element 'AMI' or 'MOT' is located after the main verb. Korean linguists have long discussed whether the deep structure of Type Ⅰ Neg and that of Type Ⅱ Neg are identical or different. I would like to adopt the argument that Type Ⅰ and Type Ⅱ Negs are derived from the same deep structure and Type Ⅱ Neg is a base. I established my own deep structure form of Korean negation, referring to Park Soon-Ham, Song Seok-Jung, Lee Hong-Bae, Oh Choon-Kyu and others. I found that Neg 'ANI' or 'MOT' is used as two functions-one is an intranstive verb {ANI_1(MOT_1)} and the other is a transtive verb {ANI_2(MOT_2)}. Therefore, the deep structures of {ANI_1(MOT_1)} and {ANI_2(MOT_2)} are very different. 'ANI' and 'MOT' are compared in their syntactic and semantic differences. In Chapter Ⅲ, the characteristics of Korean negation are dealt with. First, I dealt with the scope of negation and ambiguity. Korean neg element 'ANI(MOT)' will affect most naturally the elements to its left or that precede it, because Korean is an S-O-V language. Cho Choon-Hak(1975) argues that only Type Ⅱ Neg has an ambiguity and Type Ⅰ has no ambiguity. But I argue that Type Ⅰ Neg also has an ambiguity. Many informers, who are my students-seniors in Teachers' College of Kyungpook National University, answered 'yes' in that there are ambiguities in Type Ⅰ Neg in Korean. Second, neg transportation(neg raising) is dealt with. Neg transportation means that Neg in the lower sentence raises to the higher sesnence. Poutsma (1928) points out that the shifting of 'not' often has the effect of softening down the negativing of a sentence in English. That phenomenon occurs not only in English or Korean, but also in all languages. Third, quasi-negation or rhetorical questions are dealt with. Universally the affirmative question has the meaning of the negative statement (e.g. Who knows? = Nobody knows. Shall I ever forget you? = I shall never forget you.). Finally, negative polarities in Korean and English are illustrated. In conclusion, I think that this paper will contribute to make a new deep structure form of Korean negation, to propose that there is an ambiguity not only in Type Ⅱ Neg, but also in Type Ⅰ Neg, and to distinguish {ANI_1(MOT_1)} from {ANI_2(MOT_2)}.

부정극성어와 그 의미구조

전병쾌,이예식 慶北大學校 人文科學硏究所 1993 人文 科學 Vol.9 No.-

반대부정과 모순부정의 화용론적 접근

전병쾌 언어과학회 1998 언어과학연구 Vol.15 No.-

한국에 거주하는 외국인을 위한 한국언어 및 한국문화에 대한 이해와 그 적응에 과한 연구

전병쾌,유기룡,조문호,은죽남 慶北大學校 語學硏究所 1991 語文硏究 Vol.16 No.-

一般句節構造文法(GPSG) 理論

全炳快 慶北大學校 1985 論文集 Vol.39 No.-

Generalized Phrase Structute Grammar (GPSG) is based on work that has been done by a number of linguists since about 1978. A GPSG is type of generative grammar that exploits several of the resources of transformational grammars but which does not employ either transformations, deep structures, surface structures, and which introduces only a single level of structural description. As their name suggests, GPSG's are essentially context-free phrase structure grammars. In Chapter Ⅱ, we discuss universal feature instantiation principles such as Food Feature Principle (FFP), Control Agreement Principle (CAP), and Head Feature Convention (HFC). As Pullum puts it on FFP, the increment of the mother category's FOOT feature is the unification of the increments of the daughter categories' FOOT features. On the Control Agreement Principle, function symbols may present a morpheme whose form is determined by the noun class of the argument expression. In the tree diagram the head of the arrow indicates the controllee, and the tail the controller. A controllee is a function, and a controller is either an argument or an argument-passing function that applies to some controllee. On Head Feature Convention, the coefficients of HEAD in the mother category and the head daughter should be identical. In Chapter Ⅲ, we discuss the constituent structure such as the basic structure of verb phrases (VPs), adjective phrases (APs), noun phrases (NPs), prepositional phrases (PPs) and topicalizations in Englih. 22 different kinds of VPs, 7 APs, 8 NPs are classified and discussed. Gereralized phrase structure grammarians have attempted this new theory to argue against the Extended Standard Theory of generative-transformational grammar. This paper offers only an introduction to GPSG theory.

GB理論의 統辭制約과 移動規則

全炳快 慶北大學校 語學硏究所 1988 語文硏究 Vol.13 No.-

HPSG(두부중심 구절구조 문법)이론

전병쾌 慶北大學校 語學硏究所 1990 語文硏究 Vol.15 No.-