http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
최정신,Choi, Jung-Shin 한국주거학회 2008 한국주거학회 논문집 Vol.19 No.5
In Korea, a movement for forming intentional communities is gathering people's interests to improve individualistic living environment, and to create a humanistic lifestyle. However, it is difficult to say if its management is successful or not, because intentional community is just in the experimental stage in Korea. The purpose of this study is to identify actual condition of residents' participation in forming process, shared activities in their daily lives, residents' regulation, common facilities and its management in order to offer basic information for revitalization of intentional communities in Korea. 7 intentional communities including eco-friendly villages, religious communities and a cooperative housing community were collected as the study objects. Upon analysis, those communities were divided into two groups according to their purpose of establishment; "HC (Housing-life focused Community includes cooperative housing community and eco-friendly community)" and "IC (Ideology focused Community includes ideology community and religious community)" in order to identify difference in residents' participation between the two groups. In-dept interviews with representatives of 7 intentional communities by a structured questionnaire were used as study method. The findings of this study are as follows; In general, more active residents' participation is identified in ICs than in HCs. There is no common house, which is considered as essential in intentional community, in HCs, while it was facilitated in all ICs. Role of leader seems more important in ICs than in HCs. About the ownership of housing and land, private owned is common in HCs, while community owned is common in ICs. Shared activities and residents' regulations are evidently less in most HCs than in ICs. Furthermore, in order to run a community sustainable, it is crucial to encourage sense of community among residents, and developing common house and activity programs. Common house design, which can promote proactive residents' participation in shared activity should be studied fitted to Korean circumstances. Above all, proactive participation in the shared activities is one of the most important factors in intentional community.
한국인 50대의 노인용 코하우징 공유공간과 공동활동에 대한 선호 - 서울과 지방도시 간 차이 비교를 중심으로 -
최정신,Choi, Jung-Shin 한국주거학회 2007 한국주거학회 논문집 Vol.18 No.1
The aim of this paper is to find out different preference of common spaces and shared activities in senior cohousing community between regions in Korea: Seoul and other cities. Social survey was conducted nationwide and the respondents were 50s only, since they are the generation who will face to elderly housing subject within 10 years in turbulent Korean society. Collected data, about 1000, were analyzed by SPSS program using frequency, percentage, and Chi-square test. In summary, respondents mostly would like to move to senior cohousing on circumstance when they remain alone without big difference between regions. Loneliness and housekeeping were considered as the most difficult issues for the elderly to manage by themselves. Among common spaces, exercise room was the most preferred space to meeting room and kitchen. Exercise room was more preferred in Seoul than in other cities, on the contrary meeting room was evidently less preferred in other cities than in Seoul. Regarding shared activities, resident meeting, gardening, and common meal were revealed as less preferred activities than hobby exercise and tea meeting. As a conclusion, I would like to propose that a big common living room is better to be designed for meeting room cum dining and gathering room with flexibility in order to give residents chances to know each other more often. And since common space and shared activity show different preferences by regions, those are to be designed and planned reflecting region's different circumstance.
스웨덴과 덴마크 노인용 코하우징 주민의 생활만족도 비교
최정신,Choi, Jung-Shin 한국주거학회 2005 한국주거학회 논문집 Vol.16 No.6
There is an increasing curiosity in Nordic as well as Far East Asian countries about senior cohousing, where the middle-aged and elderly people, 55+. form a community for independent living. What are the ideas behind senior cohousins? Why are people moving to senior cohousing community? What may senior cohousing provide and mean for individuals and groups of the elderly? Is senior cohousing a sustainable idea for future generations of elderly people? There is a curiosity among elderly people looking for interesting alternatives. Municipalities and state authorities hope that senior cohousing can contribute to the welfare of the elderly as the scope far support by the public sector is decreasing. Actors in the building sector are interested In investment and meeting the demands. In Denmark and Sweden the senior cohousing concept had a revival around 1985. In Denmark there has been a vivid discussion and plenty of books have been published. In Sweden there are few evaluations but an increasing interest. From different points of view, Danish, Swedish and Nordic as well as Far East Asian countries, there is a concern to explore and compare to get more facts and deeper understanding far further actions. This is a comparative study of inhabitants' life satisfaction in cohousing communities in Denmark and Sweden. The study is based on discussions with cohousing providers, study-visits in cohousing communities and a questionnaire to residents themselves. Study-visits took place during springtime and the questionnaires were handled spring and summer of 2002. 655 seniors responded to the questionnaire from 14 seniorbofae llesskaber (rented or housing cooperatives) in Denmark, 11 seniorhus within the SABO sector (municipality owned housing with rental apartments) and 8 housing cooperatives initiated by the Seniorgarden Housing Company in Sweden. Data were analyzed by SPSS program, using frequency, percentage, cross-tab and chi-square test. This paper focused three major areas of interest; 1)characteristics of the inhabitants. 2) participation in common activities and mutual cooperation among residents and 3) evaluative outcomes from the inhabitants' points of view. Mainly the inhabitants expressed quite positive experiences of their living environment and everyday lift and a few difference was found in life satisfaction between Denmark and Sweden.
농촌 여성의 지역사회활동 참여 유형별 특성 및 교육프로그램 요구 분석
최정신(Choi, Jung-Shin),최윤지(Choi, Yoon-Ji),윤순덕(Yoon, Soon-Duck),김수림(Kim, Su-Rim),한송희(Han, Song-Hee) 대한관광경영학회 2017 觀光硏究 Vol.32 No.6
본 연구는 지역사회활동 참여 유형별 특성 및 교육프로그램 요구 분석을 통해 농촌 여성의 욕구에 부합한 지역사회활동 참여 교육프로그램의 개발 방향을 도출하고자 한다. 연구방법은 2016년 7월 22일부터 9월 28일까지 전국 여성농업인센터에서 추천 받은 농촌 여성 30명에 대해 직접 면담을 통한 심층면접을 실시하였다. 조사 내용은 참여자의 동의하에 녹취하여 문서로 자료화하고, 전사된 면접 자료를 통해 주요 중심 주제를 파악하였다. 그 결과 농촌 여성의 지역사회활동 참여 유형은 크게 교육활동, 지역주민활동, 봉사활동, 지역사회활동 결합, 지역사회활동 변화의 5유형으로 분류되었다. 또한, 농촌 여성이 원하는 지역사회활동 참여 프로그램은 지역사회활동 참여 연령 및 유형에 따라 가족문제 해소를 위한 상담·의사소통 중심의 자녀·가족 관련 교육, 양성평등 및 인문학 중심의 시민의식교육, 여성 리더십·6차산업 중심의 역량강화교육으로 도출되었다. This study aims to derive a set of education programs for rural women to participate in community activities in accordance with their needs. It has analyzed the characteristics of each community activity participation type and the demands of education programs. We conducted in-depth interviews with 30 rural women who were recommended by the National Women Farmers Center from July 22 to September 28, 2016. The contents of the survey were recorded with the consent of the participants and documented, and the major subject was identified through the transcribed interview data. As a result, the types of rural women s participation in community activities were classified into five types: educational activities, local residents activities, volunteer activities, combining community activities, and changing community activities. In addition, the rural community participation programs that rural women want are divided into as follow. They are: counseling to solve family problems according to the age and the type of community activity; education related to children and family centered on communication; citizenship education centered on gender equality and humanities education; female leadership; capacity building training centered on the 6th industry; and so on.