민선단체장 이후 주민참여제도의 운영실태분석 - 부천시 , 평택시 , 안성군 사례를 중심으로 -

하혜수,양기용 ( Hyue Su Ha,Gi Yong Yang ) 한국지방자치학회 1998 한국지방자치학회보 Vol.10 No.2

사드 배치의 수용성 결정요인 분석: 구조방정식모형의 활용

하혜수(Hyue-Su Ha),우남규(Sang-Woo Seok),석상우(Nam-Kyu Woo) 한국지방행정학회 2021 한국지방행정학보 (KLAR) Vol.18 No.1

본 연구는 사드 배치를 둘러싸고 격렬한 대립과 분쟁을 경험한 성주지역 주민들을 대상으로 인식조사를 실시하여 사드 배치의 수용성에 영향을 미치는 요인을 탐색하였다. 이론과 선행연구에 입각하여 분석모형을 구성하고 이해관계, 인식틀, 그리고 한국적 특수성인 응어리가 수용성에 미치는 효과를 분석하였다. 분석 결과 이해관계, 인식틀, 응어리의 3가지 요인이 수용성에 유의한 영향을 미치며, 그 중에서 응어리가 가장 큰 영향을 미친다는 사실을 확인하였다. 사드배치에 대한 주민의 수용성은 지역의 손익이나 정부 신뢰보다 가슴에 쌓인 울분과 분노에 의해 더 좌우될 수 있다는 것이다. 이러한 연구 결과 이론적 관점에서 가치, 신념, 이해관계, 신뢰성을 중시하는 서구 중심의 수용성 이론에서 한국문화의 특수성인 응어리를 고려한 이론의 확장가능성을 시사 받을 수 있다. 그 다음 실천적 관점에서 원전과 사드 배치 등의 국책사업 추진시 지역의 피해를 보상하거나 정부의 신뢰를 회복하는 조치 못지않게 주민들의 분노, 울화, 좌절 등과 같은 응어리를 해소하는 과정에 초점을 두어야 한다는 사실을 시사 받을 수 있다. The purpose of this paper is to explore the determinants of public acceptance through the survey of SungJu county residents who have been suffered from the THAAD deployment. This paper analyzed the effect of interests, conceptual frame, hard feelings on public acceptance through the structural equation model. The results of this analysis showed that interests, conceptual frame, and hard feelings have a significant negative effect on public acceptance, especially hard feelings embedded in Korean culture have the most negative effect on acceptance. In theoretical aspects, the paper suggests that Western acceptance theories need to consider the hard feelings embedded in Korean culture as well as the value, personal beliefs, and interests. In practical aspects, the paper also proposes that Korean government should switch its focus from compensation for regional loss and trust building with residents to the dissolution of hard feeling such as individual resentment and anger in siting the hazardous public facilities.

우리나라의 지방분권 수준은 왜 낮은가 : 지방분권가설에 관한 탐색적 연구

하혜수(Hyue-Su Ha) 한국지방행정학회 2020 한국지방행정학보 (KLAR) Vol.17 No.2

This Study aims at explaining the reason why Korea still remains low in the level of local decentralization from the perspectives of historical institutionalism, advocacy coalition framework, and collective action dilemma, and drawing a low devolution hypothesis(LDH) in Korea. First part of LDH is about a vicious circle that low local decentralization causes the lack of local self-governing capacity, and which consequently leads to the low devolution due to the drop in agenda-setting of decentralization by centralization coalition. Second one of LDH is a proposition that low local decentralization brings about a weak cohesiveness of decentralization coalition(collective action dilemma among local governments) caused by the disparity among local self-governing and the one-size-fits-all solutions to devolution, thereby producing a weak push for local decentralization. According to these hypotheses, this study suggested some alternatives to cope with the local self-governing capacity shortage, the logics of centralization coalition, and the collective action dilemma among local governments. 본 논문은 역사적 제도주의, 정책연합이론, 그리고 집단행동이론을 동원하여 우리나라 지방분권 수준이 낮은 이유를 설명하고, 이를 기초로 낮은 지방분권 수준에 관한 가설을 도출하였다. 첫째, 낮은 지방분권 수준이 지방정부의 자치역량 저하를 초래하고, 이는 중앙집권연대를 강화하여 지방분권의제의 채택률을 낮춰 지방분권의 추진을 저해함으로써 낮은 지방분권으로 이어지는 악순환 구조를 만든다는 것이다. 둘째, 낮은 지방분권 수준은 지방정부의 자치역량 저하를 초래하고, 이는 지역맞춤형 정책추진을 저해하여 지방정부의 집단행동 실패를 포함한 지방분권연대의 응집력을 약화시켜 지방분권의 추진을 저해한다는 것이다. 이러한 가설에 따라 지방정부의 자치역량 강화, 중앙집권연대의 논리 극복, 그리고 지방분권연대의 응집력 강화를 위한 대안을 제시하였다.

특별시ㆍ광역시 자치구의 개편대안 연구

하혜수(Ha Hyue Su) 서울행정학회 2009 한국사회와 행정연구 Vol.20 No.2

The purpose of this paper is to examine the alternatives for the reorganization of autonomous district system in the Korean metropolitan cities in perspective of the self-governing competence. The reorganization proposals discussed by earlier studies can be summarized as following: (1) marginal change of functional relations between the metropolitan city government and district governments; (2) establishing new local entities equal to city governments; (3) replacing autonomous districts with administrative districts; (4) consolidation of autonomous districts. The paper attempts to evaluate those proposals in terms of metropolitan competitiveness and administrative efficiency, deep disparity and inequality among autonomous districts, autonomy and financial sufficiency of autonomous districts, and citizen self-government and participation. The result shows that both the establishing new local entities and the consolidation of autonomous districts is better than the others. Finally, the paper proposes we should adopt the consolidation of autonomous districts which are suffering from lack of self-sufficiency, regarding that it has higher political possibility of realization than the establishing new local entities.

