http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
유찬확(Zuan-Kuo Liu) 한국관세학회 2007 관세학회지 Vol.8 No.4
This paper researches the development and change courses of chinese safeguard system. Then, it reveals some differences and common feature between the safeguard arrangements of WTO and chinese safeguard system. The chinese safeguard system has a lot of something in common compared with the safeguard arrangements of WTO through some revision process during the last decades. Finally, it investigates some troublesome retaliatory measures of chinese safeguard system and proposes a few useful developmental courses for the system. Chinese government should consider some revisional courses such as loosening the invocation requirement of chinese safeguard measures when they revise the chinese safeguard system.
유찬확(Zuan Kuo Liu),박석재(Suk Jae Park) 한국무역연구원 2015 무역연구 Vol.11 No.2
This paper intends to study the differences on global market entry strategies of Korean and Chinese logistics companies. Results show that there are two major differences in global market entry motivation and government policy between both countries. The motivation of Korean logistics companies include constructing a global network, decreasing rate of return owing to keen competition in the domestic market, and developing resources. On the other hand, the motivation of logistics companies in China are securing overseas markets, constructing a global network, and improving international competitiveness. In addition, there are some differences in the global market entry policy between both countries. The law or system in relation to global market entry of Korean logistics companies is more previous and systematic than that of China. Entrepreneurs and governmental officials in China should analyze more the laws and policies governing logistics in Korea and benchmark against the success model of Korean logistics companies.
윤충원(Chung-Weon Yoon),유찬확(Zuan-Kuo Liu) 한국국제상학회 2008 國際商學 Vol.23 No.3
The aims of this paper are to search the status and the improving ways of curriculums of international trade department(major) in Korean universities. To attain these aims, this paper is composed of the environment changes influenced on the recent education of international trade, the status and problems of curriculum of international trade department in Korean universities, global trade experts incubating programs supported by Korean government for several universities, the problems and reform measures of the curriculum in future.<BR> As result of this study, the authors’ opinion is that Korean universities have to unify the name of a large number of curriculums by preparing the standardized curriculum, taking part in the activities of Korea Institute for Accreditation of International Trade Education which is established last year, and strengthening practical education in international trade department(major) of universities.
중국에 대한 외국인직접투자의 기술파급 효과 요인에 관한 실증분석
최백렬 ( Baek Yul Choi ),맹경뢰 ( Qing Lei Meng ),유찬확 ( Zuan Kuo Liu ) 한국국제통상학회 2011 국제통상연구 Vol.16 No.4
본 연구에서는 중국 국내기업과 외국인투자기업이 상호작용하는 패널 연립방 정식을 이용한 2SLS 시스템 분석방법을 통해 외국인직접투자기업의 중국내 기술 파급효과에 대해 실증분석을 행하였다. 분석결과를 요약하면 첫째, 경쟁관계에 의한 기술파급효과는 정의 상관관계를 보이고 있어 외국인투자기업과 국내기업과의 경쟁이 심할수록 기술파급효과는 크다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 둘째, 자본집약도의 경우에는 정의 상관관계를 나타내고 있어 중국 국내기업의 자본집약도가 높을수록 노동생산성이 증가한다는 것을 의미한다. 셋째, 인적자본 규모에 따른 기술파급효과는 예상과 달리 부의 상관관계를 보이고 있는데 이러한 이유는 중국의 고급 기술 인력이 그들이 속한 기업의 성취도에 크게 기여하지 못하기 때문으로 판단된다. 넷째, 기업규모변수는 예상한 바와 정의 상관관계가 나타내고 있어 기업규모가 확대됨에 따라 기술습득능력이 개선되어 국내기업의 노동생산성도 향상되는 것으로 판단된다. 다섯째, 기술격차의 경우 예상 부호와 같이 부의 상관관계를 나타내고 있어 외국인투자기업과 중국 국내기업의 기술격차가 큰 경우 기술파급효과는 낮음을 알수 있었다. 마지막으로 외국기업의 국내시장 개입정도는 정의 상관관계를 나타내고 있어 외국인투자기업이 중국내 시장에서의 비중이 높을수록 중국내 기술파급효과는 더 높이 나타남을 알 수 있었다 This paper implemented the empirical analysis on technology spillover effects of foreign direct investment within China through 2SLS system method. It uses panel simultaneous equations with interacting domestic firms of China and foreign firms. The empirical results are summarized as follows. First, competition and technology spillover effect has a positive relationship. It implies that the more competition between China`s firms and foreign firm is, the more significant technology spillover effect has. Second, capital intensity and technology spillover effect has a positive relationship. It means that as firms increase their capital intensity, labor productivity increases as well. Third, the size of human capital and technology spillover effect has an unexpected negative relationship. The reason seems that high skilled labors of China do not contribute to their firms` achievement. Fourth, the size of firms shows an expected positive sign. It suggests that the improved ability of technique acquirement by expanding the size of firms causes to increase their labor productivity. Fifth, technology gap and its spillover effect has an expected positive relationship. In other word, technology spillover effect is low when there exists large technology gap betwe en foreign and domestic firms of China. Finally, the higher domestic market share of foreign firms and technology spillover effect has a positive relationship. It implies that as foreign firms have the higher market share in China, technology spillover effect has the stronger impact.