http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
개별검색 DB통합검색이 안되는 DB는 DB아이콘을 클릭하여 이용하실 수 있습니다.
통계정보 및 조사
예술 / 패션
<해외전자자료 이용권한 안내>
- 이용 대상 : RISS의 모든 해외전자자료는 교수, 강사, 대학(원)생, 연구원, 대학직원에 한하여(로그인 필수) 이용 가능
- 구독대학 소속 이용자: RISS 해외전자자료 통합검색 및 등록된 대학IP 대역 내에서 24시간 무료 이용
- 미구독대학 소속 이용자: RISS 해외전자자료 통합검색을 통한 오후 4시~익일 오전 9시 무료 이용
※ 단, EBSCO ASC/BSC(오후 5시~익일 오전 9시 무료 이용)
Background: The role of propofol cu the inflammatory cytokine response during surgery has been contradictory. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of propofol compared to that of enflurane on cytokine responses. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-12, were measured. Methods: Thirty patients, who underwent colo-rectal cancer surgery, were randomly assigned into two groups in double-blind fashion. One group (n = 15) was anesthetized with enflurane vapor anesthetic, whereas the other group (n = 15) was anesthetized with a propofol intravenous infusion. At predetermined time intervals. the changes of IL-10 and IL-12 were measured. In addition, vital signs, amount of fluid infused during the operation, estimated blood loss and total amount of pethidine given within 24 hours after the operation were also measured. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the changes of IL-10 and IL-12 concentrations at all intervals when compared between the two groups, although the IL-10 was significantly increased at 1 hour after incision within each group. No other measured variables showed any meaningful differences. Conclusion: This study has demonstrated that propofol anesthesia did not prevent the surgical stress provoked cytokine responses. (Korean J Anesthesiol 2001: 40: 155∼162)