http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
양희석 忠州大學校 2011 한국교통대학교 논문집 Vol.46 No.-
Generic competitive strategy is presented a cost leadership and a differentiation as competitive strategy for companies. Although it is able to satisfy their own customers, it has some limitations in practicing to satisfy customers only in two aspects, price and quality of products. So having company competitive capability, it is very important for companies to realize a customer satisfaction. Therefore, a company needs to understand customer's needs and wants truly and deeply. To realize customer satisfaction fully, a company will persuit managing customer competitiveness factors like as service quality management, service differentiation, customer value, customer emotion, customer attitude, activity by word of mouth and internal customer management. To do these managerial factors successfully, a company will have an advanced customer competitiveness. In conclusion, this study will provide company managers a viewpoint for practicing a strong company competitive strategy through managing factors of customer competitiveness effectively.
리카아도에서 마르크스까지의 價値 및 分配理論에 있어서의 문제점
梁熺錫 慶尙大學校 1982 論文集 Vol.21 No.3
In the Cambridge System of economic analysis, the distributive variables are treated as equilibrating variables. Such an analytical system originates from David Ricardo in his 'Essay on Profits.' This paper attempts at a close inquiry into the problems in the transition of Ricardo's theories of value and distribution, and into the problems in the so-called 'Transformation' Process. Ricardo, with all his literatures, published or not, tried to prove the proposition that 'it is the profits of the farmer that regulate the profits of all other trades.' To prove this proposition he made three alternative methodogical hypotheses; namely; (1) Corn Model or 'corn rate of profits'. in which the distributive variables are logically prior to the price variables, (2) Pure Labour Theory of Value, the result of an abortive attempt to construct a value system in which the antagonistic relations of dirtributive variables are directly realised without causing any compounding effects of changes in the distributive variables upon relative prices of commodities, and (3) an Invariable Measure of Value, with which the influence of changes in the relative prices of commodities(caused by changes in the distributive variables) upon the appregative relations of distribution can wholly be removed. Marx, as a post-Ricardian political economist, also attempted to construct an analytical system, in which the distributive variables are determined within value-relations only; independently of the relative prices or the prices of production which are defined up to the changes in a dirtributive variable (i.e., the rate of profits) given by value-relations. Marx however, did not fully recognised the 'Ricardian Problem' of finding an Invariable Measure of Value, in terms of which aggregative values as aggregated income and aggregate profits are invariant to the distribution of income. Then, Marx, as Ricardo did, left one of the distributive variables, i.e., the rate of profits, to be determined simultaneously with, not prior to, the price variables.
梁熺錫 慶尙大學校 1986 論文集 Vol.25 No.2
An attempt is made in this note to review critically the changes of framework of the fundamental concepts made by the dominant neo-Classical theory of value and distribution in the process submerging the Classical surplus approach to profits upon capital on behalf of the marginal productivity approach. The literatual survey performed in terms of a methodological assumption that the concepts of competition and equilibrium constitute the very base of economic science leads to two general conclusions as follows; (1) Equilibrium analysis based upon the hypothetical changes is one of the results of the Marginalist attempts to replace the Classical surplus approach, where the level of output is assumed to be given, by the marginal productivity approach which requires changes either in output or in input. (2) The concept of competition has been changed in its main content from the uniform rate of profit to the economic agents assumed to be mere price-takers, in spite of the ever increasing capitalist realism of concentration and centralisation of capital, and the ever shortening of the periods during which equilibrium analysis is given reality. This could be accounted for by the fact that the demand-and-supply theory of price determination based upon price-taking economic agents performs a role as a protective belt for the marginal productivity theory of distribution by submerging itself in the theories of imperfect competition and monopoly.