http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
GOVERNANCE AND POLICY PERFORMANCE IN KOREA
이연호,임유진 경남대학교 극동문제연구소 2010 ASIAN PERSPECTIVE Vol.34 No.3
With the successful economic development of the East Asian tigers, it has been taken for granted that insulating the policy process from social influences results in better policy outcomes. However, empirical studies conducted since the 1990s on both developing and developed countries cast doubt on this assumption. Instead, good governance has emerged as an alternative to enhance the government’s policy outcomes and engineer sustainable development, which is defined as the formal and informal institutions in which the state, market,and civil society form an egalitarian network to make and implement policies in a democratic and transparent manner. The three variables of the governance model—namely, social trust, local governance, and transparent and open policymaking—could enhance the policy process in the era of democratization. Using a case study of the Korean government’s selection process for finding a radioactive waste repository site, the authors empirically show that the governance approach generates successful policy outcomes in the era of democratization.
Labor and Politics in East Asia: The Case of Failure of the Encompassing Labor Organization in Korea
이연호,정석규,장해현 경남대학교 극동문제연구소 2008 ASIAN PERSPECTIVE Vol.32 No.3
Olsonian theory supposes that when labor unions are organized in an encompassing manner at the industrial and national levels, they can better prevent collective action problems and bring about more stable industrial relations. This theory regards the encompassing labor organization as a positive institution. However, the Korean case shows that the institutionalized tripartite talk did not contribute to establishing stable. In some respects, the situation only became worse. The proposition of the encompassing organization of labor holds only a weak theoretical and empirical relevance, at least in the case of Korea. The Korean case suggests that the optimistic propositions of encompassing organizations of labor need a careful reassessment.