日照權侵害에 관한 私法的 救濟

徐海溶 한국환경법학회 2004 環境法 硏究 Vol.26 No.1

Human beings can not but take an inborn interest in the environment as the demand for a comfortable life in order to have a normal daily life. A certain level of sunshine and view is required that has recently been emphasized in the urban life as this representative right to living environment. But with the phenomenon of high industrialization and urbanization the gravitation of the population towards cities and the phenomenon of high-rise and dense buildings have continued to cause the sunshine interruption problem to the human comfortable daily life. Especially, in case the great population is densely living in the narrow national land like Korea, the problem of the infringement of the right to enjoy sunshine can not but appear remarkable with the construction of high-rise buildings arising from efficient land use. The the legal problem of properly coordinating the clash from the claims of preserving the efficient use of national land as well as preserving the right to enjoy sunshine in accordance with the qualitative improvement of the living environment has thus far become problematic. In spite of the corresponding public-law restrictions, judicial relief for the infringement of the right to enjoy sunshine has in reality thus far poor. Accordingly, this study attempted to examine the problem of whether the infringement of the right to enjoy sunshine from the efficient use and adjustment of land can be acknowledged as the judicial relief and through what legal construction the damage of property and personality from its infringement can be relieved in such a case.

離婚時의 財産分割請求權

徐海溶 건국대학교 1991 法大論叢 Vol.2 No.1

獨逸에 있어서의 成年後見制度 : 改正法의 槪要와 特質 Der Auszug und das Charakteristikum des Verbesserungsrechts

서해용 건국대학교 1995 대학원 학술논문집 Vol.41 No.-

In Inhalts dieser Manuskriptes, Der bei 1990 reformieret und zu 1992 der Kraft bleiben das System vom Mundegkeitsvormundschsft beobachtet in dem Deutschland. Bei dem reformierte System vom Mundegkeitsvormundschaft um allgemein Merkmal sehende die ju¨ngst Zeit in gleichem Schritt in den Sozialsachlagesvera¨nderungs und dem hohe Alters in Sozial nach folge. Des hohes Alters behinderte personen Zunahmen in dem gesellschagtliche Bewuβt sein und Aberkennung in der Gescha¨ftsfa¨higkeits und System in dem Mundigkeitvor mundschaft zu dem Ofeiler Der die Steifheit aufgaben. Auf diese Sachlage die neue Bestimmungrecht nach die System vom behinderte Personsschutzs in dem Zivilrechts vereinheitlichen werden. Das Dazwischen in der Recht einzellen Rinzelfall sich trete, in Falle der Not auf dem Schra¨nken. Auch, Die Grenzen druch den Notwendig einerseits der Grund individualle Betreuung des Betreuter die Fa¨higkeit hochachten. Besonders, in bezug auf den eigner Ko~rpersbetreuung nach dem Bormundschaftsgericht die versta¨rkte Verwaltungen die Richtung aufstellten. Diese Inhalt zusammengenommen, die Abschaffungen der Gescha¨ftesfa¨higkeitsaberkenzung des Urteils und das neue Betreuungsysteme ein fu¨hrungende den Charaktere des Individum in die h chstgrenzen Richung hochachten. Das Recht zu den reformierte Point die Bedeutung sein.

再婚禁止期間의 合憲性

徐海溶 건국대학교 1997 학술논문집 : 건국대 대학원 Vol.45 No.1

Das alle Volkes nach die menschenliche Wu¨de und den werte besetzen, das besitzen das Rechte nach die Glu¨cklichkeit forschen. Auch, das alle Volkes gleichheiten yorher das Gesetzes, jeder nicht den Geschlechte und die Religion oder ihn die sozialstellung bebinen den unterschied erleiden. Obgleich immer noch der Mann und die Frau von veischdeden die gesetzlichbehandlung ihn den Fa¨11e ist. Zwischen dem Mann und der Frau von verschieden sollst die gesetzlichebehandlung allerlei sein. Der gegenstand des Studiums die Dissertation des Muster sollst die betreffend Frau in liegen die Verfassungs ma¨ßigkeitder Widerverheiratungsverbotfrist der Anordung sein. In Details sollen unten gegeben werden. In der allgemeinen Chronik zu dieser Zeit war ihn entwickelend der Warterfristbestu-mmung, die letzte Zeit indes Japan nehmen einer Diskussion auf der Wtrterfrist der Theorie und so weiter die Tendenz die Wirhung urteilen die U¨berpru¨fung vermeiden die vatervermuing die Verdoppelung haben im allgemeunen so ein Bestimmung nicht fu¨r angemessen sollst ab gin Gesetz schaffen.

