http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
지방공기업의 재정성과에 영향을 미치는 외부환경 요인에 관한 연구 -도시개발공사를 중심으로
전영준 ( Jun Yeong-jun ),곽선주 ( Kwak Sun-joo ) 한국자치행정학회 2017 한국자치행정학보 Vol.31 No.2
With local public enterprises` growing debts causing concerns for local finances, there is an increasing need for effective measures to improve the financial performance of local public enterprises. With this in mind, the present study has explored environmental factors influencing the financial performance of local public enterprises using panel data from 2006 to 2015 involving 16 Urban Development Corporations under Regional Governments in Korea. The study has found that the financial autonomy of local governments as a financial factor and the approval rating and political ideology of chief executive officers as a political factor have a statistically significant effect on the financial performance of Urban Development Corporations. In addition, the financial performance of other Urban Development Corporations as a legitimacy factor was also found to have a significant effect. Taken together, these results suggest that the financial performance of local public enterprises is affected not only by their internal organizational characteristics but also by their external environmental factors including their interaction with the host governments. The policy implications made by this study are clear: First of all, in the short term, institutional arrangements need to be in place to improve the decision-making capability of local chief executive officers and also strengthen legislative control over the government and its public enterprises. In the long term, it is necessary for local governments to provide local public enterprises with managerial discretion and political independence and instead make sure that they assume responsibility for their financial performance.
파괴면적지수법을 이용한 복합재료 기계적 체결부의 강도평가에 관한 연구
전영준 ( Jeon Yeong Jun ),최진호 ( Choe Jin Ho ),권진회 ( Kwon Jin Hoe ) 한국복합재료학회 2003 Composites research Vol.16 No.5
복합재료의 사용이 일반화되면서 복합재료 구조물의 효율성은 복합재료 구조자체 보다는 복합재료 체결부에 의해서 결정되기 때문에 복합재료 체결부의 설계는 매우 중요한 연구분야가 되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 체결부의 형상변화 및 적층순서의 변화에 따른 파손하중을 파괴면적지수법에 의한 수치적인 예측과 실험치를 비교하여 파괴면적지수법의 유용성을 검토하였다. 11 cases에 대해서 파괴면적지수법에 의한 예측하중은 측정된 파손하중과 최대 9.96%내의 오차를 가짐을 볼 수 있었다. As the use of composites has become popular in recent years, the design of the composite joints has become a very important research area because the structural efficiency of the composite structure is determined by its joints. not by its hasic structures. In this paper, presented comparisons of numerical results by the FAI (Failure area index) method[9] and measured data for a various geometric shapes and stacking sequence justify the validity of the FA1 method. The FAI method is shown to produce very favorable comparisons with measured failure loads of mechanically fastened composite joints with the difference well within 9.96% for all 1 I cases investigated.
김진영(Jin-Yeong Kim),전영준(Young-jun Chun),임병인(Byung In Lim) 한국재정학회(구 한국재정·공공경제학회) 2014 재정학연구 Vol.7 No.2
이 논문은 PISA 자료에서 나타난 부모들의 학력 자료를 이용하여 부모 학력에 따른 자녀들의 성취도 격차의 국가별 차이를 검토한다. 국제비교를 통해 우리나라는 부모 학력에 따른 학업 성취도 차이가 적은 나라라는 사실이 발견된다. 이는 대졸 아버지의 자녀들과 고졸 아버지 자녀들간 격차를 통해서도 확인되며 고졸 어머니의 자녀들과 초등학교 졸업 어머니 자녀들 간 격차를 통해서도 발견된다. 하지만 학력 격차를 줄이는 요인이 무엇인지는 여전히 뚜렷이 나타나지 않고 있다. 횡단면 분석에서는 소득수준이 높고, 교사-학생비율이 낮은 나라들이 부모 학력에 따른 학력격차가 작은 것으로 나타나지만 패널 분석에서는 소득수준, 전반적인 교육수준, 교사-학생 비율, 교사에 대한 보수 등 관측 가능한 요인들이 저학력 부모를 가진 학생들의 학력을 높이거나 부모 학력에 따른 학력 격차를 줄인다는 증거는 발견되지않았다. This paper examines the score gaps in PISA among students with different family background from the international view point. Parents' education level affects students' performances in every OECD counttγ, but the extents are different for different countries. Compared to other participating countries, Korea has shown relatively small performance gaps among students with different parents' educational attainment. This holds for the score gaps between students with high school graduated fathers and those with college-graduated fathers, as well as between those with elementary school graduated mothers and those with high school graduated mothers. We try to identify factors reducing score gaps of students with different background from panel regressions of OECD countries. It is found that, at the national level, such observable factors as the high per pupil expenditure level, the smaller class-size, and the high teacher compensation does not raise the performances of students whose parents have low educational attainment. Nor these variables are positively correlated with smaller score gaps among students with different family background. These results suggest that most countries have not found effective ways to raise the performance of students from adverse family background and that simple input-based policies will not be enough to enhance the equality in the academic performances.
대학입학경쟁과 사교육: 공교육 강화와 교육비 보조 정책의 효과
최봉제 ( Bong Je Choi ),전영준 ( Young Jun Chun ),김진영 ( Jin Yeong Kim ) 한국경제학회 2016 經濟學硏究 Vol.64 No.2
본 연구는 차입제약 하에서 부모소득과 자녀능력에서 서로 구별되는 가구들의 소비와 자녀의 대학진학 및 사교육비 지출에 관한 선택 문제를 이론적으로 분석한다. 입학정원의 제한으로 인해 우수 대학에 진학하기 위해서는 진입경쟁을 거쳐야 하며 이 경우 사교육을 통해 성적을 향상시킬 여지가 많은 고소득층 자녀의 우수 대학 진학률이 높은 경향이 나타난다. 정부의 공교육 강화나 교육비 보조정책을 통해 이러한 교육기회의 불평등을 교정할 수는 있으나 그 효과는 제한적이며 등록금 상승에 대한 규제가 선행되지 않을 때 이러한 경향은 더 두드러진다. 한편, 등록금 상승에 대한 통제 하에서 두 정책은 모두 교육기회의 불평등을 개선하는 효과를 가지며 특히 교육비 보조가 공교육 강화에 비해 더 효과적이다. This study theoretically analyzes the households’ choice regarding child’s university attendance jointly with household consumption and private tutoring under borrowing constraint where the households are differentiated by parental income and child ability. Due to the enrollment limit, the entrance into the high-quality university entails an intense competition. This may incur the cost of private tutoring that leads to the overrepresence of children from rich families in high-quality university attendance. By reinforcing public education or providing more education subsidy to households, the government can mitigate wealth bias. However, its effect is limited in reducing the inequality of educational opportunity without tuition control. With tuition control, however, both policies are effective in improving equality of educational opportunity. Especially, providing more education subsidy is more effective than reinforcing public education.