지방소멸시대의 지방자치 재검토 - 다양화와 차등화 -

하혜수(Hyue-Su Ha) 한국지방행정학회 2017 한국지방행정학보 (KLAR) Vol.14 No.2

The purpose of this study is to examine the problems and alternatives of the local autonomy congruent with an era of local extinction in Korea. There has been a big gap among local governments in Korea in terms of population and fiscal capacity since 1995 Whereas Suwon city has a population of over a million and a high level of financial independence, Yeongyang county has a population of less than twenty thousand and relatively low financial independence. This gap is supposed to be widened increasingly in the near future. This paper reviews diversification and differentiation as a possible solution to the demographic cliff and the local lapse. The paper suggests that diversification of local autonomy can be achieved by adopting local institutions by referendum, the new-typed governance of the autonomous districts in metropolitan cities, and testing town-meeting system in small counties. It suggests that differentiation of local autonomy can be realized by differentiating decentralization on the basis of local culture, limiting the autonomy of small local governments, and enhancing the special status of large cities.

신공공관리론적 지방행정개혁의 성과평가

하혜수 ( Hyue Su Ha ),정정화 ( Jeong Wha Jeong ) 한국지방자치학회 2004 한국지방자치학회보 Vol.16 No.1

도시정부의 ' 삶의 질 ' 결정요인분석

하혜수 ( Hyue Su Ha ) 한국행정학회 1996 韓國行政學報 Vol.30 No.2

지리적 분산이 정책결정의 질에 미치는 영향 분석: 세종시 이전 사례를 중심으로

하혜수 ( Ha Hyue-su ),김철회 ( Kim Cheol-hol ) 한국지방행정연구원 2018 地方行政硏究 Vol.32 No.2

This study analyzed how the geographic dispersion of central government departments influenced on the decision quality in public policy-making. We divided sub-variables of geographic dispersion into face-to-face contact, time pressure, and group discussion, and policy typology into routine policy, non-routine policy, and multi-departmental policy on the theoretical basis. To find out impacts of geographic dispersion on decision quality, we carried out mainly in-depth interview with directors and heads of the departments who play the key role in public policy-making. The analysis results are as followings. First, in cases of routine policy the impacts of geographic dispersion were insignificant, because government has overcome the troubles through the practical use of electronic approval and SNS. Second, in cases of non-routine policy the geographic dispersion had the negative impacts on the decision quality by the decreased opportunities of face-to-face contact and group discussions, but the increased time pressure to review. Third, in cases of multi-departmental policy the geographic dispersion also had the negative impacts on the decision quality due to increased time pressure and work overload of high-rank officials. Finally, we suggested that Korean government have to search the alternatives to cope that problem since the geographic dispersion decreased the accuracy and timeliness of public policy-making.

중앙과 지방간 사드 배치 갈등 분석 : 협상론적 시각에서

하혜수 ( Ha Hyue-su ),석상우 ( Seok Sang-woo ) 한국지방행정연구원 2019 地方行政硏究 Vol.33 No.3

The purpose of this paper is to examine the conflict process on the THAAD(Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) between Ministry of National Defense(MND) and Seongju Gun(SJ) from a negotiation theoretic perspective. We selected four criteria for analysis, three of which are real interests, objective criteria, and creative options considered to be important in win-win negotiations, and the other one is anger-dissolving unique to Korean culture. According to the analysis, first, MND and SJ did not focus on mutual underlying interests, but clung to their own demands or positions. In case of the THAAD Site, they never paid attention to the other party’s interests, namely, damage minimization of SJ and military utility of MND. Second, they did not apply the objective criteria to coordinate their conflicting interests. For example, MND opened the measurements of electromagnetic wave from foreign THAAD sites without considering the SJ’ demand. Third, MND moved the THAAD Site from Seongsan battery to Seongju country club, but failed to dissolve the anger of residents due to the lack of warm-hearted apology and corrective action. Finally, they did not seek creative options to meet their conflicting interests, thereby the conflict still remains unresolved.

지방정부의 자율성수준 측정에 관한 연구 - 지방공무원의 주관적 인식을 중심으로 -

하혜수(Hyue Su Ha) 한국지방자치학회 2001 韓國地方自治學會報 Vol.13 No.3

The purpose of this article is to measure the level of local government autonomy by focusing on the perspective of the local civil service. Local government autonomy can be defined as the freedom to exercise choice in local policy-making and the capacity to influence the well-being of local residents. To measure the local government autonomy, this study performs a survey, which is answered by 930 local employees of 12 local governments, Based on the results of the survey, this study has the following findings; First, the survey suggests that we should try to decrease central constraints and exempt local governments from central control in order to enlarge the local government autonomy. Most of the local civil service admitted the existence of the central control such as rules and regulations, informal advices, and financial control. Second, the survey also suggests that differential decentralization is a promising way to increase the local government autonomy. This kind of decentralization system is to provide the capable localities with more discretion and power than the less capable localities. But it is essential to develop the renewed performance indicators for thus system to be successful. Because some ill-performance localities can resist the evaluation results by central government and consequent low-devolution. Therefore, we should design the evaluative mechanism which make the system work effectively.