數人이 채권의 일부씩을 代位辨濟한 경우에 있어서의 配當順位

서해용 한국민사법학회 2007 民事法學 Vol.35 No.-

遺留分算定에 관한 考察

徐海溶 건국대학교 1998 학술논문집 : 건국대 대학원 Vol.48 No.1

Under the private property system, an individual's right to dispose of property freely is guaranted such a freedom of property disposalapplies not only to disposal in life, bur also to one after the death, showing etself as the principle of the predecessor's freedom of will. But it is feared that the abuse of predecessor's right to dispose of property is apt to land the family of the deceased in poverty. The lefal portion of an heir is a system aiming to protect surviving families from predecessor's arbitrary disposal of property. It is a system that secures a heritage in the fixed ratio of one's legal portion for a successor by restriction predecessor's freedom of property disposal by will. Our country did not have the legal portion of an heir before 1977, and established thd system through partial amendment of the Civil law in 1977 . but there are only 7 provisions on a legal portion of an heir which are difficult to handle the complex matter of the legal portion of an heir. Also the partial amendment of the Civil law in 1990 caused new problems with regard to the calculation of the legal portion of an heir, about which no hot debate has been developed. This dissertatoin tried to explore the proper method of calculation the legal portion of an heir by looking into problems with regard to the calculation of the legal portion of an heir. I have efforts on reasonable interpretation with reference to loopholes of legislation in calculation the legal portion of an heir. Though our Civil law has fewer provisions on the legal portion of an heir compared with other legislative examples, we must not follow the interprtation of other countries' civil law, thereby avoding interpretation confliting with our Civil law and trying to present corret interpretation.

抵當權의 效力의 範圍 : 民法 第358條를 中心으로

徐海溶 건국대학교 1998 학술논문집 : 건국대 대학원 Vol.46 No.1

Wie oben gesagt, Der Schlu?? des Ausland mit der Gesetzgebungsgewohnheit der U¨berpru¨fungs und der Augemessenheitsware sein, Der reichende Bereich die Hypothekendwirkung ist die Angemessienheitsware und der Zubeho¨r reichen. In Ru¨cksicht einer Sache, in diese Manuskript der reichende Bereich die Hypothekendwirkung ist entsprechende in dem Genitive gegeben sein. Die reichende Bereich der Hypothekendswirkung ist gleich in der reichende Bereing dem Genitivswirkung beurteiln. Aber in der Aufgabe der Hypotheksverwirklungs in diese soweit von der Erweiterung bis die Beschra¨nkung reichlichen sein. In dieser Beziehung das Pfandrecht und des teleolgical Besitzer in Einklang das komplizierte Interesse bringen, in der heutig Hypothek fu¨r den verwirklichen Zweck das Leben nur wenn die Lo¨sungen ist. Besonders, nach der Vera¨nderung der Wirtschaftsflage auch der Aufgabe der Hypotheksverwirklungs allma¨hlich erweitem werden. zusammen soweit auch der Zivilrechtsanalysis habe die Vera¨nderungs werden sein. Nach arch die Aufgabe der Hypotheksverwirklungs die Situationed und wirtschafted Vera¨nderungs in Verbindung mit dem haben werden.

環境侵害에 있어서의 私法的 救濟 : 소음·진동피해를 중심으로

서해용 한국환경법학회 2004 環境法 硏究 Vol.26 No.2

The surrounding environment, the key element for man to lead a human life, can be divided into the natural environment and the artificially formed living environment. The natural environment is referred to as every ecosystem of nature including all the living organisms underground, on the surface(including the sea) and above ground and the non-biological things surrounding them, whereas the living environment means the artificial environment related to people's daily life such as air, water, noise, vibration, odor, sunlight, waste product and the like. Because these environments are the indispensable element for man to lead a healthy and safe life, every people should be equally treated in using those environments. But in relation to the problem of invasion on the environment, the human inborn right in the process of industrialization and urbanization, the technologies for environmental protection have been developed and the legal measures have been reinforced and expanded for environmental invasion. Judicial relief, the general after-the-fact relief measure for this environmental invasion, has been first developed. Public-law regulations on precaution at the dimension of active and efficient regulation has tended to be reinforced. This study attempted to examine the problem of compensation for damages through conciliation and arbitration with a focus on the cases of judicial relief for such representative environmental invasion as damage from noise and vibration arising from the process of redevelopment and rebuilding for the improvement of residential life found in the process of urbanization for resolving the gravitation of the population toward cities.

