RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        현행범인 체포제도의 비교법적 고찰

        유동하,한종욱 원광대학교 경찰학연구소 2020 경찰학논총 Vol.15 No.1

        The Supreme Court of our nation continues to demand four requirements for the arrest of criminals. They are the possibility of punishment for action, temporal adhesion of crime, obviousness of crime and criminals, and the need for arrest. However, the legal principle that the need for arrest among the requirements for legality is necessary for arrest, which is all current crimes, has made the on-site police officer hesitant to enforce the law. I think the weak enforcement of public law now derives from the legal principles of the Supreme Court. Therefore, the Supreme Court should distinguish stopped current offenders from ongoing current ones. The former(stopped spot offenders) must be established a legal principle that the need for arrest becomes a legal requirement, but the latter(ongoing spot offenders) is not. Stopped spot offenders are current offenders who stop the crimes just before a police officer is commissioned to the scene or stop further crimes after a police officer arrives at the scene. On-going spot offenders refers to current offenders who do not stop violence and other crimes even when a police officer is commissioned to the scene, or obstructs the execution of official duties by transferring the target of violence to a police officer. For the Daejeon police, 10 percent of the current offenders in 2017 were obstruction of justice. The fact that obstruction of justice accounts for a large proportion of the current offenders means that their public power has weakened, and that those who do not need to be booked are being booked and punished. The reason why an arbitrary companion or a spot arrestee in many crime scenes is because there is no immediate identity verification at the scene. Identifying them on the spot reduces the real need for a spot arrest and stops the violence. Therefore, the National Assembly should legislate an identity verification clause in the Criminal Procedure Act. Although there is a "request" clause in the resident registration law for identity verification from police, the target is limited to "criminal" and there is no mandatory provision for refusal of identity verification. Most of the current arrests are subject to summary orders. The court does not review the requirements for the legality of an arrest in the event of an summary order. The court reviews the requirements for the need for arrest only after the defendant filed a formal appeal. Therefore, the court should notify the police officer of the reason if the police officer's current capture is illegal, even if the order is informal, because a considerable number of police officers believe that the requirements for arrest are not in the law and are actually unnecessary. On the contrary, many police officers believe that arrest is necessary even to prevent further crimes. Comparatively speaking, the expansion of the law on the face of American police officers and reasons for exceptions. Among them, the fact that domestic violent crimes are managed so that they can be arrested even if they are not face-to-face criminals by police officers is something that Korea should also consider, the identification provisions of Germany and France, and the expansion of the reason for Japan's arrest of petty crimes are thought to have great implications for us. Hopefully, the Supreme Court will make the current law on the need for arrest a reality, and the National Assembly is eager to legislate the identification verification clause in the Criminal Procedure Act like Germany and France. If the law is realized and legislated, the use of police physical force could be lowered by one notch, and the number of arbitrary actions or current criminal arrests would be significantly reduced. 우리 대법원은 현행범인 체포의 요건으로 행위의 가벌성, 범죄의 현행성·시간적 접착성, 범인과 범죄의 명백성 그리고 체포의 필요성 등 4가지 요건을 요구한다. 이 중에서도 특히 체포의 필요성이 현장경찰관의 법집행에 가장 큰 영향을 미치는데, 모든 현행범에 체포의 필요성을 요구하는 법리가 공권력 약화를 초래하고 있다. 적정한 공권력 행사를 위해 경찰관이 현장에 임장한 상태에서도 폭력 등 범행을 중지하지 않거나 경찰관에게 폭력을 가하는 현행범인(‘진행형 현행범인’)에 대해서는 ‘체포의 필요성’을 의제하는 법리가 마련되어야 한다. 또한, 불필요한 공권력 행사를 줄이기 위해 형사소송법상 ‘신원확인’ 조항 입법이 필요하다. 현장에서 즉각적으로 신원확인이 이뤄지지 않기 때문인 범행이 중단된 후에도 현행범인 체포가 이뤄지는 경우가 많다. 주민등록법에 경찰에게 신원확인 요구 조항이 있기는 하나, 신원확인 거부 시 어떠한 강제조항도 없는 실정이다. 잘못된 공권력 행사를 바로잡기 위한 법원의 사후통제 강화도 필요하다. 법원은 정식재판에서만 체포의 필요성을 검토하고 약식명령 시에는 검토하지 않는다. 경찰의 현행범인 체포사건 대부분이 약식명령 대상에 해당한다. 실효적 통제를 위해 법원의 약식명령 시에도 위법한 체포에 대해서는 그 사유를 경찰에 통보할 필요가 있다. 비교법적으로 미국의 경찰관의 면전법칙과 예외사유의 확대, 그 중 가정폭력범죄는 경찰관의 면전범행이 아니더라도 체포할 수 있게 운용하는 점이 우리나라도 숙고해야 할 부분이다. 독일과 프랑스의 신원확인 가능조항, 일본의 경미범죄 체포사유의 확대 역시 우리에게 시사하는 바가 크다. 향후 우리나라도 법리의 현실화, 신원확인 조항 입법 및 법원의 사후통제 강화 등을 통해서 현행범인 체포 시 공권력의 과잉이나 위축 논란을 상당 부분 줄일 수 있을 것이다.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        Use of Cytochrome c Oxidase Subunit I (COI ) Nucleotide Sequences for Identification of the Korean Luciliinae Fly Species (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in Forensic Investigations

        박성환,유동하,정현주,유가영,정욱희,조태호,황적준,Yong Zhang,Huguo Piao 대한의학회 2009 Journal of Korean medical science Vol.24 No.6

        Blowflies, especially species belonging to the subfamily Luciliinae, are the first insects to lay eggs on corpses in Korea. Fast and accurate species identification has been a key task for forensic entomologists. Because conventional morphologic identification methods have many limitations with respect to forensic practice, molecular methods have been proposed to identify fly species of forensic importance. To this end, the authors amplified and sequenced the full length of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene of the Luciliinae fly species collected in Korea. The results showed the COI sequences are instrumental in identifying Luciliinae fly species. However, when compared with previously reported data, considerable inconsistencies were noted. Hemipyrellia ligurriens data in this study differed significantly from two of the five pre-existing data. Two closely related species, Lucilia illustris and Lucilia caesar, showed an overlap of COI haplotypes due to four European sequences. The results suggest that more individuals from various geographic regions and additive nuclear DNA markers should be analyzed, and morphologic identification keys must be reconfirmed to overcome these inconsistencies.

      • KCI등재

        효과적으로 기부를 받기 위한 인간형 로봇의 외형 디자인 및 행동에 관한 연구

        엄윤설,송현종,김이택,민인준,유동하,한재권 한국로봇학회 2019 로봇학회 논문지 Vol.14 No.3

        Robot ALICE@ERICA is a service robot developed to receive donations and to provide information services. ALICE@ERICA stands for Artificial Learning Intelligence robot for Culture and Entertainment at ERICA. In order to achieve the specific purpose of receiving donations, proper appearance design, appropriate movement and good communication skills are required in terms of HRI. In this paper, we introduce three strategies for developing robots to receive donations effectively. The first is to design a robot that makes people feel intimacy, the second is to approach only one of several people as a donor, and finally the donor communicates with video contents and voice recognition. A survey was conducted on the person who showed the reaction after the robot donated money in public places. Based on the survey results, it is proved that the method presented in this study effectively contributed to fund raising. If robots can perform actions that require high level of HRI, such as donation, robots can contribute more to human society. We hope that this study contributes to the improvement of human happiness.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