http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : question-answer pair analysis (검색결과 6 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
김은호(Kim, Eunho) 중앙어문학회 2017 語文論集 Vol.71 No.-
이 논문은 실제 상황과 유사한 자연스러운 대화에서 나타나는 질문에 대한 자가 응답 전략의 상호작용적 의미와 기능을 살펴보는 것을 목표로 한다. 질문과 응답은 서로 다른 화자에 의해 발화되는 것이 일반적인 인접쌍이다. 그러나 일상 대화 상황에서 질문을 제기한 화자가 그 질문에 스스로 응답하는 경우를 종종 볼 수 있다. 본 논문은 이렇게 한국어 질문과 응답이 한 명의 화자에 의해 이루어지는 경우 즉, 스스로 묻고 답하는 현상에 대해 살펴본다. 대화분석의 방법론을 사용하여 질문-응답 인접쌍에 대해 살펴보고 대화 자료를 분석하여 그 맥락과 기능을 밝혔다. 분석 결과, 자가 질문-응답 인접쌍은 대화 참여자들이 서로의 의견을 주고 받는 문맥에서 상대방의 주장에 대한 반대 의견을 제시하는 사용되는 전략으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 대화에 대한 미시적 분석을 통해 대화 참여자가 자신의 의견을 주장할 때 사용하는 의사소통 전략의 하나를 파악하였다. 또한 본고의 연구 결과는 사회적 상호작용에서 의사소통의 목표가 어떻게 이해, 표현, 협상되는지에 대한 이해를 확장시켰다는 것에 의의가 있다. This paper examines the use of question and self-answer adjacency pairs in ordinary Korean conversations. Analysis of 28 cases of question and self-answer adjacency pairs in the current data set found a routine practice in the use of question and self-answer adjacency pairs— disagreeing about other members’ prior stance. In other words, the speaker uses the question and self-answer adjacency pair as a resource to make disagreement. The analysis shows that the participants deploy three major practices in their turn of question and self-answer: providing evidence in their arguments, counter-challenging through specifying their arguments, and strong opposition through the use of multiple questions and self-answer. The unique design of question and self-answer adjacency pairs allows Korean speakers to strategically present delicate action of disagreement. Through enacting disagreement in particular in a question and self-answer format, the speakers are able to display their oppositional stance of disagreement in an effective way. The findings of this study expand our understanding of the intricate tactics involved in making disagreements in conversations.
-
Connectivity Effects and Questions as Specificational Subjects
( Eun Jung Yoo ) 한국언어정보학회 2006 언어와 정보 Vol.10 No.2
Connectivity effects have been central issues in dealing with specificational pseudoclefts. While syntactic approaches motivate their analysis in order to explain connectivity effects in terms of a connected clause, these accounts have numerous problems including a wide range of anti-connectivity effects that constitutes crucial counterevidence. On the other hand, semantic accounts of connectivity effects treat BV and BT connectivity by independent interpretive mechanisms, providing a more fundamental explanation for connectivity effects. Yet existing semantic accounts have limitations in explaining syntactic properties and syntactic connectivity effects in SPCs, and in accounting for BV anti-connectivity effects in English. Focusing on BV connectivity, this paper explores how the relevant (anti-)connectivity facts can be accounted for by an analysis that provides both an elaborate syntactic analysis of SPCs and a semantic mechanism for bound anaphora. Based on Yoo`s (2005) non-deletion based, question-answer pair analysis of SPCs, this paper shows that a functional question analysis of a specificational subject, when combined with a theory of operator scope and a non-configurational condition on bound anaphora, can explain various BV (anti-)connectivity patterns in SPCs and related constructions. (Seoul National University)
-
Connectivity Effects and Questions as Specificational Subjects
Yoo, Eun-Jung Korean Society for Language and Information 2006 언어와 정보 Vol.10 No.2
Connectivity effects have been central issues in dealing with specificational pseudoclefts. While syntactic approaches motivate their analysis in order to explain connectivity effects in terms of a connected clause, these accounts have numerous problems including a wide range of anti-connectivity effects that constitute crucial counterevidence. On the other hand, semantic accounts of connectivity effects treat BV and BT connectivity by independent interpretive mechanisms providing a more fundamental explanation for connectivity effects. Yet existing semantic accounts have limitations in explaining syntactic properties and syntactic connectivity effects in SPCs, and in accounting for BV anti-connectivity effects in English. Focusing on BV connectivity, this paper explores how the relevant (anti-)connectivity facts can be accounted for by an analysis that provides both an elaborate syntactic analysis of SPCs and a semantic mechanism for bound anaphora. Based on Yoo's (2005) non-deletion based, question-answer pair analysis of SPCs, this paper shows that a functional question analysis of a specificational subject, when combined with a theory of operator scope and a non-configurational condition on bound anaphora, can explain various BV (anti-)connectivity patterns in SPCs and related constructions.
-
-
-
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