住宅賃借人의 對抗力의 問題點과 改善方案 : 법 제3조 제1항의 개정을 중심으로

서해용(徐海溶) 한국민사법학회 2003 民事法學 Vol.23 No.-

경매에 있어서의 소액임차인의 악용에 따른 문제점과 개선방안

서해용(Seo, hae yong) 강원대학교 비교법학연구소 2016 江原法學 Vol.47 No.-

민법의 특례를 인정해 주택임대차보호법이 시행되면서 임차인은 등기가 없는 경우에도 주택의 인도와 주민등록을 마친 때에는 대항요건을 취득하고 다음날부터 제3자에 대항할 수 있다. 대항요건과 계약서상의 확정일자를 구비하면 보증금에 대한 우선변제권도 행사할 수 있다. 또한 사회정책적인 약자인 소액임차인을 보호하기 위해서 경매신청 등기 전에 대항요건을 갖추면 담보물권자보다 우선하여 보증금 중 일정액을 최우선변제 받을 수 있다. 그러나 이러한 소액임차인 보호조항이 법 시행 당시의 취지에 부합하지 않게 경매나 공매에 있어서 이러한 사실을 잘 알고 있는 임대인이나 중개업자가 주택임대차보호법 제8조 제1항의 경매신청의 등기 전의 조항을 악용하여 친 · 인척이나 지인들을 이용하여 가장임차인을 양산하고 있다. 이유는 소액임차인의 보증금 중 일정액의 최우선변제의 요건이 경매신청 등기 전에 대항요건만 갖추면 되고 계약서상의 확정일자를 필요로 하지 않기 때문에 임의적인 임대차계약서를 작성해서 제출하고 있다. 이러한 경우 경매나 공매에 있어서 채권자나 다른 권리자의 이익을 해하는 결과로 나타나 사회적인 문제가 되고 있다. 이 조항은 신설할 당시 소액임차인이 법적으로 무지하다보니 임대차계약만 맺고 대항요건을 갖추지 않은 경우가 많아 경매에 있어서 임차인의 주거 안정을 침해하고 임차인의 전재산이라고 볼 수 있는 보증금이 전혀 보호되지 않은 사회적인 문제점이 있어서 신설된 조항이었다. 그러나 지금은 임대차보호법이 시행된 지가 30여년 이상 되었고 소액임차인일지라도 임대차계약과 더불어 대항요건을 갖추는 경우가 일반적이다. 오히려 이 조항을 임대인이나 중개업자가 악용하는 경우가 오히려 많아지고 있는 것이 현실이다. 따라서 본연의 소액임차인 보호 취지에 부합할 수 있고 임대인이나 중개업자의 악용을 방지하기 위해서 주택임대차보호법 제8조 제1항을 다음과 같이 개정해야 한다. 동법 조항 중 ‘주택에 대한 경매신청의 등기 전에’ 조항을 삭제하고 ‘임차인은 보증금 중 일정액을 다른 담보물권자보다 우선하여 변제받을 권리가 있다. 이 경우 임차인은 제3조 제1항의 요건을 갖추어야 한다’로 개정하여야 한다고 본다. The Housing Lease Protection Act is enacted and implemented for residential stability of tenants and recollection of deposit money approving the special case of Civil Law in housing lease. The main contents include the countervailing requirement that the tenant, when finished delivery and resident registration, can countervail against the 3rd party from the next day though with no registration. In addition, the residential stability of tenants and recollection of deposit money are guaranteed by allowing even implementation of seniority in case of the fixed date prepared on the Lease Agreement. Also to protect small sum tenants, the social disadvantaged, a systematical device of small sum guaranty money was prepared to allow collecting a fixed money within the fixed range of guaranty money earlier than other creditors. Requirements of this small sum guaranty money collection are delivery before auction application and the countervailing requirement of transfer of resident registration. If those requirements are satisfied, a fixed sum of guaranty money is protected. This small sum tenants protection system was on the purpose of securing the minimum residential space of small sum tenants centering around the guaranty money as the house lease was used mostly as charter at the early stage of implementation. However, many cases of small sum tenants were false that leaseholders or brokers, who are debtors, abuse them rather than protecting small sum tenants, and the value of house lowered. Accordingly, small sum tenants with excessive liabilities appeared a lot and conflicts from fraudulent behavior became a social issue. This cases of frequent abuse increased the application for dividend exclusion through creditor"s or the interested party" dividend profit in auction, and in the end rapidly increased lawsuit case that is not proper for the purpose of small sum tenant system. In reality, this abuse frequently disadvantages the prior rightful claimant, the successful bidder in auction or the interested party. In spite of these abuse cases, a systematical backup should be to improve the abuse cases appearing so far in maintaining the current small sum tenant system. As a plan of improvement, Article 8, Item 1 of the Housing Lease Protection Act should first be revised.